melitten and protegrin-1

Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria have increased the prevalence of a variety of serious diseases in modern times. Polymyxins are used as the last-line therapeutic options for the treatment of infections. However, the mechanism of action of polymyxins remains in dispute. In this work, we used a coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulation to investigate the mechanism of the cationic antimicrobial peptide polymyxin B (PmB) interacting with both the inner and outer membrane models of bacteria. Our results show that the binding of PmB disturbs the outer membrane by displacing the counterions, decreasing the orientation order of the lipopolysaccharide tail, and creating more lipopolysaccharide packing defects. Upon binding onto the inner membrane, in contrast to the traditional killing mechanism that antimicrobial peptides usually use to induce holes in the membrane, PmBs do not permeabilize the inner membrane but stiffen it by filling up the lipid packing defect, increasing the lipid tail order and the membrane bending rigidity as well as restricting the lipid diffusion. PmBs also mediate intermembrane contact and adhesion. These joint effects suggest that PmBs deprive the biological activity of Gram-negative bacteria by sterilizing the cell.

Topics: Antimicrobial Cationic Peptides; Cell Membrane; Lipid Bilayers; Lipopolysaccharides; Melitten; Models, Molecular; Phospholipids; Polymyxin B; Protein Conformation, alpha-Helical; Protein Conformation, beta-Strand

We have studied the influence of four antimicrobial peptides of different secondary and ternary structure--melittin (Mel), protegrin-1 (PG-1), peptidyl-glycylleucine-carboxyamide (PGLa), and gramicidin S (GS)--on the lamellar-to-nonlamellar transition of palmitoyloleoyl phosphatidylethanolamine (POPE) applying differential scanning calorimetry and small-angle X-ray diffraction. None of the peptides studied led to the formation of an inverted hexagonal phase observed for pure POPE at high temperatures. Instead either cubic or lamellar phases were stabilized to different degrees. GS was most effective in inducing a cubic phase, whereas Mel fully stabilized the lamellar phase. The behavior of POPE in the presence of PG-1 and PGLa was intermediate to GS and Mel. In addition to the known role of membrane elasticity we propose two mechanisms, which cause stabilization of the lamellar phase: electrostatic repulsion and lipid/peptide pore formation. Both mechanisms prevent transmembrane contact required to form either an inverted hexagonal phase or fusion pores, as precursors of the cubic phase.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Infective Agents; Antimicrobial Cationic Peptides; Calorimetry, Differential Scanning; Gramicidin; Lipids; Liposomes; Melitten; Models, Molecular; Phase Transition; Phosphatidylethanolamines; Protein Precursors; Protein Structure, Secondary; Protein Structure, Tertiary; X-Ray Diffraction