melphalan and trofosfamide

melphalan has been researched along with trofosfamide* in 3 studies

Trials

2 trial(s) available for melphalan and trofosfamide

ArticleYear
Treatment of children with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma with oral maintenance compared to high dose chemotherapy: report of the HD CWS-96 trial.
    Pediatric blood & cancer, 2008, Volume: 50, Issue:4

    We prospectively studied the efficacy of high dose therapy (HDT) versus an oral maintenance treatment (OMT) in patients with stage IV soft tissue sarcoma (STS).. Both groups were pretreated with the CEVAIE combination consisting of carboplatin, etoposide, vincristine, actinomycin D, ifosfamide, and epirubicin. HDT consisted of a tandem cycle of thiotepa (600 mg/m(2)) plus cyclophosphamide (4,500 mg/m(2)) and melphalan (120 mg/m(2)) plus etoposide (1,800 mg/m(2)). This treatment was compared with OMT, consisting of four cycles trofosfamide (10 days 2 x 75 mg/m(2)/day) plus etoposide (10 days 2 x 25 mg/m(2)/day), and 4 cycles trofosfamide (10 days 2 x 75 mg/m(2)/day) plus idarubicin (10 days 4 x 5 mg/m(2)). Eligibility criteria were: diagnosis confirmed by reference pathology, primary stage IV, below 22 years of age, and having completed the study therapy.. From 96 patients 45 were treated with HDT and 51 with OMT. The main risk parameters were equally distributed in both arms. After a median follow-up of 57.4 months, 11/45 (24.4%) patients in the HDT-arm and 26/51 (57.8%) patients in OMT-arm were alive. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated an overall survival for the whole group of 0.27 (OMT group: 0.52, HDT group 0.27, log rank P = 0.03). The proportional hazard analysis for patients with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) or "RMS-like" tumors (77.1% of all patients) demonstrated an independent benefit of OMT on outcome.. Oral maintenance therapy seems to be a promising option for patients with RMS-like stage IV tumors.

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carboplatin; Child; Child, Preschool; Cyclophosphamide; Dactinomycin; Epirubicin; Etoposide; Female; Humans; Idarubicin; Ifosfamide; Infant; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Melphalan; Sarcoma; Soft Tissue Neoplasms; Thiotepa; Treatment Outcome; Vincristine

2008
[Results of the Hamburg ovarian blastoma study].
    Onkologie, 1985, Volume: 8, Issue:6

    A randomized chemotherapy trial is forthwith reported on, in which therapy A (vincristine/ifosfamide/tegafur) was compared with therapy B (fluorouracil/trofosfamide/methotrexate/melphalan). Both patient groups received trofosfamide and oral progesterone as maintenance treatment until the end of the second therapy year. Forty-six patients were randomized into group A, 63 into group B. The evaluation of the survival curves suggests a division of the patients into 3 groups with different mortality risks.

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Trials as Topic; Combined Modality Therapy; Cyclophosphamide; Female; Fluorouracil; Germany, West; Humans; Ifosfamide; Melphalan; Methotrexate; Neoplasm Staging; Ovarian Neoplasms; Prognosis; Random Allocation; Tegafur; Vincristine

1985

Other Studies

1 other study(ies) available for melphalan and trofosfamide

ArticleYear
High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue in children with nephroblastoma.
    Bone marrow transplantation, 2002, Volume: 30, Issue:12

    Children with Wilms tumor who have a particular risk of failure at relapse or at primary diagnosis were treated with high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous peripheral blood stem cell rescue in order to improve their probability of survival. From April 1992 to December 1998, 23 evaluable patients received HDC within the German Cooperative Wilms Tumor Studies. Nineteen were given melphalan, etoposide and carboplatin (MEC); the others received different regimens. The dose of carboplatin was adjusted according to renal function. Indications for HDC were high-risk relapse in 20 patients, bone metastases in two patients and no response in one patient. Fourteen of 23 patients are alive after a median observation time of 41 months, 11 of 14 in continuous complete remission, three in CR after relapse post HDC. The estimated survival and event-free survival for these patients are 60.9% and 48.2%. Twelve children relapsed after HDC; nine of them died within 12 months and three are surviving from 20 to 33 months after relapse. The main toxicities were hematologic, mucositis and renal (tubular dysfunction; intermittent hemodialysis in one patient). There were no toxic deaths. About half of the children suffering from Wilms tumor with very unfavorable prognostic factors survive disease-free after HDC for over 3 years. Besides hematological toxicity, mucositis and infections, renal function is at risk during HDC. With dose adjustment on glomerular filtration rate, however, no permanent renal failure was observed.

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carboplatin; Child; Child, Preschool; Combined Modality Therapy; Cyclophosphamide; Disease-Free Survival; Etoposide; Female; Germany; Hematologic Diseases; Humans; Ifosfamide; Infant; Kidney Diseases; Kidney Neoplasms; Life Tables; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Melphalan; Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation; Prognosis; Stomatitis; Survival Analysis; Thiotepa; Transplantation, Autologous; Wilms Tumor

2002