ledipasvir and grazoprevir

There has been a revolution in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. Several oral regimens combining direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) from different families [NS5B nucleotide inhibitors, NS5B non-nucleoside inhibitors, NS5A replication complex inhibitors and NS3/4A protease inhibitors (PI)] have been developed. These regimens result in an increase in sustained virological response (SVR) rates to above 90% and reduce the duration of treatment to 12 weeks or less. As of 2016 several regimens will be approved with additive potencies, without cross-resistance and with a good safety profile. Remaining issues will include increasing screening and access to care so that HCV may become the first chronic viral infection eradicated worldwide. This review summarizes results obtained with oral DAA combinations that have been approved and/or have completed phase 3 clinical trials for HCV infection and discusses future perspectives.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Amides; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Benzofurans; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings; Humans; Imidazoles; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Macrocyclic Compounds; Proline; Protease Inhibitors; Quinoxalines; Sofosbuvir; Sulfonamides; Uracil; Valine; Viral Nonstructural Proteins

The PRIORITIZE trial (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02786537) was the first comparative effectiveness study to directly compare ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) and elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV). A secondary aim of this study was to compare LDV/SOF and EBR/GZR on sustainable changes in several HCV-associated symptoms and functional well-being in patients who achieved sustained virological response (SVR). PRIORITIZE, a randomized controlled trial conducted between 2016 and 2020, evaluated change in six PROMIS® symptom scores (fatigue, sleep disturbance, cognitive disturbance, nausea, diarrhoea, abdominal pain) and functional well-being using the disease-specific HCV-PRO instrument. Survey assessments were administered at baseline, early post-treatment (median = 6 months) and late post-treatment (median = 21 months). Constrained longitudinal linear mixed-effects models were used to evaluate within-treatment change and between-treatment differences. Data from 793 participants (average 55 years old, 57% male, 44% black, 17% with cirrhosis) were analysed. From baseline to early post-treatment, 5 out of 6 symptoms and functional well-being significantly improved (all p's < .05). In the LDV/SOF arm, mean changes ranged from -3.73 for nausea to -6.41 for fatigue and in the EBR/GZR, mean changes ranged from -2.19 for cognitive impairment to -4.67 for fatigue. Change of >3 points was consider clinically meaningful. Improvements in most symptoms slightly favoured LDV/SOF, although the magnitude of differences between the regimens were small. Both regimens demonstrated significant improvements in symptoms and functional well-being that were sustained during the late post-treatment phase. EBR/GZR and LDV/SOF regimens had clinically equivalent and durable improvements in HCV symptoms and functional well-being up to two years after SVR.

Topics: Amides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Benzofurans; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fatigue; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Imidazoles; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Quinoxalines; Sofosbuvir; Sulfonamides

The pandemic of SARS-CoV-2 has necessitated expedited research efforts towards finding potential antiviral targets and drug development measures. While new drug discovery is time consuming, drug repurposing has been a promising area for elaborate virtual screening and identification of existing FDA approved drugs that could possibly be used for targeting against functions of various proteins of SARS-CoV-2 virus. RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) is an important enzyme for the virus that mediates replication of the viral RNA. Inhibition of RdRp could inhibit viral RNA replication and thus new virus particle production. Here, we screened non-nucleoside antivirals and found three out of them to be strongest in binding to RdRp out of which two retained binding even using molecular dynamic simulations. We propose these two drugs as potential RdRp inhibitors which need further in-depth testing.

Topics: Amides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Catalytic Domain; Computer Simulation; Coronavirus RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase; COVID-19; COVID-19 Drug Treatment; Cyclopropanes; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Drug Repositioning; Fluorenes; Humans; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Molecular Docking Simulation; Molecular Dynamics Simulation; Pandemics; Proline; Protein Conformation; Quinoxalines; SARS-CoV-2; Sulfonamides

Doravirine is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection. Due to the high prevalence of HIV-1 and hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection and coadministration of HIV-1 and HCV treatment, potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between doravirine and two HCV treatments were investigated in two phase 1 drug interaction trials in healthy participants. Trial 1 investigated the effect of multiple-dose doravirine and elbasvir + grazoprevir coadministration (

Topics: Adult; Amides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Benzofurans; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Interactions; Female; Fluorenes; Humans; Imidazoles; Least-Squares Analysis; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridones; Quinoxalines; Sulfonamides; Triazoles