mepirodipine and lercanidipine

Essential hypertension has been extensively reported to cause endothelial dysfunction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of barnidipine or lercanidipine, in addition to losartan, on some parameters indicative of endothelial damage and oxidative stress in hypertensive, type 2 diabetic patients.. One hundred and fifty one patients were randomised to barnidipine, 20 mg/day, or lercanidipine, 20 mg/day, both in addition to losartan, 100 mg/day, for 6 months. We assessed BP every month, in addition, patients underwent ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). We also assessed: fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), some markers such as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (Hs-CRP), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) and -9 (MMP-9), soluble vascular adhesion protein-1 (sVCAM-1), soluble intercellular adhesion protein-1 (sICAM-1), isoprostanes and paraoxonase-1 (PON-1).. Both barnidipine and lercanidipine resulted in a significant reduction in blood pressure, even if the reduction obtained with barnidipine + losartan was greater than that obtained with lercanidipine + losartan. Data recorded with ABPM also showed a similar trend. Barnidipine + losartan reduced the levels of Hs-CRP, TNF-α, sVCAM-1, sICAM-1, and isoprostanes both compared to baseline and to lercanidipine + losartan.. Barnidipine + losartan gave an improvement of some parameters indicative of endothelial damage and oxidative stress in diabetic and hypertensive patients.. NCT02064218 , ClinicalTrials.gov.

Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Biomarkers; Blood Pressure; Calcium Channel Blockers; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dihydropyridines; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Endothelium, Vascular; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Italy; Losartan; Male; Middle Aged; Nifedipine; Oxidative Stress; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of lercanidipine or barnidipine on echocardiographic parameters, in hypertensive, type 2 diabetics with left ventricular hypertrophy. One hundred and forty-four patients were randomized to lercanidipine, 20 mg/day, or barnidipine, 20 mg/day, in addition to losartan, 100 mg/day, for 6 months. We evaluated: blood pressure, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)), lipid profile, creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), sodium, potassium, and acid uric. Echocardiography was performed at baseline and after 6 months. Both lercanidipine and barnidipine decreased blood pressure. Left ventricular mass index was reduced to a greater extent with barnidipine + losartan. Interventricular septal thickness in diastole was reduced by barnidipine + losartan. Posterior wall thickness in diastole was decreased by both treatments, even if barnidipine + losartan were more effective. Ratio of peak early diastolic filling velocity to peak filling velocity at atrial contraction was increased by barnidipine + losartan, but not by lercanidipine + losartan. Finally, isovolumetric relaxation and time and left atrial volume index were reduced by barnidipine + losartan, while lercanidipine + losartan did not affect them. In conclusion, barnidipine + losartan provided a greater improvement of echocardiographic parameters compared to lercanidipine + losartan.

Topics: Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Calcium Channel Blockers; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dihydropyridines; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Echocardiography; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular; Losartan; Male; Middle Aged; Nifedipine; Treatment Outcome

Hypertension is the leading cause of cardiovascular disease worldwide. Calcium channel blockers are an effective antihypertensive treatment, but frequently hypertension remains uncontrolled for many patients, partly due to tolerability issues.. To assess the tolerability and effectiveness of barnidipine in mild to moderate hypertension patients switching treatment from other calcium channel blockers in daily practice.. BASIC-HT, a prospective real life study, enrolled 20,479 hypertensive patients initiating barnidipine treatment. The present paper focuses on a subgroup of patients in BASIC-HT for whom the previous treatment with amlodipine or lercanidipine was replaced by barnidipine. Tolerability and effectiveness of barnidipine in these patients were assessed at two visits during a 3-month follow up.. In 1710 mild to moderate hypertension patients switching treatment from amlodipine or lercanidipine to barnidipine monotherapy or in combination with other antihypertensive drug classes, mean blood pressure decreased during 3-month follow-up. The mean systolic blood pressure decreased from 153.15 mmHg [95% CI 152.35-153.95] at baseline to 139.20 mmHg [95% CI 138.58-139.82] at visit 3, after 3 months. The mean diastolic blood pressure decreased from 88.85 mmHg at baseline [95% CI 88.36-89.34], to 81.56 mmHg [95% CI 81.20-81.91] at visit 3. Among these patients, 65.4% replaced their initial calcium channel blocker treatment to barnidipine for tolerability reasons. During the follow-up, the main adverse event reported was edema (4.8%). The nature and frequency of events reported in this subgroup of switcher patients were in line with those reported by the total population in BASIC-HT.. This real-life study suggests that replacement of other calcium channel blockers with barnidipine is a valuable therapeutic option, especially when tolerability is an issue.

Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Calcium Channel Blockers; Dihydropyridines; Drug Substitution; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Nifedipine; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Prospective Studies; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome