meropenem has been researched along with tebipenem* in 5 studies
1 review(s) available for meropenem and tebipenem
Article | Year |
---|---|
Comparative review of the carbapenems.
The carbapenems are beta-lactam antimicrobial agents with an exceptionally broad spectrum of activity. Older carbapenems, such as imipenem, were often susceptible to degradation by the enzyme dehydropeptidase-1 (DHP-1) located in renal tubules and required co-administration with a DHP-1 inhibitor such as cilastatin. Later additions to the class such as meropenem, ertapenem and doripenem demonstrated increased stability to DHP-1 and are administered without a DHP-1 inhibitor. Like all beta-lactam antimicrobial agents, carbapenems act by inhibiting bacterial cell wall synthesis by binding to and inactivating penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs). Carbapenems are stable to most beta-lactamases including AmpC beta-lactamases and extended-spectrum beta-lactamases. Resistance to carbapenems develops when bacteria acquire or develop structural changes within their PBPs, when they acquire metallo-beta-lactamases that are capable of rapidly degrading carbapenems, or when changes in membrane permeability arise as a result of loss of specific outer membrane porins. Carbapenems (imipenem, meropenem, doripenem) possess broad-spectrum in vitro activity, which includes activity against many Gram-positive, Gram-negative and anaerobic bacteria; carbapenems lack activity against Enterococcus faecium, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Compared with imipenem, meropenem and doripenem, the spectrum of activity of ertapenem is more limited primarily because it lacks activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterococcus spp. Imipenem, meropenem and doripenem have in vivo half lives of approximately 1 hour, while ertapenem has a half-life of approximately 4 hours making it suitable for once-daily administration. As with other beta-lactam antimicrobial agents, the most important pharmacodynamic parameter predicting in vivo efficacy is the time that the plasma drug concentration is maintained above the minimum inhibitory concentration (T>MIC). Imipenem/cilastatin and meropenem have been studied in comparative clinical trials establishing their efficacy in the treatment of a variety of infections including complicated intra-abdominal infections, skin and skin structure infections, community-acquired pneumonia, nosocomial pneumonia, complicated urinary tract infections, meningitis (meropenem only) and febrile neutropenia. The current role for imipenem/cilastatin and meropenem in therapy remains for use in moderate to severe nosocomial and p Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Infections; beta-Lactams; Carbapenems; Doripenem; Ertapenem; Humans; Imipenem; Meropenem; Thienamycins | 2007 |
4 other study(ies) available for meropenem and tebipenem
Article | Year |
---|---|
Impact of acquired broad-spectrum β-lactamases on susceptibility to oral penems/carbapenems (tebipenem, sulopenem, and faropenem) alone or in combination with avibactam and taniborbactam β-lactamase inhibitors in
The impact of β-lactamases on susceptibility to oral penems/carbapenems (tebipenem, sulopenem, and faropenem) and other carbapenem molecules was evaluated in Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azabicyclo Compounds; beta-Lactamase Inhibitors; beta-Lactamases; Carbapenems; Escherichia coli; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests | 2023 |
The continued evolution of bacterial resistance to the β-lactam class of antibiotics has necessitated countermeasures to ensure continued effectiveness in the treatment of infections caused by bacterial pathogens. One relatively successful approach has been the development of new β-lactam analogs with advantages over prior compounds in this class. The carbapenems are an example of such β-lactam analogs possessing improved stability against β-lactamase enzymes and, therefore, a wider spectrum of activity. However, all carbapenems currently marketed for adult patients are intravenous agents, and there is an unmet need for an oral agent to treat patients that otherwise do not require hospitalization. Tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide (tebipenem-PI-HBr or SPR994) is an orally available prodrug of tebipenem, a carbapenem with activity versus multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative pathogens, including quinolone-resistant and extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Topics: Adult; Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Carbapenems; Humans; Meropenem; Mice; Urinary Tract Infections | 2020 |
In vitro activity of tebipenem, a new oral carbapenem antibiotic, against beta-lactamase-nonproducing, ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae.
In vitro activity of tebipenem, a new oral carbapenem antibiotic, against clinical Haemophilus influenzae isolates was compared with those of 8 reference agents. Isolates were classified into 6 resistance classes after PCR identification of beta-lactamase genes and ftsI gene mutations. For all isolates, the minimal concentration at which 90% of isolates were inhibited was lower for tebipenem than for the reference oral antibiotics, except for cefditoren. Tebipenem also showed excellent bactericidal activity against beta-lactamase-nonproducing, ampicillin-resistant isolates. Topics: Ampicillin Resistance; Bacterial Proteins; beta-Lactamases; Carbapenems; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Haemophilus influenzae; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Polymerase Chain Reaction | 2010 |
[Relationship between protein binding and antimicrobial activities of antibiotics against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae].
Fifty isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae and 42 isolates of Haemophilus influenzae were isolated from the blood of children admitted to pediatric wards of hospitals in subprefucture between January 1998 and December 2005. The susceptibilities were measured by a microbroth dilution method using a standard broth and a broth containing 4.5% albumin. Against S. pneumoniae, penicillin G, ampicillin, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, panipenem, meropenem, vancomycin, cefditoren, cefcapene, cefteram, faropenem and tebipenem were used and against H. influenzae, ampicillin, piperacillin, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, panipenem, meropenem, clavulanic acid/ amoxicillin, cefditoren, cefcapene, cefteram, faropenem and tebipenem were used. Against S. pneumoniae, tebipenem was the highest antimicrobial activity in oral antibiotics (MIC90; < or = 0.06 microg/ml) and panipenem showed the highest activity for intravenous antibiotics (MIC90; < or = 0.12 microg/ml). Against H. influenzae, cefditoren was the highest activity for oral antibiotics (MIC90; < or = 0.06 microg/ml) and meropenem showed the highest activity for intravenous antibiotics (MIC90; < or = 50.06 microg/ml). The MIC90s measured by albumin containing broth were higher than those measured by standard broth. Protein binding rates of ceftriaxone, cefditoren, and faropenem were greater than 90%, and the MIC90 of these antibiotics measured by albumin addition methods were over 4-fold higher than those measured by standard methods. Topics: Administration, Oral; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Carbapenems; Cephalosporins; Child; Haemophilus influenzae; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Protein Binding; Streptococcus pneumoniae; Thienamycins | 2006 |