minocycline and dalbavancin

Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are a common cause of hospital admission among elderly patients, and traditionally have been divided into complicated and uncomplicated SSTIs. In 2010, the FDA provided a new classification of these infections, and a new category of disease, named acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs), has been proposed as an independent clinical entity. ABSSSIs include three entities: cellulitis and erysipelas, wound infections, and major cutaneous abscesses This paper revises the epidemiology of SSTIs and ABSSSIs with regard to etiologies, diagnostic techniques, and clinical presentation in the hospital settings. Particular attention is owed to frail patients with multiple comorbidities and underlying significant disease states, hospitalized on internal medicine wards or residing in nursing homes, who appear to be at increased risk of infection due to multi-drug resistant pathogens and treatment failures. Management of ABSSSIs and SSTIs, including evaluation of the hemodynamic state, surgical intervention and treatment with appropriate antibiotic therapy are extensively discussed.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Carbapenems; Ceftaroline; Cephalosporins; Daptomycin; Female; Fluoroquinolones; Glycopeptides; Hospitalization; Humans; Iatrogenic Disease; Internal Medicine; Linezolid; Lipoglycopeptides; Male; Minocycline; Oxazolidinones; Skin Diseases, Infectious; Soft Tissue Infections; Teicoplanin; Tigecycline; Vancomycin

There is a constant need for new antibacterial agents because of the unavoidable development of bacterial resistance that follows the introduction of antibiotics in clinical practice. As observed in many fields, innovation generally comes by series. For instance, a wide variety of broad-spectrum antibacterial agents became available between the 1970s and the 1990s, such as cephalosporins, penicillin/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations, carbapenems, and fluoroquinolones. Over the last 2 decades, the arrival of new antibacterial drugs on the market has dramatically slowed, leaving a frequent gap between isolation of resistant pathogens and effective treatment options. In fact, many pharmaceutical companies focused on the development of narrow-spectrum antibiotics targeted at multidrug-resistant Gram-positive bacteria (e.g. methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, penicillin resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium). Therefore, multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (e.g. extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii) recently emerged and rapidly spread worldwide. Even if some molecules were developed, new molecules for infections caused by these multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria remain remarkably scarce compared to those for Gram-positive infections. This review summarises the major microbiological, pharmacological, and clinical properties of systemic antibiotics recently marketed in France (i.e. linezolid, daptomycin, tigecycline, ertapenem, and doripenem) as well as those of antibacterial drugs currently in development (i.e. ceftobiprole, ceftaroline, dalbavancin, telavancin, oritavancin, iclaprim, and ramoplanin) or available in other countries (i.e. garenoxacin, sitafloxacin, and temocillin).

Topics: Acetamides; Aminoglycosides; Anti-Infective Agents; beta-Lactams; Carbapenems; Cephalosporins; Daptomycin; Doripenem; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Ertapenem; Fluoroquinolones; France; Humans; Linezolid; Lipoglycopeptides; Minocycline; Oxazolidinones; Penicillins; Pyrimidines; Teicoplanin; Tigecycline

Topics: Acetamides; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cephalosporins; Clindamycin; Community-Acquired Infections; Daptomycin; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluoroquinolones; Humans; Linezolid; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Minocycline; Oxazolidinones; Staphylococcal Infections; Teicoplanin; Tetracyclines; Tigecycline; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination; United States; Vancomycin

Multi-antibiotic resistant Gram-positive cocci represent emerging pathogens especially in the setting of the immunocompromised, hospitalized patients, in particular when surgery, invasive procedures, or prosthetic implants are of concern, patients are admitted in intensive care units, or underlying chronic disorders and immunodeficiency are of concern, and broad-spectrum antibiotics and/or immunosuppressive drugs are widely administered. The spectrum of available antimicrobial compounds for an effective management of these relevant infections is significantly impaired in selection and clinical efficacy by the emerging and spread of methicillin-resistant and more recently glycopeptide-resistant Gram-positive microbial strains linezolid, together with the recently licensed quinupristin-dalfopristin, daptomycin and tigecycline, followed by a number of glycopeptides, fluoroquinolones, and other experimental compounds represent an effective response to these concerns, due to their innovative mechanisms of action, their maintained or enhanced activity against multiresistant pathogens, their effective pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties, their frequent possibility of synergistic activity with other compounds effective against Gram-positive pathogens, and a diffuse potential for a safe and easy administration, also when compromised patients are of concern. The main problems related to the epidemiological and clinical features of multiresistant Gram-positive infection, the potential clinical indications of all recently available compounds compared with the standard of treatment of resistant Gram-positive infections, and updated data on efficacy and tolerability of linezolid have to be clarified.

Topics: Acetamides; Administration, Oral; Anti-Infective Agents; Daptomycin; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Enterococcus; Gram-Positive Bacteria; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Linezolid; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Minocycline; Oxazolidinones; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Staphylococcus aureus; Streptococcus pneumoniae; Teicoplanin; Tigecycline; Time Factors; Vancomycin; Virginiamycin

Infection by Staphylococcus aureus in critically ill patients is usually associated with antimicrobial resistance and high mortality. A more effective antibiotic treatment is needed to replace older drugs that have limited efficacy. Novel substances active on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, which are already available on the market or are still in development, are discussed in this review, with emphasis on nosocomial infections.. A number of new antibiotics are on the market (linezolid, quinupristin-dalfopristin, daptomycin) and there is good evidence regarding their efficacy, especially in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Linezolid is, to date, the best alternative in treating nosocomial pneumonia by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. It is cost-effective; resistance levels are still very low but there are some concerns regarding its adverse events. Quinupristin-dalfopristin shows good activity in vitro but its efficacy in patients with pneumonia by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is modest. Daptomycin is not recommended for pulmonary infections because of its reduced penetration in the lung tissue. Under current phase III trials in patients with nosocomial infections are tigecycline, ceftobiprole, and three new glycopeptides, all with particular activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.. For the moment, there are limited and rather expensive therapeutic options for the infections by Staphylococcus aureus in the critically ill. No dramatic superiority of the new drugs in comparison to the standard therapies was observed in most of the clinical trials. Better results on the efficacy of the drugs under investigation are expected.

Topics: Acetamides; Aminoglycosides; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cephalosporins; Clinical Trials as Topic; Critical Illness; Daptomycin; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Glycopeptides; Humans; Linezolid; Lipoglycopeptides; Methicillin Resistance; Minocycline; Oxazolidinones; Staphylococcal Infections; Teicoplanin; Tigecycline; Virginiamycin

This paper reviews recent data on the treatment of infections caused by drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, particularly methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). This review will focus on new findings reported in the English-language medical literature from June 2003 to September 2004.. Despite the emergence of resistant and multidrug-resistant S. aureus, we have three effective drugs in clinical use for which little resistance has been observed: quinupristin-dalfopristin, linezolid, and daptomycin. Linezolid looks particularly promising in the treatment of MRSA pneumonia. Daptomycin displays rapid bactericidal activity in vitro, but, so far, clinical trials have only been conducted for the treatment of skin and soft-tissue infections. There are three drugs with broad-spectrum activity against Gram-positive organisms at an advanced stage of testing: two new glycopeptides with potent bacteriocidal activity and long half-lives (oritavancin and dalbavancin), and tigecycline, a minocycline derivative. These drugs have also shown efficacy in the treatment of skin and soft-tissue infections.. The promising data that have emerged in the last year indicate that we may have six available drugs to treat resistant S. aureus infections within the next few years. The next goal is to determine the appropriate indications and cost-effectiveness of each of these drugs in our treatment strategy against S. aureus and other Gram-positive pathogens.

Topics: Acetamides; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Daptomycin; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Glycopeptides; Humans; Linezolid; Lipoglycopeptides; Minocycline; Oxazolidinones; Staphylococcal Infections; Teicoplanin; Tigecycline; Virginiamycin

In over a decade (2002 to 2012) of Staphylococcus aureus surveillance testing on 62,195 isolates, dalbavancin was demonstrated to be active against isolates that were either susceptible or nonsusceptible to daptomycin, linezolid, or tigecycline. Nearly all (99.8%) multidrug-resistant methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates were inhibited by dalbavancin at ≤0.12 μg/ml (MIC50/90, 0.06/0.06 μg/ml), the current U.S. Food and Drug Administration (U.S. FDA) breakpoint. Overall, only 0.35% of the monitored S. aureus isolates had a dalbavancin MIC of either 0.25 or 0.5 μg/ml (i.e., were nonsusceptible).

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Daptomycin; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Epidemiological Monitoring; Humans; Linezolid; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Minocycline; Staphylococcal Infections; Teicoplanin; Tigecycline; United States

The aim of the present study was to compare the potential of ceftobiprole, dalbavancin, daptomycin, tigecycline, linezolid and vancomycin to achieve their requisite pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates collected from intensive care unit (ICU) settings. Monte Carlo simulations were carried out to simulate the PK/PD indices of the investigated antimicrobials. The probability of target attainment (PTA) was estimated at minimum inhibitory concentration values ranging from 0.03 to 32 μg/mL to define the PK/PD susceptibility breakpoints. The cumulative fraction of response (CFR) was computed using minimum inhibitory concentration data from the Canadian National Intensive Care Unit study. Analysis of the simulation results suggested the breakpoints of 4 μg/mL for ceftobiprole (500 mg/2 h t.i.d.), 0.25 μg/mL for dalbavancin (1000 mg), 0.12 μg/mL for daptomycin (4 mg/kg q.d. and 6 mg/kg q.d.) and tigecycline (50 mg b.i.d.), and 2 μg/mL for linezolid (600 mg b.i.d.) and vancomycin (1 g b.i.d. and 1.5 g b.i.d.). The estimated CFR were 100, 100, 70.6, 88.8, 96.5, 82.4, 89.4, and 98.3% for ceftobiprole, dalbavancin, daptomycin (4 mg/kg/day), daptomycin (6 mg/kg/day), linezolid, tigecycline, vancomycin (1 g b.i.d.) and vancomycin (1.5 g b.i.d.), respectively. In conclusion, ceftobiprole and dalbavancin have the highest probability of achieving their requisite PK/PD targets against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from ICU settings. The susceptibility predictions suggested a reduction of the vancomycin breakpoint to 1 μg/mL.

Topics: Acetamides; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cephalosporins; Computer Simulation; Cross Infection; Daptomycin; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Linezolid; Methicillin Resistance; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Minocycline; Models, Biological; Monte Carlo Method; Oxazolidinones; Staphylococcal Infections; Teicoplanin; Tigecycline; Vancomycin

The prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is characterized by variations (sometimes extreme) by country and geographic region. The conventional association of MRSA with healthcare settings has been upset by the emergence of community-associated MRSA infections in many areas. With this surge in MRSA comes a renewed interest in alternative agents to vancomycin for treatment of MRSA infections, including older drugs, such as clindamycin, doxycycline and trimethoprim- sulfamethoxazole. Newer agents, such as linezolid and daptomycin, are aiming to improve on the poor cure rates found with vancomycin in serious MRSA infections, but definitive studies showing superiority of these drugs are not yet available. Finally, the drug-development pipeline contains a number of agents for the treatment of MRSA infections, including enhanced glycopeptides (dalbavancin, oritavancin and telavancin) and anti-MRSA cephalosporins (ceftobiprole). As MRSA becomes the 'new normal' in many areas, clinicians will have to sort out the proper role of a dozen or more anti-MRSA drugs.

Topics: Acetamides; Aminoglycosides; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cephalosporins; Clindamycin; Daptomycin; Doxycycline; Folic Acid Antagonists; Global Health; Glycopeptides; Humans; Linezolid; Lipoglycopeptides; Methicillin; Methicillin Resistance; Minocycline; Oxazolidinones; Prevalence; Staphylococcal Infections; Staphylococcus aureus; Sulfamethoxazole; Teicoplanin; Tigecycline; Trimethoprim; Vancomycin