meropenem and eravacycline

Which antimicrobial agents provide the optimal efficacy, safety, and tolerability for the empirical treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) remains unclear but is paramount in the context of evolving antimicrobial resistance. Therefore, updated meta-analyses on this issue are warranted.. We systematically searched four major electronic databases from their inception through October 2022. Randomized controlled trials examining antimicrobial agents for cIAI treatment were included. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of included studies utilizing the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool as described in the updated version 1 of the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook and extracted data from all manuscripts according to a predetermined list of topics. All meta-analyses were conducted using R software. The primary outcome was clinical success rate in patients with cIAIs.. Forty-five active-controlled trials with low to medium methodological quality and involving 14,267 adults with cIAIs were included in the network meta-analyses. The vast majority of patients with an acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score < 10 had low risk of treatment failure or death. Twenty-one regimens were investigated. In the network meta-analyses, cefepime plus metronidazole was more effective than tigecycline and ceftolozane/tazobactam plus metronidazole (odds ratio [OR] = 1.96, 95% credibility interval [CrI] 1.05 ~ 3.79; OR = 3.09, 95% CrI 1.02 ~ 9.79, respectively). No statistically significant differences were found among antimicrobial agents regarding microbiological success rates. Cefepime plus metronidazole had lower risk of all-cause mortality than tigecycline (OR = 0.22, 95% CrI 0.05 ~ 0.85). Statistically significant trends were observed favoring cefotaxime plus metronidazole, which exhibited fewer discontinuations because of adverse events (AEs) when compared with eravacycline, meropenem and ceftolozane/tazobactam plus metronidazole (OR = 0.0, 95% CrI 0.0 ~ 0.8; OR = 0.0, 95% CrI 0.0 ~ 0.7; OR = 0.0, 95% CrI 0.0 ~ 0.64, respectively). Compared with tigecycline, eravacycline was associated with fewer discontinuations because of AEs (OR = 0.17, 95% CrI 0.03 ~ 0.81). Compared with meropenem, ceftazidime/avibactam plus metronidazole had a higher rate of discontinuation due to AEs (OR = 2.09, 95% CrI 1.0 ~ 4.41). In pairwise meta-analyses, compared with ceftriaxone plus metronidazole, ertapenem and moxifloxacin (one trial, OR = 1.93, 95% CI 1.06 ~ 3.50; one trial, OR = 4.24, 95% CI 1.18 ~ 15.28, respectively) were associated with significantly increased risks of serious AEs. Compared with imipenem/cilastatin, tigecycline (four trials, OR = 1.57, 95%CI 1.07 ~ 2.32) was associated with a significantly increased risk of serious AEs. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve, Cefepime plus metronidazole was more likely to be optimal among all treatments in terms of efficacy and safety, tigecycline was more likely to be worst regimen in terms of tolerability, and eravacycline was more likely to be best tolerated.. This study suggests that cefepime plus metronidazole is optimal for empirical treatment of patients with cIAIs and that tigecycline should be prescribed cautiously considering the safety and tolerability concerns. However, it should be noted that data currently available on the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of antimicrobial agents pertain mostly to lower-risk patients with cIAIs.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Infective Agents; Cefepime; Humans; Intraabdominal Infections; Meropenem; Metronidazole; Network Meta-Analysis; Tazobactam; Tigecycline

Antimicrobial resistance is a growing threat to public health and an increasingly common problem for acute care physicians to confront. Several novel antibiotics have been approved in the past decade to combat these infections; however, physicians may be unfamiliar with how to appropriately utilize them. The purpose of this review is to evaluate novel antibiotics active against resistant gram-negative bacteria and highlight clinical information regarding their use in the acute care setting. This review focuses on novel antibiotics useful in the treatment of infections caused by resistant gram-negative organisms that may be seen in the acute care setting. These novel antibiotics include ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/cilistatin/relebactam, cefiderocol, plazomicin, eravacycline, and omadacycline. Acute care physicians should be familiar with these novel antibiotics so they can utilize them appropriately.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azabicyclo Compounds; Boronic Acids; Cefiderocol; Ceftazidime; Cephalosporins; Cilastatin, Imipenem Drug Combination; Drug Combinations; Drug Design; Drug Resistance, Multiple; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring; Humans; Meropenem; Sisomicin; Tazobactam; Tetracyclines

The present work aims to examine the worrying problem of antibiotic resistance and the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacterial strains, which have now become really common in hospitals and risk hindering the global control of infectious diseases. After a careful examination of these phenomena and multiple mechanisms that make certain bacteria resistant to specific antibiotics that were originally effective in the treatment of infections caused by the same pathogens, possible strategies to stem antibiotic resistance are analyzed. This paper, therefore, focuses on the most promising new chemical compounds in the current pipeline active against multidrug-resistant organisms that are innovative compared to traditional antibiotics: Firstly, the main antibacterial agents in clinical development (Phase III) from 2017 to 2020 are listed (with special attention on the treatment of infections caused by the pathogens

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; beta-Lactamase Inhibitors; Boronic Acids; Cefiderocol; Cephalosporins; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Clostridioides difficile; Clostridium Infections; Drug Design; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Fluoroquinolones; Gonorrhea; Humans; Meropenem; Neisseria gonorrhoeae; Nitroimidazoles; Sisomicin; Tetracyclines

Eravacycline (Xerava™), a novel fully synthetic fluorocycline, consists of the tetracyclic core scaffold with unique modifications in the tetracyclic D ring; consequently, it exhibits potent in vitro activity against Gram-positive and -negative bacterial strains expressing certain common tetracycline-specific acquired resistance mechanisms. In vitro, eravacycline exhibits potent activity against a broad spectrum of clinically relevant Gram-positive and -negative aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Intravenous eravacycline is approved in several countries for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) in adult patients. In two pivotal double-blind, multinational trials in this patient population, eravacycline (infusion ≈ 1 h) was noninferior to intravenous ertapenem or meropenem at the test-of-cure visit in terms of clinical response rates in all prespecified populations. Eravacycline had an acceptable tolerability profile, with infusion site reactions, nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea the most commonly reported adverse reactions, most of which were of mild to moderate severity. Given its broad spectrum of activity against common clinically relevant pathogens (including those expressing certain tetracycline- and other antibacterial-specific acquired resistance mechanisms) and its more potent in vitro activity and better tolerability profile than tigecycline, eravacycline provides a novel emerging option for the treatment of adult patients with cIAIs, especially as empirical therapy when coverage of resistant pathogens is required.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Ertapenem; Humans; Intraabdominal Infections; Meropenem; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Tetracyclines; Tigecycline

The increasing prevalence of infections due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative bacteria constitutes a serious threat to global public health due to the limited treatment options available and the historically slow pace of development of new antimicrobial agents. Infections due to MDR strains are associated with increased morbidity and mortality and prolonged hospitalization, which translates to a significant burden on healthcare systems. In particular, MDR strains of Enterobacteriaceae (especially Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli), Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii have emerged as particularly serious concerns. In the United States, MDR strains of these organisms have been reported from hospitals throughout the country and are not limited to a small subset of hospitals. Factors that have contributed to the persistence and spread of MDR gram-negative bacteria include the following: overuse of existing antimicrobial agents, which has led to the development of adaptive resistance mechanisms by bacteria; a lack of good antimicrobial stewardship such that use of multiple broad-spectrum agents has helped perpetuate the cycle of increasing resistance; and a lack of good infection control practices. The rising prevalence of infections due to MDR gram-negative bacteria presents a significant dilemma in selecting empiric antimicrobial therapy in seriously ill hospitalized patients. A prudent initial strategy is to initiate treatment with a broad-spectrum regimen pending the availability of microbiological results allowing for targeted or narrowing of therapy. Empiric therapy with newer agents that exhibit good activity against MDR gram-negative bacterial strains such as tigecycline, ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, and others in the development pipeline offer promising alternatives to existing agents.

Topics: Acinetobacter baumannii; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Boronic Acids; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enterobacteriaceae Infections; Escherichia coli; Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring; Hospitals; Humans; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Meropenem; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Sisomicin; Tetracyclines; Thienamycins

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; beta-Lactamases; Carbapenems; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Enterobacteriaceae; Ertapenem; Female; Humans; Intraabdominal Infections; Male; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Tetracyclines; Young Adult

Increasing antimicrobial resistance among pathogens that cause complicated intraabdominal infections (cIAIs) supports the development of new antimicrobials. Eravacycline, a novel member of the fluorocycline family, is active against multidrug-resistant bacteria including extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae.. IGNITE4 was a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Hospitalized patients with cIAI received either eravacycline 1 mg/kg every 12 hours or meropenem 1 g every 8 hours intravenously for 4-14 days. The primary objective was to demonstrate statistical noninferiority (NI) in clinical cure rates at the test-of-cure visit (25-31 days from start of therapy) in the microbiological intent-to-treat population using a NI margin of 12.5%. Microbiological outcomes and safety were also evaluated.. Eravacycline was noninferior to meropenem in the primary endpoint (177/195 [90.8%] vs 187/205 [91.2%]; difference, -0.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -6.3 to 5.3), exceeding the prespecified margin. Secondary endpoints included clinical cure rates in the modified ITT population (231/250 [92.4%] vs 228/249 [91.6%]; difference, 0.8; 95% CI, -4.1, 5.8) and the clinically evaluable population (218/225 [96.9%] vs 222/231 [96.1%]; (difference, 0.8; 95% CI -2.9, 4.5). In patients with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae, clinical cure rates were 87.5% (14/16) and 84.6% (11/13) in the eravacycline and meropenem groups, respectively. Eravacycline had relatively low rates of adverse events for a drug of this class, with less than 5%, 4%, and 3% of patients experiencing nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, respectively.. Treatment with eravacycline was noninferior to meropenem in adult patients with cIAI, including infections caused by resistant pathogens.. NCT01844856.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Disease Management; Female; Humans; Intraabdominal Infections; Male; Meropenem; Tetracyclines; Time-to-Treatment; Treatment Outcome

New tetracycline derivatives exhibit broad-spectrum antimicrobial activities. This study aimed to assess the in vitro activity of eravacycline against common Enterobacterales.. Clinical Enterobacterales isolates were collected between 2017 and 2021. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined using a broth microdilution test.. This study provides the MIC and susceptibility rate of eravacycline for common Enterobacterales. Eravacycline could be a therapeutic choice for cefotaxime non-susceptible or meropenem non-susceptible Enterobacterales, especially K. oxytoca, C. freundii, and E. coli.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefotaxime; Escherichia coli; Humans; Klebsiella oxytoca; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Taiwan; Tigecycline

The

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Ceftazidime; Colistin; Cystic Fibrosis; Drug Synergism; Humans; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests

The increase in carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections is of great concern because of limited treatment options. New antimicrobials were recently approved for clinical therapy. This study evaluated the epidemiology of carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae isolates collected at a Greek university hospital during 2017-2020, and their susceptibilities to ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ/AVI), meropenem-vaborbactam (M/V), imipenem-relebactam (I/R), eravacycline, plazomicin, and comparators.. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were evaluated by Etest. Only colistin MICs were determined by the broth microdilution method. Carbapenemase genes were detected by PCR. Selected isolates were typed by multilocus sequence typing (MLST).. A total of 266 carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae strains were isolated during the 4-year study period. Among them, KPC was the most prevalent (75.6%), followed by NDM (11.7%), VIM (5.6%), and OXA-48 (4.1%). KPC-producing isolates belonged mainly to ST258 and NDM producers belonged to ST11, whereas OXA-48- and VIM producers were polyclonal. Susceptibility to tigecycline, fosfomycin, and colistin was 80.5%, 83.8%, and 65.8%, respectively. Of the novel agents tested, plazomicin was the most active inhibiting 94% of the isolates at ≤ 1.5 μg/ml. CAZ/AVI and M/V inhibited all KPC producers and I/R 98.5% of them. All OXA-48 producers were susceptible to CAZ/AVI and plazomicin. The novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BLBLIs) tested were inactive against MBL-positive isolates, while eravacycline inhibited 61.3% and 66.7% of the NDM and VIM producers, respectively.. KPC remains the predominant carbapenemase among K. pneumoniae, followed by NDM. Novel BLBLIs, eravacycline, and plazomicin are promising agents for combating infections by carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae. However, the emergence of resistance to these agents highlights the need for continuous surveillance and application of enhanced antimicrobial stewardship.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azabicyclo Compounds; Bacterial Proteins; beta-Lactamases; Boronic Acids; Ceftazidime; Drug Combinations; Humans; Imipenem; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Multilocus Sequence Typing; Sisomicin; Tetracyclines

Concerns regarding carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CR-Kp), especially in bloodstream infections (BSIs), are continuing to increase worldwide. Several novel agents with activity against BSI CR-Kp have been approved or are in late-stage clinical development. In this study, the antibacterial effects of ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA), aztreonam/avibactam (AZA), meropenem/vaborbactam (MEV), imipenem-cilastatin/relebactam (ICR) and eravacycline (ERV) against three colistin-resistant CR-Kp (COLR-Kp) and four CZA-resistant CR-Kp (CZAR-Kp) were tested by time-kill assay. Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC® BAA-1705TM was used as a control strain. Two COLR-Kp isolates carried the blaKPC-2 gene and four CAZR-Kp isolates carried metallo-β-lactamase genes. The results revealed that ERV resulted in re-growth of seven tested isolates. CZA and MEV showed a bactericidal effect against isolates harbouring blaKPC-2. ICR reduced the population of six isolates to >5 log10 CFU/mL compared with the initial count. AZA showed a bactericidal effect (>5 log10 CFU/mL) against seven isolates and a bacteriostatic effect (<3 log10 CFU/mL) against one CZAR-Kp isolate. Therefore, AZA and ICR are effective therapeutic candidates for COLR-Kp and CZAR-Kp isolates.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azabicyclo Compounds; Aztreonam; Bacteremia; beta-Lactamase Inhibitors; Boronic Acids; Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae; Ceftazidime; Cilastatin; Colistin; Drug Combinations; Humans; Imipenem; Klebsiella Infections; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Tetracyclines

Topics: Humans; Intraabdominal Infections; Meropenem; Prospective Studies; Tetracyclines

Topics: Bacterial Infections; Humans; Intraabdominal Infections; Meropenem; Prospective Studies; Tetracyclines

Members of the tetracycline class are frequently classified as bacteriostatic. However, recent findings have demonstrated an improved antibacterial killing profile, often achieving ≥3 log10 bacterial count reduction, when such antibiotics have been given for periods longer than 24 h. We aimed to study this effect with eravacycline, a novel fluorocycline, given in an immunocompetent murine thigh infection model over 72 h against two methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates (eravacycline MICs = 0.03 and 0.25 μg/ml) and three Enterobacteriaceae isolates (eravacycline MICs = 0.125 to 0.25 μg/ml). A humanized eravacycline regimen, 2.5 mg/kg of body weight given intravenously (i.v.) every 12 h (q12h), demonstrated progressively enhanced activity over the 72-h study period. A cumulative dose response in which bacterial density was reduced by more than 3 log10 CFU at 72 h was noted over the study period in the two Gram-positive isolates, and eravacycline performed similarly to comparator antibiotics (tigecycline, linezolid, and vancomycin). A cumulative dose response with eravacycline and comparators (tigecycline and meropenem) over the study period was also observed in the Gram-negative isolates, although more variability in bacterial killing was observed for all antibacterial agents. Overall, a bacterial count reduction of ≥3 log was achieved in one of the three isolates with both eravacycline and tigecycline, while meropenem achieved a similar endpoint against two of the three isolates. Bactericidal activity is typically defined in vitro over 24 h; however, extended regimen studies in vivo may demonstrate an improved correlation with clinical outcomes by better identification of antimicrobial effects.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Gram-Positive Bacteria; Linezolid; Meropenem; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Minocycline; Staphylococcus aureus; Tetracyclines; Thienamycins; Tigecycline; Vancomycin

Eravacycline (formerly TP-434) was evaluated in vitro against pre-established biofilms formed by a uropathogenic Escherichia coli strain. Biofilms were eradicated by 0.5 μg/ml eravacycline, which was within 2-fold of the MIC for planktonic cells. In contrast, colistin and meropenem disrupted biofilms at 32 and 2 μg/ml, respectively, concentrations well above their respective MICs of 0.5 and 0.03 μg/ml. Gentamicin and levofloxacin eradicated biofilms at concentrations within 2-fold of their MICs.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Biofilms; Colistin; Colony Count, Microbial; Escherichia coli Infections; Gentamicins; Humans; Levofloxacin; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Tetracyclines; Thienamycins; Urinary Tract Infections; Uropathogenic Escherichia coli