menogaril and amrubicin

Idarubicin showed the superior activity against Acute Non-Lymphocytic Leukemia (ANLL) in the prospective randomized trials comparing to daunorubicin and it is judged that the analog will become the first choice in the treatment on ANLL. Anthracyclines including SM-5887, KRN-8602, ME-2303 under studies in Japan have shown comparable or superior antitumor activities and lower cardiac toxicities compared to doxorubicin in preclinical studies and therefore the results obtained in clinical trials are expected. Phase II trials of anthrapyrazoles which is an analog of mitoxantrone are in progress. Among three compounds entered it is of note that CI-941 has demonstrated an excellent activity against advanced breast cancer.

Topics: Animals; Anthracyclines; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Agents; Brain Neoplasms; Carubicin; Doxorubicin; Humans; Idarubicin; Leukemia, Experimental; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Menogaril; Stomach Neoplasms

Doxorubicin is one of the most potent drugs for the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC), but less potent for non-small eell lung cancer (NSCLC). The prevalent use of doxorubicin is limited by the development of cardiomyopathy. Therefore, TUT-7 SM-5887, and ME2303 have been under the clinical studies to find new anthracyclines with less cardiotoxicity and higher therapeutic indices not only for SCLC but also for NSCLC. The dose-limiting factor of these drugs determined in phase I studies was leukocytopenia. Phase II studies which are currently under way have indicated that SM-5887 is possibly most potent for the treatment of NSCLC, and that these drugs have less cardiotoxicity compared to the mother compound, doxorubicin.

Topics: Anthracyclines; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Carcinoma, Small Cell; Doxorubicin; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Menogaril

Idarubicin showed the superior activity against Acute Non-Lymphocytic Leukemia (ANLL) in the prospective randomized trials comparing to daunorubicin and it is judged that the analog will become the first choice in the treatment on ANLL. Anthracyclines including SM-5887, KRN-8602, ME-2303 under studies in Japan have shown comparable or superior antitumor activities and lower cardiac toxicities compared to doxorubicin in preclinical studies and therefore the results obtained in clinical trials are expected. Phase II trials of anthrapyrazoles which is an analog of mitoxantrone are in progress. Among three compounds entered it is of note that CI-941 has demonstrated an excellent activity against advanced breast cancer.

Topics: Animals; Anthracyclines; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Agents; Brain Neoplasms; Carubicin; Doxorubicin; Humans; Idarubicin; Leukemia, Experimental; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Menogaril; Stomach Neoplasms

A new model to predict antitumor activity of new analogues was developed, and the cross-resistance against cisplatin (CDDP) and Adriamycin (ADM) was examined. A preclinical evaluation of various new analogues using this new model was performed. The antitumor activities of KT6149, MX-2 (KRN8602), SM5887, menogaril (TUT-7), and liblomycin (NK313) were evaluated against four non-small cell lung cancer cell lines, PC-7, -9, -13, and -14; two small cell lung cancer cell lines, H69 and N231; four CDDP-resistant cell lines, PC-7/1.0, PC-9/0.5, PC-14/1.5, and H69/0.4; a human myelogenous leukemia cell line, K562; and its ADM-resistant subline, K562/ADM by clonogenic assay. The relative antitumor activities of these new analogues were compared with those of parental agents, mitomycin C, ADM, bleomycin, and several anticancer drugs, CDDP, daunomycin, vindesine, and etoposide. KT6149 was more active than mitomycin C against all lung cancer cell lines and the human myelogenous leukemia cell line. Menogaril showed greater activity than ADM, and MX-2 showed activity similar to ADM. However, the antitumor activity of SM5887 was lower than that of ADM. SM5887 and menogaril showed cross-resistance to K562/ADM. Nevertheless, the antitumor activity against K562/ADM of MX-2 was similar to that of the parental cell lines. The activity of liblomycin was similar to that of bleomycin. Thus, KT6149 appears to be the best analogue for use in a clinical trial against lung cancer. MX-2 was active even against ADM-resistant cancer cells. The values of relative resistance to CDDP or ADM were 4.7, 8.1, 7.5, 20.0, and 13.6 for PC-7/1.0, PC-9/0.5, PC-14/1.5, H69/0.4, and K562/ADM, respectively. CDDP-resistant cell lines showed no cross-resistance with other drugs in this study. K562/ADM showed cross-resistance against daunomycin, etoposide, and vindesine. In contrast, mitomycin C and bleomycin had nearly equal activity against K562 and K562/ADM. However, K562/ADM was 2.4-fold more sensitive to CDDP than its parental cell line, K562 (P less than 0.001). These results suggested that the mechanism of CDDP resistance is different from that of multidrug resistance.

Topics: Anthracyclines; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Agents; Bleomycin; Carubicin; Cisplatin; Daunorubicin; Doxorubicin; Drug Resistance; Humans; Menogaril; Mitomycins; Nogalamycin; Tumor Cells, Cultured