lacosamide and fosphenytoin

Compare the cost and effectiveness of nonbenzodiazepine antiepileptic drugs (non-BZD AEDs) for treatment of BZD-resistant convulsive status epilepticus (SE).. Decision analysis model populated with effectiveness data from a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature, and cost data from publicly available prices. The primary outcome was cost per seizure stopped ($/SS). Sensitivity analyses evaluated the robustness of the results across a wide variation of the input parameters.. VPA and PB were more effective than PHT for SE. There is substantial overlap in the cost-effectiveness of non-BZD AEDs for SE, but available evidence does not support the preeminence of PHT, neither in terms of effectiveness nor in terms of cost-effectiveness.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Benzodiazepines; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Decision Support Techniques; Humans; Lacosamide; Levetiracetam; Phenobarbital; Phenytoin; Status Epilepticus; Treatment Failure; Valproic Acid

Many patients with critical illness have been noted to have nonconvulsive seizures (NCSs) and nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE). How aggressively these seizures should be treated is unclear. Many investigators feel that the morbidity of NCSs and NCSE is different from that of generalized convulsive status epilepticus (GCSE), so treatment should be less urgent. Consequently, many nonsedating AEDs have been used to treat NCSs and NCSE in patients with critical illness. Randomized, controlled trials demonstrating the efficacy of AEDs in NCSs and NCSE are lacking. The Treatment of Recurrent Electrographic Nonconvulsive Seizures (TRENdS) study compared lacosamide to fosphenytoin in the treatment of NCSs. An update of the study is presented. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Status Epilepticus".

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Critical Illness; Humans; Lacosamide; Phenytoin; Recurrence; Seizures; Status Epilepticus

The optimal treatment of nonconvulsive seizures in critically ill patients is uncertain. We evaluated the comparative effectiveness of the antiseizure drugs lacosamide (LCM) and fosphenytoin (fPHT) in this population.. The TRENdS (Treatment of Recurrent Electrographic Nonconvulsive Seizures) study was a noninferiority, prospective, multicenter, randomized treatment trial of patients diagnosed with nonconvulsive seizures (NCSs) by continuous electroencephalography (cEEG). Treatment was randomized to intravenous (IV) LCM 400mg or IV fPHT 20mg phenytoin equivalents/kg. The primary endpoint was absence of electrographic seizures for 24 hours as determined by 1 blinded EEG reviewer. The frequency with which NCS control was achieved in each arm was compared, and the 90% confidence interval (CI) was determined. Noninferiority of LCM to fPHT was to be concluded if the lower bound of the CI for relative risk was >0.8.. Seventy-four subjects were enrolled (37 LCM, 37 fPHT) between August 21, 2012 and December 20, 2013. The mean age was 63.6 years; 38 were women. Seizures were controlled in 19 of 30 (63.3%) subjects in the LCM arm and 16 of 32 (50%) subjects in the fPHT arm. LCM was noninferior to fPHT (p = 0.02), with a risk ratio of 1.27 (90% CI = 0.88-1.83). Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were similar in both arms, occurring in 9 of 35 (25.7%) LCM and 9 of 37 (24.3%) fPHT subjects (p = 1.0).. LCM was noninferior to fPHT in controlling NCS, and TEAEs were comparable. LCM can be considered an alternative to fPHT in the treatment of NCSs detected on cEEG. Ann Neurol 2018;83:1174-1185.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticonvulsants; Brain Waves; Cross-Over Studies; Electroencephalography; Epilepsy, Generalized; Female; Glasgow Coma Scale; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Phenytoin; Prospective Studies; Single-Blind Method; Treatment Outcome

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are immune-mediated diseases characterized by an extensive loss of the epidermal skin layer, often resulting in death. SJS and TEN are often triggered by certain drugs, including antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Epilepsy is very difficult to treat and often involves the combination of two or more AEDs. In this study, we quantified not only the risk of SJS or TEN associated with single-AED therapy but also the risk related to concomitant AED treatment using reporting-derived signals.. An analysis of the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database was performed from the first quarter of 2004 to the fourth quarter of 2018. The single-AED signals were evaluated using the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), and the combination therapy signals were evaluated using Ω shrinkage measure and combination risk ratio (CRR).. SJS signals were associated with 11 AEDs, and TEN signals were related to 12 AEDs. Moreover, the following AED combinations were associated with SJS signals: carbamazepine-lorazepam (Ω. This study identified two AED combinations that increased the SJS signals and seven combinations that increased the TEN signals. Although AED monotherapies require attention for SJS and TEN, some AED combinations require extra caution.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Clobazam; Clonazepam; Databases, Factual; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Gabapentin; Humans; Japan; Lacosamide; Lamotrigine; Levetiracetam; Lorazepam; Pharmacovigilance; Phenytoin; Stevens-Johnson Syndrome; Valproic Acid

Nonconvulsive seizures (NCS) and nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) are electrographic seizures (ESz) that are not associated with overt clinical seizure activity. NCS are distinct ESz, whereas NCSE has ongoing, continuous electrographic seizure activity. Both are common in critically ill patients admitted to hospital intensive care units (ICUs), and studies have shown that about 20% of ICU patients undergoing continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) monitoring will have NCS/NCSE. Although the treatment for convulsive SE is well established, there is no clear consensus for the treatment of NCS/NCSE. Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), such as phenytoin (PHT) and fosphenytoin (fPHT), used in convulsive SE are also used to treat NCS/NCSE despite lack of data for their appropriateness for these conditions. Recent studies have shown that very aggressive treatment of NCSss/NCSE can lead to worse outcomes because the AEDs used can have significant adverse effects. Recently, several intravenous (IV) AEDs have become available for substitution therapy when their oral use is not possible. There are retrospective case reports and case series that suggest that these AEDs may be beneficial for treatment of NCS/NCSE. The Treatment of Recurrent Electrographic Nonconvulsive Seizures (TRENdS) Study will compare the efficacy and tolerability of fPHT and lacosamide in patients having NCS as noted by cEEG monitoring. The study is currently open to recruitment and has 13 sites in the United States. A total of 200 subjects will be randomized, 100 to each treatment arm.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Electroencephalography; Humans; Lacosamide; Monitoring, Physiologic; Phenytoin; Retrospective Studies; Secondary Prevention; Status Epilepticus; Treatment Outcome

Subacute encephalopathy with seizures in chronic alcoholism (SESA) was first described in 1981 by Niedermeyer who reported alcoholic patients presenting with confusion, seizures and focal neurological deficits and is quite distinct from patients presenting with typical alcohol withdrawal seizures. EEG often reveals periodic discharges and spikes, but SESA presenting with non-convulsive status epilepticus has rarely been described. We report a case of SESA with non-convulsive status epilepticus in a patient who was initially suspected of having a typical alcohol withdrawal seizure. A 61 year old woman with a history of chronic alcoholism was admitted at an outside hospital for confusion thought to be secondary to an alcohol withdrawal seizure. She had right hemiparesis and later developed right facial twitching that did not respond to intravenous fosphenytoin and levetiracetam. She was transferred for further management. Upon arrival, lorazepam and fosphenytoin were given and right face clonic movements resolved. However, continuous EEG monitoring revealed ongoing non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE). Following treatment with IV valproate and lacosamide, there was resolution of NCSE. SESA is likely an under recognized clinical syndrome that is quite distinct from typical alcohol withdrawal seizures and requires a different diagnostic and management approach. NCSE is likely to account for the encephalopathy and focal neurological deficits seen in patients presenting with the clinical syndrome of SESA. Therefore, a high degree of suspicion is warranted and continuous EEG monitoring is recommended for alcoholic patients with encephalopathy and focal neurological deficits.

Topics: Acetamides; Alcohol Withdrawal Seizures; Alcoholism; Anticonvulsants; Brain Diseases; Confusion; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Electroencephalography; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Lorazepam; Middle Aged; Neurologic Examination; Paresis; Patient Compliance; Phenytoin; Seizures; Status Epilepticus; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Valproic Acid