jarosite and arsenic-acid

jarosite has been researched along with arsenic-acid* in 3 studies

Other Studies

3 other study(ies) available for jarosite and arsenic-acid

ArticleYear
Iron Isotopes in Acid Mine Drainage: Extreme and Divergent Fractionation between Solid (Schwertmannite, Jarosite, and Ferric Arsenate) and Aqueous Species.
    Environmental science & technology, 2022, 12-20, Volume: 56, Issue:24

    Examination of stable Fe isotopes is a powerful tool to explore Fe cycling in a range of environments. However, the isotopic fractionation of Fe in acid mine drainage (AMD) has received little attention and is poorly understood. Here, we analyze Fe isotopes in waters and Fe(III)-rich solids along an AMD flow-path. Aqueous Fe spanned a concentration and δ

    Topics: Arsenates; Ferric Compounds; Iron; Iron Isotopes

2022
Humic acid promotes arsenopyrite bio-oxidation and arsenic immobilization.
    Journal of hazardous materials, 2020, 02-15, Volume: 384

    The bio-oxidative dissolution of arsenopyrite, the most severe arsenic contamination source, can be mediated by organic substances, but pertinent studies on this subject are scarce. In this study, the bio-oxidative dissolution of arsenopyrite by Sulfobacillus thermosulfidooxidans and arsenic immobilization were evaluated in the presence of humic acid (HA). The mineral dissolution was monitored through analyses of the parameters in solution, phase and element speciation transformations on the mineral surface, and arsenic immobilization on the surfaces of cells and jarosites-HA. The results show that the presence of HA enhances the dissolution of arsenopyrite, e.g., 7.1% of arsenopyrite was in the residue after 12 d of bio-oxidation compared to 19.3% in the absence of HA. Meanwhile, the presence of HA led to changes of the fates of As and Fe and no accumulation of elemental sulfur (S

    Topics: Arsenates; Arsenicals; Arsenites; Biodegradation, Environmental; Clostridiales; Ferric Compounds; Humic Substances; Iron Compounds; Minerals; Models, Theoretical; Oxidation-Reduction; Solubility; Sulfates; Sulfides; Surface Properties

2020
Copper and arsenate co-sorption at the mineral-water interfaces of goethite and jarosite.
    Journal of colloid and interface science, 2008, Jun-15, Volume: 322, Issue:2

    The co-sorption reaction products of arsenate (As(V)) and copper (Cu(II)) on goethite (alpha-FeOOH) and natro-jarosite (Na(3)Fe(3)(SO(4))(2)(OH)(6)) were investigated with extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectroscopy to determine if Cu(II) and As(V) would form precipitates or compete with each other for surface sites. The reaction products were prepared by mixing 250 microM Cu(SO(4)) with 10, 25, or 50 microM Na(2)HAsO(4) at pH 5.65 and allowing the mixture to react in 10 m(2) L(-1) goethite or jarosite suspensions for 12 days. In addition, EXAFS data of Cu(SO(4)) and As(V) sorbed on goethite and jarosite were collected as control species. All reaction conditions were under-saturated with respect to common copper bearing minerals: tenorite (CuO), brochantite (Cu(4)(OH)(6)SO(4)), and hydrated clinoclase (Cu(3)(AsO(4))(2)2H(2)O). The extents of the As(V) and Cu(II) surface adsorption reactions showed a strong competitive effect from Cu(II) on As(V) adsorption for a nominal Cu:As mole-ratio of 25:1. With increasing nominal As(V) concentration, As(V) sorption on goethite and jarosite increased without diminishing the amount of Cu(II) sorption. In the absence of either co-sorbate, As(V) and Cu(II) formed the expected surface adsorption species, i.e., bidentate binuclear and edge-sharing surface complexes, consistent with previously published results. In each other's presence, the local bonding environments of As(V) and Cu(II) showed that the co-sorbates form a precipitate on the goethite and jarosite surface at nominal concentrations of 10:1 and 5:1. At nominal Cu:As mole-ratios of 25:1, Cu(II) did not form significantly different surface complexes on goethite or jarosite from those in the absence of As(V), however, As K-edge EXAFS results distinctly showed Cu(II) atoms in As(V)'s local bonding environment on the goethite surface. The structures of the two precipitates were different and depended on the anion-layer structure and possibly the presence of structural oxyanions in the case of jarosite. On goethite, the copper-arsenate precipitate was similar to hydrated clinoclase, while on jarosite, a euchroite-like precipitate (Cu(2)[AsO(4)](OH)3H(2)O, P 2(1)2(1)2(1)) had formed. Despite under-saturated solution conditions, the formation of these precipitates may have occurred due to a seed-formation effect from densely surface adsorbed Cu(II) and As(V) for which the "new" saturation index was significantly lower than homogeneous values would ot

    Topics: Adsorption; Arsenates; Copper; Ferric Compounds; Iron Compounds; Minerals; Solutions; Spectrum Analysis; Sulfates; Water Pollutants, Chemical; X-Rays

2008