iothalamate-meglumine and ioxilan

The inflammatory effects of fallopian tube catheterization and selective injection of seven contrast agents (ethiodized oil, diatrizoate meglumine 52%, diatrizoate meglumine 66%, iothalamate meglumine 60%, iopamidol, ioxitol, and ioxaglate) were evaluated in 88 rabbits. The contrast agent used was randomly selected and selectively injected after unilateral catheterization; the contralateral side was used for control. Pathologic inspection of right and left uteri with attached fallopian tubes and ovaries was done without knowledge of side of catheterization or duration of time since catheterization. The degree and location of inflammation were noted. Inflammation disappeared by 4 days in five of seven contrast agents. Iothalamate meglumine 60% and iopamidol required 2 weeks for disappearance of inflammation. Essentially no inflammation was associated at any time with ioxaglate. These findings suggest that all of these contrast agents would be clinically acceptable for direct injection into the human fallopian tube.

Topics: Animals; Contrast Media; Diatrizoate Meglumine; Ethiodized Oil; Fallopian Tubes; Female; Hysterosalpingography; Injections; Iohexol; Iopamidol; Iothalamate Meglumine; Ioxaglic Acid; Rabbits; Salpingitis

The authors evaluated the effect of different iodinated contrast agents on the fallopian tube and adnexal tissue in 15 rabbits. Ethiodized oil, an oil-soluble agent, was used in five rabbits. The following water-soluble agents were used: iothalamate meglumine 30% (n = 3), iothalamate meglumine 60% (n = 3), and ioxilan (n = 4). The agents were injected through catheters placed in the fallopian tubes. Fallopian tubes and peritoneal cavities were histologically evaluated. The contralateral tube served as a control. Ioxilan and iothalamate meglumine 30% produced no pathologic response in the tube or peritoneal cavity. Iothalamate meglumine 60% was associated with mild inflammatory infiltrate, mucosal edema, giant cell reaction, and periovarian adhesions that were bilateral but more pronounced on the injected side. Use of ethiodized oil resulted in papillary fibrous adhesions on the ovarian surface, and fat granulomas were seen in the periovarian tissues. The safety of oil-based contrast agents for use in hysterosalpingography is therefore questioned. No significant differences were found among the water-soluble contrast agents.

Topics: Adnexa Uteri; Adnexal Diseases; Animals; Contrast Media; Ethiodized Oil; Fallopian Tube Diseases; Fallopian Tubes; Female; Granuloma; Hysterosalpingography; Iohexol; Iothalamate Meglumine; Rabbits; Tissue Adhesions

A consensus does not exist as to the optimal contrast agent for hysterosalpingography. This study was undertaken to evaluate the early and delayed inflammatory responses of the peritoneal surfaces to various types of iodinated contrast media. Guinea pigs received intraperitoneal injections of lactated Ringer solution, iothalamate meglumine, diatrizoate sodium, ioxilan, or ethiodized oil. The inflammatory response of the peritoneal surfaces was assessed at 1,7, and 30 days. Five animals were studied at each time point for each agent. No animals that received Ringer lactate or iothalamate meglumine had inflammation at any time. Ioxilan produced inflammation in two of five animals at 7 days and no inflammation at 1 or 30 days. Ethiodized oil produced no inflammation at 1 day; however, three animals had inflammation at 7 days, and all five had inflammation at 30 days. The 30-day group showed striking inflammatory response with granulomatous features. The authors recommend the continued use of meglumine-based water-soluble ionic contrast material for hysterosalpingography.

Topics: Animals; Contrast Media; Diatrizoate; Ethiodized Oil; Guinea Pigs; Iohexol; Iothalamate Meglumine; Peritonitis