levonorgestrel has been researched along with freedom in 9 studies
| Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
|---|---|---|
| pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
| 1990's | 8 (88.89) | 18.2507 |
| 2000's | 1 (11.11) | 29.6817 |
| 2010's | 0 (0.00) | 24.3611 |
| 2020's | 0 (0.00) | 2.80 |
| Authors | Studies |
|---|---|
| MacKenzie, JP | 1 |
| Gupta, JA | 1 |
| Heller, S; Mertus, J | 1 |
| Ballard, T | 1 |
| Young, ME | 1 |
| Rutherford, C | 1 |
| Waxman, BF | 1 |
| Arnow, RS | 1 |
| Croxatto, HB; Fernández, SD | 1 |
9 other study(ies) available for levonorgestrel and freedom
| Article | Year |
|---|---|
Whose choice is it, anyway?
Topics: California; Child Abuse; Civil Rights; Coercion; Contraception; Freedom; Hormones; Humans; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Law Enforcement; Levonorgestrel; Social Control, Formal; United States | 1991 |
Women's bodies: the site for the ongoing conquest by reproductive technologies.
Topics: Abortion, Induced; Amniocentesis; Contraception; Developing Countries; Equipment and Supplies; Europe; Female; Fertilization in Vitro; Freedom; General Surgery; Hormones; Humans; Immunization; India; International Cooperation; Internationality; Levonorgestrel; Men; Methods; Mifepristone; Morbidity; Netherlands; Personal Autonomy; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Public Policy; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted; Risk; Risk Assessment; Sex Determination Analysis; Sex Preselection; Socioeconomic Factors; Sterilization, Reproductive; United States; Vulnerable Populations; Women; Women's Rights | 1991 |
Norplant meets the new eugenicists: the impermissibility of coerced contraception.
Topics: California; Child Abuse; Civil Rights; Coercion; Contraception; Eugenics; Female; Freedom; Hormones; Humans; Informed Consent; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Legislation as Topic; Levonorgestrel; Mandatory Programs; Medicaid; Minority Groups; Mothers; Motivation; Personal Autonomy; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Poverty; Pregnancy; Pregnant Women; Prejudice; Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects; Privacy; Punishment; Reproduction; Risk; Risk Assessment; Socioeconomic Factors; State Government; Sterilization, Involuntary; Substance-Related Disorders; United States; Vulnerable Populations; Women; Women's Rights | 1992 |
The Norplant condition: one step forward or two steps back?
Topics: Black or African American; California; Child Abuse; Civil Rights; Coercion; Contraception; Female; Fetus; Freedom; Hormones; Humans; Jurisprudence; Law Enforcement; Levonorgestrel; Minority Groups; Personal Autonomy; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Poverty; Pregnancy; Pregnant Women; Prejudice; Privacy; Punishment; Rehabilitation; Reproduction; Social Control, Formal; Treatment Refusal; United States; Women | 1993 |
Reproductive technologies and the law: Norplant and the bad mother.
Topics: Child Abuse; Civil Rights; Coercion; Contraception; Female; Freedom; Hormones; Humans; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Law Enforcement; Levonorgestrel; Minority Groups; Mothers; Personal Autonomy; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Politics; Population Control; Prejudice; Punishment; Reproduction; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted; Sexuality; Single Person; Social Control, Formal; Social Dominance; Socioeconomic Factors; Sterilization, Reproductive; United States; Vulnerable Populations; Women; Women's Rights | 1995 |
Reproductive freedoms and African American women.
Topics: Abortion, Induced; Adolescent; Black or African American; Civil Rights; Coercion; Contraception; Counseling; Decision Making; Family Planning Services; Federal Government; Female; Financing, Government; Freedom; Government; Hazardous Substances; Human Experimentation; Humans; Infant; Informed Consent; Jurisprudence; Labor, Obstetric; Levonorgestrel; Medicaid; Minors; Mortality; Motivation; Occupational Exposure; Parent-Child Relations; Poverty; Pregnancy; Pregnant Women; Reproduction; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted; State Government; Sterilization, Reproductive; Supreme Court Decisions; Surrogate Mothers; United States; Women; Women's Health; Women's Health Services; Women's Rights | 1992 |
Up against eugenics: disabled women's challenge to receive reproductive health services.
Topics: Abortion, Induced; Biomedical Research; Civil Rights; Coercion; Contraception; Disabled Persons; Eugenics; Female; Freedom; Health Facilities; Health Services Research; History; Human Experimentation; Humans; Levonorgestrel; Medroxyprogesterone Acetate; Mifepristone; Patient Advocacy; Patient Selection; Personal Autonomy; Politics; Prejudice; Reproduction; Research; Research Subjects; Risk; Sexuality; Social Control, Formal; Social Desirability; Stereotyping; Sterilization, Reproductive; United States; Women; Women's Health; Women's Health Services; Women's Rights | 1994 |
The implantation of rights: an argument for unconditionally funded Norplant removal.
Topics: Civil Rights; Coercion; Contraception; Family Planning Services; Federal Government; Financing, Government; Freedom; Government; Humans; Jurisprudence; Levonorgestrel; Medicaid; Oklahoma; Personal Autonomy; Poverty; Privacy; Public Policy; Reproduction; South Carolina; South Dakota; State Government; Supreme Court Decisions; United States | 1996 |
Emergency contraception - a human rights issue.
Topics: Contraception, Postcoital; Contraceptives, Oral, Synthetic; Contraceptives, Postcoital; Female; Freedom; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Human Rights; Humans; Levonorgestrel; Pregnancy; Pregnancy, Unwanted; Women's Health | 2006 |