jhw-015 and anandamide

Stimulation of the perivascular sensory outflow in pithed rats produces vasodepressor responses mediated by CGRP release. Interestingly, endocannabinoids such as anandamide (which interacts with CB1 , CB2 , TRPV1 and GPR55 receptors) can regulate the activity of perivascular sensory nerves in dural blood vessels by modulating CGRP release. Yet, as no publication has reported whether this mechanism is operative in the healthy systemic vasculature, this study has specifically analysed the receptors mediating the potential inhibitory effects of the cannabinoid (CB) receptor agonists anandamide (non-selective), JWH-015 (CB2 ) and lysophosphatidylinositol (GPR55) on the rat vasodepressor sensory CGRPergic outflow (an index of systemic vasodilatation). Healthy pithed rats were pre-treated with consecutive i.v. continuous infusions of hexamethonium, methoxamine and the above agonists. Electrical spinal (T9 -T12 ) stimulation of the vasodepressor sensory CGRPergic outflow or i.v. injections of α-CGRP produced frequency-dependent or dose-dependent vasodepressor responses. The infusions of anandamide in a dose-dependent manner inhibited the vasodepressor responses by electrical stimulation (remaining unaffected by JWH-015 or lysophosphatidylinositol), but not those by α-CGRP. After i.v. administration of antagonists, the inhibition by 3.1 μg/kg min anandamide was: (i) potently blocked by 31-100 μg/kg NIDA41020 (CB1 ), (ii) unaffected by 180 μg/kg AM630 (CB2 ), 31 μg/kg cannabidiol (GPR55) or 31-100 μg/kg capsazepine (TRPV1) and (iii) slightly blocked by 310 μg/kg AM630. The above doses of antagonists were enough to block their respective receptors. These results suggest that anandamide-induced inhibition of the vasodepressor sensory CGRPergic outflow is mainly mediated by pre-junctional activation of CB1 receptors, with no pharmacological evidence for the role of CB2 , TRPV1 or GPR55 receptors.

Topics: Animals; Arachidonic Acids; Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide; Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Electric Stimulation; Endocannabinoids; Indoles; Lysophospholipids; Male; Polyunsaturated Alkamides; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; Vasodilation

Cannabinoid receptor activation is protective in animal colitis models. We sought to investigate if cannabinoids attenuated colitis-like tissue damage in human colonic specimens, with the hypothesis that cannabinoids would be protective in a cytokine-driven model of human colonic mucosal damage. Healthy human colonic mucosa was incubated with pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-1β to elicit colitis-like tissue damage. The cytokine-driven increase in scored crypt and mucosal damage and lymphocyte density was attenuated with concomitant hydrocortisone pretreatment. The cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2) receptor-selective agonist JWH-015 significantly reduced colitis scores following cytokine incubation, as evidenced by a reduction in mucosal crypt and luminal epithelial damage and lymphocyte density in the lamina propria. The effect of JWH-015 was reversed in the presence of the CB2 receptor inverse agonist JTE-907. Anandamide was also protective in the cytokine-incubated explant colitis model in a manner reversible with JTE-907, while CB1 receptor agonism with ACEA was without effect. TNF-α and IL-1β together evoked an increase in paracellular epithelial permeability in Caco-2 cell monolayers over 48h of incubation. However, neither CB2 nor CB1 receptor activation altered the cytokine-evoked increase in permeability. These findings support a discrete role for CB2 receptors in the attenuation of detrimental pro-inflammatory cytokine-mediated mucosal damage in the human colon without directly affecting mucosal epithelial barrier function.

Topics: Arachidonic Acids; Biological Transport; Caco-2 Cells; Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists; Colitis; Colon; Colorectal Neoplasms; Dioxoles; Endocannabinoids; Epithelial Cells; Epithelium; Female; Humans; Hydrocortisone; Indoles; Inflammation; Interleukin-1beta; Intestinal Mucosa; Lymphocyte Count; Male; Permeability; Polyunsaturated Alkamides; Quinolones; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

The endocannabinoid system exhibits multiple functions in cardiovascular regulation mainly by cannabinoid (CB1 and CB2) receptors, vanilloid TRPV1 receptors and, probably, by the orphan G protein-coupled receptor 55 (GPR55). Hence, the role of these receptors was investigated in Wistar pithed rats on anandamide- and lysophosphatidylinositol (LPI)-induced inhibition of the vasopressor responses induced by preganglionic (T7-T9) stimulation of the vasopressor sympathetic outflow or i.v. bolus injections of noradrenaline. The corresponding frequency- and dose-dependent vasopressor responses were analyzed before and during i.v. continuous infusions of anandamide (CB1, CB2, TRPV1 and GPR55), JWH-015 (CB2) and LPI (GPR55) in animals receiving (i.v.) the antagonists NIDA41020 (CB1), AM630 (CB2), capsazepine (TRPV1) and/or cannabidiol (GPR55). Anandamide (0.1-3.1 μg/kg min) inhibited the vasopressor responses by electrical stimulation, but not those by noradrenaline; while LPI (5.6-10 μg/kg min) inhibited both responses. In contrast, JWH-015 (5.6-10 μg/kg min) failed to induce sympatho-inhibition. Anandamide-induced sympatho-inhibition was: (i) dose-dependently blocked by 31 and 100 μg/kg NIDA41020; (ii) slightly blocked by 310 μg/kg AM630 or 31 μg/kg cannabidiol; and (iii) unaffected by 310 μg/kg capsazepine. Moreover, LPI-induced inhibition of both vasopressor responses was blocked and abolished by 10 and 31 μg/kg cannabidiol, respectively, and weakly blocked by 100 μg/kg NIDA41020. Thus, the sympatho-inhibition by anandamide is primarily mediated by cannabinoid CB1 and, minimally, by cannabidiol-sensitive receptors. In contrast, LPI-induced inhibition of both responses seems to be mainly mediated by postjunctional cannabidiol-sensitive (presumably endothelial GPR55) receptors.

Topics: Animals; Arachidonic Acids; Blood Pressure; Desipramine; Electric Stimulation; Endocannabinoids; Heart Rate; Indoles; Lysophospholipids; Male; Norepinephrine; Polyunsaturated Alkamides; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Sympathetic Nervous System; Vasoconstrictor Agents

The endocannabinoid system functions through two well characterized receptor systems, the CB1 and CB2 receptors. Work by a number of groups in recent years has provided evidence that the system is more complicated and additional receptor types should exist to explain ligand activity in a number of physiological processes.. Cells transfected with the human cDNA for GPR55 were tested for their ability to bind and to mediate GTPgammaS binding by cannabinoid ligands. Using an antibody and peptide blocking approach, the nature of the G-protein coupling was determined and further demonstrated by measuring activity of downstream signalling pathways.. We demonstrate that GPR55 binds to and is activated by the cannabinoid ligand CP55940. In addition endocannabinoids including anandamide and virodhamine activate GTPgammaS binding via GPR55 with nM potencies. Ligands such as cannabidiol and abnormal cannabidiol which exhibit no CB1 or CB2 activity and are believed to function at a novel cannabinoid receptor, also showed activity at GPR55. GPR55 couples to Galpha13 and can mediate activation of rhoA, cdc42 and rac1.. These data suggest that GPR55 is a novel cannabinoid receptor, and its ligand profile with respect to CB1 and CB2 described here will permit delineation of its physiological function(s).

Topics: Amino Acid Sequence; Animals; Arachidonic Acids; Binding Sites; Binding, Competitive; Cannabidiol; Cannabinoids; Cell Line; Cloning, Molecular; Cyclohexanols; Down-Regulation; Endocannabinoids; Guanosine 5'-O-(3-Thiotriphosphate); Humans; Ligands; Mice; Molecular Sequence Data; Organ Specificity; Polymerase Chain Reaction; Polyunsaturated Alkamides; Rats; Receptors, Cannabinoid; Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled; RNA, Messenger; Signal Transduction; Structure-Activity Relationship

It is well accepted that endogenous cannabinoids and CB1 receptors are involved in the regulation of smooth muscle contractility and intestinal motility, through a mechanism mainly related to reduction of acetylcholine release from cholinergic nerve endings. Because, few data exist on a possible modulatory action of the cannabinoid agents on the non-adrenergic non-cholinergic (NANC) excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission, the aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of cannabinoid drugs on the NANC responses elicited by electrical field stimulation (EFS) in the circular muscle of mouse proximal colon. Colonic contractions were monitored as changes in endoluminal pressure. In NANC conditions, EFS evoked TTX-sensitive responses, characterized by a relaxation, nitrergic in origin, followed by a contraction. The EFS-evoked contraction was significantly reduced by SR48968, NK2 receptor antagonist, and abolished by co-administration of SR48968 and SR140333, NK1 receptor antagonist, suggesting that it was due to release of tachykinins. The cannabinoid receptor synthetic agonist, WIN55,212-2, the putative endogenous ligand, anandamide, the selective CB1 receptor agonist ACEA, but not the selective CB2 receptor agonist JWH-015, produced a concentration-dependent reduction of the NANC contractile responses, without affecting the NANC relaxation. ACEA or anandamide did not modify the contractions induced by exogenous [beta-Ala(8)]-NKA(4-10), agonist of NK2 receptors. The selective antagonist of CB1 receptors, SR141716A, per se failed to affect the EFS-evoked responses, but antagonized the inhibitory effects of WIN55,212-2, anandamide and ACEA on NANC contractile responses. AM630, CB2 receptor antagonist, did not modify the inhibitory effects of WIN55,212-2 or anandamide. URB597, inhibitor of the fatty acid amide hydrolase, enzyme which catalyze the hydrolysis of anandamide, was without any effect on the NANC evoked responses. We conclude that the activation of prejunctional CB1 receptors produces inhibition of NANC contractile responses in mouse colonic preparations. However, endogenous ligands do not seem to modulate tonically the NANC transmission in mouse colon.

Topics: Animals; Arachidonic Acids; Benzoxazines; Cannabinoid Receptor Modulators; Cannabinoids; Colon; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Electric Stimulation; Endocannabinoids; Enteric Nervous System; Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials; Gastrointestinal Motility; In Vitro Techniques; Indoles; Inhibitory Postsynaptic Potentials; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Morpholines; Naphthalenes; Neuromuscular Junction; Piperidines; Polyunsaturated Alkamides; Pyrazoles; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2; Receptors, Tachykinin; Rimonabant; Synaptic Transmission; Tachykinins

In this study, we investigated the mechanism of S100B neurotoxicity and the effect of cannabinoids, in C6 cells treated with 1-methyl-4-phenyl 1,2,3,6 tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) and co-cultured with differentiated PC12 cells. MPTP concentration- and time-dependently increased S100B density in C6 cells. This effect was followed by increased C6 cell proliferation and decreased cell viability of co-cultured PC12 cells. An antibody against S100B, given to PC12 cells before co-culture, led to their survival. Treatment with arachidonyl-2-chloroethylamide, a CB1 agonist, significantly inhibited MPTP-induced S100B density in C6 cells and protected co-cultured PC12 cells from cell death. Because MPTP selectively increased the levels of anandamide in C6 cells, the involvement of the endocannabinoid system was investigated by using selective inhibitors of endocannabinoid inactivation (cellular re-uptake or enzymatic hydrolysis) and selective cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptor antagonists and by silencing the CB1 receptor. Our data suggest that selective activation of CB1 receptors by either exogenous or endogenous cannabinoids might afford neuroprotection in MPTP-induced neurotoxicity also by controlling S100B up-regulation in activated glial cells.

Topics: 1-Methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine; Amidohydrolases; Animals; Antibodies; Apoptosis; Arachidonic Acids; Calcium; Caspase 3; Cell Communication; Cell Differentiation; Cell Proliferation; Cell Survival; Coculture Techniques; Culture Media, Conditioned; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Endocannabinoids; Enzyme Activation; Enzyme Inhibitors; Indoles; MPTP Poisoning; Nerve Growth Factors; Neuroglia; Neurons; Neuroprotective Agents; PC12 Cells; Piperidines; Polyunsaturated Alkamides; Pyrazoles; Rats; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2; Rimonabant; RNA Interference; RNA, Small Interfering; S100 Calcium Binding Protein beta Subunit; S100 Proteins; Serotonin; Time Factors; Up-Regulation

While most of the studies concerning the role of cannabinoids on gastric motility have focused the attention on the gastric emptying in in vivo animal models, there is little information about the cannabinoid peripheral influence in the stomach. In addition, the functional features of CB2 receptors in the gastrointestinal tract have been poorly characterized. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of cannabinoid drugs on the excitatory cholinergic and inhibitory non-adrenergic non-cholinergic (NANC) neurotransmission in mouse isolated gastric preparations. Intraluminal pressure from isolated whole stomach was recorded and mechanical responses induced by electrical field stimulation (EFS) were analyzed in different experimental conditions. EFS (0.5ms duration, supramaximal voltage, in trains of 5s, 2-16Hz) caused a cholinergic contraction, which was abolished by atropine or tetrodotoxin (TTX). The cannabinoid receptor agonist, WIN 55,212-2, the endogenous ligand, anandamide, the selective CB1 receptor agonist ACEA, and the selective CB2 receptor agonists, JWH015 and JWH133, produced a concentration-dependent reduction of the EFS-evoked cholinergic contractions. SR141716A, CB1 receptor antagonist, significantly attenuated the inhibitory effects induced by WIN 55,212-2, anandamide or ACEA, without affecting those caused by JWH133. AM630, CB2 receptor antagonist, reduced the inhibitory effects induced by WIN 55,212-2, anandamide, JWH015 or JWH133, without affecting those caused by ACEA. The joint application of SR141716A and AM630 was able of fully preventing the WIN 55,212-2 and anandamide actions. The cannabinoid antagonists failed per se to affect the neurally evoked responses. Cannabinoids did not modify the contractions produced by exogenous carbachol. In the presence of atropine and guanethidine (NANC conditions) EFS-induced TTX-sensitive relaxation consisting in an early and rapid component followed by a second slow phase, which were unaffected by cannabinoid drugs. In conclusion, the present results suggest that cannabinoids play a prejunctional modulatory role on the cholinergic excitatory transmission without affecting the NANC inhibitory transmission. In addition, this study provides experimental evidence that also the activation of CB2 receptors is able to reduce cholinergic neurotransmission in the mouse stomach.

Topics: Animals; Arachidonic Acids; Benzoxazines; Cannabinoid Receptor Modulators; Cannabinoids; Cholinergic Fibers; Electric Stimulation; Endocannabinoids; Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials; Gastrointestinal Motility; In Vitro Techniques; Indoles; Inhibitory Postsynaptic Potentials; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Morpholines; Naphthalenes; Neuromuscular Junction; Piperidines; Polyunsaturated Alkamides; Pyrazoles; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2; Receptors, Presynaptic; Rimonabant; Stomach; Synaptic Transmission

Pharmacological effects of cannabinoid ligands are thought to be mediated through cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptor subtypes. Sequence analysis revealed that rat and human cannabinoid CB2 receptors are divergent and share 81% amino acid homology. Pharmacological analysis of the possible species differences between rat and human cannabinoid CB2 receptors was performed using radioligand binding and functional assays. Pronounced species selectivity at the rat cannabinoid CB2 receptor (50- to 140-fold) was observed with AM-1710 (3-(1,1-Dimethyl-heptyl)-1-hydroxy-9-methoxy-benzo[c]chromen-6-one) and AM-1714 (3-(1,1-Dimethyl-heptyl)-1-9-dihydroxy-benzo[c]chromen-6-one). In contrast, JWH-015 ((2-Methyl-1-propyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-napthalen-1-yl-methanone) was 3- to 10-fold selective at the human cannabinoid CB2 receptor. Endocannabinoid ligands were more human receptor selective. Cannabinoid CB2 receptor antagonist, AM-630 ((6-Iodo-2-methyl-1-(2-morpholin-4-yl-ethyl)-1H-indol-3-yl)-(4-methoxy-phenyl)-methanone) was more potent at the rat receptor in radioligand binding and functional assays than that of the human receptor. The findings of the pharmacological differences between the human and rat cannabinoid CB2 receptors in this study provide critical information for characterizing cannabinoid ligands in in vivo rodent models for drug discovery purpose.

Topics: Animals; Arachidonic Acids; Benzoxazines; Binding, Competitive; Calcium; Cell Line; Chromones; Colforsin; Cyclic AMP; Cyclohexanols; DNA, Complementary; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Endocannabinoids; Glycerides; Humans; Indoles; Morpholines; Naphthalenes; Polyunsaturated Alkamides; Radioligand Assay; Rats; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2; Species Specificity; Transfection; Tritium

A 3D-QSAR study was carried out on 20 cannabinoids for which the binding affinities (K(i)) with respect to CB(1) and CB(2) receptors, determined in the same cell line, were available. For the first time three series of significantly different chemical structures such as Delta(9)-THC analogues, anandamides, and indoles were included in a single 3D-QSAR model, to obtain information on the interactions of all ligands with both CB(1) and CB(2) receptors and on their receptor selectivity. Delta(9)-THC was chosen as the structural template for alignment. The 3D-structure-activity correlation obtained by the GOLPE procedure provided a partial least squares (PLS) model with a very good predictive ability for the CB(1) receptor affinity of all compounds. The model allowed us to identify seven different regions in the space that contribute to explain the above binding affinities. External validation of the interpretation of the 3D-QSAR model was derived from a response-independent procedure such as principal components analysis (PCA). The CB(2) receptor model evidenced, besides the seven regions found for the CB(1) receptor, a new characteristic region for the CB(2) receptor. Another PCA, using 10 GRID probes, provided further evidence of receptor selectivity regions. One region opposite to the amidic NH of CB(1) selective O585 appears to be responsible for the CB(1) selectivity, while an interaction region opposite to the carbonyl of CB(2) selective JWH-015 appears to be involved in the CB(2) binding selectivity.

Topics: Arachidonic Acids; Cannabinoids; Drug Design; Endocannabinoids; Indoles; Ligands; Models, Biological; Models, Molecular; Polyunsaturated Alkamides; Receptors, Cannabinoid; Receptors, Drug; Structure-Activity Relationship