metribolone and hydroxyflutamide

Prostate epithelial cells depend on androgens for survival and function. In (early) prostate cancer (PCa) androgens also regulate tumor growth, which is exploited by hormonal therapies in metastatic disease. The aim of the present study was to characterize the androgen receptor (AR) response in hormonal therapy-resistant PC346 cells and identify potential disease markers.. Human 19K oligoarrays were used to establish the androgen-regulated expression profile of androgen-responsive PC346C cells and its derivative therapy-resistant sublines: PC346DCC (vestigial AR levels), PC346Flu1 (AR overexpression) and PC346Flu2 (T877A AR mutation). In total, 107 transcripts were differentially-expressed in PC346C and derivatives after R1881 or hydroxyflutamide stimulations. The AR-regulated expression profiles reflected the AR modifications of respective therapy-resistant sublines: AR overexpression resulted in stronger and broader transcriptional response to R1881 stimulation, AR down-regulation correlated with deficient response of AR-target genes and the T877A mutation resulted in transcriptional response to both R1881 and hydroxyflutamide. This AR-target signature was linked to multiple publicly available cell line and tumor derived PCa databases, revealing that distinct functional clusters were differentially modulated during PCa progression. Differentiation and secretory functions were up-regulated in primary PCa but repressed in metastasis, whereas proliferation, cytoskeletal remodeling and adhesion were overexpressed in metastasis. Finally, the androgen-regulated genes ENDOD1, MCCC2 and ACSL3 were selected as potential disease markers for RT-PCR quantification in a distinct set of human prostate specimens. ENDOD1 and ACSL3 showed down-regulation in high-grade and metastatic PCa, while MCCC2 was overexpressed in low-grade PCa.. AR modifications altered the transcriptional response to (anti)androgens in therapy-resistant cells. Furthermore, selective down-regulation of genes involved in differentiation and up-regulation of genes promoting proliferation and invasion suggest a disturbed balance between the growth and differentiation functions of the AR pathway during PCa progression. These findings may have implications in the current treatment and development of novel therapeutical approaches for metastatic PCa.

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Base Sequence; Cell Line, Tumor; DNA Primers; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Flutamide; Gene Expression Profiling; Humans; Male; Metribolone; Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis; Prostatic Neoplasms; Receptors, Androgen; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; Signal Transduction

Androgens have key roles in normal physiology and in male sexual differentiation as well as in pathological conditions such as prostate cancer. Androgens act through the androgen receptor (AR), which is a ligand-modulated transcription factor. Antiandrogens block AR function and are widely used in disease states, but little is known about their mechanism of action in vivo. Here, we describe a rapid differential interaction of AR with target genomic sites in living cells in the presence of agonists which coincides with the recruitment of BRM ATPase complex and chromatin remodeling, resulting in transcriptional activation. In contrast, the interaction of antagonist-bound or mutant AR with its target was found to be kinetically different: it was dramatically faster, occurred without chromatin remodeling, and resulted in the lack of transcriptional inhibition. Fluorescent resonance energy transfer analysis of wild-type AR and a transcriptionally compromised mutant at the hormone response element showed that intramolecular interactions between the N and C termini of AR play a key functional role in vivo compared to intermolecular interactions between two neighboring ARs. These data provide a kinetic and mechanistic basis for regulation of gene expression by androgens and antiandrogens in living cells.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Androgen Antagonists; Androgens; Anilides; Animals; Cell Line, Tumor; Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly; Cyproterone Acetate; Dihydrotestosterone; Female; Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching; Flutamide; Genes, Reporter; Green Fluorescent Proteins; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence; Ligands; Luciferases; Mammary Neoplasms, Animal; Mammary Tumor Virus, Mouse; Metribolone; Mice; Microscopy, Video; Mifepristone; Models, Biological; Nitriles; Plasmids; Promoter Regions, Genetic; Receptors, Androgen; Response Elements; Testosterone; Tosyl Compounds; Transcription, Genetic

The androgen receptor (AR) is essential for development of the male gender and in the growth of the majority of prostate cancers. Agonists as well as most antagonists induce translocation of the receptor to the nucleus, whereas only agonists can activate AR function. Antagonists are therefore used in the therapy of metastasized prostate cancer. To obtain insight into the mechanism by which antagonists block AR function in living cells, we studied nuclear mobility and localization of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged AR in the presence of either the agonist R1881 or the antagonists bicalutamide and hydroxyflutamide. As controls we investigated a non-DNA-binding AR mutant (A573D) and two mutants (W741C and T877A) with broadened ligand specificity. We demonstrate that in the presence of R1881, AR localizes in numerous intranuclear foci and, using complementary fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) approaches and computer modelling, that a fraction of AR ( approximately 10-15%) is transiently immobilized in a DNA-binding-dependent manner (individual ARs being immobile for approximately 45 seconds). By contrast, antagonist-bound GFP-AR showed no detectable immobile fraction and the mobility was similar to that of the R1881-liganded non-DNA-binding mutant (A573D), indicating that antagonists do not induce the relatively stable DNA-binding-dependent immobilization observed with agonist-bound AR. Moreover, in the presence of bicalutamide and hydroxyflutamide GFP-AR was homogeneously distributed in the nucleus. Binding of bicalutamide and hydroxyflutamide to GFP-AR(W741C) and GFP-AR(T877A), respectively, resulted in similar mobility and heterogeneous nuclear distribution as observed for R1881-liganded GFP-AR. The live cell studies indicate that the investigated antagonists interfere with events early in the transactivation function of the AR.

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Androgen Receptor Antagonists; Androgens; Anilides; Blotting, Western; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cell Line, Tumor; Cells, Cultured; Computer Simulation; DNA; DNA-Binding Proteins; DNA, Neoplasm; Flutamide; Green Fluorescent Proteins; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Male; Metribolone; Nitriles; Prostatic Neoplasms; Receptors, Androgen; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Tosyl Compounds

Many persistent organochlorine pesticides (OCs) have been implicated in adverse effects, that is, reproductive and developmental effects, in man and in wildlife alike. It has been hypothesized that these so-called xeno-hormones could be responsible for the increased incidence in various male sexual differentiation disorders such as hypospadias, cryptorchidism, low sperm counts and quality. In this report, OCs, called endocrine disrupters, were tested for their interaction with the androgen receptor. The stable prostatic cell line PALM, which contains a human androgen receptor (hAR) expression vector and the reporter MMTV-luciferase, was used to characterize the response of hAR to OC and was compared with synthetic androgen compound R1881. We found that all the OC pesticides tested were able to shift the agonist [(3)H]-R1881 from its binding site to the AR in competitive binding assays. In addition, these compounds antagonize-in a dose-dependent manner-the AR-mediated transcription by synthetic AR ligand R1881. None of the pesticides reacted as agonists. These results demonstrate that OC endocrine activities in vivo probably result from direct and specific binding to the AR ligand-binding domain. Although the antagonistic potential of OC pesticides is lower than that of hydroxyflutamide, they are capable of disrupting the male hormone signaling pathway. Because these chemicals are extremely persistent and tend to bioaccumulate, these results support the hypothesis that the recent increase in the incidence of male sexual disorders could be due to long exposure to ubiquitous OC pesticides found in the environment.

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Binding, Competitive; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Flutamide; Humans; Inhibitory Concentration 50; Insecticides; Male; Metribolone; Receptors, Androgen; Testosterone Congeners

Androgens, like progestins, are 3-ketosteroids with structural differences restricted to the 17beta substituent in the steroid D-ring. To better understand the specific recognition of ligands by the human androgen receptor (hAR), a homology model of the ligand-binding domain (LBD) was constructed based on the progesterone receptor LBD crystal structure. Several mutants of residues potentially involved in the specific recognition of ligands in the hAR were constructed and tested for their ability to bind agonists. Their transactivation capacity in response to agonist (R1881) and antagonists (cyproterone acetate, hydroxyflutamide, and ICI 176344) was also measured. Substitution of His(874) by alanine, only marginally impairs the ligand-binding and transactivation capacity of the hAR receptor. In contrast, mutations of Thr(877) and, to a greater extent, Asn(705) perturb ligand recognition, alter transactivation efficiency, and broaden receptor specificity. Interestingly, the N705A mutant acquires progesterone receptor (PR) properties for agonist ligands but, unlike wild type AR and PR, loses the capacity to repress transactivation with nonsteroidal antagonists. Models of the hAR.LBD complexes with several ligands are presented, which suggests new directions for drug design.

Topics: Amino Acid Sequence; Androgen Antagonists; Androgen Receptor Antagonists; Androgens; Anilides; Binding Sites; Computer Simulation; Cyproterone Acetate; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Flutamide; Humans; Ligands; Metribolone; Models, Molecular; Molecular Sequence Data; Nitriles; Progesterone; Promegestone; Receptors, Androgen; Sequence Alignment; Tosyl Compounds; Transcriptional Activation

Androgen-induced calcium fluxes and gap junctional intercellular communication (GJIC) were studied in three different cell types. A transient (2-3 min duration) increase in intracellular calcium levels was observed within 20-30 sec of androgen addition, which was followed by a plateau phase with steroid concentrations higher than 1 nM. The kinetics of the calcium responses were similar in immature rat Sertoli cells, which contain normal nuclear receptors; the human prostatic tumor cell line, LNCaP, which contains a mutated nuclear receptor; and the human prostatic cell line, PC3, which does not contain a nuclear receptor. The human A431 tumor cell line did not respond to androgens. Concentrations of testosterone and the synthetic androgen, R1881, between 1-1000 pM induced transient calcium increases with ED(50) values near 1 pM and 1 nM, whereas dihydrotestosterone (DHT) was not active at these concentrations. At concentrations higher than 1 nM, testosterone, R1881, and DHT were equipotent in stimulating an increase in calcium that lasted for more than 10 min, with ED(50) values between 5 and 20 nM. Testosterone covalently bound to albumin was also active, whereas 11 related androstane compounds as well as progesterone and estradiol-17beta were inactive at 1000 nM. The calcium response induced by the three androgens (10 nM) was abolished in all cell types by hydroxyflutamide (1000 nM) and finasteride (1000 nM), but not by cyproterone acetate (1000 nM). The calcium response was also abolished in the absence of extracellular calcium and strongly inhibited by the presence of verapamil. Exposure of the responsive cells to brief (150-sec) pulses of androgens generated calcium responses that were similar to those after continuous exposure. After exposure of Sertoli cells for only 30 sec to 100 nM testosterone, the calcium response lasted for at least 50 min. Although nuclear binding of androgens could be demonstrated, there was no evidence for tight binding to the plasma membrane under similar conditions. When protein synthesis was inhibited, an enhancement of GJIC between rat Sertoli cells, but not between LNCaP cells or PC3 cells, was observed within 15 min of the addition of 10 nM testosterone. Because nuclear androgens are not present in PC3 cells and many functional properties of the responsive system are different from the nuclear receptor in all three cell types, we postulate the existence of an alternative cell surface receptor system with biphasic resp

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Androgens; Animals; Calcium Signaling; Cell Line; Cyproterone Acetate; Dihydrotestosterone; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Flutamide; Gap Junctions; Humans; Kinetics; Male; Metribolone; Prostate; Prostatic Neoplasms; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Sertoli Cells; Testosterone; Tumor Cells, Cultured

Androgen receptors (AR) have been identified in the human endometrium, but their role in endometrial function and development towards endometrial receptivity remains poorly understood. In an effort to study the regulation and possible function in endometrial epithelium, we utilized the well-differentiated endometrial adenocarcinoma cell line, Ishikawa, as a model system. This cell line has proven to be stable, hormonally responsive, contains both estrogen and progesterone receptors, and has been shown to express endometrial proteins in a hormone responsive manner. In the present study, we demonstrate that Ishikawa cells also express AR, based on immunohistochemical staining, radioactive binding studies, RT-PCR and Northern blot analysis. The expression of AR is induced in Ishikawa cells by estrogens, similar to that reported for normal endometrium. Further, using an estrogen-responsive gene that has been characterized in this cell line, alkaline phosphatase, we show that androgens act as antiestrogens in diethylstilbestrol (DES) treated cells, inhibiting enzymatic activity in a dose-dependent manner. These data support a physiologic role for AR in the endometrium. Elevations in endometrial AR in certain clinical situations such as polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) may amplify the effects of androgens on the endometrium leading to suspected defects in uterine receptivity, higher than expected infertility and high miscarriage rates observed in patients with this disorder.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Alkaline Phosphatase; Androgens; Cell Differentiation; Cell Nucleus; Diethylstilbestrol; Dihydrotestosterone; Endometrial Neoplasms; Endometrium; Estradiol; Estrogen Receptor Modulators; Estrogens; Female; Flutamide; Fulvestrant; Humans; Metribolone; Progesterone; Receptors, Androgen; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; Tumor Cells, Cultured

For many years it has been recognized that sex steroids have profound effects on bone metabolism. The current perception is that estrogen decreases bone resorption and androgen increases bone deposition. To investigate the potential for androgens to directly modulate bone resorption, we have examined avian osteoclast and human and mouse osteoclast-like cells for androgen responsiveness. There was a dose-dependent decrease in resorption activity in response to alpha-dihydrotestosterone (alpha-DHT), beta-DHT, testosterone, or the synthetic androgen RU1881. This decrease was blocked by cotreatment with the specific androgen antagonist hydroxyflutamide. Further examination of avian osteoclasts revealed that the cells exhibited specific and saturable nuclear binding of tritiated RU1881 and that alpha-DHT stimulated the activity of the androgen response element as measured by using a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter plasmid. In addition, avian osteoclasts responded to androgen treatment with elevated production and secretion of transforming growth factor beta, a well documented response to androgen exposure in other cell systems. Treatment with either alpha-DHT or beta-DHT for 24 hours resulted in a significant dose-dependent decrease in secretion of cathepsin B and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase. This response to beta-DHT, a stereoisomer of alpha-DHT that is inactive in other androgen receptor-dependent systems, supports the hypothesis that the osteoclast androgen receptor has unusual ligand-binding properties. Taken together, these results confirm the presence of functional androgen receptors in these cells and support the conclusion that osteoclasts are able to respond directly to androgens in vitro and thus are potential androgen target cells in vivo.

Topics: Acid Phosphatase; Androgen Antagonists; Androgens; Animals; Bone Resorption; Cathepsin B; Chickens; Dihydrotestosterone; Flutamide; Genes, Reporter; Humans; Isoenzymes; Metribolone; Mice; Osteoclasts; Receptors, Androgen; Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid; Tartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase; Transfection; Transforming Growth Factor beta

Low levels of p27Kip1 in primary prostate cancer specimens have been shown to be associated with higher rates of disease recurrence and poor rates of disease-free survival in patients with localized disease. In this study, we provide the first direct evidence showing that dihydrotestosterone (DHT), a major proliferation regulator of prostate cancer, can down-regulate p27Kip1 and stimulate cyclin-dependent kinase-2 (CDK2) activity in established prostate cancer cell lines. We investigated the cooperative effects of DHT and epidermal growth factor (EGF) on the proliferation of androgen-responsive MDA PCa 2a and MDA PCa 2b prostate cancer cells. DHT and EGF each stimulated proliferation of these cells, but exposure of the cells to DHT and EGF together stimulated greater proliferation. Stimulation of cell proliferation by DHT and/or EGF was associated with increased CDK2 activity and a decreased level of p27Kip1. There seems to be a positive feedback stimulation loop between androgen-induced gene transcription and EGF-stimulated signal transduction, as one could stimulate the synthesis of the receptors for the other. Dual blockade of androgen receptor function with the antiandrogen hydroxyflutamide and EGF receptor superfamily-mediated signal transduction with the anti-EGF receptor monoclonal antibody C225 and the anti-HER2 receptor monoclonal antibody Herceptin significantly enhanced growth inhibition of the MDA PCa 2a cells. Our results demonstrate the importance of counteracting both androgen receptors and EGF receptors in the development of novel therapies for prostate cancer.

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Cell Cycle Proteins; Cell Division; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p27; Cyclin-Dependent Kinases; Cycloheximide; Dihydrotestosterone; Down-Regulation; Drug Synergism; Enzyme Inhibitors; Epidermal Growth Factor; ErbB Receptors; Flutamide; Humans; Male; Metribolone; Microtubule-Associated Proteins; Prostatic Neoplasms; Protein Synthesis Inhibitors; Receptors, Androgen; Testosterone Congeners; Trastuzumab; Tumor Cells, Cultured; Tumor Suppressor Proteins

DnaJ-like proteins function in association with Hsp70 molecular chaperones to facilitate protein folding. We previously demonstrated that a yeast DnaJ-like protein, Ydj1p, was important for activation of heterologously expressed steroid hormone receptors (Caplan, A. J., Langley, E., Wilson, E. M., and Vidal, J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 5251-5257). In the present study, we analyzed Ydj1p function by assaying hormone binding to the human androgen receptor (AR) heterologously expressed in yeast. We analyzed hormone binding in strains that were wild type or deleted for the YDJ1 gene. In the deletion mutant, the AR did not bind hormone to the same extent as the wild type. Introduction of mutant forms of Ydj1p to the deletion strain revealed that the J-domain is necessary but not sufficient for Ydj1p action, and that other domains of the protein are also functionally important. Of three human DnaJ-like proteins introduced into the deletion mutant, only Hdj2, which displays full domain conservation with Ydj1p, suppressed the hormone binding defect of the deletion mutant. By comparison of the domains shared by these three human proteins, and with mutants of Ydj1p that were functional, it was deduced that the cysteine-rich zinc binding domain is important for Hdj2/Ydj1p action in hormone receptor function. A model for the mechanism of DnaJ-like protein action is discussed.

Topics: Binding Sites; Binding, Competitive; Flutamide; Gene Deletion; Genetic Complementation Test; Heat-Shock Proteins; HSP40 Heat-Shock Proteins; HSP70 Heat-Shock Proteins; Humans; Metribolone; Molecular Chaperones; Mutation; Phenotype; Protein Binding; Protein Structure, Tertiary; Radioligand Assay; Receptors, Androgen; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins; Suppression, Genetic; Tritium; Zinc Fingers

Sex steroids control the proliferation of their target cells through two different pathways: 1) proliferative response (Step-1); and 2) inhibition of cell proliferation (Step-2). Mechanisms of cell proliferation regulation are incompletely understood; however, there is general agreement with the notion that sex steroid receptors play an important role in the control of the proliferation of sex steroid target cells. To test this hypothesis, a full human androgen receptor (AR) vector was transfected into human breast cancer MCF7 cells. The cloned cells that stably express the AR, called MCF7-AR1 cells, contained approximately five times more AR than the wild-type MCF7 cells from which they were derived. These AR-transfected cells retained their capacity to proliferate when estrogens were added to 10% charcoal-dextran stripped human serum but did not acquire the ability to proliferate when androgens were added to this medium. In serumless medium (ITDME), these cells proliferated maximally, as MCF7 cells did; however, natural and synthetic androgens prevented the AR-transfected cells from proliferating. Inhibition of cell proliferation occurred when physiological androgen concentrations (1 nM) were added to ITDME; this effect was almost completely reversed by Casodex, a synthetic androgen antagonist. Under the effect of androgens added to ITDME, MCF7-AR1 cells were arrested in the G0/G1 phase within 24 h. These data suggest that: 1) the androgen-induced inhibition of cell proliferation (Step-2) is AR-mediated; and 2) the AR may be necessary, but not sufficient, to mediate the androgen-induced proliferative response (Step-1).

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Androgens; Anilides; Blotting, Western; Breast Neoplasms; Cell Cycle; Cell Division; Dihydrotestosterone; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Flutamide; Humans; In Vitro Techniques; Metribolone; Nandrolone; Nitriles; Receptors, Androgen; Testosterone; Testosterone Congeners; Tosyl Compounds; Transfection; Tumor Cells, Cultured

We investigated modulation of androgen receptor (AR) activity in prostatic tumor cells by luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH)-induced increase of the intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) level.. AR transactivation activity was assessed in transiently transfected DU-145 and in LNCaP cells.. LHRH and cAMP derivative, respectively, induced reporter gene activity to about 15% of the maximal level in DU-145 cells transfected with an AR expression vector and an androgen-inducible reporter gene. LHRH or the cAMP analogue acted synergistically in combination with low concentrations of androgen thus lowering the androgen concentration required for maximal AR activation by a factor of 100. A similar activation of the AR by cAMP analogue was observed in LNCaP cells when enhancement of androgen-induced secretion of prostate-specific antigen was determined. The two nonsteroidal antiandrogens hydroxyflutamide and Casodex(R) inhibited reporter gene activity.. The AR is synergistically activated by low doses of androgen and LHRH or the second messenger cAMP. This may have implications for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer.

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Anilides; Bucladesine; Cell Line; Chloramphenicol O-Acetyltransferase; Cyclic AMP; Flutamide; Genes, Reporter; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Kinetics; Male; Metribolone; Nitriles; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms; Receptors, Androgen; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Testosterone Congeners; Tosyl Compounds; Transcriptional Activation; Transfection; Tumor Cells, Cultured

To evaluate the presence of androgen receptors in the human melanoma cell line IIB-MEL-J, a Scatchard plot analysis was performed. Cells in culture revealed a single binding component with an apparent dissociation constant (KD) at 37 degrees C of 11 nM and a binding capacity of 326 fmol/mg protein when measured with [3H]-R1881. Competition analysis revealed an atypical relaxation of specificity, since not only androgen (testosterone, dihydrotestosterone [DHT], R1881) and antiandrogen (hydroxy-flutamide [OH-FLU]) competed for [3H]-R1881 binding, but also estradiol, progesterone, and cortisol at 500-fold excess concentration. Binding of [3H]-estradiol and [3H]-R5020 in the absence of unlabeled DHT were completely suppressed in its presence. Immunohistochemistry of androgen receptor with a monoclonal antibody showed that nuclei were vigorously stained. Different doses of flutamide (FLU) and OH-FLU tested on cultured IIB-MEL-J cells in the presence of serum inhibited significantly cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner. When cells were incubated with 10 nM DHT and 1% charcoal-adsorbed serum, a significant stimulation of growth that was observed was inhibited by 4 microM OH-FLU. DHT stimulation was completely reversed by the antiestrogen tamoxifen. In addition, male nude mice transplanted with IIB-MEL-J tumor were treated with FLU when tumors were palpable. FLU was effective in diminishing tumor growth and increasing survival rate of the animals. As a conclusion, the presence of functional androgen receptors in these cells has been demonstrated by growth inhibition in vitro and in vivo with antiandrogens, and their atypical nature is suggested by binding cross-reactivity and competition studies.

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Animals; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Binding, Competitive; Cell Division; Dihydrotestosterone; Estradiol; Flutamide; Humans; Hydrocortisone; Immunohistochemistry; Male; Melanoma; Metribolone; Mice; Mice, Nude; Progesterone; Receptors, Androgen; Testosterone; Tumor Cells, Cultured

Both androgen and antiandrogen treatments enhance the proliferation rate of the hormone-dependent prostate cancer cell line LNCaP, expressing a mutated androgen receptor (AR). We studied the modification of the expression of epidermal growth factor (EGF), of its receptor (EGF-R), and of androgen receptor (AR) in the LNCaP cell line, under basal conditions and during androgen (R1881) and antiandrogen hydroxy-flutamide (OH-FLU) treatment. After prolonged R1881 administration, a marked increase of EGF release was observed, completely blocked by the addition of OH-FLU. The Scatchard plot analysis of EGF-R binding revealed two classes of binding sites with high and low affinity. The administration of OH-FLU alone or combined with R1881 did not modify the affinity constants, while the low-affinity component disappeared after androgen administration. Both androgen and antiandrogen administration led to a significant increase of the EGF-R high-affinity component. AR mRNA and protein levels were downregulated by R1881 treatment. Following OH-FLU administration, AR mRNA was slightly downregulated, and there was not a strict parallelism between AR mRNA levels and AR binding capacity. When combined with R1881, OH-FLU partially counteracted the androgen-induced AR downregulation. Our data show that EGF-R binding capacity is the only parameter constantly raised in cell proliferation with respect to quiescent cells, and highlights the nonunivocal action of OH-FLU on androgen-induced effects.

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Blotting, Northern; Down-Regulation; Epidermal Growth Factor; ErbB Receptors; Flutamide; Gene Expression; Humans; Male; Metribolone; Prostatic Neoplasms; Protein Binding; Radioimmunoassay; Receptors, Androgen; RNA, Messenger; Time Factors; Tumor Cells, Cultured

Androgen receptor (AR) levels are regulated by androgens, other steroids and non-steroidal hormones via complex, tissue-specific processes. Since alterations in receptor levels may influence cellular sensitivity to androgens, understanding AR regulation is of fundamental and potentially therapeutic significance. In most target tissues and AR-containing cell lines, AR mRNA is down-regulated in response to androgens. We have reconstituted this androgen-mediated down-regulation of AR mRNA in COS 1 cells transfected with a human AR cDNA under the control of the cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter. The sequences mediating receptor mRNA down-regulation are represented within the AR cDNA and not within the CMV promoter. Androgenic down-regulation of AR cDNA expression was time- and dose-dependent, resembling native AR mRNA down-regulation. In addition, androgenic regulation of the receptor cDNA was not dependent on protein synthesis suggesting that AR and/or another pre-existing protein(s) is involved in this process. In COS 1 cells co-transfected with androgen and glucocorticoid receptor cDNAs, dexamethasone mimicked the action of androgen in down-regulating AR mRNA. This response depended on glucocorticoid receptors. Androgen had little effect on steady-state levels of AR protein consistent with reports that androgen down-regulates AR mRNA but increases AR protein half-life (Kemppainen et al. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 968-974; Zhou et al. (1995) Mol. Endocrinol. 9, 208-218). However, glucocorticoids decreased AR protein levels in cells that co-expressed androgen and glucocorticoid receptors. These results indicate that sequences represented in the AR cDNA mediate AR mRNA down-regulation by both androgens and glucocorticoids. Inhibition of AR mRNA and protein by glucocorticoids suggests that these steroids may modulate androgen action in tissues, such as mammary gland and prostate, which express both androgen and glucocorticoid receptors.

Topics: Cell Line; Cyproterone Acetate; Cytomegalovirus; DNA, Complementary; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Down-Regulation; Flutamide; Gene Expression; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Metribolone; Promoter Regions, Genetic; Protein Biosynthesis; Receptors, Androgen; Receptors, Glucocorticoid; RNA, Messenger; Testosterone Congeners; Time Factors; Transfection; Tumor Cells, Cultured

Differentiation of skeletal muscle and the formation of the neuromuscular junction are regulated by steroid hormones. The effects of androgens on ion channel proteins central to neuromuscular signalling have been investigated in differentiating mouse muscle C2 cells and in C2 cells that stably overexpress the rat androgen receptor (AR) cDNA. Neither the expression nor function of ACh receptors was regulated by androgenic actions in these cells. However, voltage-dependent sodium (Na) current density was decreased by androgen treatment of C2 cells and was abolished, even in the absence of androgens, in C2 cells that overexpress the AR. The decrease in functional Na current was not accompanied by concomitant decreases in Na channel mRNA, suggesting that AR influence posttranscriptional processing of Na channels in differentiating C2 cells.

Topics: Acetylcholine; Androgen Antagonists; Animals; Bungarotoxins; Cell Differentiation; Cell Line; Dihydrotestosterone; Flutamide; Gene Expression; Metribolone; Mice; Muscles; Rats; Receptors, Androgen; Receptors, Cholinergic; Sodium Channels; Transfection

Human androgen receptor (hAR) is a ligand-dependent transcription factor that mediates androgen-induced actions on target tissues. Transfection studies in receptor deficient monkey kidney cells CV-1 in culture examine the ability of dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and of the antiandrogens hydroxylflutamide (HO-FLU), cyproterone acetate (Cypro.A) and RU 23908-10 to stimulate or to inhibit the transcription activation of mouse mammary tumor virus-bacterial chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (MMTV-CAT). CV-1 cells cotransfected with wild type hAR (hAR1-910) and MMTV-CAT, were treated with varying concentrations of DHT. DHT stimulated transcription activation of MMTV-CAT gene in a dose-dependent fashion. Cypro.A though only partially, also stimulated the transcription activation of MMTV-CAT. In the absence of steroids, HO-FLU induced the MMTV-CAT transcription in transfectants only 4% above the basal level. RU 23908-10 revealed the least agonistic activity at concentrations between 10 nM and 1 microM. Despite this, 100- to 1000-fold molar excess of all antiandrogens inhibited the agonistic activity of 10 nM DHT in this system. Receptor binding assays confirmed that HO-FLU, Cypro.A and RU 23908-10 competed with [3H]DHT for AR binding with hAR expressed in CV-1 cells. Western blot analysis using AR antipeptide antibodies raised in rabbits revealed the presence of two AR protein bands in extracts prepared from hAR1-910 transfected CV-1 cells. Incubation of labeled synthetic palindromic androgen responsive element (ARE) with the hAR containing CV-1 cell extracts followed by u.v. cross-linking demonstrated the specificity of AR-DNA interaction. Analysis by gel mobility shift assays showed that the interaction of AR-antiandrogen complexes with labeled ARE was specific.

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Animals; Binding, Competitive; Blotting, Western; Cell Line; Chloramphenicol O-Acetyltransferase; Chlorocebus aethiops; Cyproterone Acetate; Dihydrotestosterone; DNA; Flutamide; Gene Expression Regulation; Humans; Imidazoles; Imidazolidines; Kidney; Kinetics; Mammary Tumor Virus, Mouse; Metribolone; Receptors, Androgen; Recombinant Proteins; Transcription Factors; Transcription, Genetic; Transcriptional Activation; Transfection

LNCaP cells contain androgen receptors with a mutation in the steroid binding domain (Thr 868 changed to Ala) resulting in a changed hormone specificity. Both the wild-type and mutated androgen receptors were transfected into COS cells. Transcription activation was studied in cells co-transfected with an androgen sensitive reporter (CAT) gene. The wild-type androgen receptor was activated by the agonist R1881, but the antiandrogens did not enhance transcription apart from a partial agonistic effect at high concentrations of cyproterone acetate. The mutated androgen receptor was fully activated by R1881, cyproterone acetate and hydroxyflutamide, but not by ICI 176,334. Receptor transformation to a tight nuclear binding state was studied by preparation of detergent washed nuclei and Western blotting with a specific antibody against the androgen receptor. Nuclei of COS cells transfected with wild-type receptor retained the receptor when the cells had been treated with the agonist R1881, partially retained receptors when treated with antiandrogen cyproterone acetate, but did not retain receptor when treated with hydroxyflutamide or ICI 176,334. The cells transfected with the mutated receptor additionally retained nuclear receptors after treatment with hydroxyflutamide. We conclude that each one of the three antiandrogens tested displayed different characteristics with respect to its effect on transformation and transcription activation.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Alanine; Amino Acid Sequence; Androgen Antagonists; Anilides; Animals; Blotting, Western; Cell Line; Cell Nucleus; Chloramphenicol O-Acetyltransferase; Cyproterone Acetate; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Flutamide; Humans; Male; Metribolone; Mutagenesis, Site-Directed; Nitriles; Point Mutation; Prostatic Neoplasms; Receptors, Androgen; Recombinant Proteins; Threonine; Tosyl Compounds; Transcription, Genetic; Transfection; Transformation, Genetic; Tumor Cells, Cultured

The most potent steroid in human prostatic carcinoma LNCaP cells, i.e., dihydrotestosterone (DHT), has a biphasic stimulatory effect on cell proliferation. At the maximal stimulatory concentration of 0.1 nM DHT, analysis of cell kinetic parameters shows a decrease of the G0-G1 fraction with a corresponding increase of the S and G2 + M fractions. In contrast, concentrations of 1 nM DHT or higher induce a return of cell proliferation to control levels, reflected by an increase in the G0-G1 fraction at the expense of the S and especially the G2 + M fractions. Continuous labeling for 144 h with the nucleotide analogue 5'-bromodeoxyuridine shows that the percentage of cycling LNCaP cells rises more than 90% after treatment with stimulatory concentrations of DHT, whereas in control cells as well as in cells treated with high concentrations of the androgen, this value remains below 50%. Although LNCaP cells do not contain detectable estrogen receptors, the new pure steroidal antiestrogen EM-139 not only reversed the stimulation of cell proliferation and cell kinetics induced by stimulatory doses of DHT but also inhibited basal cell proliferation.

Topics: Androgens; Androstane-3,17-diol; Binding, Competitive; Cell Cycle; Dihydrotestosterone; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Antagonism; Estradiol; Estrogen Antagonists; Estrone; Flow Cytometry; Flutamide; Humans; In Vitro Techniques; Male; Metribolone; Piperidines; Prostatic Neoplasms; Raloxifene Hydrochloride; Tamoxifen; Testosterone; Time Factors; Tumor Cells, Cultured