lenvatinib and regorafenib

Topics: Anilides; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Chemoembolization, Therapeutic; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Hepatectomy; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Liver Transplantation; Phenylurea Compounds; Pyridines; Quinolines; Ramucirumab; Retreatment; Sorafenib

Angiogenesis is an important and interesting scientific subject in the area of malignant tumours. Current research importance and interest are directed in connection to blood microvessels in cancer cell proliferation, tumour growth, and metastasis. Tyrosine kinases have been intensely implicated as therapeutic targets that affect the angiogenic process in tumour growth. In the last decades, targeting angiogenesis has led to achievements in the therapy of different carcinomas by different mechanisms, such as the utilization of anti-angiogenic small molecule receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. In the current review, we aim to track the advancements in the total synthesis of three receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (pazopanib, regorafenib and lenvatinib). This review surveys different synthetic routes for these three approved drugs (pazopanib, regorafenib and lenvatinib) which were previously published as patents (2014-2021). The purity of medicines is a very important factor during manufacturing so we have decided to review the purification process of these anticancer medicines as well. It should be noted that the different patents may have reported some procedures with different yields and purities for the synthesis of desired drug and their intermediates. In order to simplify the understanding of the contents of this review article, only the best results reported in each of these patents are reported for the synthesis of desired drug and their intermediates.

Topics: Humans; Indazoles; Neoplasms; Phenylurea Compounds; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Quinolines; Sulfonamides; Tyrosine

Systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) consisting of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib has remained unchanged for over a decade, although results from phase III targeted therapy trials have recently emerged. This review considers available phase III evidence on the use and sequencing of targeted therapy for intermediate and advanced non-locoregional therapy (LRT) eligible HCC and discusses implications for clinical practice.. Published and presented literature on phase III data reporting on targeted therapy for advanced HCC that was not eligible for loco-regional therapies was identified using the key search terms "hepatocellular cancer" AND "advanced" AND "targeted therapy" AND "phase III" OR respective aliases (PRISMA).. Ten phase III trials assessed targeted therapy first-line and eight following sorafenib. In the first-line, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab statistically significantly improved overall survival (OS) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) compared with sorafenib, while lenvatinib demonstrated non-inferior OS. Following progression on sorafenib, statistically significant OS improvements over placebo were seen for cabozantinib and regorafenib in unselected patients and for ramucirumab in those with baseline α-fetoprotein≥400 ng/mL. Based on improved OS and PROs, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab appears to be a preferred first-line treatment option for intermediate or advanced non-LRT eligible HCC. Phase III data informing sequencing of later lines of treatment is lacking. Therefore, sequencing principles are proposed that can be used to guide treatment selection.. Ongoing trials will continue to inform optimal therapy. Multiple targeted therapies have improved OS in intermediate or advanced non-LRT eligible HCC, although optimal sequencing is an area of ongoing investigation.

Topics: Anilides; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Combined Modality Therapy; Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Liver Neoplasms; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Phenylurea Compounds; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Quinolines; Ramucirumab; Sorafenib; Survival Analysis; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Low muscle mass has been associated with worse clinical outcomes in various cancers. This work investigated whether, during tyrosine kinases inhibitors (TKIs) therapy, low muscle mass was associated with treatment toxicity and survival outcomes. A systematic literature search was performed in Pubmed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases from inception to June 2020, based on fixed inclusion and exclusion criteria. Effect sizes were estimated with hazard ratios (HR) and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and heterogeneity was assessed by measuring inconsistency (I

Topics: Gefitinib; Humans; Imatinib Mesylate; Indazoles; Muscle, Skeletal; Neoplasms; Phenylurea Compounds; Prognosis; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Quinolines; Sorafenib; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib; Survival Analysis

Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) portends a poor prognosis; however recent advances in first-line and second-line treatment options should yield significant improvements in survival.. To summarize the evolving landscape of treatment options for patients with advanced HCC.. We reviewed published clinical trials conducted in patients with advanced HCC published in PubMed or presented at national conferences.. Sorafenib was approved for treatment of unresectable HCC in 2007 and remained the only therapy with proven survival benefit in advanced HCC for several years. Lenvatinib, another tyrosine-kinase inhibitor, was recently shown to have non-inferior survival vs sorafenib and is another first-line treatment option. The tyrosine-kinase inhibitors, regorafenib and cabozantinib, were shown to significantly improve survival in the second-line setting after sorafenib failure. Ramucirumab, a VEGF inhibitor, can also improve survival in the second-line setting among patients with AFP ≥ 400 ng/dL. Phase II data highlight potential durable objective responses with immune checkpoint inhibitors, prompting conditional FDA approval of nivolumab and pembrolizumab in the second-line setting; however, recent phase III data have failed to demonstrate improved survival compared to other treatment options. Ongoing trials are evaluating combination immune checkpoint inhibitor and immune checkpoint inhibitors with tyrosine-kinase inhibitors or VEGF inhibitors in hopes of further increasing objective responses and overall survival in this patient population.. There are several first-line and second-line therapeutic options available for patients with advanced HCC. Further studies are needed to determine how best to select between and sequence the growing number of therapeutic options.

Topics: Anilides; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Clinical Trials as Topic; Disease Progression; Humans; Immunotherapy; Liver Neoplasms; Neoplasm Staging; Phenylurea Compounds; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Quinolines; Ramucirumab; Sorafenib; Therapies, Investigational

Over the past decade, sorafenib has been the only systemic agent with proven clinical efficacy for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recently, lenvatinib was shown to be non-inferior to sorafenib, while regorafenib, cabozantinib, and ramucirumab were shown to be superior to placebo in patients failing sorafenib. In addition, trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors reported encouraging efficacy signals. However, apart from alpha-fetoprotein, which is used to select patients for ramucirumab, no biomarkers are available to identify patients that may respond to a specific treatment. Different synergisms have been postulated based on the potential interplay between antiangiogenic drugs and immunotherapy, with several clinical trials currently testing this hypothesis. Indeed, encouraging preliminary results of phase I studies of bevacizumab plus atezolizumab and lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab have led to the design of ongoing phase III trials, including both antiangiogenics and immune checkpoint inhibitors in the front-line setting. Other important phase II studies have tested molecular therapies directed against different novel targets, such as transforming growth factor-beta, MET (hepatocyte growth factor receptor), and fibroblast growth factor receptor 4. These studies integrated translational research with the aim of better defining the biological tumour profile and identifying tumour and blood biomarkers that select patients who may really benefit from a specific molecular therapy. Importantly, good safety profiles make these drugs suitable for future combinations. In this review, we discuss the most recent data on novel combination strategies and targets, as well as looking ahead to the future role of molecular therapies in the treatment of patients with advanced HCC.

Topics: Algorithms; Anilides; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Phenylurea Compounds; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Quinolines; Ramucirumab; Sorafenib; Treatment Outcome

Sorafenib was the first tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that showed success in extending survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In recent years, additional TKIs have been shown to improve survival and expanded the armamentarium for treating this malignancy. The current landscape includes other classes of drugs, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies. The challenge is now placed on how to best select, combine, and sequence drugs with the goal of improving efficacy and minimizing toxicities to deliver better outcomes for HCC patients.

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Phenylurea Compounds; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Pyridines; Quinolines; Sorafenib

In cancer patients, loss of muscle mass is significantly associated with low tolerability of chemotherapy and poor survival. Despite the great strides in the treatment of cancer, targeted therapies such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) could exacerbate muscle wasting. Over recent years, the impact of skeletal muscle loss during TKI therapy on clinical outcomes has been in the spotlight. In this review, we focus on the different molecular pathways of TKIs potentially involved in muscle wasting. Then, we report the results of the studies assessing the effects of different TKI therapies-such as sorafenib, regorafenib, sunitinib, and lenvatinib-on muscle mass, and highlight their potential clinical implications. Finally, we discuss an integrative nutritional approach to be adopted during TKI treatment. The assessment of muscle mass from computerized tomography imaging could be helpful in predicting toxicity and prognosis in patients treated with TKI such as sorafenib. Early recognition of low muscle mass and effective personalized nutritional support could prevent or attenuate muscle mass wasting. However, the role of nutrition is still overlooked, and future clinical trials are needed to find the optimal nutritional support to countermeasure muscle mass depletion during TKI therapy.

Topics: Cachexia; Humans; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Muscle, Skeletal; Neoplasms; Nutrition Assessment; Nutritional Status; Phenylurea Compounds; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Quinolines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recommended Dietary Allowances; Sorafenib; Sunitinib; Treatment Outcome

Molecular targeted therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has changed markedly. Although sorafenib was used in clinical practice as the first molecular targeted agent in 2007, the SHARPE and Asian-Pacific trials demonstrated that sorafenib only improved overall survival (OS) by approximately 3 months in patients with advanced HCC compared with placebo. Molecular targeted agents were developed during the 10-year period from 2007 to 2016, but every test of these agents from phase II or phase III clinical trial failed due to a low response rate and high toxicity. In the 2 years after, 2017 through 2018, four successful novel drugs emerged from clinical trials for clinical use. As recommended by updated Barcelona Clinical Liver cancer (BCLC) treatment algorithms, lenvatinib is now feasible as an alternative to sorafenib as a first-line treatment for advanced HCC. Regorafenib, cabozantinib, and ramucirumab are appropriate supplements for sorafenib as second-line treatment for patients with advanced HCC who are resistant, show progression or do not tolerate sorafenib. In addition, with promising outcomes in phase II trials, immune PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors nivolumab and pembrolizumab have been applied for HCC treatment. Despite phase III trials for nivolumab and pembrolizumab, the primary endpoints of improved OS were not statistically significant, immune PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint therapy remains to be further investigated. This review summarizes the development and progression of molecular targeted and immune-based checkpoint therapies in HCC.

Topics: Anilides; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; B7-H1 Antigen; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Humans; Immunotherapy; Liver Neoplasms; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Phenylurea Compounds; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Pyridines; Quinolines; Ramucirumab; Sorafenib; Treatment Outcome

The principal advancements in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are the use of new systemic treatments, such as lenvatinib in first-line treatment and regorafenib, cabozantinib, and ramucirumab in second-line treatment, because of their benefits in terms of overall survival. In addition, nivolumab as a second-line agent was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2017 based on improved radiological response data. Physicians and patients alike will greatly benefit from this expanded arsenal of treatments once all these new drugs for the treatment of HCC finally become available. Unfortunately, in our review of the available data, we found a conspicuous lack of approved systemic treatments for HCC in the distinct setting of after liver transplantation (LT). Careful evaluation of the clinical trials for approved systemic treatments of HCC is crucial when considering the best options for those with HCC recurrence after LT. Although several first-line or second-line treatments have been shown to be effective for HCC, each of these trials was composed of its own specific populations, and those with HCC recurrence after LT were excluded. We have also summarized from a critical and clinical point of view the issues involved in the management of patients who are candidates for systemic treatment in this era of multiple drugs for the same indication.

Topics: Anilides; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Liver Transplantation; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Nivolumab; Patient Selection; Phenylurea Compounds; Progression-Free Survival; Pyridines; Quinolines; Ramucirumab; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

The management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is based on a multidisciplinary decision tree. Treatment includes loco-regional therapy, mainly transarterial chemoembolization, for intermediate-stage HCC and systemic therapy with oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for advanced HCC. Transarterial chemoembolization involves hepatic intra-arterial infusion with either conventional procedure or drug-eluting-beads. The aim of the loco-regional procedure is to deliver treatment as close as possible to the tumor both to embolize the tumor area and to enhance efficacy and minimize systemic toxicity of the anticancer drug. Pharmacokinetic studies applied to transarterial chemoembolization are rare and pharmacodynamic studies even rarer. However, all available studies lead to the same conclusions: use of the transarterial route lowers systemic exposure to the cytotoxic drug and leads to much higher tumor drug concentrations than does a similar dose via the intravenous route. However, reproducibility of the procedure remains a major problem, and no consensus exists regarding the choice of anticancer drug and its dosage. Systemic therapy with TKIs is based on sorafenib and lenvatinib as first-line treatment and regorafenib and cabozantinib as second-line treatment. Clinical use of TKIs is challenging because of their complex pharmacokinetics, with high liver metabolism yielding both active metabolites and their common toxicities. Changes in liver function over time with the progression of HCC adds further complexity to the use of TKIs. The challenges posed by TKIs and the HCC disease process means monitoring of TKIs is required to improve clinical management. To date, only partial data supporting sorafenib monitoring is available. Results from further pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies of these four TKIs are eagerly awaited and are expected to permit such monitoring and the development of consensus guidelines.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anilides; Animals; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Chemoembolization, Therapeutic; Disease Progression; Female; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Male; Models, Animal; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Pharmacokinetics; Phenylurea Compounds; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Quinolines; Sorafenib; Treatment Outcome

Portal vein tumour thrombosis is common among patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Tremendous differences exist in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumour thrombosis between the east and the west, which derive from heterogeneities in its epidemiology, causes, pathology, comorbidities, prognosis, and other demographics. These divergences between the east and the west are not only caused by hepatocellular carcinoma itself, but are also affected by many variables including social factors, physician preferences, accessibility to costly or novel treatments, and reimbursement schemes. In this Review, we compare and contrast the management of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumour thrombosis in the east and in the west in terms of systemic and surgical treatments, radiotherapy, transcatheter arterial therapies, and portal vein revascularisation. We conclude that a personalised, data-driven approach to care with active management from a multidisciplinary team, as well as increased communication and collaboration between clinicians and researchers based in east and the west, could help to reduce the differences in management and optimise treatment strategies.

Topics: Anilides; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Chemoembolization, Therapeutic; Endovascular Procedures; Hepatectomy; Hepatic Artery; Humans; Infusions, Intra-Arterial; Liver Neoplasms; Liver Transplantation; Nivolumab; Patient Care Team; Phenylurea Compounds; Portal Vein; Pyridines; Quinolines; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant; Ramucirumab; Sorafenib; Stents; Venous Thrombosis

The approval of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib in 2007 marked a milestone in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma, as sorafenib was the first systemic therapy to show a survival benefit in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Since then many drugs failed in the first- and second-line setting and it took almost another decade until further tyrosine kinase inhibitors succeeded in phase III trials.. To summarise the evolving field of systemic therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma.. We reviewed recently published studies identified from PubMed and data presented at recent meetings. Main search terms included hepatocellular carcinoma, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immunotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, sorafenib, regorafenib, lenvatinib, cabozantinib, ramucirumab, and nivolumab.. We discuss the evolution of targeted therapies since the approval of sorafenib including failures and recent advances. We also elaborate the unmet need of biomarkers to guide treatment decisions and discuss the emerging field of immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma.. The tyrosine kinase inhibitors sorafenib (first line) and regorafenib (second line) have been approved for hepatocellular carcinoma, and the immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab obtained conditional approval for sorafenib-experienced patients in the United States. With lenvatinib in the first line, and cabozantinib and ramucirumab in sorafenib-experienced patients, three more targeted therapies reached their primary endpoint in phase III trials and may soon be added to the treatment armamentarium.

Topics: Anilides; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Humans; Immunotherapy; Liver Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Phenylurea Compounds; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Quinolines; Ramucirumab; Sorafenib

The global burden of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing and might soon surpass an annual incidence of 1 million cases. Genomic studies have established the landscape of molecular alterations in HCC; however, the most common mutations are not actionable, and only ~25% of tumours harbour potentially targetable drivers. Despite the fact that surveillance programmes lead to early diagnosis in 40-50% of patients, at a point when potentially curative treatments are applicable, almost half of all patients with HCC ultimately receive systemic therapies. Sorafenib was the first systemic therapy approved for patients with advanced-stage HCC, after a landmark study revealed an improvement in median overall survival from 8 to 11 months. New drugs - lenvatinib in the frontline and regorafenib, cabozantinib, and ramucirumab in the second line - have also been demonstrated to improve clinical outcomes, although the median overall survival remains ~1 year; thus, therapeutic breakthroughs are still needed. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors are now being incorporated into the HCC treatment armamentarium and combinations of molecularly targeted therapies with immunotherapies are emerging as tools to boost the immune response. Research on biomarkers of a response or primary resistance to immunotherapies is also advancing. Herein, we summarize the molecular targets and therapies for the management of HCC and discuss the advancements expected in the near future, including biomarker-driven treatments and immunotherapies.

Topics: Anilides; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Humans; Immunotherapy; Liver Neoplasms; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Phenylurea Compounds; Precision Medicine; Pyridines; Quinolines; Ramucirumab; Sorafenib

Multikinase inhibitors with antiangiogenic properties used to be standard therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recently, several antiangiogenic agents (lenvatinib, cabozantinib, and ramucirumab) have demonstrated antitumor activity for advanced HCC in randomized controlled trials. However, the landscape of drug development for HCC may change dramatically with the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, particularly the anti-programmed cell death-1 (anti-PD1) agents. In addition, early-phase clinical trials of combination of anti-PD-1 and antiangiogenic agents have shown very promising anti-tumor activity in patients with advanced HCC. Therefore, the critical research questions at present are whether this combination strategy will be the next generation of standard therapy and which antiangiogenic agents will be the optimal partner for the combination. All of the 4 multikinase inhibitors for HCC (sorafenib, regorafenib, lenvatinib, and cabozantinib) have been reported to have immune modulatory effects. The authors systematically reviewed the pre-clinical evidence of their immune modulatory effects to explore whether these effects were mediated by angiogenesis inhibition or by other "off-target" effects on the tumor microenvironment. Studies of sorafenib comprised the majority (58 of the 71) of the research articles reviewed. Potentially beneficial effects on anti-tumor immunity may result from increased M1 polarization of macrophages and stimulation of CD8 T cell function. On the other hand, high dosage of the kinase inhibitors in pre-clinical models and hypoxia associated with angiogenesis may contribute to immune suppression in the tumor microenvironment. Sorafenib and other multikinase inhibitors may promote anti-tumor immunity through modulation of multiple immune cell types as well as the tumor microenvironment. The optimal immune modulatory dosage should be defined to facilitate design of future combination regimens.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Anilides; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Immunotherapy; Liver Neoplasms; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Phenylurea Compounds; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Quinolines; Ramucirumab

The fatigue associated with five newly approved vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) (regorafenib, vandetanib, cabozantinib, lenvatinib, axitinib) is poorly understood. We conducted this systematic review to fully investigate the fatigue associated with these VEGFR-TKIs in cancer patients. Relevant studies of randomized controlled trials in cancer patients treated with the five VEGFR-TKIs were retrieved and a systematic evaluation was conducted. EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PubMed were searched for articles published until March 2017. Thirteen randomized controlled trials and 4395 patients were included. The current analysis suggested that the use of five newly approved VEGFR-TKIs increased the risk of all-grade fatigue (1.43; 95% CI 1.23-1.66; p < 0.00001) and high-grade (≥grade 3) fatigue (1.97; 95% CI1.44-2.70; p < 0.0001). On subgroup analysis, the risk ratio (RR) of all-grade fatigue varied significantly within drug type, but high-grade fatigue did not. The RR of all-grade and high-grade fatigue did not vary significantly according to cancer type, treatment line, and treatment duration. The risk of high-grade fatigue may vary with treatment duration, whereas all-grade fatigue may not. The available data suggest that the use of the five newly approved VEGFR-TKIs is associated with a significantly increased risk of fatigue in cancer patients. Physicians should be aware of this adverse effect and should monitor cancer patients receiving these drugs.

Topics: Anilides; Axitinib; Fatigue; Humans; Imidazoles; Indazoles; Neoplasms; Odds Ratio; Phenylurea Compounds; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Quinolines; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor

Topics: Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Liver Neoplasms; Phenylurea Compounds

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common primary liver cancer, remains a deadly cancer, with an incidence that has tripled in the United States since 1980. In recent years, new systemic therapies for HCC have been approved and a critical assessment of the existing data is necessary to balance benefits and harms and inform the development of evidence-based guidelines.. The American Gastroenterological Association formed a multidisciplinary group consisting of a Technical Review Panel and a Guideline Panel. The Technical Review Panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients and conducted an evidence review of systemic therapies in patients with advanced-stage HCC. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework was used to assess evidence. The Guideline Panel reviewed the evidence and used the Evidence-to-Decision Framework to develop recommendations.. The Panel reviewed the evidence, summarized in the Technical Review, for the following medications approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for HCC: first-line therapies: bevacizumab+atezolizumab, sorafenib, and lenvatinib; second-line therapies: cabozantinib, pembrolizumab, ramucirumab, and regorafenib; and other agents: bevacizumab, nivolumab, and nivolumab+ipilimumab.. The Panel agreed on 11 recommendations focused on systemic therapy for HCC in patients who are not eligible for locoregional therapy or resection, those with metastatic disease and preserved liver function, those with poor liver function, and those on systemic therapy as adjuvant therapy.

Topics: Anilides; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Chemoembolization, Therapeutic; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Hepatectomy; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Liver Transplantation; Phenylurea Compounds; Pyridines; Quinolines; Ramucirumab; Retreatment; Sorafenib

Background: Breast cancer currently affects more than two million women worldwide, and its incidence is steadily increasing. One of the most essential factors of invasion and metastasis of breast cancer cells is angiogenesis and non-angiogenic vascularization. Lenvatinib and Regorafenib share the same anti-angiogenic effect by inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs subtypes 1 to 3) and have been approved for treating different types of cancer. Methods: We investigated Lenvatinib and Regorafenib effects on a well-established in-vitro model of breast cancer using MCF-7 (estrogen, progesterone receptor-positive, and HER2-negative), MDA-MB-231 (triple negative), as well as Human Umbilical Vascular Endothelial Cell line (HUVEC) cell lines. We performed the cell viability assay on four groups of cells, which included a control group, a Lenvatinib treated only group, a Regorafenib treated only group, and a group treated with a combination of both drugs at 24, 48, and 72 h. Data were analyzed as means ± standard deviation, and the drug−drug interactions with Compusyn software. Cellular migration assay, tube formation assay, and Western blots were conducted to determine the functional and the protein expression of downstream signals such as Caspase-9, anti-apoptotic Survivin, P-ERK, and total-ERK in the control and treatment groups. Results: MCF-7 cells showed a reduction in cell survival rates with higher dosing and longer incubation periods with each drug and with the combination of drugs. A synergistic interaction was identified (CI < 1) with both drugs on MCF7 at different dose combinations and at a higher dose in MDA-MB-231 cells. Furthermore, there was a marked decrease in the anti-angiogenic effect of both drugs in tube formation assay using MDA-MB-231 cells and survivin protein expression in MCF-7, and those antitumor markers showed a better outcome in drug combination than the use of each drug alone. Conclusion: Our result is the first to report the synergistic anti-angiogenic potential of combination therapy of Lenvatinib and Regorafenib. Therefore, it shows their therapeutic potential in breast cancer, including the aggressive types. Further studies are warranted to confirm and explore this therapeutic approach.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Breast Neoplasms; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Female; Humans; Neovascularization, Pathologic; Phenylurea Compounds; Pyridines; Quinolines; Survivin; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

The clinical outcome of ramucirumab in multi-molecular targeted agent (MTA) sequential therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC) was assessed in comparison with that of prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy.. Sixteen patients who received ramucirumab as part of multi-MTA sequential therapy for u-HCC were enrolled in a retrospective, cohort study. Ramucirumab was started as 2nd line in 7 patients, 3rd line in 5 patients, and 4th line in 4 patients.. The overall response rate was 6.3%, the disease control rate (DCR) was 50.0%, median progression-free survival was 2.0 months (evaluated by mRECIST), median overall survival (OS) with ramucirumab was 7.9 months, and the median OS from 1st-line therapy was 28.1 months. One month after the start of ramucirumab, α-fetoprotein (AFP) decreased in 6 of 12 cases (50.0%), and the DCR in AFP-decreased cases was 83.3%. The DCR of ramucirumab was 66.7% in cases in which disease control was obtained by prior TKI therapy, whereas it was 0.0% in the cases in which disease control was not obtained by prior TKI therapy. Examining the adverse events, no new safety concerns were confirmed.. The AFP response to ramucirumab and the treatment response to prior TKI therapy are associated with treatment response to ramucirumab.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Phenylurea Compounds; Prognosis; Pyridines; Quinolines; Ramucirumab; Retrospective Studies; Sorafenib; Survival Rate

This study compared clinical outcomes of 2nd- and 3rd-line regorafenib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.. In this retrospective cohort study, 48 patients were treated with regorafenib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Thirty-five and 13 patients were initiated on 2nd- and 3rd-line therapy, respectively. We assessed the responses to and safety of the therapy.. There were no statistically significant differences in clinical characteristics at the start of 2nd- or 3rd-line regorafenib therapy. The overall response rate of 2nd- and 3rd-line regorafenib was 20 and 8%, respectively. The disease control rate was 57 and 54%, respectively. Median overall survival (mOS) from the start of 2nd-line regorafenib was 17.5 months. mOS from the start of 3rd-line regorafenib was not obtained. Median progression-free survival of 2nd- and 3rd-line regorafenib was 4.9 and 2.3 months, respectively. mOS from 1st-line therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitor plus sorafenib-regorafenib-lenvatinib was 29.5 months; that with lenvatinib-sorafenib-regorafenib was not obtained. Patients on 3rd-line therapy tended to have better Child-Pugh scores and tumor factors at the start of 1st-line therapy than other patients.. Patients on 2nd- and 3rd-line regorafenib showed favorable responses. Good Child-Pugh scores and tumor factors may be associated with a better response rate and OS.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Phenylurea Compounds; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Quinolines; Retrospective Studies; Sorafenib; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome

Sorafenib and Regorafenib are the recommended first- and second-line therapies in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Lenvatinib and Cabozantinib have shown non-inferior antitumoral activities compared with the corresponding recommended therapies. The clinical trials have established recommended doses for each treatment that lead different blood concentrations in patients for Sorafenib (10 µM), Regorafenib (1 µM), Lenvatinib (0.1 µM), and Cabozantinib (1 µM). However, very low response rates are observed in patients attributed to intrinsic resistances or upregulation of survival signaling. The aim of the study was the comparative dose-response analysis of the drugs (0-100 µM) in well-differentiated (HepG2, Hep3B, and Huh7), moderately (SNU423), and poorly (SNU449) differentiated liver cancer cells in 2D/3D cultures. Cells harbors wild-type p53 (HepG2), non-sense p53 mutation (Hep3B), inframe p53 gene deletion (SNU423), and p53 point mutation (Huh7 and SNU449). The administration of regular used in vitro dose (10 µM) in 3D and 2D cultures, as well as the dose-response analysis in 2D cultures showed Sorafenib and Regorafenib were increasingly effective in reducing cell proliferation, and inducing apoptosis in well-differentiated and expressing wild-type p53 in HCC cells. Lenvatinib and Cabozantinib were particularly effective in moderately to poorly differentiated cells with mutated or lacking p53 that have lower basal oxygen consumption rate (OCR), ATP, and maximal respiration capacity than observed in differentiated HCC cells. Sorafenib and Regorafenib downregulated, and Lenvatinib and Cabozantinib upregulated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor receptor (c-Met) in HepG2 cells. Conclusions: Sorafenib and Regorafenib were especially active in well-differentiated cells, with wild-type p53 and increased mitochondrial respiration. By contrast, Lenvatinib and Cabozantinib appeared more effective in moderately to poorly differentiated cells with mutated p53 and low mitochondrial respiration. The development of strategies that allow us to deliver increased doses in tumors might potentially enhance the effectiveness of the treatments.

Topics: Adult; Anilides; Apoptosis; Cell Culture Techniques; Cell Differentiation; Cell Proliferation; Cell Respiration; Female; Hep G2 Cells; Hepatocytes; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Male; Mitochondria; Oxygen Consumption; Phenylurea Compounds; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Quinolines; Sorafenib; Spheroids, Cellular; Tumor Suppressor Protein p53

Multiple kinase inhibitors are available for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It is largely unknown whether regorafenib or lenvatinib modulates innate immunity including Toll-like receptor (TLR)-signaling pathways in HCC. We performed real-time RT-PCR to investigate 84 TLR-associated gene expression levels and compared these gene expression levels in each hepatoma cells treated with or without regorafenib or lenvatinib. In response to regorafenib, nine and 10 genes were upregulated in Huh7 and HepG2 cells, respectively, and only C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 was upregulated in both cell lines. A total of 14 and 12 genes were downregulated in Huh7 and HepG2 cells, respectively, and two genes (Fos proto-oncogene, AP-1 transcription factor subunit, and ubiquitin conjugating enzyme E2 N) were downregulated in both cell lines. In response to lenvatinib, four and 16 genes were upregulated in Huh7 and HepG2 cells, respectively, and two genes (interleukin 1 alpha and TLR4) were upregulated in both cells. Six and one genes were downregulated in Huh7 and HepG2, respectively, and no genes were downregulated in both cell lines. In summary, regorafenib and lenvatinib affect TLR signaling pathways in human hepatoma cell lines. Modulation of TLR signaling pathway may improve the treatment of HCC patients with refractory disease.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Survival; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Gene Regulatory Networks; Hep G2 Cells; Humans; Immunity, Innate; Liver Neoplasms; Neoplasm Proteins; Phenylurea Compounds; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Proto-Oncogene Mas; Pyridines; Quinolines; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction; Signal Transduction; Sorafenib; Toll-Like Receptors; Transcriptome

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most lethal cancers. After many years of stagnation, there are now several systemic treatments available for patients with HCC.. To analyse the feasibility and efficacy of sequential systemic treatments in patients with HCC in clinical practice.. In this multicentre study, patients who were treated with novel systemic therapies for HCC between 2014 and 2019 at two referral centres, Hannover Medical School, Germany, and Medical University of Vienna, Austria, were included.. Overall, 85 patients were included of which 76 patients (89.4%) received more than one and a maximum of five systemic treatment lines. The most common therapy sequence was sorafenib (n = 72; 84.7%) followed by regorafenib (n = 37; 48.7%), whereas 11 patients were initially treated with lenvatinib (12.9%). Other second-line treatments included pembrolizumab, nivolumab, cabozantinib and ramucirumab. Hepatic function deteriorated during sequential systemic treatment in 48.6% of the patients as defined by an increase in at least one Child-Pugh point. Median overall survival (mOS) from the start of first systemic treatment was 35 months for patients with sequential systemic treatment compared to 9 months for patients with one systemic treatment line (P < 0.001). Patients previously treated with surgical/locoregional therapies had a longer mOS compared to patients with initial systemic treatment (66 vs 25 months; P = 0.020).. Sequential systemic treatment is feasible and effective in selected patients with HCC in clinical practice. Our study underlines the critical importance of well-preserved liver function for successful administration of sequential systemic therapy.

Topics: Anilides; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Female; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Male; Nivolumab; Phenylurea Compounds; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Quinolines; Ramucirumab; Sorafenib

Sorafenib is the standard treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the development of drug resistance is common. By using genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 library screening, we identify phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase (PHGDH), the first committed enzyme in the serine synthesis pathway (SSP), as a critical driver for Sorafenib resistance. Sorafenib treatment activates SSP by inducing PHGDH expression. With RNAi knockdown and CRISPR/Cas9 knockout models, we show that inactivation of PHGDH paralyzes the SSP and reduce the production of αKG, serine, and NADPH. Concomitantly, inactivation of PHGDH elevates ROS level and induces HCC apoptosis upon Sorafenib treatment. More strikingly, treatment of PHGDH inhibitor NCT-503 works synergistically with Sorafenib to abolish HCC growth in vivo. Similar findings are also obtained in other FDA-approved tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), including Regorafenib or Lenvatinib. In summary, our results demonstrate that targeting PHGDH is an effective approach to overcome TKI drug resistance in HCC.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cell Line, Tumor; CRISPR-Cas Systems; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Gene Knock-In Techniques; Gene Knockout Techniques; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Phenylurea Compounds; Phosphoglycerate Dehydrogenase; Pyridines; Quinolines; Reactive Oxygen Species; Sorafenib

Recently, three tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have become available for treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We herein report a case of a 59-year-old man with interstitial pneumonia that was suspected during regorafenib administration and was exacerbated by subsequent lenvatinib treatment for advanced HCC. After sorafenib was discontinued due to progressive HCC, regorafenib treatment was started. Progressive HCC was again noted and reticular shadows were suspected in both lower lung fields at 2 months after starting regorafenib administration. Subsequent treatment with lenvatinib obtained a partial response for HCC, but the reticular shadows became marked and dyspnea on effort emerged, followed by hypoxemia and an increased Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) value. Because we suspected acute interstitial pneumonia, due to these TKIs, intravenous pulse steroid therapy was started immediately after discontinuing lenvatinib. Within 1 week after starting steroid therapy, the patient's respiratory condition and hypoxemia gradually began improving. No previous case of pulmonary interstitial changes that appeared in association with regorafenib administration for HCC and that were exacerbated by subsequent treatment with lenvatinib has been reported. This case emphasizes that it is necessary to observe the patient's respiratory condition and to perform imaging examinations to monitor for adverse events during TKI treatment.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Lung Diseases, Interstitial; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Phenylurea Compounds; Pyridines; Quinolines; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

To investigate the effect of multi-kinase kinase inhibitors (sorafenib; regorafenib; lenvatinib) on the invasion and metastasis of human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells, and the outcome of this effect on the expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and tissue inhibitors of MMPs (TIMPs), yet unclarified. Cells were subjected to four different treatments: blank control group, sorafenib (10 μmol/L) treatment group, regorafenib (20 mmol/L) treatment group, and lenvatinib (4 μmol/L) treatment group. Anti-invasion and anti-metastasis effects were tested using the wound-healing assay and transwell invasion assay. Real-time PCR and Western blot analyses were used to determine the impact of sorafenib, regorafenib, and lenvatinib on the gene expression of MMPs and TIMPs in the two HCC lines (Hep3B and SMMC-7721). Results from the wound-healing and transwell invasion assays showed the three tested anti-cancer drugs to have a significant inhibitory effect on the metastasis and invasion of HCC cells. Real-time PCR and western blot analyses revealed that sorafenib down-regulated the expressions of MMP-7,10,16 and up-regulated those of TIMP-1,3,4, regorafenib down-regulated the expression of MMP-1 and up-regulated TIMP-3 gene expression, and lenvatinib down-regulated the expressions of MMP-1,2,7,9,10,16 and up-regulated those of TIMP-1,3,4. However, these three targeted anti-cancer drugs seem to have no significant regulatory effect on the expressions of other MMPs and TIMPs family genes. In conclusion, sorafenib, regorafenib, and lenvatinib inhibit the invasion and metastasis of HCC cells by regulating MMPs/TIMPs expression levels.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Movement; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Matrix Metalloproteinases; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Multigene Family; Phenylurea Compounds; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Quinolines; Sorafenib; Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinases