metribolone and bicalutamide

We show that HEXIM1 (hexamethylene bis-acetamide inducible 1) functions as an AR (androgen receptor) co-repressor as it physically interacts with the AR and is required for the ability of anti-androgens to inhibit androgen-induced target gene expression and cell proliferation. Oncomine™ database and IHC (immunohistochemistry) analyses of human prostate tissues revealed that expression of HEXIM1 mRNA and protein are down-regulated during the development and progression of prostate cancer. Enforced down-regulation of HEXIM1 in parental hormone-dependent LNCaP cells results in resistance to the inhibitory action of anti-androgens. Conversely, ectopic expression of HEXIM1 in the CRPC (castration-resistant prostate cancer) cell line, C4-2, enhances their sensitivity to the repressive effects of the anti-androgen bicalutamide. Novel insight into the mechanistic basis for HEXIM1 inhibition of AR activity is provided by the present studies showing that HEXIM1 induces expression of the histone demethylase KDM5B (lysine-specific demethylase 5B) and inhibits histone methylation, resulting in the inhibition of FOXA1 (forkhead box A1) licensing activity. This is a new mechanism of action attributed to HEXIM1, and distinct from what has been reported so far to be involved in HEXIM1 regulation of other nuclear hormone receptors, including the oestrogen receptor.

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Anilides; Cell Line, Tumor; Enhancer Elements, Genetic; Epithelial Cells; Gene Expression; Histones; Humans; Jumonji Domain-Containing Histone Demethylases; Male; Metribolone; Nitriles; Nuclear Proteins; Prostate; Prostatic Neoplasms; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Protein Transport; Receptors, Androgen; Repressor Proteins; RNA-Binding Proteins; Tosyl Compounds; Transcription Factors; Transcriptional Elongation Factors

LuCaP serially transplantable xenografts are valuable preclinical models of locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer. For the first time, we recently succeeded in establishing and serially passaging spheroid cultures of several LuCaP xenografts. Here, we characterized in depth the molecular and cellular phenotype of LuCaP 147 cultures and found faithful retention of the characteristics of the original xenograft, including immunophenotype, genetic fidelity, gene expression profile and responsiveness to androgen. Furthermore, we demonstrated capabilities for high-throughput drug screening and that anti-cancer agents induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in spheroid cultures. Finally, we showed that cells formed tumors when re-introduced into mice, providing an authentic in vitro-in vivo preclinical model of a subtype of prostate cancer with a hypermutator phenotype and an SPOP mutation.

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Anilides; Animals; Cell Line, Tumor; Heterografts; Humans; Immunophenotyping; Male; Metribolone; Mice; Mutation; Nitriles; Nuclear Proteins; Phenotype; Prostatic Neoplasms; Repressor Proteins; Spheroids, Cellular; Tosyl Compounds; Ubiquitin-Protein Ligase Complexes

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most fatal cancers. In almost all populations, males have a higher HCC rate than females. Here we sought to explore the roles and mechanisms of acetylcholine (Ach) and androgen receptor (AR) on regulating the fate determinations of HCC. Ach activated AR and promoted its expression in HCC cells. Ach enhanced HCC cell migration and invasion but inhibited their apoptosis. Ach had no obvious effects on the migration, invasion, or apoptosis in AR-negative HCC cells. Elevation of migration and invasion induced by Ach was eliminated in AR-knockdown HCC cells. In contrast, Ach stimulated the migration and invasion but suppressed apoptosis in AR over-expressed HCC cells. Additionally, AR agonist R1881 promoted the migration and invasion but reduced the apoptosis of SNU-449 cells, whereas AR antagonist casodex inhibited the migration and invasion but stimulated the apoptosis of SNU-449 cells. STAT3 and AKT phosphorylation was activated by Ach in HCC cells. Collectively, these data suggest that Ach activates STAT3 and AKT pathways and acts on AR to promote the migration and invasion but inhibit the apoptosis of HCC cells. This study thus provides novel insights into carcinogenesis of liver cancer by local interaction between neurotransmitter Ach and hormone receptor AR in HCC.

Topics: Acetylcholine; Androgen Antagonists; Androgens; Anilides; Apoptosis; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Movement; Female; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Male; Mecamylamine; Metribolone; Neoplasm Invasiveness; Nitriles; Phosphorylation; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt; Receptors, Androgen; Receptors, Cholinergic; RNA, Small Interfering; Signal Transduction; STAT3 Transcription Factor; Tosyl Compounds; Transcription, Genetic; Up-Regulation

Androgen plays an important role in the pathogenesis of PCa (prostate cancer). Previously, we identified GNMT (glycine N-methyltransferase) as a tumour susceptibility gene and characterized its promoter region. Besides, its enzymatic product-sarcosine has been recognized as a marker for prognosis of PCa. The goals of this study were to determine whether GNMT is regulated by androgen and to map its AREs (androgen response elements). Real-time PCR analyses showed that R1881, a synthetic AR (androgen receptor) agonist induced GNMT expression in AR-positive LNCaP cells, but not in AR-negative DU145 cells. In silico prediction showed that there are four putative AREs in GNMT-ARE1, ARE2 and ARE3 are located in the intron 1 and ARE4 is in the intron 2. Consensus ARE motif deduced from published AREs was used to identify the fifth ARE-ARE5 in the coding region of exon 1. Luciferase reporter assay found that only ARE5 mediated the transcriptional activation of R1881. ARE3 overlaps with a YY1 [Yin and Yang 1 (motif (CaCCATGTT, +1118/+1126)] that was further confirmed by antibody supershift and ChIP (chromatin immunoprecipitation) assays. EMSA (electrophoretic mobility shift assay) and ChIP assay confirmed that AR interacts with ARE5 in vitro and in vivo. In summary, GNMT is an AR-targeted gene with its functional ARE located at +19/+33 of the first exon. These results are valuable for the study of the influence of androgen on the gene expression of GNMT especially in the pathogenesis of cancer.

Topics: Androgen Receptor Antagonists; Anilides; Base Sequence; Binding Sites; Cell Line, Tumor; Exons; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Glycine N-Methyltransferase; Humans; Male; Metribolone; Nitriles; Open Reading Frames; Prostatic Neoplasms; Protein Binding; Receptors, Androgen; Response Elements; Sequence Analysis, DNA; Testosterone Congeners; Tosyl Compounds; Transcription, Genetic

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) is regulated by a number of different factors, but the mechanism(s) behind androgen-mediated regulation of VEGF in prostate cancer are poorly understood.. Three novel androgen receptor (AR) binding sites were discovered in the VEGF promoter and in vivo binding of AR to these sites was demonstrated by chromatin immunoprecipitation. Mutation of these sites attenuated activation of the VEGF promoter by the androgen analog, R1881 in prostate cancer cells. The transcription factors AR and Sp1 were shown to form a nuclear complex and both bound the VEGF core promoter in chromatin of hormone treated CWR22Rv1 prostate cancer cells. The importance of the Sp1 binding site in hormone mediated activation of VEGF expression was demonstrated by site directed mutagenesis. Mutation of a critical Sp1 binding site (Sp1.4) in the VEGF core promoter region prevented activation by androgen. Similarly, suppression of Sp1 binding by Mithramycin A treatment significantly reduced VEGF expression.. Our mechanistic study of androgen mediated induction of VEGF expression in prostate cancer cells revealed for the first time that this induction is mediated through the core promoter region and is dependent upon a critical Sp1 binding site. The importance of Sp1 binding suggests that therapy targeting the AR-Sp1 complex may dampen VEGF induced angiogenesis and, thereby, block prostate cancer progression, helping to maintain the indolent form of prostate cancer.

Topics: Androgen Receptor Antagonists; Anilides; Base Sequence; Binding Sites; Cell Line, Tumor; Chromatin; Gene Expression; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Humans; Male; Metribolone; Nitriles; Promoter Regions, Genetic; Prostatic Neoplasms; Protein Binding; Receptors, Androgen; Response Elements; Sp1 Transcription Factor; Testosterone Congeners; Tosyl Compounds; Transcriptional Activation; Up-Regulation; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Although a high frequency of androgen receptor (AR) expression in human breast cancers has been described, exploiting this knowledge for therapy has been challenging. This is in part because androgens can either inhibit or stimulate cell proliferation in pre-clinical models of breast cancer. In addition, many breast cancers co-express other steroid hormone receptors that can affect AR signaling, further obfuscating the effects of androgens on breast cancer cells.. To create better-defined models of AR signaling in human breast epithelial cells, we took estrogen receptor (ER)-α-negative and progesterone receptor (PR)-negative human breast epithelial cell lines, both cancerous and non-cancerous, and engineered them to express AR, thus allowing the unambiguous study of AR signaling. We cloned a full-length cDNA of human AR, and expressed this transgene in MCF-10A non-tumorigenic human breast epithelial cells and MDA-MB-231 human breast-cancer cells. We characterized the responses to AR ligand binding using various assays, and used isogenic MCF-10A p21 knock-out cell lines expressing AR to demonstrate the requirement for p21 in mediating the proliferative responses to AR signaling in human breast epithelial cells.. We found that hyperactivation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway from both AR and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling resulted in a growth-inhibitory response, whereas MAPK signaling from either AR or EGFR activation resulted in cellular proliferation. Additionally, p21 gene knock-out studies confirmed that AR signaling/activation of the MAPK pathway is dependent on p21.. These studies present a new model for the analysis of AR signaling in human breast epithelial cells lacking ERα/PR expression, providing an experimental system without the potential confounding effects of ERα/PR crosstalk. Using this system, we provide a mechanistic explanation for previous observations ascribing a dual role for AR signaling in human breast cancer cells. As previous reports have shown that approximately 40% of breast cancers can lack p21 expression, our data also identify potential new caveats for exploiting AR as a target for breast cancer therapy.

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Androgens; Anilides; Breast Neoplasms; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Cyclin D1; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21; Enzyme Activation; Epithelial Cells; Estrogen Receptor alpha; Extracellular Signal-Regulated MAP Kinases; Female; Gene Expression; Humans; MAP Kinase Signaling System; Metribolone; Nitriles; Receptors, Androgen; Recombinant Proteins; Tosyl Compounds; Up-Regulation

Cell culture/xenograft and gene arrays of clinical material document that development of castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) cells involves acquisition of adaptive auto-regulation resulting in >25-fold increase in Androgen Receptor (AR) protein expression in a low androgen environment. Such adaptive AR increase paradoxically is a liability in castrated hosts, however, when supraphysiologic androgen is acutely replaced. Cell synchronization/anti-androgen response is due to AR binding to replication complexes (RC) at origin of replication sites (ORS) in early G1 associated with licensing/restricting DNA for single round of duplication during S-phase. When CRPC cells are acutely exposed to supraphysiologic androgen, adaptively increased nuclear AR is over-stabilized, preventing sufficient degradation in mitosis, inhibiting DNA re-licensing, and thus death in the subsequent cell cycle. These mechanistic results and the fact that AR/RC binding occurs in metastatic CRPCs directly from patients provides a paradigm shifting rationale for bipolar androgen therapy (BAT) in patient progressing on chronic androgen ablation. BAT involves giving sequential cycles alternating between periods of acute supraphysiologic androgen followed by acute ablation to take advantage of vulnerability produced by adaptive auto-regulation and binding of AR to RC in CRPC cells. BAT therapy is effective in xenografts and based upon positive results has entered clinical testing.

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Androgens; Anilides; Animals; Cell Cycle; Cell Death; Cell Line, Tumor; DNA Replication; Flow Cytometry; Gene Expression Profiling; Humans; Immunohistochemistry; Male; Metribolone; Mice; Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent; Nitriles; Prostatic Neoplasms; Receptors, Androgen; Testosterone; Tosyl Compounds; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays

Prostate cancer progression can be associated with androgen receptor (AR) mutations acquired following treatment with castration and/or an antiandrogen. Abiraterone, a rationally designed inhibitor of CYP17A1 recently approved for the treatment of docetaxel-treated castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), is often effective, but requires coadministration with glucocorticoids to curtail side effects. Here, we hypothesized that progressive disease on abiraterone may occur secondary to glucocorticoid-induced activation of mutated AR. We found that prednisolone plasma levels in patients with CRPC were sufficiently high to activate mutant AR. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, such as spironolactone and eplerenone that are used to treat side effects related to mineralocorticoid excess, can also bind to and activate signaling through wild-type or mutant AR. Abiraterone inhibited in vitro proliferation and AR-regulated gene expression of AR-positive prostate cancer cells, which could be explained by AR antagonism in addition to inhibition of steroidogenesis. In fact, activation of mutant AR by eplerenone was inhibited by MDV3100, bicalutamide, or greater concentrations of abiraterone. Therefore, an increase in abiraterone exposure could reverse resistance secondary to activation of AR by residual ligands or coadministered drugs. Together, our findings provide a strong rationale for clinical evaluation of combined CYP17A1 inhibition and AR antagonism.

Topics: Androgen Receptor Antagonists; Androgens; Androstenes; Androstenols; Anilides; Benzamides; Binding, Competitive; Cell Line, Tumor; Drug Interactions; Eplerenone; Humans; Male; Metribolone; Nitriles; Phenylthiohydantoin; Prednisolone; Prostatic Neoplasms; Receptors, Androgen; Spironolactone; Tosyl Compounds

The androgen receptor (AR) has a critical role in the growth and progression of androgen-dependent and castration-resistant prostate cancers. To identify novel inhibitors of AR transactivation that block growth of prostate cancer cells, a luciferase-based high-throughput screen of ~160,000 small molecules was performed in cells stably expressing AR and a prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-luciferase reporter. CPIC (1-(3-(2-chlorophenoxy) propyl)-1H-indole-3-carbonitrile) was identified as a small molecule that blocks AR transactivation to a greater extent than other steroid receptors. CPIC inhibited AR-mediated proliferation of androgen-sensitive prostate cancer cell lines, with minimal toxicity in AR-negative cell lines. CPIC treatment also reduced the anchorage-independent growth of LAPC-4 prostate cancer cells. CPIC functioned as a pure antagonist by inhibiting the expression of AR-regulated genes in LAPC-4 cells that express wild-type AR and exhibited weak agonist activity in LNCaP cells that express the mutant AR-T877A. CPIC treatment did not reduce AR levels or alter its nuclear localization. We used chromatin immunoprecipitation to identify the site of action of CPIC. CPIC inhibited recruitment of androgen-bound AR to the PSA promoter and enhancer sites to a greater extent than bicalutamide. CPIC is a new therapeutic inhibitor that targets AR-mediated gene activation with potential to arrest the growth of prostate cancer.

Topics: Androgen Receptor Antagonists; Androgens; Anilides; Binding, Competitive; Blotting, Western; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; HeLa Cells; Humans; Indoles; Luciferases; Male; Metribolone; Microscopy, Fluorescence; Nitriles; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms; Receptors, Androgen; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; Serine Endopeptidases; Small Molecule Libraries; Tosyl Compounds

Androgen receptor (AR) is overexpressed in a majority of castration-resistant prostate cancers, but most of the cell model studies addressing AR function have been conducted in LNCaP prostate cancer cells expressing unamplified AR levels. Here, we have compared the responses of various types of AR ligands towards a pattern of AR target genes and chromatin binding sites in Vertebral-Cancer of the Prostate (VCaP) cells and LNCaP cells. In keeping with the AR gene amplification in VCaP cells, our analyses show that these cells contain ≥10-fold receptor mRNA and protein than LNCaP cells. Loading of the agonist-occupied AR onto chromatin regulatory sites and expression of several AR target genes, including their basal expression, were stronger in VCaP cells than LNCaP cells. Bicalutamide displayed a trend towards agonism in VCaP cells. Bicalutamide also evoked AR-chromatin interaction, whereas diarylthiohydantoin antiandrogen RD162 was inert with this respect both in VCaP and LNCaP cells. These results support the notion that the AR protein level translates into augmented occupancy of AR-regulated enhancers and target gene activity in prostate cancer cells.

Topics: Androgens; Anilides; Cell Line, Tumor; Chromatin; Cyproterone Acetate; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Down-Regulation; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Gene Silencing; Humans; Male; Metribolone; Nitriles; Phenylthiohydantoin; Prostatic Neoplasms; Receptors, Androgen; Tosyl Compounds; Transcription, Genetic

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Anilides; Animals; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Male; Metribolone; Mice; Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent; Nitriles; Prostatic Neoplasms; Tosyl Compounds

Androgen receptor (AR)-mediated transcription is modulated by interaction with coregulatory proteins. We demonstrate that the unconventional prefoldin RPB5 interactor (URI) is a new regulator of AR transcription and is critical for antagonist (bicalutamide) action. URI is phosphorylated upon androgen treatment, suggesting communication between the URI and AR signaling pathways. Whereas depletion of URI enhances AR-mediated gene transcription, overexpression of URI suppresses AR transcriptional activation and anchorage-independent prostate cancer cell growth. Repression of AR-mediated transcription is achieved, in part, by URI binding and regulation of androgen receptor trapped clone 27 (Art-27), a previously characterized AR corepressor. Consistent with this idea, genome-wide expression profiling in prostate cancer cells upon depletion of URI or Art-27 reveals substantially overlapping patterns of gene expression. Further, depletion of URI increases the expression of the AR target gene NKX-3.1, decreases the recruitment of Art-27, and increases AR occupancy at the NKX-3.1 promoter. While Art-27 can bind AR directly, URI is bound to chromatin prior to hormone-dependent recruitment of AR, suggesting a role for URI in modulating AR recruitment to target genes.

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Anilides; Blotting, Western; Cell Cycle Proteins; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Chromatin; Chromatin Immunoprecipitation; Gene Expression Profiling; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; HEK293 Cells; Homeodomain Proteins; Humans; Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins; Male; Metribolone; Molecular Chaperones; Neoplasm Proteins; Nitriles; Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis; Phosphorylation; Prostatic Neoplasms; Protein Binding; Receptors, Androgen; Repressor Proteins; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; RNA Interference; Tosyl Compounds; Transcription Factors; Transcription, Genetic

Androgen ablation therapy is the primary treatment for metastatic prostate cancer. However, this therapy is associated with several undesired side-effects, including increased risk of cardiovascular diseases. To study if termination of long-term androgen ablation and restoration of testosterone levels could suppress the growth of relapsed hormone-refractory prostate tumors, we implanted testosterone pellets in castrated nude mice carrying androgen receptor (AR)-positive LNCaP 104-R2 cells, which relapsed from androgen-dependent LNCaP 104-S cells after long-term androgen deprivation. 104-R2 tumor xenografts regressed after testosterone pellets were implanted. Of 33 tumors, 24 adapted to elevation of testosterone level and relapsed as androgen-insensitive tumors. Relapsed tumors (R2Ad) expressed less AR and prostate-specific antigen. We then studied the molecular mechanism underlying the androgenic regulation of prostate cancer cell proliferation. Androgen suppresses proliferation of 104-R2 by inducing G(1) cell cycle arrest through reduction of S-phase kinase-associated protein 2 (Skp2) and c-Myc, and induction of p27(Kip1). 104-R2 cells adapted to androgen treatment and the adapted cells, R2Ad, were androgen-insensitive cells with a slower growth rate and low protein level of AR, high levels of c-Myc and Skp2, and low levels of p27(Kip1). Nuclear AR and prostate-specific antigen expression is present in 104-R2 cells but not R2Ad cells when androgen is absent. Overexpression of AR in R2Ad cells regenerated an androgen-repressed phenotype; knockdown of AR in 104-R2 cells generated an androgen-insensitive phenotype. Overexpression of Skp2 and c-Myc in 104-R2 cells blocked the growth inhibition caused by androgens. We concluded that androgens cause growth inhibition in LNCaP 104-R2 prostate cancer cells through AR, Skp2, and c-Myc.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Androgen Antagonists; Anilides; Animals; Cell Cycle; Cell Division; Cell Line, Tumor; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p27; Drug Implants; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Humans; Lymphatic Metastasis; Male; Metribolone; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Mice, Nude; Neoplasm Proteins; Nitriles; Orchiectomy; Prostatic Neoplasms; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc; Receptors, Androgen; S-Phase Kinase-Associated Proteins; Testosterone; Tosyl Compounds; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays

A stem cell model of prostate cancer tumourigenesis explains progression to castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and offers novel perspectives in targeting this cancer in its more advanced forms. Androgen receptor (AR) regulated pathways are central mechanisms in progression to CRPC. However, AR was thought to be lacking in prostate stem cell enriched fractions. Potential low levels of AR expression in stem cell enriched cells were investigated and potential direct effects of androgen were examined.. Human prostate stem cell enriched populations, based on high α(2)β(1) integrin expression (α(2)β(1)(hi)), were selected from primary human prostate tissue in men undergoing transurethral prostatectomy or cystoprostatectomy. Effects on differentiation were assayed with flow cytometry using differentiation-specific markers.. Low levels of AR were demonstrable in α(2)β(1)(hi) cells following inhibition of the proteasome using MG132. Furthermore, a direct effect of androgen was shown in stabilising/inducing AR expression. Androgen treatment of α(2)β(1)(hi) cells was associated with the induction of differentiation using a number of differentiation-specific markers (prostatic acid phosphatase, cytokeratin 18 and AR) with increases ranging from 49% to 67% (p<0.05). These effects were blocked with the AR-specific inhibitor bicalutamide (p<0.05). These data support a role of direct androgen activity on stem cell enriched cells in the prostate and the implications of these findings are discussed.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androgen Antagonists; Androgen Receptor Antagonists; Androgens; Anilides; Antigens, Differentiation; Biomarkers, Tumor; Cell Transformation, Neoplastic; Cysteine Proteinase Inhibitors; Epithelial Cells; Humans; Leupeptins; Male; Metribolone; Middle Aged; Neoplastic Stem Cells; Nitriles; Prostatic Neoplasms; Receptors, Androgen; Testosterone Congeners; Tosyl Compounds

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) facilitates the response of prostate cancer (PC) to radiation. Androgens have been shown to induce elevated basal levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in PC, leading to adaptation to radiation-induced cytotoxic oxidative stress. Here, we show that androgens increase the expression of p22(phox) and gp91(phox) subunits of NADPH oxidase (NOX) and ROS production by NOX2 and NOX4 in PC. Pre-radiation treatment of 22Rv1 human PC cells with NOX inhibitors sensitize the cells to radiation similarly to ADT, suggesting that their future usage may spare the need for adjuvant ADT in PC patients undergoing radiation.

Topics: Acetophenones; Acetylcysteine; Androgen Antagonists; Androgens; Anilides; Animals; Cell Line, Tumor; Humans; Male; Membrane Glycoproteins; Metribolone; Mice; NADPH Oxidase 2; NADPH Oxidase 4; NADPH Oxidases; Neoplasm Transplantation; Nitriles; Onium Compounds; Oxidative Stress; Prostatic Neoplasms; Radiation-Sensitizing Agents; Reactive Oxygen Species; Tosyl Compounds

The androgen-signaling pathway with the androgen receptor (AR) as its key molecule is widely understood to influence prostate tumor growth significantly even after androgen ablation. Under androgen-deprived conditions, the AR may be activated inappropriately through interaction with other molecules, including cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase A (PKA). In a previous study, we have shown that knocking down the AR significantly inhibits prostate tumor growth. In this study, we show that combined inhibition of the AR and the regulatory subunit I alpha of PKA (RIalpha) with small interference RNAs significantly increased the growth-inhibitory and proapoptotic effects of AR knockdown. This treatment strategy was effective in androgen-sensitive and in androgen ablation-resistant prostate cancer cells. In addition, we report that downregulating PKA RIalpha was sufficient to inhibit PKA signaling and interestingly also impaired AR expression and activation. Vice versa, AR knockdown induced a decline in PKA RIalpha, associated with reduced PKA activity. This mutual influence on expression level was specific, because siRNAs against the AR did not affect expression of PKA RIalpha in AR negative DU-145 cells and a siRNA control did not affect protein expression. Another important finding of our study was that depletion of PKA RIalpha also potentiated the antiproliferative effect of the antiandrogen bicalutamide in androgen-sensitive LNCaP. We therefore concluded that combined inhibition of PKA RIalpha and AR may be a promising new therapeutic option for prostate cancer patients and might be superior to solely preventing AR expression.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Androgen Antagonists; Androgen Receptor Antagonists; Androgens; Anilides; Animals; Apoptosis; Bucladesine; Cell Division; Colforsin; Cyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinase RIalpha Subunit; Enzyme Induction; Gene Knockdown Techniques; Humans; Isoquinolines; Male; Metribolone; Neoplasm Proteins; Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent; Nitriles; Prostatic Neoplasms; Receptors, Androgen; RNA, Small Interfering; Signal Transduction; Sulfonamides; Tosyl Compounds

Oxidation of mitochondrial fatty acids (FA) results in the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) which have been postulated to play a key role in the initiation and progression of prostate cancer (PC). We previously reported that androgens increase FA uptake into PC cells. We thus examined if androgens that are known to induce ROS generation regulate FA oxidation in PC cells. The effects of the androgen-depleted medium, R1881 (synthetic androgen) and/or androgen receptor blocker, bicalutamide were examined in the human androgen-responsive but not dependent 22rv1 cells. R1881 supplementation significantly increased mitochondrial FA oxidation ((14)C-radiolabeled FA degradation studies), resulting in increased ROS production. Androgens increased the mRNA levels of carnitine palmitoyltransferase (CPT1), the rate limiting enzyme in the process of mitochondrial FA oxidation. Treatment with R1881 and bicalutamide inhibited these androgen regulated effects. Inhibition of mitochondrial ROS generation by two different inhibitors, rotenone and thenoyltrifluoroacetone, eliminated the androgen-induced ROS generation, to the same level as in cells deprived of androgens or treated with R1881 and bicalutamide. Taken together, androgens increase the mitochondrial oxidation of FA, leading to increased production of ROS that is associated with prostate cell proliferation and mutagenesis. These results therefore support the rationale for PC prevention using 5-alpha reductase inhibitors, dietary restrictions or anti-oxidants, each of which has different inhibitory but complementary effects.

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Anilides; Carnitine O-Palmitoyltransferase; Cell Line, Tumor; Fatty Acids; Free Radical Scavengers; Gene Expression Regulation, Enzymologic; Humans; Male; Metribolone; Mitochondria; Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent; Nitriles; Oxidation-Reduction; Oxidative Stress; Prostatic Neoplasms; Reactive Oxygen Species; RNA, Messenger; Testosterone Congeners; Tosyl Compounds; Uncoupling Agents; Up-Regulation

Androgen receptor (AR) is a ligand-controlled transcription factor frequently deregulated in prostate carcinomas. Since there is scarce information on the action of AR on the chromatin level, we have elucidated the molecular mechanisms underlying the androgen-dependent regulation of immunophilin FKBP51 in prostate cancer cells. In comparison to the canonical AR target PSA, FKBP51 is more rapidly and strongly induced by androgen, with the regulation occurring merely at the transcriptional level. FKBP51 locus harbors 13 in silico-predicted androgen response elements (AREs), with most of them located downstream from transcription start site (TSS) and capable of binding AR in vitro. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays in VCaP and LNCaP prostate cancer cells indicate that activation of the locus by the AR relies on four major intronic sites, with the compound ARE-containing sites >or=90 kb downstream from the TSS playing critical roles. Binding of agonist-loaded AR onto these sites in vivo was accompanied with significant recruitment of RNA polymerase II and BRM-containing chromatin remodeling complexes to the FKBP51 locus, which resulted in changes in the histone density of the locus. Our results indicate that very distal AREs act as genuine and robust enhancers, highlighting the importance of long-range regulation of transcription by the AR.

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Anilides; Binding Sites; Cell Line, Tumor; Chromatin; Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly; Enhancer Elements, Genetic; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Histones; Humans; Introns; Male; Metribolone; Nitriles; Prostatic Neoplasms; Receptors, Androgen; Tacrolimus Binding Proteins; Testosterone Congeners; Tosyl Compounds; Transcription, Genetic; Transcriptional Activation

Suppressors of cytokine signalling (SOCS) are induced by interleukins and peptide hormones. These molecules prevent the activation of diverse signalling pathways in benign and malignant cells. In previous studies, we showed that SOCS-3 is expressed in most prostate cancer cell lines and tissue specimens. In the present study we investigated the effects of androgen on the regulation of SOCS-3 in prostate cancer cell lines.. SOCS-3 expression was determined with PCR and Western blot techniques. The activity of the SOCS-3 promoter was measured with the luciferase test. We measured proliferation with (3)H-thymidine assay.. We show that androgen induces the expression of SOCS-3 in two prostate cancer cell lines. The non-steroidal anti-androgen bicalutamide is able to block the induction of SOCS-3 -expression. Androgenic hormones did not induce the expression of SOCS-3 mRNA or its promoter activity. In LNCaP-IL-6- cells transfected with the inducible Tet-On construct SOCS-3 expression was induced. The effects of androgenic hormones on the proliferation and induction of PSA were -diminished in the presence of SOCS-3.. Our results show that androgenic -regulation of SOCS-3 leads to inhibition of prolif-eration and secretion in human prostate cancer.

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Androgens; Anilides; Biomarkers, Tumor; Blotting, Western; Cell Division; Cyclin-Dependent Kinases; Doxycycline; Gene Expression; Humans; Interleukin-6; Male; Metribolone; Nitriles; Polymerase Chain Reaction; Promoter Regions, Genetic; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms; RNA, Messenger; Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling 3 Protein; Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling Proteins; Testosterone Congeners; Tosyl Compounds; Transfection; Tumor Cells, Cultured

Proteins responsive to androgen and anti-androgen may be involved in the development and progression of prostate cancer and the ultimate failure of androgen-ablation therapy. These proteins represent potential diagnostic and therapeutic targets for improved management of prostate cancer. We have investigated the effect of androgen (R1881) and anti-androgen (bicalutamide) on the androgen-responsive prostate cancer LNCaP cell line using a quantitative gel-based proteomic approach. Prior to analysis, the in vitro system was evaluated for reproducibility and validated by appropriate molecular responses to treatment. Six replicate samples were independently generated and analysed by 2-D DIGE. According to strict statistical criteria, 197 spots were differentially expressed, of which we have successfully identified 165 spots corresponding to 125 distinct proteins. Following androgen supplementation, 108 spots (68 proteins) were increased and 57 spots (39 proteins) were decreased. Essentially no difference was observed between control and anti-androgen-treated samples, confirming the absence of "off-target" effects of bicalutamide. Identified proteins were involved in diverse processes including the stress response and intracellular signalling. The potential contribution to disease of these processes and identified constituent proteins are discussed. This rigorous, statistically supported study of androgen responses has provided a number of potential candidates for development as diagnostic/prognostic markers and drug targets.

Topics: Androgens; Anilides; Cell Line, Tumor; Electrophoresis, Gel, Two-Dimensional; Gene Expression; Humans; Male; Metribolone; Nitriles; Prostatic Neoplasms; Proteome; Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization; Tosyl Compounds

Androgens have key roles in normal physiology and in male sexual differentiation as well as in pathological conditions such as prostate cancer. Androgens act through the androgen receptor (AR), which is a ligand-modulated transcription factor. Antiandrogens block AR function and are widely used in disease states, but little is known about their mechanism of action in vivo. Here, we describe a rapid differential interaction of AR with target genomic sites in living cells in the presence of agonists which coincides with the recruitment of BRM ATPase complex and chromatin remodeling, resulting in transcriptional activation. In contrast, the interaction of antagonist-bound or mutant AR with its target was found to be kinetically different: it was dramatically faster, occurred without chromatin remodeling, and resulted in the lack of transcriptional inhibition. Fluorescent resonance energy transfer analysis of wild-type AR and a transcriptionally compromised mutant at the hormone response element showed that intramolecular interactions between the N and C termini of AR play a key functional role in vivo compared to intermolecular interactions between two neighboring ARs. These data provide a kinetic and mechanistic basis for regulation of gene expression by androgens and antiandrogens in living cells.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Androgen Antagonists; Androgens; Anilides; Animals; Cell Line, Tumor; Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly; Cyproterone Acetate; Dihydrotestosterone; Female; Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching; Flutamide; Genes, Reporter; Green Fluorescent Proteins; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence; Ligands; Luciferases; Mammary Neoplasms, Animal; Mammary Tumor Virus, Mouse; Metribolone; Mice; Microscopy, Video; Mifepristone; Models, Biological; Nitriles; Plasmids; Promoter Regions, Genetic; Receptors, Androgen; Response Elements; Testosterone; Tosyl Compounds; Transcription, Genetic

Abnormal differentiation in epithelial stem cells or their immediate proliferative progeny, the transiently amplifying population (TAP), may explain malignant pathogenesis in the human prostate. These models are of particular importance as differing sensitivities to androgen among epithelial cell subpopulations during differentiation are recognised and may account for progression to androgen independent prostate cancer. Androgens are crucial in driving terminal differentiation and their indirect effects via growth factors from adjacent androgen responsive stroma are becoming better characterised. However, direct effects of androgen on immature cells in the context of a prostate stem cell model have not been investigated in detail and are studied in this work. In alpha2beta1hi stem cell enriched basal cells, androgen analogue R1881 directly promoted differentiation by the induction of differentiation-specific markers CK18, androgen receptor (AR), PSA and PAP. Furthermore, treatment with androgen down-regulated alpha2beta1 integrin expression, which is implicated in the maintenance of the immature basal cell phenotype. The alpha2beta1hi cells were previously demonstrated to lack AR expression and the direct effects of androgen were confirmed by inhibition using the anti-androgen bicalutamide. AR protein expression in alpha2beta1hi cells became detectable when its degradation was repressed by the proteosomal inhibitor MG132. Stratifying the alpha2beta1hi cells into stem (CD133(+)) and transient amplifying population (TAP) (CD133(-)) subpopulations, AR mRNA expression was found to be restricted to the CD133(-) (TAP) cells. The presence of a functional AR in the TAP, an androgen independent subpopulation for survival, may have particular clinical significance in hormone resistant prostate cancer, where both the selection of immature cells and functioning AR regulated pathways are involved.

Topics: AC133 Antigen; Acid Phosphatase; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androgen Antagonists; Anilides; Antigens, CD; Cell Differentiation; Cell Proliferation; Cell Transformation, Neoplastic; Cells, Cultured; Cysteine Proteinase Inhibitors; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Epithelial Cells; Fibroblast Growth Factor 7; Glycoproteins; Humans; Integrin alpha2beta1; Keratin-18; Leupeptins; Male; Metribolone; Middle Aged; Neoplastic Stem Cells; Nitriles; Peptides; Phenotype; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms; Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex; Proteasome Inhibitors; Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases; Receptors, Androgen; RNA, Messenger; Signal Transduction; Testosterone Congeners; Tosyl Compounds

Epidemiological and experimental studies suggest that both fatty acids and androgens have a role in the development and progression of prostate cancer (PC). Plasma membrane fatty acid binding protein (FABP(pm)) is a transporter of medium and long chain fatty acids (MCFA and LCFA) across the plasma membrane, and is identical to the mitochondrial protein aspartate aminotransferase (mAAT) that is regulated by testosterone only in prostate epithelial cells, a site where PC initially develops. We therefore hypothesized that FABP(pm) is also regulated by androgens.. We examined the effect of a synthetic androgen, R1881, and that of androgen receptor (AR) blocker, bicalutamide, on the expression of FABP(pm) and mAAT and on the uptake of fatty acids in the androgen-sensitive LNCaP, androgen responsive 22rv1 and androgen-independent CL1 human PC cells. This was done using immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy, Western blot, flow cytometry, and (3)H-oleate uptake studies.. Androgen supplementation increased the cellular and surface expression of FABP(pm) and mAAT and increased the uptake of fluorescently labeled MCFA and LCFA and that of (3)H-oleate only in PC cells that express the AR. Bicalutamide inhibited this phenomenon.. The uptake of MCFA and LCFA into PC cells is androgen regulated as well as the expression of FABP(pm) and mAAT.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Androgen Antagonists; Androgens; Anilides; Aspartate Aminotransferase, Mitochondrial; Blotting, Western; Cell Line, Tumor; Fatty Acid-Binding Proteins; Fatty Acids; Flow Cytometry; Humans; Male; Metribolone; Microscopy, Confocal; Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent; Nitriles; Oleic Acid; Prostatic Neoplasms; Tosyl Compounds; Up-Regulation

Using manual and automated high throughput microscopy (HTM), ligand-dependent trafficking of green fluorescent protein-androgen receptor (GFP-AR) was analyzed in fixed and living cells to determine its spatial distribution, solubility, mobility, and co-activator interactions. Within minutes, addition of the agonist R1881 resulted translocation of GFP-AR from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, where it displayed a hyperspeckled pattern and extraction resistance in low expressing cells. AR antagonists (Casodex, hydroxyflutamide) also caused nuclear translocation, however, the antagonist-bound GFP-AR had a more diffuse nuclear distribution, distinct from the agonist-bound GFP-AR, and was completely soluble; overexpressed GFP-AR in treated cells was extraction resistant, independent of ligand type. To more dramatically show the different effects of ligand on AR distribution, we utilized an AR with a mutation in the DNA binding domain (ARC619Y) that forms distinct foci upon exposure to agonists but retains a diffuse nuclear distribution in the presence of antagonists. Live-cell imaging of this mutant demonstrated that cytoplasmic foci formation occurs immediately upon agonist but not antagonist addition. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) revealed that agonist-bound GFP-AR exhibited reduced mobility relative to unliganded or antagonist-bound GFP-AR. Importantly, agonist-bound GFP-AR mobility was strongly affected by protein expression levels in transiently transfected cells, and displayed reduced mobility even in slightly overexpressing cells. Cyan fluorescent protein-AR (CFP-AR) and yellow fluorescent protein-CREB binding protein (YFP-CBP) in the presence of agonists and antagonists were used to demonstrate that CFP-AR specifically co-localizes with YFP-CBP in an agonist dependent manner. Dual FRAP experiments demonstrated that CBP mobility mirrored AR mobility only in the presence of agonist. HTM enabled simultaneous studies of the sub-cellular distribution of GFP-AR and ARC619Y in response to a range of concentrations of agonists and antagonists (ranging from 10(-12) to 10(-5)) in thousands of cells. These results further support the notion that ligand specific interactions rapidly affect receptor and co-factor organization, solubility, and molecular dynamics, and each can be aberrantly affected by mutation and overexpression.

Topics: Active Transport, Cell Nucleus; Androgen Antagonists; Androgen Receptor Antagonists; Androgens; Anilides; Cell Nucleus; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; HeLa Cells; Humans; Ligands; Metribolone; Microscopy, Fluorescence; Nitriles; Protein Structure, Tertiary; Receptors, Androgen; Tosyl Compounds

Androgen and its receptor (AR) have been reported to have pro- or antiapoptotic functions. However, the underlying molecular mechanism is incompletely understood. We report here that androgen and AR promote Bax-mediated apoptosis in prostate cancer cells. UV irradiation and ectopic expression of Bax induce apoptosis in AR-positive, but not AR-negative prostate cancer cells. UV- and Bax-induced apoptosis is abrogated in AR-positive cells that express small interference RNA (siRNA) of AR and is sensitized by reintroduction of AR into AR-negative cells. Although AR is able to promote Bax-mediated apoptosis independently of androgen, the promotion by AR can be further potentiated by androgen via AR-dependent transcription activation. AR is essential for the translocation of Bax to mitochondria in UV- or Bax-induced apoptosis. Inhibition of Bax expression by Bax siRNA suppresses UV-induced apoptosis in AR-positive cells. In addition, introduction of AR into AR-negative prostate cancer cells upregulates expression levels of the BH3-only protein Noxa, whereas inhibition of Noxa expression reduces the promotion by AR on UV-induced apoptosis. Thus, our results reveal a novel cross talk between the androgen/AR hormonal signaling pathway and the intrinsic apoptotic death pathway that determines the sensitivity of stress-induced apoptosis in prostate cancer cells.

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Androgens; Anilides; Apoptosis; bcl-2-Associated X Protein; Humans; Male; Metribolone; Mitochondria; Nitriles; Prostatic Neoplasms; Protein Transport; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2; Receptors, Androgen; Tosyl Compounds; Transcription, Genetic; Tumor Cells, Cultured; Ultraviolet Rays

Various studies have implicated the androgen receptor (AR) in the progression of androgen-dependent human prostate cancer cells to androgen-independent and androgen-insensitive phenotypes, but the exact role of AR in progression is unclear.. To mimic the clinical situation and test the role of AR in progression, we cultured androgen-dependent LNCaP 104-S prostate tumor cells in the presence of the antiandrogen Casodex (bicalutamide) to derive resistant (CDXR) clones. In a second step, we cultured CDXR cells in the presence of the androgen R1881, which generated androgen- and Casodex-insensitive (IS) cells. These cells were then characterized with regard to AR function and the effect of ectopic AR expression or AR knockdown on androgen sensitivity.. CDXR cells showed increased AR expression and transcriptional activity. CDXR cell proliferation was unaffected by Casodex but was repressed by androgen in vitro and in vivo. IS cells, on the other hand, had greatly reduced AR expression and activity compared to CDXR cells. Knockdown of AR expression in CDXR cells produced cells that were insensitive to androgen. Conversely, re-expression of AR in IS cells regenerated cells that were repressed by androgen. Knockdown of AR expression in 104-S cells produced cells that remained stimulated by androgen, while overexpression of AR in 104-S cells generated an androgen-repressed phenotype but did not confer androgen-independent growth.. Increased AR expression determines whether prostate cancer cells are repressed by androgen, but is not required for androgen independence. These results may have implications for anti-AR therapy for prostate cancer.

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Androgens; Anilides; Animals; Cell Cycle; Cell Growth Processes; Cell Line, Tumor; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p27; Disease Progression; Humans; Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins; Male; Metribolone; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent; Nitriles; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms; Receptors, Androgen; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; RNA, Messenger; Testosterone; Tosyl Compounds

The androgen receptor (AR) is essential for development of the male gender and in the growth of the majority of prostate cancers. Agonists as well as most antagonists induce translocation of the receptor to the nucleus, whereas only agonists can activate AR function. Antagonists are therefore used in the therapy of metastasized prostate cancer. To obtain insight into the mechanism by which antagonists block AR function in living cells, we studied nuclear mobility and localization of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged AR in the presence of either the agonist R1881 or the antagonists bicalutamide and hydroxyflutamide. As controls we investigated a non-DNA-binding AR mutant (A573D) and two mutants (W741C and T877A) with broadened ligand specificity. We demonstrate that in the presence of R1881, AR localizes in numerous intranuclear foci and, using complementary fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) approaches and computer modelling, that a fraction of AR ( approximately 10-15%) is transiently immobilized in a DNA-binding-dependent manner (individual ARs being immobile for approximately 45 seconds). By contrast, antagonist-bound GFP-AR showed no detectable immobile fraction and the mobility was similar to that of the R1881-liganded non-DNA-binding mutant (A573D), indicating that antagonists do not induce the relatively stable DNA-binding-dependent immobilization observed with agonist-bound AR. Moreover, in the presence of bicalutamide and hydroxyflutamide GFP-AR was homogeneously distributed in the nucleus. Binding of bicalutamide and hydroxyflutamide to GFP-AR(W741C) and GFP-AR(T877A), respectively, resulted in similar mobility and heterogeneous nuclear distribution as observed for R1881-liganded GFP-AR. The live cell studies indicate that the investigated antagonists interfere with events early in the transactivation function of the AR.

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Androgen Receptor Antagonists; Androgens; Anilides; Blotting, Western; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cell Line, Tumor; Cells, Cultured; Computer Simulation; DNA; DNA-Binding Proteins; DNA, Neoplasm; Flutamide; Green Fluorescent Proteins; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Male; Metribolone; Nitriles; Prostatic Neoplasms; Receptors, Androgen; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Tosyl Compounds

We examined the three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) of a group of endogenous and synthetic compounds for the androgen receptor (AR) using comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). The goal of these studies was to identify structural features necessary for high binding affinity and optimization of selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs). A homology model of the AR was used as a scaffold to align six lead compounds that served as templates for alignment of the remaining 116 structures prior to CoMFA modeling. The conventional r(2) and cross-validated q(2) relating observed and predicted relative binding affinity (RBA) were 0.949 and 0.593, respectively. Comparison of predicted and observed RBA for a test set of 10 compounds resulted in an r(2) of 0.954, demonstrating the excellent predictive ability of the model. These integrated homology modeling and CoMFA studies identified critical amino acids for SARM interactions and provided QSAR data as the basis for mechanistic studies of AR structure, function, and design of optimized SARMs.

Topics: Anilides; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Ligands; Models, Molecular; Molecular Conformation; Molecular Structure; Nitriles; Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship; Quinolines; Receptors, Androgen; Static Electricity; Steroids; Tosyl Compounds

The androgen receptor co-activator CREB (cAMP-response element binding protein)-binding protein (CBP) enhances androgen receptor activity after stimulation by androgenic hormones and androgen receptor antagonists. The aim of the present study was to investigate the regulation of CBP expression by steroid and peptide hormones in prostate cancer. For this purpose, LNCaP cells were treated with the synthetic androgen methyltrienolone (R1881), epidermal growth factor, insulin-like growth factor-I or interleukin-6 (IL-6). CBP protein and mRNA expression were studied by western blotting and real-time PCR, respectively. CBP expression was also investigated in tissue specimens obtained from 26 patients with therapy-resistant carcinoma of the prostate. In LNCaP cells, CBP protein was down-regulated by R1881 or IL-6. The non-steroidal anti-androgen bicalutamide antagonized the effects of R1881 and the Janus kinase inhibitor AG 490 reversed the effects of IL-6. In contrast, neither R1881 nor IL-6 caused any effect on CBP expression in the PC-3 cell line. In LNCaP cells, the inhibition of CBP expression by R1881 or IL-6 was also observed at the mRNA level. CBP protein was detected in all 26 specimens by immunohistochemistry. The results suggest that up-regulation of CBP during androgen ablation may be relevant to the failure of endocrine therapy in patients with prostate carcinoma.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androgen Antagonists; Anilides; Cell Line, Tumor; CREB-Binding Protein; Down-Regulation; Enzyme Inhibitors; Epidermal Growth Factor; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Humans; Immunohistochemistry; Insulin-Like Growth Factor I; Interleukin-6; Male; Metribolone; Nitriles; Nuclear Proteins; Prostatic Neoplasms; Receptors, Androgen; RNA, Messenger; RNA, Neoplasm; Tosyl Compounds; Trans-Activators; Tyrphostins; Up-Regulation

3,3'-Diindolylmethane (DIM) is a major digestive product of indole-3-carbinol, a potential anticancer component of cruciferous vegetables. Our results indicate that DIM exhibits potent antiproliferative and antiandrogenic properties in androgen-dependent human prostate cancer cells. DIM suppresses cell proliferation of LNCaP cells and inhibits dihydrotestosterone (DHT) stimulation of DNA synthesis. These activities were not produced in androgen-independent PC-3 cells. Moreover, DIM inhibited endogenous PSA transcription and reduced intracellular and secreted PSA protein levels induced by DHT in LNCaP cells. Also, DIM inhibited, in a concentration-dependent manner, the DHT-induced expression of a prostate-specific antigen promoter-regulated reporter gene construct in transiently transfected LNCaP cells. Similar effects of DIM were observed in PC-3 cells only when these cells were co-transfected with a wild-type androgen receptor expression plasmid. Using fluorescence imaging with green fluorescent protein androgen receptor and Western blot analysis, we demonstrated that DIM inhibited androgen-induced androgen receptor (AR) translocation into the nucleus. Results of receptor binding assays indicated further that DIM is a strong competitive inhibitor of DHT binding to the AR. Results of structural modeling studies showed that DIM is remarkably similar in conformational geometry and surface charge distribution to an established synthetic AR antagonist, although the atomic compositions of the two substances are quite different. Taken together with our published reports of the estrogen agonist activities of DIM, the present results establish DIM as a unique bifunctional hormone disrupter. To our knowledge, DIM is the first example of a pure androgen receptor antagonist from plants.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Androgen Antagonists; Anilides; Animals; Anticarcinogenic Agents; Binding, Competitive; Cell Division; Cell Nucleus; Cytoplasm; Dihydrotestosterone; DNA; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Indoles; Male; Metribolone; Nitriles; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms; Receptors, Androgen; RNA, Messenger; Signal Transduction; Testosterone Congeners; Tosyl Compounds; Transcription, Genetic; Tumor Cells, Cultured; Vegetables

Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) is an enzyme involved in beta-oxidation of branched-chain fatty acids and bile acid intermediates. Recent work has identified AMACR as a new diagnostic marker for prostate cancer (PCa). The data from the present study suggest that AMACR is also functionally important for the growth of PCa cells. Overexpressed AMACR from both clinical tissues and PCa cell lines is wild type by sequence analysis and functionally active by enzymatic assay. Correspondingly, enzyme activity of AMACR increases approximately 4-fold in PCa in comparison with adjacent normal prostate. Small interference RNA (siRNA) against AMACR, but not the control inverted siRNA, reduced the expression of AMACR and significantly impaired proliferation of the androgen-responsive PCa cell line LAPC-4. No effect was observed in HeLaS3 cells, which express AMACR at a low level. Cell cycle analyses revealed a G(2)-M cell cycle arrest in LAPC-4 cells treated with siRNA compared with mock treatment or control inverted siRNA. Expression of a siRNA-resistant form of AMACR in LAPC-4 cells protects the cells from growth arrest after AMACR-specific siRNA treatment. Data from Western blotting and luciferase-based reporter assays suggest that the function and expression of AMACR are independent of androgen receptor-mediated signaling. Moreover, simultaneous inhibition of both the AMACR pathway by siRNA and androgen signaling by means of androgen withdrawal or antiandrogen suppressed the growth of LAPC-4 cells to a greater extent than either treatment alone. Taken together, these data suggest that AMACR is essential for optimal growth of PCa cells in vitro and that this enzyme has the potential to be a complementary target with androgen ablation in PCa treatment.

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Androgens; Anilides; Cell Division; Cell Line, Tumor; Humans; Male; Metribolone; Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent; Nitriles; Prostatic Neoplasms; Racemases and Epimerases; Receptors, Androgen; RNA, Small Interfering; Testosterone Congeners; Tosyl Compounds; Transfection

We used rat prostate cancer cell stable transfectants that lacked either endogenous fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-1 secondary to constitutive expression of FGF-1 antisense RNA (aFa2-transfectants) or endogenous FGF-2 isoforms secondary to constitutive expression of FGF-2 antisense RNA (bFa9-transfectants) to examine the potential synergistic effects of mitogen and androgen as modulators of proliferation. During culture on 5% charcoal-stripped fetal bovine serum (CS-FBS), FGF-1 caused a 2- to 2.5-fold increase in the proliferation of aFa2-transfectants that lacked endogenous FGF-1 and retained full expression of FGF-2 isoforms. In marked constrast, bFa9-transfectants that lacked FGF-2 isoforms and retained full expression of FGF-1 died with exponential kinetics when cultured on either 5% CS-FBS or 5% FBS in the absence of FGF-2. However, FGF-2 promoted bFa9-transfectant survival and exponential proliferation during culture on either 5% CS-FBS or 5% FBS. The nonmetabolizable androgen R1881 did not affect proliferation of either the aFa2- transfectants, the bFa9-transfectants, or the parental prostate cancer cells used to generate these transfectants. Additionally, neither of the androgen receptor antagonists RU23908 or bicalutamide affected either FGF-1-mediated aFa2-transfectant proliferation or FGF-2-mediated bFa9-transfectant proliferation during culture on 5% CS-FBS. Notably, transient transfection analyses established R1881 concentration-dependent induction of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase activity in both aFa2-transfectants and bFa9-transfectants. Thus, the failure of either androgen or antiandrogen to affect either FGF-mediated or FGF-independent antisense-transfectant proliferation is not attributable to absence of functional androgen receptors. The results indicate that FGF effects in these androgen-resistant antisense transfectants do not involve either androgen-dependent or androgen-independent, mitogen-mediated androgen receptor activation. Our studies show that these rat prostate cancer cells are characterized by both retention of functional androgen receptors during development of androgen resistance and mitogen-mediated, autocrine or paracrine (or both) modulated proliferation. These are two prominent properties characteristic of advanced human prostate cancer.

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Anilides; Animals; Cell Division; Cell Survival; Culture Media, Serum-Free; Fibroblast Growth Factor 1; Fibroblast Growth Factor 2; Gene Expression Regulation; Humans; Imidazoles; Imidazolidines; Male; Metribolone; Nitriles; Prostatic Neoplasms; Rats; Receptors, Androgen; Testosterone Congeners; Tosyl Compounds; Transfection; Tumor Cells, Cultured

Androgens, like progestins, are 3-ketosteroids with structural differences restricted to the 17beta substituent in the steroid D-ring. To better understand the specific recognition of ligands by the human androgen receptor (hAR), a homology model of the ligand-binding domain (LBD) was constructed based on the progesterone receptor LBD crystal structure. Several mutants of residues potentially involved in the specific recognition of ligands in the hAR were constructed and tested for their ability to bind agonists. Their transactivation capacity in response to agonist (R1881) and antagonists (cyproterone acetate, hydroxyflutamide, and ICI 176344) was also measured. Substitution of His(874) by alanine, only marginally impairs the ligand-binding and transactivation capacity of the hAR receptor. In contrast, mutations of Thr(877) and, to a greater extent, Asn(705) perturb ligand recognition, alter transactivation efficiency, and broaden receptor specificity. Interestingly, the N705A mutant acquires progesterone receptor (PR) properties for agonist ligands but, unlike wild type AR and PR, loses the capacity to repress transactivation with nonsteroidal antagonists. Models of the hAR.LBD complexes with several ligands are presented, which suggests new directions for drug design.

Topics: Amino Acid Sequence; Androgen Antagonists; Androgen Receptor Antagonists; Androgens; Anilides; Binding Sites; Computer Simulation; Cyproterone Acetate; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Flutamide; Humans; Ligands; Metribolone; Models, Molecular; Molecular Sequence Data; Nitriles; Progesterone; Promegestone; Receptors, Androgen; Sequence Alignment; Tosyl Compounds; Transcriptional Activation

In addition to modulation of cell proliferation and stimulation of prostate-specific antigen secretion, one of the most striking effects of androgens on the human prostate cancer cell line LNCaP is the accumulation of neutral lipids. These lipids are synthesized de novo, suggesting that LNCaP cells express all enzymes required for endogenous lipogenesis and that the expression and/or activity of some of these enzymes is affected by androgens. One of the key enzymes involved in lipogenesis is fatty acid synthase (FAS), a potential prognostic enzyme and therapeutic target that is found to be frequently overexpressed in a variety of cancers including prostate cancer. Here, using Northern blot analysis, the gene encoding FAS is shown to be abundantly expressed in LNCaP cells and in two other prostate cancer cell lines tested (PC-3 and DU-145). In LNCaP cells, androgen treatment (10(-8) M R1881) causes a 3-4-fold increase in FAS mRNA levels. Concomitantly with the increase in FAS gene expression, androgens induce a 10-12-fold stimulation of FAS activity. Effects are dose- and time-dependent and follow courses similar to those of the androgen induction of lipid accumulation. In support of the involvement of the androgen receptor, steroid specificity of regulation of FAS activity is in agreement with the aberrant ligand specificity of the mutated androgen receptor in LNCaP cells. Stimulation of FAS activity is inhibited by the antiandrogen Casodex (bicalutamide) and is absent in the androgen receptor-negative cell lines PC-3 and DU-145. Taken together, these data demonstrate that androgens, mediated by the androgen receptor, stimulate the expression and activity of FAS and suggest that stimulation of FAS activity represents at least part of the mechanism by which androgens induce the accumulation of neutral lipids in LNCaP cells.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Androgen Antagonists; Androgens; Anilides; Dihydrotestosterone; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Enzyme Induction; Fatty Acid Synthases; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Humans; Lipids; Male; Metribolone; Nandrolone; Neoplasm Proteins; Nitriles; Prostatic Neoplasms; Receptors, Androgen; Testosterone; Testosterone Congeners; Tosyl Compounds; Tumor Cells, Cultured

Sex steroids control the proliferation of their target cells through two different pathways: 1) proliferative response (Step-1); and 2) inhibition of cell proliferation (Step-2). Mechanisms of cell proliferation regulation are incompletely understood; however, there is general agreement with the notion that sex steroid receptors play an important role in the control of the proliferation of sex steroid target cells. To test this hypothesis, a full human androgen receptor (AR) vector was transfected into human breast cancer MCF7 cells. The cloned cells that stably express the AR, called MCF7-AR1 cells, contained approximately five times more AR than the wild-type MCF7 cells from which they were derived. These AR-transfected cells retained their capacity to proliferate when estrogens were added to 10% charcoal-dextran stripped human serum but did not acquire the ability to proliferate when androgens were added to this medium. In serumless medium (ITDME), these cells proliferated maximally, as MCF7 cells did; however, natural and synthetic androgens prevented the AR-transfected cells from proliferating. Inhibition of cell proliferation occurred when physiological androgen concentrations (1 nM) were added to ITDME; this effect was almost completely reversed by Casodex, a synthetic androgen antagonist. Under the effect of androgens added to ITDME, MCF7-AR1 cells were arrested in the G0/G1 phase within 24 h. These data suggest that: 1) the androgen-induced inhibition of cell proliferation (Step-2) is AR-mediated; and 2) the AR may be necessary, but not sufficient, to mediate the androgen-induced proliferative response (Step-1).

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Androgens; Anilides; Blotting, Western; Breast Neoplasms; Cell Cycle; Cell Division; Dihydrotestosterone; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Flutamide; Humans; In Vitro Techniques; Metribolone; Nandrolone; Nitriles; Receptors, Androgen; Testosterone; Testosterone Congeners; Tosyl Compounds; Transfection; Tumor Cells, Cultured

We investigated modulation of androgen receptor (AR) activity in prostatic tumor cells by luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH)-induced increase of the intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) level.. AR transactivation activity was assessed in transiently transfected DU-145 and in LNCaP cells.. LHRH and cAMP derivative, respectively, induced reporter gene activity to about 15% of the maximal level in DU-145 cells transfected with an AR expression vector and an androgen-inducible reporter gene. LHRH or the cAMP analogue acted synergistically in combination with low concentrations of androgen thus lowering the androgen concentration required for maximal AR activation by a factor of 100. A similar activation of the AR by cAMP analogue was observed in LNCaP cells when enhancement of androgen-induced secretion of prostate-specific antigen was determined. The two nonsteroidal antiandrogens hydroxyflutamide and Casodex(R) inhibited reporter gene activity.. The AR is synergistically activated by low doses of androgen and LHRH or the second messenger cAMP. This may have implications for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer.

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Anilides; Bucladesine; Cell Line; Chloramphenicol O-Acetyltransferase; Cyclic AMP; Flutamide; Genes, Reporter; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Kinetics; Male; Metribolone; Nitriles; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms; Receptors, Androgen; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Testosterone Congeners; Tosyl Compounds; Transcriptional Activation; Transfection; Tumor Cells, Cultured

Aberrant activation of the androgen receptor (AR) may be one of the mechanisms which contribute to progression of prostatic carcinoma to an androgen-independent stage. We investigated effects of growth factors on stimulation of the AR-mediated gene transcription in human prostatic tumor cell lines. DU-145 cells, which do not contain endogenous AR, were cotransfected with an androgen-inducible chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter gene and an AR expression vector. The reporter gene (CAT) was driven either by artificial promoters consisting of one or two androgen-responsive elements in front of a TATA box or by the promoter of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) gene, a naturally occurring androgen-inducible promoter. Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), at a concentration of 50 ng/ml, stimulated AR-mediated reporter gene transcription to the same extent as the synthetic androgen methyltrienolone. This growth factor was effective irrespective of the nature of the androgen-inducible promoter. Keratinocyte growth factor (KGF) and epidermal growth factor (EGF), at concentrations of 50 ng/ml, activated CAT reporter gene transcription only in experiments in which the artificial promoter with two androgen-responsive elements was used. Insulin-like growth factor-II and basic fibroblast growth factor displayed no effect on AR-mediated gene transcription. None of the growth factors stimulated reporter gene activity in control experiments when added to cells cotransfected with the CAT gene and an empty expression vector. AR activation by IGF-I, KGF, and EGF was completely inhibited by the pure AR antagonist casodex, showing that these effects are AR mediated. Activation of endogenous AR by growth factors was studied in the LNCaP cell line by determination of PSA secretion. IGF-I, at a concentration of 50 ng/ml, increased the PSA level in the supernatant of this cell line 5-fold. Again, the IGF-I effect on PSA secretion was blocked by casodex. Our results provide evidence that IGF-I, KGF, and EGF directly activate the AR in the absence of androgens, which means that the androgen-signaling chain may be activated by growth factors in an androgen-depleted environment. These findings may have implications for endocrine therapy for metastatic prostatic carcinoma.

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Anilides; Chloramphenicol O-Acetyltransferase; Epidermal Growth Factor; Fibroblast Growth Factor 10; Fibroblast Growth Factor 7; Fibroblast Growth Factors; Genes, Reporter; Growth Substances; Humans; Insulin-Like Growth Factor I; Male; Metribolone; Nitriles; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms; Receptors, Androgen; Signal Transduction; Tosyl Compounds; Transfection; Tumor Cells, Cultured

LNCaP cells contain androgen receptors with a mutation in the steroid binding domain (Thr 868 changed to Ala) resulting in a changed hormone specificity. Both the wild-type and mutated androgen receptors were transfected into COS cells. Transcription activation was studied in cells co-transfected with an androgen sensitive reporter (CAT) gene. The wild-type androgen receptor was activated by the agonist R1881, but the antiandrogens did not enhance transcription apart from a partial agonistic effect at high concentrations of cyproterone acetate. The mutated androgen receptor was fully activated by R1881, cyproterone acetate and hydroxyflutamide, but not by ICI 176,334. Receptor transformation to a tight nuclear binding state was studied by preparation of detergent washed nuclei and Western blotting with a specific antibody against the androgen receptor. Nuclei of COS cells transfected with wild-type receptor retained the receptor when the cells had been treated with the agonist R1881, partially retained receptors when treated with antiandrogen cyproterone acetate, but did not retain receptor when treated with hydroxyflutamide or ICI 176,334. The cells transfected with the mutated receptor additionally retained nuclear receptors after treatment with hydroxyflutamide. We conclude that each one of the three antiandrogens tested displayed different characteristics with respect to its effect on transformation and transcription activation.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Alanine; Amino Acid Sequence; Androgen Antagonists; Anilides; Animals; Blotting, Western; Cell Line; Cell Nucleus; Chloramphenicol O-Acetyltransferase; Cyproterone Acetate; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Flutamide; Humans; Male; Metribolone; Mutagenesis, Site-Directed; Nitriles; Point Mutation; Prostatic Neoplasms; Receptors, Androgen; Recombinant Proteins; Threonine; Tosyl Compounds; Transcription, Genetic; Transfection; Transformation, Genetic; Tumor Cells, Cultured