meropenem and avibactam

With the current carbapenem-resistant organism crisis, conventional approaches to optimizing pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic parameters are frequently inadequate, and traditional salvage agents (eg, colistin, tigecycline, etc) confer high toxicity and/or have low efficacy. However, several β-lactam agents with activity against carbapenem-resistant organisms were approved recently by the US Food and Drug Administration, and more are anticipated to be approved in the near future. The primary goal of this review is to assist infectious disease practitioners with preferentially selecting 1 agent over another when treating patients infected with a carbapenem-resistant organism. However, resistance to some of these antibiotics has already developed. Antibiotic stewardship programs can ensure that they are reserved for situations in which other options are lacking and are paramount for the survival of these agents.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azabicyclo Compounds; Aztreonam; Boronic Acids; Carbapenems; Cefiderocol; Ceftazidime; Cephalosporins; Cilastatin, Imipenem Drug Combination; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring; Meropenem; Tazobactam

Avibactam, a novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor, restores the in vitro activity of ceftazidime against class A, C and some class D β-lactamase-producing pathogens, including those commonly associated with complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs). This randomized, active-controlled, double-blind, Phase II trial (NCT00752219) aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ceftazidime/avibactam plus metronidazole compared with meropenem in hospitalized patients with cIAI.. Adults with confirmed cIAI requiring surgical intervention and antibiotics were randomized 1 : 1 to receive intravenously either (i) 2000 mg of ceftazidime plus 500 mg of avibactam plus a separate infusion of 500 mg of metronidazole or (ii) 1000 mg of meropenem plus placebo every 8 h for a minimum of 5 days and a maximum of 14 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was the clinical response in microbiologically evaluable (ME) patients at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit 2 weeks after the last dose of study therapy.. Overall, 101 patients received ceftazidime/avibactam plus metronidazole; 102 received meropenem. The median duration of treatment was 6.0 and 6.5 days, respectively. Favourable clinical response at the TOC visit in the ME population was observed in 91.2% (62/68) and 93.4% (71/76) of patients in the ceftazidime/avibactam plus metronidazole and meropenem groups, respectively (observed difference: -2.2%; 95% CI: -20.4%, 12.2%). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar for ceftazidime/avibactam plus metronidazole (64.4%) and meropenem (57.8%).. Ceftazidime/avibactam plus metronidazole was effective and generally well tolerated in patients with cIAI, with a favourable clinical response rate in the ME population of >90%, similar to that of meropenem.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azabicyclo Compounds; Ceftazidime; Double-Blind Method; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Humans; Intraabdominal Infections; Male; Meropenem; Metronidazole; Middle Aged; Placebos; Thienamycins; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Antibiotic resistance has become a public health problem to be solved worldwide and metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing bacteria make this problem even more challenging.. The interactions of meropenem (MEM) in combination with avibactam (AVI) in growth inhibition on MBL-producing carbapenem-resistant. All strains were multi-drug resistant strains and six of them were proved to produce MBLs. We show that the combination of MEM+AVI generates profound synergistic effects on growth inhibition of all strains, which was better than that of MEM+vaborbactam or imipenem+relebactam. The time-kill curves further confirmed the potent synergistic antibacterial effects of MEM+AVI against MBL-producing CRKP strains.. To our knowledge, this study is the first report of MEM+AVI collaborating against MBL-producing CRKP strains. Our findings showed that the combination of MEM+AVI has the potential for antibiotic drug development to combat MBL-producing pathogens.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azabicyclo Compounds; beta-Lactamases; Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae; Ceftazidime; Drug Combinations; Humans; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests

Two of the three recently approved β-lactam agent (BL)/β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combinations have higher CLSI susceptibility breakpoints (ceftazidime/avibactam 8 mg/L; meropenem/vaborbactam 4 mg/L) compared with the BL alone (ceftazidime 4 mg/L; meropenem 1 mg/L). This can lead to a therapeutic grey area on susceptibility reports depending on resistance mechanism. For instance, a meropenem-resistant OXA-48 isolate (MIC 4 mg/L) may appear as meropenem/vaborbactam-susceptible (MIC 4 mg/L) despite vaborbactam's lack of OXA-48 inhibitory activity.. OXA-48-positive (n = 51) and OXA-48-negative (KPC, n = 5; Klebsiella pneumoniae wild-type, n = 1) Enterobacterales were utilized. Susceptibility tests (broth microdilution) were conducted with ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam, as well as their respective BL partner. Antimicrobial activity of all six agents was evaluated in the murine neutropenic thigh model using clinically relevant exposures. Efficacy was assessed as the change in bacterial growth at 24 h, compared with 0 h controls.. On average, the three BL/BLI agents resulted in robust bacteria killing among OXA-48-negative isolates. Among OXA-48-positive isolates, poor in vivo activity with imipenem/relebactam was concordant with its resistant phenotypic profile. Variable meropenem/vaborbactam activity was observed among isolates with a 'susceptible' MIC of 4 mg/L. Only 30% (7/23) of isolates at meropenem/vaborbactam MICs of 2 and 4 mg/L met the ≥1-log bacterial reduction threshold predictive of clinical efficacy in serious infections. In contrast, ceftazidime/avibactam resulted in marked bacterial density reduction across the range of MICs, and 96% (49/51) of isolates exceeded the ≥1-log bacterial reduction threshold.. Data demonstrate that current imipenem/relebactam and ceftazidime/avibactam CLSI breakpoints are appropriate. Data also suggest that higher meropenem/vaborbactam breakpoints relative to meropenem can translate to potentially poor clinical outcomes in patients infected with OXA-48-harbouring isolates.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azabicyclo Compounds; beta-Lactamase Inhibitors; beta-Lactamases; Ceftazidime; Drug Combinations; Genotype; Imipenem; Lactams; Meropenem; Mice; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Phenotype

With the increase in drug resistance rates of pathogens isolated from complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs), ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is increasingly used clinically. However, given the high drug cost and the fact that not yet covered by the health insurance payment, this study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of CAZ-AVI plus metronidazole versus meropenem as a first-line empiric treatment for cIAIs from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.. A decision analytic model with a one-year time horizon was constructed to assess the cost-effectiveness based on the entire disease course. Model inputs were mainly obtained from clinical studies, published literature, and publicly available databases. Primary outcomes were cost, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), life years (Lys), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were also performed.. In the base cases, compared to meropenem, CAZ-AVI plus metronidazole had a shorter mean hospital length of stay (-0.77 days per patient) and longer life expectancy (+0.05 LYs and +0.06 QALYs). CAZ-AVI plus metronidazole had an ICER of $25517/QALY, which is well below the threshold of $31509 per QALY in China. The one-way sensitivity analysis showed that the change of the treatment duration of CAZ-AVI plus metronidazole was the parameter that most influenced the results of the ICER. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, CAZ-AVI plus metronidazole was the optimal strategy in 75% of simulations at $31510/QALY threshold.. CAZ-AVI plus metronidazole could be considered as a cost-effective option for the empiric treatment of patients with cIAIs in China, and this benefit will be more evident when the price of CAZ-AVI decreases by 23.8%.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Ceftazidime; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Intraabdominal Infections; Meropenem; Metronidazole; Microbial Sensitivity Tests

Evaluate the in vivo efficacy and resistance prevention of cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam, ampicillin/sulbactam and meropenem using human-simulated regimens (HSR) in the murine infection model.. In total, 15 clinical A. baumannii were assessed: cefiderocol MICs, 2 mg/L (previously developed resistance on therapy), n = 3; 8 mg/L, n = 2; ≥32 mg/L, n = 10 (including VEB and PER-harbouring isolates). Mice received inactive control, cefiderocol, cefiderocol + ceftazidime/avibactam (C-CZA), cefiderocol + ampicillin/sulbactam (C-SAM) or cefiderocol + meropenem (C-MEM) HSRs. The mean change in log10 cfu/thigh compared with starting inoculum was assessed. Resistance development on treatment was a >4-fold increase in MIC relative control animals. In vitro activities of combinations were assessed by disc stacking.. Against cefiderocol-non-susceptible isolates, combinations produced significant kill with C-CZA -3.75 ± 0.37 reduction in log10 cfu/thigh, C-SAM produced -3.55 ± 0.50 and C-MEM produced -2.18 ± 1.75 relative to baseline. Elevated MICs in cefiderocol treated animals occurred in three out of three isolates with MICs of 2 mg/L. Of these isolates, one developed elevated MICs with C-MEM compared with none treated with C-CZA or C-SAM. Disc stacking with C-CZA or C-SAM returned all isolates to at least the CLSI intermediate breakpoint, which may correlate with in vivo efficacy.. Against cefiderocol-non-susceptible isolates, cefiderocol + ceftazidime/avibactam or ampicillin/sulbactam HSR produced in vivo kill against all 12 cefiderocol-non-susceptible isolates. Cefiderocol with ceftazidime/avibactam or ampicillin/sulbactam prevented the development of resistance during treatment against cefiderocol-high-end-susceptible isolates with a propensity for resistance on therapy. These data support the clinical evaluation of cefiderocol with ceftazidime/avibactam or ampicillin/sulbactam against A. baumannii, including multi-drug-resistant isolates.

Topics: Acinetobacter baumannii; Ampicillin; Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azabicyclo Compounds; Cefiderocol; Ceftazidime; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Humans; Meropenem; Mice; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Sulbactam

In this study, we aimed to clarify the evolutionary trajectory of a Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) population during β-lactam antibiotic therapy. Five KPC-Kp isolates were collected from a single patient. Whole-genome sequencing and a comparative genomics analysis were performed on the isolates and all

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azabicyclo Compounds; Bacterial Proteins; beta-Lactamases; Cefiderocol; Ceftazidime; Drug Combinations; Humans; Klebsiella; Klebsiella Infections; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Moxalactam

Little is known regarding outcomes and optimal therapeutic regimens of infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) and susceptible to meropenem (MEM). Although susceptible to MEM in vitro, the possibility of developing MEM resistance overtime is a concern. We describe the clinical characteristics of patients with colonization/infection due to KPC variants with a focus on the in vitro activity of fosfomycin (FOS)-containing combinations.. Patients with colonization/infection due to a KPC variant were included. Fosfomycin susceptibility was performed by agar dilution method. Synergistic activity of FOS-based combinations was evaluated by gradient strip-agar diffusion method. The emergence of in vitro MEM resistance was also tested.. Eleven patients were included: eight with infection [four with ventilator-associated pneumonia and four with bloodstream infections] and three with colonization. Previous therapy with CZA was administered to all patients (with a mean cumulative duration of 23 days). All subjects with infection received meropenem, in monotherapy (n = 4) or with amikacin (n = 2) or fosfomycin (n = 2), and achieved clinical cure. A new CZA-susceptible and MEM-resistant KPC-Kp strain was subsequently isolated in three patients (27.3%). Meropenem/vaborbactam (MVB) showed high in vitro activity, while FOS+MEM combination was synergistic in 40% of cases. In vitro resistance to MEM was observed with maintenance of CZA resistance.. Detection of KPC variants may occur within the same patient, especially if CZA has been previously administered. Although clinical success has been obtained with carbapenems, the emergence of MEM resistance is a concern. Fosfomycin plus meropenem is synergistic and may be a valuable combination option for KPC variants, while MVB may be considered in monotherapy. The detection of KPC variants in an endemic setting for KPC-Kp represents a worryingly emerging condition. The optimal therapeutic approach is still unknown and the development of meropenem resistance is of concern, which may lead to therapeutic failure in clinical practice. In these cases, the addition of fosfomycin to meropenem, or a more potent antibiotic, such as meropenem/vaborbactam, may be valuable therapeutic options.

Topics: Agar; Ceftazidime; Fosfomycin; Humans; Klebsiella Infections; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Meropenem

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Infective Agents; Ceftazidime; Cephalosporins; Drug Combinations; Humans; Leadership; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Pseudomonas Infections; Tazobactam

To assess the global and regional distribution of ESBLs in Enterobacterales and carbapenemases in Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.. Antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates collected from ATLAS (2017-2019) was determined per CLSI guidelines. Enterobacterales exhibiting meropenem MICs ≥2 mg/L and/or ceftazidime/avibactam and/or aztreonam/avibactam MICs ≥16 mg/L, Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae with aztreonam and/or ceftazidime MICs ≥2 mg/L, and P. aeruginosa with meropenem MICs ≥4 mg/L were screened for β-lactamases by PCR and sequencing.. Globally, ESBL-positive E. coli (23.7%, 4750/20047) and K. pneumoniae (35.1%, 6055/17229) carried predominantly the CTX-M-15 variant (E. coli: 53.9%; K. pneumoniae: 80.0%) with highest incidence in Africa/Middle East (AfME). Among carbapenem-resistant (CR) E. coli (1.1%, 217/20047) and Enterobacter cloacae (3.8%, 259/6866), NDMs were predominant (E. coli in AfME: 62.5%; E. cloacae in Asia Pacific: 59.7%). CR K. pneumoniae (13.3%, 2299/17 229) and P. aeruginosa (20.3%, 4187/20 643) carried predominantly KPC (30.9%) and VIM (14.7%), respectively, with highest frequency in Latin America. Among ESBL-positive Enterobacterales, susceptibility to ceftazidime/avibactam (>90.0%) and amikacin (>85.0%) was higher than to piperacillin/tazobactam (>45.0%) and ciprofloxacin (>7.4%). In CR Enterobacterales, susceptibility to amikacin (>54.0%) and ceftazidime/avibactam (>31.0%) was higher than to ciprofloxacin (>2.7%) and piperacillin/tazobactam (>0.5%). CR P. aeruginosa similarly demonstrated higher susceptibility to amikacin (63.4%) and ceftazidime/avibactam (61.9%) than to ciprofloxacin (26.2%) and piperacillin/tazobactam (25.3%).. Varied distribution of resistance genotypes across regions among ESBL-positive Enterobacterales and CR Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa provide crucial insights on major resistance mechanisms and trends observed in recent years. Continued surveillance is warranted for monitoring global dissemination and resistance.

Topics: Amikacin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azabicyclo Compounds; Aztreonam; beta-Lactamases; Ceftazidime; Ciprofloxacin; Drug Combinations; Escherichia coli; Incidence; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Nosocomial infection caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CR-A. baumannii) has become a challenge in clinical practice. Acting as the last resort antibacterial agents for the treatment of CR-A. baumannii infection, polymyxins have high risk of nephrotoxicity and poor clinical efficacy. Ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam are three β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination complexes that newly approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infection. In this study, we analyzed the in vitro activity of those novel antibacterial agents alone or in combination with polymyxin B against the CR-A. baumannii obtained from a Chinese tertiary hospital. Our results suggest that those novel antibacterial agents should not be used alone for the treatment of CR-A. baumannii infection, as they cannot prevent the regrowth of bacteria at the clinical achievable blood concentration. Imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam should not be used as the substitutes of imipenem and meropenem for polymyxin B based combination therapy against CR-A. baumannii, since they have no edge over imipenem and meropenem on antibacterial activity when in combination with polymyxin B. Ceftazidime/avibactam may be more suitable than ceftazidime for polymyxin B based combination therapy against CR-A. baumannii, as it has a higher synergistic rate with polymyxin B, and the antibacterial activity of ceftazidime/avibactam is much higher than that of ceftazidime when tested in combination with polymyxin B. Ceftazidime/avibactam may also be the better choice than imipenem and meropenem for polymyxin B based combination therapy against CR-A. baumannii, as it has a higher synergistic rate with polymyxin B.

Topics: Acinetobacter baumannii; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azabicyclo Compounds; beta-Lactamase Inhibitors; Carbapenems; Ceftazidime; Drug Combinations; Imipenem; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Polymyxin B

We evaluated the in vivo efficacy of human-simulated regimens (HSRs) of cefiderocol, ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem and ceftazidime/avibactam/meropenem combination against Guiana-extended spectrum (GES)-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates.. Eighteen P. aeruginosa isolates producing GES-1 (n = 5), GES-5 (n = 5) or miscellaneous GESs (combinations of GES-19, GES-20 and/or GES-26; n = 8) were evaluated. In vitro MIC testing was determined using broth microdilution. In a validated murine thigh infection model, HSRs of cefiderocol 2 g q8h as a 3 h IV infusion, ceftazidime/avibactam 2.5 g q8h as a 2 h IV infusion, meropenem 2 g q8h as a 3 h IV infusion or ceftazidime/avibactam/meropenem were administered. Change in bacterial burden relative to baseline and the proportion of isolates in each genotypic group meeting 1-log10 kill endpoint were assessed.. Modal MICs (mg/L) ranged from 0.125 to 1 for cefiderocol, 4 to >64 for ceftazidime/avibactam and 2 to >64 for meropenem. Cefiderocol produced >1-log10 of kill against all 18 tested isolates. Meropenem was active against all GES-1 isolates whereas activity against GES-5 and miscellaneous GESs was lacking, consistent with the MICs. Ceftazidime/avibactam was active against all GES-1 and GES-5 isolates and retained activity against 62.5% of miscellaneous GESs including isolates with elevated MICs. For isolates where ceftazidime/avibactam failed, the addition of meropenem restored the in vivo efficacy.. As monotherapy, cefiderocol was active in vivo against all tested isolates. The activities of meropenem or ceftazidime/avibactam alone were variable; however, a combination of both was active against all isolates. Cefiderocol and ceftazidime/avibactam/meropenem could be valuable therapeutic options for GES-producing P. aeruginosa infections. Clinical confirmatory data are warranted.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azabicyclo Compounds; beta-Lactamases; Cefiderocol; Ceftazidime; Drug Combinations; Humans; Meropenem; Mice; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Pseudomonas; Pseudomonas aeruginosa

The cell envelope of Gram-negative bacteria belonging to the Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) presents unique restrictions to antibiotic penetration. As a consequence, Bcc species are notorious for causing recalcitrant multidrug-resistant infections in immunocompromised individuals. Here, we present the results of a genome-wide screen for cell envelope-associated resistance and susceptibility determinants in a Burkholderia cenocepacia clinical isolate. For this purpose, we construct a high-density, randomly-barcoded transposon mutant library and expose it to 19 cell envelope-targeting antibiotics. By quantifying relative mutant fitness with BarSeq, followed by validation with CRISPR-interference, we profile over a hundred functional associations and identify mediators of antibiotic susceptibility in the Bcc cell envelope. We reveal connections between β-lactam susceptibility, peptidoglycan synthesis, and blockages in undecaprenyl phosphate metabolism. The synergy of the β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination ceftazidime/avibactam is primarily mediated by inhibition of the PenB carbapenemase. In comparison with ceftazidime, avibactam more strongly potentiates the activity of aztreonam and meropenem in a panel of Bcc clinical isolates. Finally, we characterize in Bcc the iron and receptor-dependent activity of the siderophore-cephalosporin antibiotic, cefiderocol. Our work has implications for antibiotic target prioritization, and for using additional combinations of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors that can extend the utility of current antibacterial therapies.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; beta-Lactamase Inhibitors; beta-Lactamases; Ceftazidime; Drug Combinations; Humans; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests

The impact of β-lactamases on susceptibility to oral penems/carbapenems (tebipenem, sulopenem, and faropenem) and other carbapenem molecules was evaluated in

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azabicyclo Compounds; beta-Lactamase Inhibitors; beta-Lactamases; Carbapenems; Escherichia coli; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests

Antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is complex and multifaceted. While the novel β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) avibactam, relebactam and vaborbactam inhibit serine-based β-lactamases, the comparative potency of the novel β-lactam (BL)/BLI combinations against serine carbapenemase-producing P. aeruginosa is unknown.. To compare the in vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftazidime, imipenem/relebactam, imipenem, meropenem/vaborbactam and meropenem against serine β-lactamase-producing P. aeruginosa.. Carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa were collated through the Enhancing Rational Antimicrobials against Carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (ERACE-PA) Global Surveillance. Isolates positive for serine-based carbapenemases were assessed. MICs were determined by broth microdilution to each novel BL/BLI and BL alone.. GES was the most common carbapenemase identified (n = 59) followed by KPC (n = 8). Ceftazidime/avibactam had MIC50/MIC90 values of 4/8 mg/L and 91% of isolates were susceptible. Conversely, ceftazidime alone was active against only 3% of isolates. The MIC50/MIC90 of imipenem/relebactam were 16/>16 mg/L and 13% of all isolates were defined as susceptible. Of the KPC-producing isolates, 38% were susceptible to imipenem/relebactam, compared with 0% to imipenem. The meropenem/vaborbactam MIC50/MIC90 were >16/>16 mg/L, and 6% of isolates were susceptible, which was similar to meropenem alone (MIC50/90, >8/>8 mg/L; 3% susceptible) suggesting the addition of vaborbactam cannot overcome co-expressed, non-enzymatic resistance mechanisms.. Among the novel BL/BLIs, ceftazidime/avibactam displayed better in vitro activity and thus is a rational treatment option for serine carbapenemase-harbouring P. aeruginosa. While imipenem/relebactam displayed some activity, particularly against isolates with blaKPC, meropenem/vaborbactam exhibited poor activity, with MICs similar to meropenem alone.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azabicyclo Compounds; beta-Lactamase Inhibitors; beta-Lactamases; Carbapenems; Ceftazidime; Drug Combinations; Imipenem; Lactams; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Pseudomonas aeruginosa

In February 2022, a critically ill patient colonized with a carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae producing KPC-3 and VIM-1 carbapenemases was hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 in the intensive care unit of Policlinico Umberto I hospital in Rome, Italy. During 95 days of hospitalization, ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, and cefiderocol were administered consecutively to treat 3 respiratory tract infections sustained by different bacterial agents. Those therapies altered the resistome of K. pneumoniae sequence type 512 colonizing or infecting the patient during the hospitalization period. In vivo evolution of the K. pneumoniae sequence type 512 resistome occurred through plasmid loss, outer membrane porin alteration, and a nonsense mutation in the cirA siderophore gene, resulting in high levels of cefiderocol resistance. Cross-selection can occur between K. pneumoniae and treatments prescribed for other infective agents. K. pneumoniae can stably colonize a patient, and antimicrobial-selective pressure can promote progressive K. pneumoniae resistome evolution, indicating a substantial public health threat.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Proteins; beta-Lactamases; Cefiderocol; Ceftazidime; Humans; Italy; Klebsiella Infections; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests

Small molecule adjuvants that enhance the activity of established antibiotics represent promising agents in the battle against antibiotic resistance. Adjuvants generally act by inhibiting antibiotic resistance processes, and specifying the process acted on is a critical step in defining an adjuvant's mechanism of action. This step is typically carried out biochemically by identifying molecules that bind adjuvants and then inferring their roles in resistance. Here, we present a complementary genetic strategy based on identifying mutations that both sensitize cells to antibiotic and make them "adjuvant blind." We tested the approach in Acinetobacter baumannii AB5075 using two adjuvants: a well-characterized β-lactamase inhibitor (avibactam) and a compound enhancing outer membrane permeability (aryl 2-aminoimidazole AI-1). The avibactam studies showed that the adjuvant potentiated one β-lactam (ceftazidime) through action on a single β-lactamase (GES-14) and a second (meropenem) by targeting two different enzymes (GES-14 and OXA-23). Mutations impairing disulfide bond formation (DsbAB) also reduced potentiation, possibly by impairing β-lactamase folding. Mutations reducing AI-1 potentiation of canonical Gram-positive antibiotics (vancomycin and clarithromycin) blocked lipooligosaccharide (LOS/LPS) synthesis or its acyl modification. The results indicate that LOS-mediated outer membrane impermeability is targeted by the adjuvant and show the importance of acylation in the resistance. As part of the study, we employed Acinetobacter baylyi as a model to verify the generality of the A. baumannii results and identified the principal resistance genes for ceftazidime, meropenem, vancomycin, and clarithromycin in A. baumannii AB5075. Overall, the work provides a foundation for analyzing adjuvant action using a comprehensive genetic approach.

Topics: Acinetobacter baumannii; Anti-Bacterial Agents; beta-Lactamases; Ceftazidime; Clarithromycin; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Vancomycin

The treatment of infections caused by OXA-48/CTX-M-coproducing Enterobacterales may be based on new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors, such as ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA), or on high dose of meropenem (MER). However, bacterial density at the infection site may vary widely, and the inoculum effect of such antimicrobial strategies has never been specifically investigated. To determine if CZA or MER susceptibilities are impacted by high inocula of Enterobacterales co-expressing both enzymes: OXA-48 like and CTX-M.. Thirty-nine isolates of ceftazidime-resistant Enterobacterales were included of which 27 (70%) co-expressed OXA-48 + CTX-M-15, 6 (15%) OXA-48 + CTX-M-14, and 6 (15%) OXA-181 + CTX-M-15. The susceptibility to the CZA combination was preserved whatever the inoculum used. Regarding MER, 24 (61.5%) of the isolates were susceptible to MER with the standard inoculum, 19 (48.7%) with a twofold increase, and only 15 (38.5%) with a tenfold increase.. We showed that in vitro inoculum effect was observed with meropenem but not with CZA for OXA-48- combined with CTX-M-producing Enterobacterales.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azabicyclo Compounds; beta-Lactamase Inhibitors; beta-Lactamases; Ceftazidime; Drug Combinations; Enterobacteriaceae; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests

Two out of the three recently approved β-lactam (BL)/β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) have higher CLSI susceptibility breakpoints (ceftazidime/avibactam 8 mg/L; meropenem/vaborbactam 4 mg/L) compared with the BL alone (ceftazidime 4 mg/L; meropenem 1 mg/L). This can lead to a therapeutic grey area on susceptibility reports depending on resistance mechanism. For instance, a meropenem-resistant OXA-48 isolate (MIC 4 mg/L) may appear as meropenem/vaborbactam-susceptible (MIC 4 mg/L) despite vaborbactam's lack of OXA-48 inhibitory activity.. OXA-48-positive (n = 51) and OXA-48-negative (KPC, n = 5; Klebsiella pneumoniae WT, n = 1) Enterobacterales were utilized. Susceptibility tests (broth microdilution) were conducted with ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam, as well as their respective BL partner. Antimicrobial activity of all six agents was evaluated in the murine neutropenic thigh model using clinically relevant exposures. Efficacy was assessed as the change in bacterial growth at 24 h, compared with 0 h controls.. On average, the three BL/BLI agents resulted in robust bacteria killing among OXA-48-negative isolates. Among OXA-48-positive isolates, poor in vivo activity with imipenem/relebactam was concordant with its resistant phenotypic profile. Variable meropenem/vaborbactam activity was observed among isolates with a 'susceptible' MIC of 4 mg/L. Only 30% (7/23) of isolates at meropenem/vaborbactam MICs of 2 and 4 mg/L met the ≥1 log bacterial reduction threshold predictive of clinical efficacy in serious infections. In contrast, ceftazidime/avibactam resulted in marked bacterial density reduction across the range of MICs and 73% (37/51) of isolates exceeded the ≥1 log bacterial reduction threshold.. Data demonstrate that current imipenem/relebactam and ceftazidime/avibactam CLSI breakpoints are appropriate. Data also suggest that higher meropenem/vaborbactam breakpoints relative to meropenem can translate to potentially poor clinical outcomes in patients infected with OXA-48-harbouring isolates.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azabicyclo Compounds; beta-Lactamase Inhibitors; beta-Lactamases; Boronic Acids; Ceftazidime; Drug Combinations; Genotype; Imipenem; Lactams; Meropenem; Mice; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Phenotype

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) represent a public health concern. The limited antimicrobial options against CPE have led to the development of novel antimicrobial molecules. In the present study, we characterized the genetic determinants associated with the resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI), meropenem/vaborbactam (MER-VAB), imipenem/relebactam (IMI-REL) and cefiderocol (CFD) in a carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae strain isolated from a critically ill patient.. Genomic DNA was sequenced using Illumina iSeq 100 and Minion Oxford Nanopore platforms. Assemblies were performed with a de novo approach using short-read, hybrid and long-lead assembly approaches. Final assembly was manually curated and carefully verified. Circular elements were screened for antimicrobial-resistance genes, porins, virulence factors and prophage regions.. KPC-Kp (KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae) BO743 was resistant to all novel β-lactams including CAZ-AVI, MER-VAB, IMI-REL and CFD. The genome of strain BO743 is composed of a single chromosome of 5 347 606 bp and three circular plasmids of 363 634 bp (pBO743-363Kb), 120 290 bp (pBO743-120Kb) and 54 339 bp (pBO743-54Kb). Sequence analysis demonstrated that KPC-Kp BO743 co-harboured bla. The description of the genome of KPC-Kp cross-resistant to novel βL-βLICs and cefiderocol reveals the presence of numerous antimicrobial resistance genes including bla

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azabicyclo Compounds; Boronic Acids; Cefiderocol; Ceftazidime; Cephalosporins; Critical Illness; Humans; Imipenem; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests

To evaluate the in vivo killing profile of human-simulated exposures of ceftazidime, ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem against GES-harbouring Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the murine thigh infection model.. Five P. aeruginosa isolates [three isogenic (GES-1, GES-5 and GES-15) and two clinical (GES-5 and GES-15)] were evaluated. MICs were determined using broth microdilution. Human-simulated regimens (HSRs) of ceftazidime 2 g IV q8h as a 2 h infusion, ceftazidime/avibactam 2.5 g IV q8h as a 2 h infusion and meropenem 2 g IV q8h as a 3 h infusion were administered. Change in bacterial burden relative to baseline was assessed.. Modal MICs ranged from 8 to >64 mg/L for ceftazidime, from 1 to 16 mg/L for ceftazidime/avibactam and from 1 to >64 mg/L for meropenem. In vivo, for the isogenic strains, avibactam augmented ceftazidime activity against the GES-1- and GES-15-harbouring isolates. Both ceftazidime and ceftazidime/avibactam resulted in significant kill against the GES-5 isogenic isolate. The meropenem HSR produced >1 log10 kill against each isogenic isolate (MICs of 1-4 mg/L). Against the GES-5 clinical isolate, ceftazidime and ceftazidime/avibactam resulted in >1 log10 kill compared with bacterial growth with the meropenem HSR. In the clinical isolate harbouring GES-15, the elevated MICs of ceftazidime and ceftazidime/avibactam reduced the effectiveness of both compounds, while the observed reduction in meropenem MIC translated into in vivo efficacy of the HSR regimen, predictive of clinical efficacy.. In GES-harbouring P. aeruginosa, quantitative reductions in bacterial density observed with the translational murine model suggest that the phenotypic profile of ceftazidime, ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem is predictive of clinical efficacy when using the evaluated dosing regimens.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azabicyclo Compounds; Ceftazidime; Drug Combinations; Genotype; Humans; Meropenem; Mice; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Many antibiotics are well known for being associated with adverse events (AEs) of central nervous system, ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) is a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. In this commentary, we analyzed reports of nervous system disorders associated with CAZ/AVI, meropenem, imipenem, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, and cefepime in the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System database from January 2015 to March 2022.. The reporting odds ratios (RORs) method was used to detect the safety signals. Up to 15.62% of CAZ/AVI AEs exhibit nervous system disorders associated with CAZ/AVI. A nervous system disorder signal was detected for CAZ/AVI compared with meropenem, ceftazidime, and ceftriaxone. Compared with meropenem, imipenem, ceftazidime, and ceftriaxone, encephalopathy, myoclonus, reported with CAZ/AVI exhibited significant RORs.. This study found that CAZ/AVI showed a relatively stronger sign nervous system disorder than meropenem, ceftazidime, and ceftriaxone in the real world. The poor clinical outcome of these events should attract clinical attention, especially for patients with older than 65 years old and long treatment courses.

Topics: Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Ceftazidime; Ceftriaxone; Central Nervous System; Drug Combinations; Humans; Imipenem; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Retrospective Studies; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Four new aminothiazole-oximepiperidone cephalosporins (10a-10d) were synthesized, with their in vitro antibacterial activities against hospital isolated Gram-negative bacteria assessed. The results showed that compounds 10a-10d effectively inhibit a variety of Gram-negative bacteria. Compound 10a was the most potent compound, with comparable activity as ceftazidime. The combination of compound 10a and Avibactam was very active against almost all bacteria tested, which including multidrug resistant K. pneumoniae and A. baumannii. Compared to Avycaz, this combination is more potent against ESBL producing K. pneumoniae. Thus, the combination of 10a and Avibactam is of interest for further studies.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azabicyclo Compounds; Cephalosporins; Drug Combinations; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Oximes; Piperidones; Thiazoles

To investigate the increase in the rates of OXA-48-like-producing isolates during 3 years of global surveillance.. Among 55?>162 Enterobacterales isolates, 354 carbapenem-resistant isolates carried genes encoding OXA-48-like enzymes. Isolates were susceptibility tested for ceftazidime/avibactam and comparators by broth microdilution methods. Analysis of β-lactam resistance mechanisms and MLST was performed in silico using WGS data.. OXA-48-like-producing isolates increased from 0.5% (94/18 656) in 2016 to 0.9% (169/18?>808) in 2018. OXA-48 was the most common variant; isolates primarily were Klebsiella pneumoniae (318/354 isolates) from Europe and adjacent countries. MLST analysis revealed a diversity of STs, but K. pneumoniae belonging to ST395, ST23 and ST11 were observed most frequently. Thirty-nine isolates harboured MBLs and were resistant to most agents tested. The presence of blaCTX-M-15 (258 isolates), OmpK35 nonsense mutations (232) and OmpK36 alterations (316) was common among OXA-48 producers. Ceftazidime, cefepime and aztreonam susceptibility rates, when applying CLSI breakpoints, were 12%-15% lower for isolates carrying ESBLs alone and with either or both OmpK35 stop codons and OmpK36 alterations. Meropenem and, remarkably, meropenem/vaborbactam were affected by specific OmpK36 alterations when a deleterious mutation also was observed in OmpK35. These mechanisms caused a decrease of 12%-42% in the susceptibility rates for meropenem and meropenem/vaborbactam. Ceftazidime/avibactam susceptibility rates were >98.9%, regardless of the presence of additional β-lactam resistance mechanisms.. Guidelines for the treatment of infections caused by OXA-48-producing isolates are scarce and, as the dissemination of these isolates continues, studies are needed to help physicians understand treatment options for these infections.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azabicyclo Compounds; beta-Lactamases; Boronic Acids; Ceftazidime; Drug Combinations; Enterobacteriaceae; Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Multilocus Sequence Typing

The limited armamentarium against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli led to the development of a new generation of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BL/BLI).. To evaluate the in vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, and imipenem/relebactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates recovered from patients hospitalized with skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) in several countries around the world.. A total of 360 P. aeruginosa isolates were consecutively collected from 47 medical centers located in Western Europe, Eastern Europe, the Asia-Pacific region, and Latin America. Susceptibility testing was performed by broth microdilution method at a monitoring laboratory. EUCAST breakpoints were applied.. Ceftazidime/avibactam (98.3% susceptible), ceftolozane/tazobactam (98.6% susceptible), and imipenem/relebactam (98.3% susceptible) were the most active compounds after colistin (100.0% susceptible) and retained activity against isolates nonsusceptible to piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem, imipenem, and/or ceftazidime. Meropenem-vaborbactam was active against 94.2% of isolates. Ceftazidime/avibactam was the most active BL/BLI against meropenem-nonsusceptible (92.6% susceptible) and imipenem-resistant (93.8% susceptible) isolates, whereas ceftolozane/tazobactam was the most active BL/BLI against piperacillin/tazobactam-resistant (91.1% susceptible) and ceftazidime-resistant (91.7% susceptible) isolates.. The recently approved BL/BLIs demonstrated potent activity and broad coverage against contemporary P. aeruginosa isolates from patients with SSTIs.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azabicyclo Compounds; Boronic Acids; Ceftazidime; Cephalosporins; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Humans; Imipenem; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Pseudomonas Infections; Soft Tissue Infections; Tazobactam

Ceftazidime-avibactam (C/A), has shown reduction in mortality rates and risk of nephrotoxicity, compared to colistin, conventional therapy.. To estimate the cost-effectiveness of C/A versus colistin + meropenem in the treatment of infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) in Chile.. An economic decision tree type model was adapted. The perspective of the public payer was used with a time horizon of 30 days and extrapolation to life expectancy. The clinical information was derived from an observational study. Medication and care costs correspond to local reports. The results are expressed as incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per life year gained (LYG) and per quality adjusted life year (QALY) in Chilean pesos and US dollars (US$ 1.00 = $792.2218).. 8.65 and 6.48 LYGs and 6.44 and 4.27 QALYs were obtained, for C/A and colistin + meropenem, respectively. The estimated ICER for C/A was $940,488 (US$1,187.2) per AVG and $938,715 (US$1,184.9) per QALY.. Given the lack of publications or evidence, the model is based on an observational study. C/A would reduce the death rate and increase LYGs and QALYs, resulting in a cost-effective alternative vs. colistin + meropenem for CRE.

Topics: Azabicyclo Compounds; Ceftazidime; Chile; Colistin; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Combinations; Enterobacteriaceae; Meropenem

To investigate the susceptibility of imipenem-non-susceptible Escherichia coli (INS-EC), Klebsiella pneumoniae (INS-KP), Acinetobacter baumannii (INS-AB) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (INS-PA) to novel antibiotics.. MICs were determined using the broth microdilution method. Carbapenemase and ESBL phenotypic testing and PCR for genes encoding ESBLs, AmpCs and carbapenemases were performed.. Zidebactam, avibactam and relebactam increased the respective susceptibility rates to cefepime, ceftazidime and imipenem of 17 INS-EC by 58.8%, 58.8% and 70.6%, of 163 INS-KP by 77.9%, 88.3% and 76.1% and of 81 INS-PA by 45.7%, 38.3% and 85.2%, respectively. Vaborbactam increased the meropenem susceptibility of INS-EC by 41.2% and of INS-KP by 54%. Combinations of β-lactams and novel β-lactamase inhibitors or β-lactam enhancers (BLI-BLE) were inactive against 136 INS-AB. In 58 INS-EC and INS-KP with exclusively blaKPC-like genes, zidebactam, avibactam, relebactam and vaborbactam increased the susceptibility of the partner β-lactams by 100%, 96.6%, 84.5% and 75.9%, respectively. In the presence of avibactam, ceftazidime was active in an additional 85% of 20 INS-EC and INS-KP with exclusively blaOXA-48-like genes while with zidebactam, cefepime was active in an additional 75%. INS-EC and INS-KP with MBL genes were susceptible only to cefepime/zidebactam. The β-lactam/BLI-BLE combinations were active against INS-EC and INS-KP without detectable carbapenemases. For INS-EC, INS-KP and INS-AB, tigecycline was more active than omadacycline and eravacycline but eravacycline had a lower MIC distribution. Lascufloxacin and delafloxacin were active in <35% of these INS isolates.. β-Lactam/BLI-BLE combinations were active in a higher proportion of INS-EC, INS-KP and INS-PA. The susceptibility of novel fluoroquinolones and tetracyclines was not superior to that of old ones.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azabicyclo Compounds; Bacterial Proteins; beta-Lactamases; Boronic Acids; Cefepime; Ceftazidime; Cyclooctanes; Drug Combinations; Humans; Imipenem; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Piperidines; Taiwan

The comparative efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem-vaborbactam for treatment of carbapenem-resistant

Topics: Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azabicyclo Compounds; beta-Lactamase Inhibitors; Boronic Acids; Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae; Carbapenems; Ceftazidime; Cohort Studies; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Enterobacteriaceae Infections; Female; Humans; Male; Meropenem; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Urinary Tract Infections

Carbapenem-resistant

Topics: Acylation; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azabicyclo Compounds; Bacterial Proteins; beta-Lactamase Inhibitors; beta-Lactamases; Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae; Carbapenems; Escherichia coli; Humans; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests

Topics: Animals; Azabicyclo Compounds; beta-Lactamase Inhibitors; beta-Lactamases; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Combinations; Drug Synergism; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Moths; Mycobacterium abscessus; Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous; Piperacillin

This study evaluated the in vitro pharmacodynamics of combinations of ceftazidime and the non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor, avibactam, against ceftazidime-, piperacillin/tazobactam- and meropenem-multiresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa by a quantitative time-kill method.. MICs of ceftazidime plus 0-16 mg/L avibactam were determined against eight isolates of P. aeruginosa . Single-compartment, 24 h time-kill kinetics were investigated for three isolates at 0-16 mg/L avibactam with ceftazidime at 0.25-4-fold the MIC as measured at the respective avibactam concentration. Ceftazidime and avibactam concentrations were measured by LC-MS/MS during the time-kill kinetic studies to evaluate drug degradation.. Avibactam alone displayed no antimicrobial activity. MICs of ceftazidime decreased by 8-16-fold in the presence of avibactam at 4 mg/L. The changes in log 10 cfu/mL at both the 10 h and 24 h timepoints (versus 0 h) revealed bacterial killing at ≥1-fold MIC. Significantly higher concentrations of ceftazidime alone, as compared with those of ceftazidime in combination, were required to produce any given kill. Without avibactam, ceftazidime degradation was significant (defined as degradation t 1/2  <   24 h), with as little as 19%   ±   18% of the original concentration remaining at 8 h for the most resistant strain. In combination with avibactam, ceftazidime degradation at ≥ 1-fold MIC was negligible.. The addition of avibactam protected ceftazidime from degradation in a dose-dependent manner and restored its cidal and static activity at concentrations in combination well below the MIC of ceftazidime alone.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azabicyclo Compounds; beta-Lactam Resistance; beta-Lactamase Inhibitors; Ceftazidime; Drug Synergism; Kinetics; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Penicillanic Acid; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Thienamycins

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic pathogen often associated with severe and life-threatening infections that are highly impervious to treatment. This microbe readily exhibits intrinsic and acquired resistance to varied antimicrobial drugs. Resistance to penicillin-like compounds is commonplace and provided by the chromosomal AmpC β-lactamase. A second, chromosomally encoded β-lactamase, PoxB, has previously been reported in P. aeruginosa. In the present work, the contribution of this class D enzyme was investigated using a series of clean in-frame ampC, poxB, and oprD deletions, as well as complementation by expression under the control of an inducible promoter. While poxB deletions failed to alter β-lactam sensitivities, expression of poxB in ampC-deficient backgrounds decreased susceptibility to both meropenem and doripenem but had no effect on imipenem, penicillin, and cephalosporin MICs. However, when expressed in an ampCpoxB-deficient background, that additionally lacked the outer membrane porin-encoding gene oprD, PoxB significantly increased the imipenem as well as the meropenem and doripenem MICs. Like other class D carbapenem-hydrolyzing β-lactamases, PoxB was only poorly inhibited by class A enzyme inhibitors, but a novel non-β-lactam compound, avibactam, was a slightly better inhibitor of PoxB activity. In vitro susceptibility testing with a clinical concentration of avibactam, however, failed to reduce PoxB activity against the carbapenems. In addition, poxB was found to be cotranscribed with an upstream open reading frame, poxA, which itself was shown to encode a 32-kDa protein of yet unknown function.

Topics: Azabicyclo Compounds; Bacterial Proteins; beta-Lactam Resistance; beta-Lactamases; Carbapenems; Gene Deletion; Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial; Imipenem; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Operon; Porins; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Thienamycins

We evaluated the efficacy of NXL104, a novel β-lactamase inhibitor, in combination with ceftazidime (CAZ) in two murine infection models (septicemia and thigh infection). We chose two KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae strains (VA-361 and VA-406) showing MICs of CAZ of ≥256 μg/ml. Septicemia was induced by the intraperitoneal injection of KPC-producing K. pneumoniae followed 30 min later by a single subcutaneous treatment with CAZ alone or CAZ-NXL104 in ratios of 2:1, 4:1, 8:1, and 16:1. In this model, the median effective doses for 50% (ED(50)) of the animals for CAZ alone versus VA-361 and VA-406 were 1,578 and 709 mg/kg of body weight, respectively. When combined with NXL104 at 2:1, 4:1, 8:1, and 16:1 ratios, the CAZ ED(50)s for VA-361 and VA-406 were reduced to 8.1 and 3.5 mg/kg, 15.1 and 3.8 mg/kg, 16.9 and 7.2 mg/kg, and 29.5 and 12.1 mg/kg, respectively. For thigh infection, neutropenia was induced by the intraperitoneal injection of cyclophosphamide at days -4 and -1 preinfection. Infection was established by the intramuscular injection of KPC-producing K. pneumoniae into the right thigh. Mice were treated 1.5 h postinfection with either CAZ alone or CAZ-NXL104 at constant ratios of 4:1. When thighs were removed at 24 h postinfection, a >2-log CFU reduction was observed for mice treated with CAZ-NXL104 at doses of ≥128:32 mg/kg. In contrast, CAZ doses of ≥1,024 mg/kg were unable to reduce the numbers of CFU. Despite resistance to CAZ and possessing a complex β-lactamase background, NXL104 combined with CAZ proved to be very effective in murine models of infection due to contemporary highly resistant KPC-producing K. pneumoniae isolates.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azabicyclo Compounds; Ceftazidime; Disease Models, Animal; Female; Klebsiella Infections; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Mice; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Sepsis