meropenem and arbekacin

meropenem has been researched along with arbekacin* in 3 studies

Other Studies

3 other study(ies) available for meropenem and arbekacin

ArticleYear
[Influence of inoculum size on MICs for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus].
    The Japanese journal of antibiotics, 2011, Volume: 64, Issue:4

    Using 49 clinical methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus isolates (MSSA) and 54 clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates, we examined the change of MIC using five different inocula (2.5-4 x 10(2) cfu/spot-2.5-4 x 10(6) cfu/spot). We found the big change of the MIC with the increase of the inoculum size in ampicillin against MSSA, and the change was small in cefazolin, meropenem, ciprofloxacin. For anti-MRSA antibiotics, we found the small change with the increase of the inoculums size in vancomycin and arbekacin, and the middle change in teicoplanin and linezolid against MSSA and MRSA. The data from this study suggest that in serious and high inocula infections caused by S. aureus, the presence of an inoculum effect should be considered in curing.

    Topics: Acetamides; Ampicillin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Infective Agents; Bacteriological Techniques; Cefazolin; Ciprofloxacin; Dibekacin; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Linezolid; Meropenem; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Oxazolidinones; Staphylococcus aureus; Teicoplanin; Thienamycins; Vancomycin

2011
In vitro activity of the aminoglycoside antibiotic arbekacin against Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus isolated from war-wounded patients at Walter Reed Army Medical Center.
    Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2010, Volume: 54, Issue:7

    We determined the in vitro MIC of arbekacin against 200 Acinetobacter isolates recovered from wounded soldiers. The median MIC was 2 microg/ml (range, 0.5 to > 64 microg/ml). A total of 97.5% of the isolates had arbekacin MICs of < 8 microg/ml and 86.5% had MICs of < or = 4 microg/ml. There was no association between the arbekacin MIC and susceptibility to 16 other antibiotics or the specimen source (P = 0.7239). Synergy testing suggested an enhanced effect of arbekacin-carbapenem combinations.

    Topics: Acinetobacter baumannii; Aminoglycosides; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Carbapenems; Dibekacin; Hospitals, Military; Humans; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Warfare

2010
[Comparative studies on activities of antimicrobial agents against causative organisms isolated from patients with urinary tract infections (2004). I. Susceptibility distribution].
    The Japanese journal of antibiotics, 2006, Volume: 59, Issue:3

    The bacterial strains isolated from 490 patients diagnosed as having urinary tract infections (UTIs) in 14 institutions in Japan were collected between August 2004 and July 2005. The susceptibilities of them to many kinds of antimicrobial agents were measured. Of them, 577 strains were estimated as causative bacteria and used for the measurement. The strains consisted of 156 gram-positive bacterial strains (27.0%) and 421 gram-negative bacterial strains (73.0%). Against Staphylococcus aureus, arbekacin (ABK), vancomycin (VCM) showed the strongest activity and prevented the growth of all strains with 2 microg/mL. Against Enterococcus faecalis, ampicillin (ABPC) and VCM showed a strong antibacterial activity. The antibacterial activity of cephems to Escherichia coli was generally good, and especially cefozopran (CZOP) and cefpirome (CPR) showed the strongest activity (MIC90: < or = 125 microg/mL). Quinolone resistant E. coli [MIC of ciprofloxacin (CPFX): > or = 4 microg/mL] was detected at frequency of 18.8%, which was higher than that in the last year. Against Klebsiella pneumoniae, CZOP, meropenem (MEPM), and carumonam (CRMN) showed the strongest activity and prevented the growth of all strains with 0.125 microg/mL or less. The antibacterial activity of the other cephems was relatively good, and decrease in their activity observed in the last year study was not recognized. Against Serratia marcescens, imipenem (IPM) and gentamicin (GM) had the strongest antibacterial activity. Against Proteus mirabilis, CRMN showed the strongest activity and prevented the growth of all strains with 0.125 microg/mL or less. MEPM prevented the growth of all strains with 0.25 microg/mL. Next, cefmenoxime (CMX), ceftazidime (CAZ), CZOP, cefixime (CFIX), cefpodoxime (CPDX), and cefditoren (CDTR) showed a strong activity. The antibacterial activity of the drugs to Pseudomonas aeruginosa was generally low, and MIC90 of all the drugs was ranged from 32 to > 128 microg/mL except IPM and MEPM having 16 microg/mL. The antibacterial activities of CZOP and CAZ were considered to be relatively good on MIC50 comparison (MIC50: 2 microg/mL).

    Topics: Aminoglycosides; Ampicillin; Anti-Infective Agents; Aztreonam; Cefixime; Cefozopran; Cefpirome; Cefpodoxime; Ceftizoxime; Cephalosporins; Dibekacin; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Enterococcus faecalis; Escherichia coli; Gentamicins; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Gram-Positive Bacteria; Humans; Imipenem; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Proteus mirabilis; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Quinolones; Serratia marcescens; Staphylococcus aureus; Thienamycins; Urinary Tract Infections; Vancomycin

2006