mobic and pimagedine

mobic has been researched along with pimagedine* in 7 studies

Other Studies

7 other study(ies) available for mobic and pimagedine

ArticleYear
Dual effect of nitric oxide on uterine prostaglandin synthesis in a murine model of preterm labour.
    British journal of pharmacology, 2010, Volume: 161, Issue:4

    Maternal infections are one of the main causes of adverse developmental outcomes including embryonic resorption and preterm labour. In this study a mouse model of inflammation-associated preterm delivery was developed, and used to study the relationship between nitric oxide (NO) and prostaglandins (PGs).. The murine model of preterm labour was achieved by assaying different doses of bacterial lipopolysaccharides (LPS). Once established, it was used to analyse uterine levels of prostaglandins E(2) and F(2α) (by radioimmunoassay), cyclooxygenases (COX) and NOS proteins (by Western blot) and NO synthase (NOS) activity. Effects of inhibitors of COX and NOS on LPS-induced preterm labour were also studied. In vitro assays with a nitric oxide donor (SNAP) were performed to analyse the modulation of prostaglandin production by NO.. Lipopolysaccharide increased uterine NO and PG synthesis and induced preterm delivery. Co-administration of meloxicam, a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, or aminoguanidine, an inducible NOS inhibitor, prevented LPS-induced preterm delivery and blocked the increase in PGs and NO. Notably, the levels of NO were found to determine its effect on PG synthesis; low concentrations of NO reduced PG synthesis whereas high concentrations augmented them.. An infection-associated model of preterm labour showed that preterm delivery can be prevented by decreasing PG or NO production. NO was found to have a dual effect on PG synthesis depending on its concentration. These data contribute to the understanding of the interaction between NO and PGs in pregnancy and parturition, and could help to improve neonatal outcomes.

    Topics: Animals; Blotting, Western; Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors; Dinoprost; Dinoprostone; Disease Models, Animal; Enzyme Inhibitors; Female; Guanidines; Inflammation; Lipopolysaccharides; Meloxicam; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Nitric Oxide; Nitric Oxide Synthase; Obstetric Labor, Premature; Pregnancy; Radioimmunoassay; Thiazines; Thiazoles; Uterus

2010
Synergistic interaction between meloxicam and aminoguanidine in formalin-induced nociception in mice.
    European journal of pain (London, England), 2008, Volume: 12, Issue:3

    The objective of this study was to examine the nature of interaction between cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor meloxicam and inducible nitric oxide synthase inhibitor aminoguanidine in formalin-induced nociception in mice and the possible therapeutic advantage.. Antinociceptive effect of meloxicam (1, 3, 10 and 30 mg/kg, oral) and aminoguanidine (10, 30, 100 and 300 mg/kg, oral) and their combinations was examined in formalin-induced paw licking model in mice. Analysis of variance and isobolographic method were employed to identify the nature of antinociceptive interaction.. Higher doses of meloxicam (10 and 30 mg/kg) and aminoguanidine (100 and 300 mg/kg) produced significant reduction in paw licking time (antinociceptive) in late phase of formalin-induced nociception. Combination of sub-threshold dose of meloxicam (3 mg/kg) with increasing doses of aminoguanidine (10, 30, 100 and 300 mg/kg) resulted in synergistic antinociceptive effect. Similarly, co-administration of sub-threshold dose of aminoguanidine (30 mg/kg) with increasing doses of meloxicam (1, 3, 10 and 30 mg/kg) produced significant reduction in formalin-induced paw licking behaviour. The experimental ED(50) for combination with their confidence limits are below the confidence interval of theoretical line of additive interaction, suggesting synergistic nature of interaction between meloxicam and aminoguanidine in isobolographic analysis.. Co-administration of meloxicam and aminoguanidine showed synergistic antinociceptive effect which might possibly reduce gastrointestinal toxicity associated with the use of meloxicam.

    Topics: Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Formaldehyde; Guanidines; Male; Meloxicam; Mice; Nitric Oxide Synthase Type II; Nociceptors; Pain; Pain Measurement; Thiazines; Thiazoles

2008
Ameliorative effect of combined administration of inducible nitric oxide synthase inhibitor with cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors in neuropathic pain in rats.
    European journal of pain (London, England), 2007, Volume: 11, Issue:5

    The objective of this study was to examine the effects of rofecoxib, meloxicam, both cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors and aminoguanidine hydrochloride, an inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) inhibitor and their combinations in neuropathic pain in rats.. Neuropathy was induced by chronic constriction injury (CCI) of right sciatic nerve under ketamine anesthesia in rats. Effect of ED(50) of aminoguanidine hydrochloride, rofecoxib and meloxicam administered orally was investigated using behavioral tests. Effect of combinations of aminoguanidine hydrochloride with rofecoxib and meloxicam was also investigated in neuropathic pain employing behavioral tests.. Behavioral tests, mechanical, thermal and cold stimuli confirmed the development of neuropathic pain after CCI. Aminoguanidine hydrochloride, rofecoxib and meloxicam when administered alone, produced significant increase in paw withdrawal threshold to mechanical stimuli at 6 h in ipsilateral hind paw after CCI. Co-administration of aminoguanidine hydrochloride (30 mg/kg) with rofecoxib (1.31 mg/kg) and meloxicam (1.34 mg/kg) was also found to produce significant increase in paw withdrawal latencies to mechanical stimuli at 6 h. Combined administration of aminoguanidine hydrochloride with meloxicam and rofecoxib produced significant rise in pain threshold for mechanical hyperalgesia in ipsilateral hind paw when compared with the groups treated with aminoguanidine hydrochloride, meloxicam and rofecoxib alone.. Co-administration of meloxicam and rofecoxib with aminoguanidine hydrochloride may be an alternative approach for the treatment of neuropathic pain.

    Topics: Animals; Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors; Disease Models, Animal; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Combinations; Drug Synergism; Guanidines; Hyperalgesia; Lactones; Male; Meloxicam; Neuralgia; Neurons, Afferent; Nitric Oxide; Nitric Oxide Synthase Type II; Nociceptors; Pain Threshold; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; Physical Stimulation; Rats; Reaction Time; Sciatic Neuropathy; Sulfones; Thiazines; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

2007
Synergistic anti-inflammatory interaction between meloxicam and aminoguanidine hydrochloride in carrageenan-induced acute inflammation in rats.
    Life sciences, 2006, Feb-02, Volume: 78, Issue:10

    Interaction studies with inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor have been conducted to assess the nature of interaction and the possible therapeutic advantage. The interaction between meloxicam--a selective COX-2 inhibitor--and aminoguanidine hydrochloride--a selective iNOS inhibitor-- was examined in carrageenan-induced paw edema in rats. Appropriate statistical method was applied to detect the nature of anti-inflammatory interaction. Different doses of meloxicam (1, 3, 10 and 30 mg/kg) or aminoguanidine hydrochloride (10, 30, 100 and 300 mg/kg) were administered orally to adult male albino rats. Higher doses of meloxicam (3, 10 and 30 mg/kg) showed statistically significant anti-inflammatory effect. However, aminoguanidine hydrochloride did not show any anti-inflammatory activity. Combination of sub-threshold dose of meloxicam (1 mg/kg) with increasing doses of aminoguanidine hydrochloride (30, 100 and 300 mg/kg) resulted in synergistic anti-inflammatory effect. Combined therapy with sub-threshold dose of aminoguanidine hydrochloride (30 mg/kg) with increasing doses of meloxicam (1, 3, 10 and 30 mg/kg) also resulted in synergistic anti-inflammatory effect. The possible mechanism of interaction could be the stimulation of COX-2 activity by nitric oxide (NO) by combining with heme component. These results suggest that co-administration of meloxicam and aminoguanidine hydrochloride may be an alternative in clinical control of inflammation.

    Topics: Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Carrageenan; Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Synergism; Enzyme Inhibitors; Foot; Guanidines; Inflammation; Male; Meloxicam; Nitric Oxide Synthase Type II; Rats; Thiazines; Thiazoles

2006
Effects of aminoguanidine and cyclooxygenase inhibitors on nitric oxide and prostaglandin production, and nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenase expression induced by lipopolysaccharide in the estrogenized rat uterus.
    Neuroimmunomodulation, 2004, Volume: 11, Issue:3

    The aim of our study was first to investigate if there exists an interaction between nitric oxide (NO) and prostaglandin (PG) generation in the estrogenized rat uterus challenged by lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and, secondly, which isoforms of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and cyclooxygenase (COX) participate in this process.. To study the effect of LPS and to characterize the isoenzymes involved in the process, specific inhibitors of iNOS (aminoguanidine) and COX-II (meloxicam, nimesulide) and non-specific of COX (indomethacin) were injected intraperitoneally to determine their effect on NO and PG production, and on NOS and COX expression induced by LPS in estrogenized rat uterus. NO production was measured by arginine-citrulline conversion assay and PGE(2)/PGF(2alpha,)by radioconversion. Enzyme expression was evaluated by Western blot analysis.. The present work shows that iNOS inhibitor, aminoguanidine, reduced NO and PGE(2)/PGF(2alpha) production induced by LPS injection. Aminoguanidine exerts its effect over the PG metabolism by inhibiting COX-II activity and expression. On the other hand, both indomethacin, a non-selective PG inhibitor, and meloxicam, a COX-II inhibitor, stimulated NO production and reduced PGE(2)/PGF(2alpha) generation. Indomethacin also reduced COX-II and iNOS expression.. These results indicate that in the estrogenized rat uterus challenged with LPS, PG and NO interact affecting each other's metabolic pathways. The above findings indicate that the interaction between NOS and COX might be important in the regulation of physiopathologic events during pregnancy.

    Topics: Animals; Cyclooxygenase 2; Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors; Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors; Dinoprost; Dinoprostone; Down-Regulation; Embryo Loss; Estrogens; Female; Guanidines; Indomethacin; Inflammation; Isoenzymes; Lipopolysaccharides; Meloxicam; Nitric Oxide; Nitric Oxide Synthase; Nitric Oxide Synthase Type II; Pregnancy; Prostaglandin-Endoperoxide Synthases; Prostaglandins; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Sulfonamides; Thiazines; Thiazoles; Uterus

2004
Inhibition of salivary secretion by lipopolysaccharide: possible role of prostaglandins.
    American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism, 2001, Volume: 281, Issue:2

    Inducible (calcium-independent) nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) are important in the regulation of the function of different organs during infection. A single dose of lipopolysaccharide (LPS; 5 mg/kg ip) within 6 h increased NOS activity (20%) and prostaglandin E (PGE) content (100%) in submandibular glands (SMG) and blocked stimulated salivary secretion in adult male rats. The administration of an iNOS synthesis inhibitor, aminoguanidine (AG), with LPS decreased NOS activity and PGE content. Furthermore, the administration of meloxicam (MLX), an inhibitor of COX-2, blocked the increase in PGE and the production of NO. The incubation of slices of SMG in the presence of 3-morpholinosydnonimine, a donor of NO, increased the release of PGE highly significantly. The incubation of SMG in the presence of a PGE(1) analog (alprostadil) increased the production of NO. These results indicate that LPS activates NOS, leading to NO release, which activates COX, generating PGEs that act back to further activate NOS, causing further generation of PGEs by activation of COX. Because the alprostadil administration inhibited stimulated salivation, LPS-induced inhibition of salivation appears to be caused by increased PGE production. Diminished salivary secretion produces poor oral health; thus the use of COX-2 inhibitors to counteract the effects of inhibited salivation should be considered.

    Topics: Alprostadil; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arachidonic Acid; Autonomic Agents; Cyclooxygenase 2; Enzyme Inhibitors; Guanidines; In Vitro Techniques; Injections, Intraperitoneal; Isoenzymes; Lipopolysaccharides; Male; Meloxicam; Methacholine Chloride; Nitric Oxide; Nitric Oxide Donors; Nitric Oxide Synthase; Nitric Oxide Synthase Type II; Norepinephrine; Prostaglandin-Endoperoxide Synthases; Prostaglandins E; Rats; Saliva; Submandibular Gland; Thiazines; Thiazoles

2001
Effects of aminoguanidine and meloxicam on nitric oxide and prostaglandin E production induced by lipopolysaccharide in the hypothalamus and anterior pituitary of the rat.
    Neuroimmunomodulation, 2001, Volume: 9, Issue:5

    Injection of bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) into male rats activates genes that in turn induce many enzymes that participate in the animals' response to LPS. There is induction of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) in many tissues. This induction could result from combination with cell surface LPS receptors that directly induce both genes, or the nitric oxide (NO) released as a result of iNOS induction could induce COX-2.. To distinguish between these two possibilities, specific inhibitors of iNOS and COX-2 activity, aminoguanidine (AG) and meloxicam (MLX), respectively, were injected either peripherally or intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.), and their effect on NO and prostaglandin E (PGE) production induced by LPS in the medial basal hypothalamus (MBH) and anterior pituitary gland (AP) were determined.. Peripheral injection of AG blocked iNOS-derived NO production in the AP but not in the MBH. When AG was injected i.c.v., iNOS-derived NO production in the MBH was blocked. MLX injected peripherally blocked COX-2-derived PGE(2) production in the MBH and AP, whereas AG injected peripherally or i.c.v. was ineffective. Since AG was only effective in blocking iNOS-derived NO production in the MBH when injected i.c.v., AG apparently does not effectively cross the blood brain barrier, whereas MLX injected peripherally inhibited PGE production, probably by inhibiting COX-2 activity in both the MBH and AP. AG was ineffective in preventing the increase in PGE derived from COX-2 in either the MBH or AP.. LPS directly induces both enzymes, iNOS and COX-2, in the hypothalamus and AP.

    Topics: Animals; Cyclooxygenase 2; Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors; Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors; Dinoprostone; Endotoxemia; Guanidines; Hypothalamus; Inflammation; Isoenzymes; Lipopolysaccharides; Male; Meloxicam; Nitric Oxide; Nitric Oxide Synthase; Pituitary Gland, Anterior; Prostaglandin-Endoperoxide Synthases; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Thiazines; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Up-Regulation

2001