indinavir-sulfate and tipranavir

Protease inhibitors (PIs) are potent competitive inhibitors of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) widely used in the treatment of the acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) and prescribed in combination with other antiretroviral drugs. So far ten PIs were approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of HIV infection. In this mini review, quality control methods of each PI are discussed on the basis of analytical techniques published in the literature. Special attention is given to summarize the LC methods described for the analysis of the selected PIs in both drug substances and products with the available literature till date.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Carbamates; Chromatography, Liquid; Darunavir; Drug Contamination; Furans; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Indinavir; Lopinavir; Nelfinavir; Oligopeptides; Organophosphates; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Pyrones; Quality Control; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Sulfonamides

Although protease inhibitors (PIs) have dramatically improved outcomes in HIV-infected patients, half still fail treatment with PI-based combination therapy. Genetic pressure from incomplete viral suppression rapidly selects for HIV variants with protease gene mutations that confer reduced susceptibility to PI drugs. A number of specific amino acid substitutions have been associated with PI resistance. However, high-level resistance to individual PIs requires the accumulation of several primary and secondary mutations, developing along drug-specific, step-wise pathways. HIV variants resistant to saquinavir and ritonavir usually contain L90M and V82A substitutions, respectively. Indinavir resistance may be linked to substitutions at positions 46 or 82. Resistance to nelfinavir is primarily associated with D30N but may alternatively be found with L90M. Resistance during exposure to amprenavir can follow development of I50V, which also may confer resistance to lopinavir. Failure during treatment with atazanavir is closely linked to 150L. The overlapping of these pathways can lead to multiple-PI resistance, limiting therapeutic options in antiretroviral-experienced patients. Reduced susceptibility to more than one PI is most likely to be associated with amino acid substitutions at six positions: 10, 46, 54, 82, 84 and 90. Other mutations (D30N, G48V, I50V or I50L) are relatively specific for particular PIs and are less likely to produce cross resistance. Certain resistance mutations selected by exposure to one PI may actually increase susceptibility to others. Patients newly diagnosed with HIV infection are increasingly found to harbour virus that is resistant to the more commonly used drugs. Newer PIs may select for mutations that result in less cross resistance with older agents.

Topics: Amino Acid Substitution; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Resistance, Viral; Genetic Variation; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Mutation; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Sulfonamides

This review deals with clinical applications of compounds that inhibit the action of the protease encoded within the genome of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The HIV-protease is essential for viral maturation and represents an important therapeutic target in the fight against AIDS. Following a brief overview of the enzyme structure and function, the article focuses on a number of peptide and non-peptide based HIV-protease inhibitors that are in current clinical use. These drugs are discussed both with respect to their efficacy in treatment of AIDS, and to problems related to insurgence of viral resistance and side effects seen to date in patient populations.

Topics: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Anti-HIV Agents; Binding Sites; Carbamates; Clinical Trials as Topic; Computer-Aided Design; Crystallography, X-Ray; Drug Design; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Drug Therapy, Combination; Furans; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Nelfinavir; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Pyrones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Sulfonamides

Topics: Carbamates; Drug Resistance; Furans; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Indinavir; Nelfinavir; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Structure-Activity Relationship; Sulfonamides

The effect of HIV type-1 (HIV-1) subtype on in vitro susceptibility and virological response to darunavir (DRV) and lopinavir (LPV) was studied using a broad panel of primary isolates, and in recombinant clinical isolates from treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected patients in the Phase III trial, AntiRetroviral Therapy with TMC114 ExaMined In naive Subjects (ARTEMIS).. Patients received DRV/ritonavir (DRV/r) 800/100 mg once daily (n=343) or LPV/ritonavir (LPV/r) 800/200 mg total daily dose (n=346), plus a fixed daily dose of emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.. DRV demonstrated high antiviral activity against a broad panel of HIV-1 major group (M) and outlier group (O) primary isolates in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, with a median 50% effective concentration (EC(50)) of 0.52 nM. Most (61%) patients in ARTEMIS harboured HIV-1 subtype B; other prevalent subtypes were C (13%) and CRF01_AE (17%); 9% harboured other subtypes. Median EC(50) values (interquartile range) for DRV were 1.79 nM (1.3-2.6) for subtype B, 1.12 nM (0.8-1.4) for C and 1.27 nM (1.0-1.7) for CRF01_AE. Virological response to DRV/r (HIV-1 RNA<50 copies/ml [intent-to-treat, time-to-loss of virological response algorithm]) was 81%, 87% and 85% for patients with subtype B, C and CRF01_AE infections, respectively. Similar results were observed in the LPV/r treatment group.. In vitro susceptibility to DRV was comparable across HIV-1 subtypes in a broad panel of primary isolates and in recombinant clinical isolates. Once daily DRV/r 800/100 mg and LPV/r 800/200 mg were highly effective in ARTEMIS irrespective of the HIV-1 subtype studied, confirming their broad anti-HIV-1 activity.

Topics: Adamantane; Adult; Analysis of Variance; Atazanavir Sulfate; Carbamates; Darunavir; Drug Resistance, Viral; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Lopinavir; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Molecular Typing; Nelfinavir; Neuraminidase; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Pyrones; Saquinavir; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

Outbreak of COVID-19 has been recognized as a global health concern since it causes high rates of morbidity and mortality. No specific antiviral drugs are available for the treatment of COVID-19 till date. Drug repurposing strategy helps to find out the drugs for COVID-19 treatment from existing FDA approved antiviral drugs. In this study, FDA approved small molecule antiviral drugs were repurposed against the major viral proteins of SARS-CoV-2.. The 3D structures of FDA approved small molecule antiviral drugs were retrieved from PubChem. Virtual screening was performed to find out the lead antiviral drug molecules against main protease (Mpro) and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) using COVID-19 Docking Server. Furthermore, lead molecules were individually docked against protein targets using AutoDock 4.0.1 software and their drug-likeness and ADMET properties were evaluated.. Out of 65 FDA approved small molecule antiviral drugs screened, Raltegravir showed highest interaction energy value of -9 kcal/mol against Mpro of SARS-CoV-2 and Indinavir, Tipranavir, and Pibrentasvir exhibited a binding energy value of ≥-8 kcal/mol. Similarly Indinavir showed the highest binding energy of -11.5 kcal/mol against the target protein RdRp and Dolutegravir, Elbasvir, Tipranavir, Taltegravir, Grazoprevir, Daclatasvir, Glecaprevir, Ledipasvir, Pibrentasvir and Velpatasvir showed a binding energy value in range from -8 to -11.2 kcal/mol. The antiviral drugs Raltegravir, Indinavir, Tipranavir, Dolutegravir, and Etravirine also exhibited good bioavailability and drug-likeness properties.. This study suggests that the screened small molecule antiviral drugs Raltegravir, Indinavir, Tipranavir, Dolutegravir, and Etravirine could serve as potential drugs for the treatment of COVID-19 with further validation studies.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Coronavirus Protease Inhibitors; COVID-19 Drug Treatment; Drug Repositioning; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Indinavir; Molecular Docking Simulation; Nitriles; Oxazines; Piperazines; Pyridines; Pyridones; Pyrimidines; Pyrones; Raltegravir Potassium; RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase; SARS-CoV-2; Sulfonamides

HIV infected patients often take at least three anti-HIV drugs together in Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART) and/or Ritonavir-Boosted Protease Inhibitor Therapy (PI/r) to suppress the viral replications. The potential drug-drug interactions affect efficacy of anti-HIV treatment and major source of such interaction is competition for the drug metabolizing enzyme, cytochrome P450 (CYP). CYP3A4 isoform is the enzyme responsible for metabolism of currently available HIV-1 protease drugs. Hence administration of these drugs in HARRT or PI/r leads to increased toxicity and reduced efficacy in HIV treatment. We used computational molecular docking method to predict such interactions by which to compare experimentally measured metabolism of each HIV-1 protease drug. AutoDock 4.0 was used to carry out molecular docking of 10 HIV-protease drugs into CYP3A4 to explore sites of reaction and interaction energies (i.e., binding affinity) of the complexes. Arg105, Arg106, Ser119, Arg212, Ala370, Arg372, and Glu374 are identified as major drug binding residues, and consistent with previous data of site-directed mutagenesis, crystallography structure, modeling, and docking studies. In addition, our docking results suggested that phenylalanine clusters and heme are also participated in the binding to mediate drug oxidative metabolism. We have shown that HIV-1 protease drugs such as tipranavir, nelfinavir, lopinavir, and atazanavir differ in their binding modes on each other for metabolic clearance in CYP3A4, whereas ritonavir, amprenavir, indinavir, saquinavir, fosamprenavir, and darunavir share the same binding mode.

Topics: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Computational Biology; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Darunavir; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Lopinavir; Nelfinavir; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

The effects of many protease inhibitor (PI)-selected mutations on the susceptibility to individual PIs are unknown. We analyzed in vitro susceptibility test results on 2,725 HIV-1 protease isolates. More than 2,400 isolates had been tested for susceptibility to fosamprenavir, indinavir, nelfinavir, and saquinavir; 2,130 isolates had been tested for susceptibility to lopinavir; 1,644 isolates had been tested for susceptibility to atazanavir; 1,265 isolates had been tested for susceptibility to tipranavir; and 642 isolates had been tested for susceptibility to darunavir. We applied least-angle regression (LARS) to the 200 most common mutations in the data set and identified a set of 46 mutations associated with decreased PI susceptibility of which 40 were not polymorphic in the eight most common HIV-1 group M subtypes. We then used least-squares regression to ascertain the relative contribution of each of these 46 mutations. The median number of mutations associated with decreased susceptibility to each PI was 28 (range, 19 to 32), and the median number of mutations associated with increased susceptibility to each PI was 2.5 (range, 1 to 8). Of the mutations with the greatest effect on PI susceptibility, I84AV was associated with decreased susceptibility to eight PIs; V32I, G48V, I54ALMSTV, V82F, and L90M were associated with decreased susceptibility to six to seven PIs; I47A, G48M, I50V, L76V, V82ST, and N88S were associated with decreased susceptibility to four to five PIs; and D30N, I50L, and V82AL were associated with decreased susceptibility to fewer than four PIs. This study underscores the greater impact of nonpolymorphic mutations compared with polymorphic mutations on decreased PI susceptibility and provides a comprehensive quantitative assessment of the effects of individual mutations on susceptibility to the eight clinically available PIs.

Topics: Atazanavir Sulfate; Carbamates; Darunavir; Furans; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Indinavir; Least-Squares Analysis; Lopinavir; Mutation; Nelfinavir; Oligopeptides; Organophosphates; Polymorphism, Genetic; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Pyrones; Saquinavir; Sulfonamides

The importance of the active site region aspartyl residues 25 and 29 of the mature HIV-1 protease (PR) for the binding of five clinical and three experimental protease inhibitors [symmetric cyclic urea inhibitor DMP323, nonhydrolyzable substrate analog (RPB) and the generic aspartic protease inhibitor acetyl-pepstatin (Ac-PEP)] was assessed by differential scanning calorimetry. DeltaT(m) values, defined as the difference in T(m) for a given protein in the presence and absence of inhibitor, for PR with DRV, ATV, SQV, RTV, APV, DMP323, RPB, and Ac-PEP are 22.4, 20.8, 19.3, 15.6, 14.3, 14.7, 8.7, and 6.5 degrees C, respectively. Binding of APV and Ac-PEP is most sensitive to the D25N mutation, as shown by DeltaT(m) ratios [DeltaT(m)(PR)/DeltaT(m)(PR(D25N))] of 35.8 and 16.3, respectively, whereas binding of DMP323 and RPB (DeltaT(m) ratios of 1-2) is least affected. Binding of the substrate-like inhibitors RPB and Ac-PEP is nearly abolished (DeltaT(m)(PR)/DeltaT(m)(PR(D29N)) > or = 44) by the D29N mutation, whereas this mutation only moderately affects binding of the smaller inhibitors (DeltaT(m) ratios of 1.4-2.2). Of the nine FDA-approved clinical HIV-1 protease inhibitors screened, APV, RTV, and DRV competitively inhibit porcine pepsin with K(i) values of 0.3, 0.6, and 2.14 microM, respectively. DSC results were consistent with this relatively weak binding of APV (DeltaT(m) 2.7 degrees C) compared with the tight binding of Ac-PEP (DeltaT(m) > or = 17 degrees C). Comparison of superimposed structures of the PR/APV complex with those of PR/Ac-PEP and pepsin/pepstatin A complexes suggests a role for Asp215, Asp32, and Ser219 in pepsin, equivalent to Asp25, Asp25', and Asp29 in PR in the binding and stabilization of the pepsin/APV complex.

Topics: Atazanavir Sulfate; Binding Sites; Binding, Competitive; Calorimetry, Differential Scanning; Carbamates; Crystallography, X-Ray; Darunavir; Furans; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Kinetics; Lopinavir; Models, Molecular; Molecular Structure; Mutation; Nelfinavir; Oligopeptides; Pepsin A; Protein Binding; Protein Structure, Tertiary; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Sulfonamides

Most HPLC-UV methods for therapeutic drug monitoring of anti-HIV drugs have long run times, which reduce their applicability for high-throughput analysis. We developed an ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC)-diode array detection method for the simultaneous quantification of the HIV-protease inhibitors (PIs) amprenavir, atazanavir, indinavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir, and tipranavir (TPV), and the nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) efavirenz and nevirapine.. Solid-phase extraction of 1 mL plasma was performed with Waters HLB cartridges. After 3 wash steps, we eluted the drugs with methanol, evaporated the alcohol, and reconstituted the residue with 50 microL methanol. We injected a 4-microL volume into the UPLC system (Waters ACQUITY UPLC BEH C8 column maintained at 60 degrees C) and used a linear gradient of 50 mmol/L ammonium acetate and 50 mmol/L formic acid in water versus acetonitrile to achieve chromatographic separation of the drugs and internal standard (A-86093). Three wavelengths (215, 240, and 260 nm) were monitored.. All drugs were eluted within 15 min. Calibration curves with concentrations of 0.025-10 mg/L (1.875-75 mg/L for TPV) showed coefficients of determination (r(2)) between 0.993 and 0.999. The lower limits of quantification were well below the trough concentrations reported in the literature. Inter- and intraassay CVs and the deviations between the nominal and measured concentrations were <15%. The method was validated by successful participation in an international interlaboratory QC program.. This method allows fast and simultaneous quantification of all commercially available PIs and NNRTIs for therapeutic drug monitoring.

Topics: Alkynes; Atazanavir Sulfate; Benzoxazines; Carbamates; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Cyclopropanes; Furans; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Lopinavir; Nelfinavir; Nevirapine; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Pyrones; Reproducibility of Results; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Sensitivity and Specificity; Solid Phase Extraction; Sulfonamides

Human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) contains numerous natural polymorphisms in its protease (PR) gene that are implicated in drug resistance in the case of HIV-1. This study evaluated emergent PR resistance in HIV-2. Three HIV-2 isolates were selected for resistance to amprenavir (APV), nelfinavir (NFV), indinavir (IDV), and tipranavir (TPV) in cell culture. Genotypic analysis determined the time to the appearance of protease inhibitor (PI)-associated mutations compared to HIV-1. Phenotypic drug susceptibility assays were used to determine the levels of drug resistance. Within 10 to 15 weeks of serial passage, three major mutations--I54M, I82F, and L90M--arose in HIV-2 viral cultures exposed to APV, NFV, and IDV, whereas I82L was selected with TPV. After 25 weeks, other cultures had developed I50V and I84V mutations. In contrast, no major PI mutations were selected in HIV-1 over this period except for D30N in the context of NFV selective pressure. The baseline phenotypes of wild-type HIV-2 isolates were in the range observed for HIV-1, except for APV and NFV for which a lower degree of sensitivity was seen. The acquisition of the I54M, I84V, L90M, and L99F mutations resulted in multi-PI-resistant viruses, conferring 10-fold to more than 100-fold resistance. Of note, we observed a 62A/99F mutational motif that conferred high-level resistance to PIs, as well as novel secondary mutations, including 6F, 12A, and 21K. Thus, natural polymorphisms in HIV-2 may facilitate the selection of PI resistance. The increasing incidence of such polymorphisms in drug-naive HIV-1- and HIV-2-infected persons is of concern.

Topics: Amino Acid Sequence; Carbamates; Drug Resistance, Viral; Furans; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; HIV-2; Humans; Indinavir; Molecular Sequence Data; Mutation; Nelfinavir; Polymorphism, Genetic; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides

An accurate, sensitive and simple reverse-phase (RP) high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay has been developed and validated for the simultaneous quantitative determination of tipranavir with nine other antiretroviral drugs in plasma. A liquid-liquid extraction of the drugs in tert-butylmethylether (TBME) from 200 microL of plasma is followed by a reversed phase gradient HPLC assay with UV detection at 210 nm. The standard curve for the drug was linear in the range of 80-80,000 ng/mL for tipranavir; 10-10,000 ng/mL for nevirapine, indinavir, efavirenz, and saquinavir; and 25-10,000 ng/mL for amprenavir, atazanavir, ritonavir, lopinavir, and nelfinavir. The regression coefficient (r(2)) was greater than 0.998 for all analytes. This method has been fully validated and shown to be specific, accurate and precise. Due to an excellent extraction procedure giving good recovery and a clean baseline, this method is simple, rapid, accurate and provides excellent resolution and peak shape for all analytes. Thus this method is very suitable for therapeutic drug monitoring.

Topics: Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Benzoxazines; Carbamates; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Cyclopropanes; Drug Stability; Furans; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Lopinavir; Molecular Structure; Nelfinavir; Nevirapine; Oligopeptides; Oxazines; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Pyrones; Reproducibility of Results; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Sensitivity and Specificity; Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet; Sulfonamides; Time Factors

To compare baseline susceptibility to protease inhibitors among HIV-1 isolates of subtypes C, F, G and CRF02_AG, and to identify polymorphisms that determine the differences in susceptibility.. A total of 42 samples of drug-naive patients infected with subtypes G (n=19), CRF02_AG (n = 10), F (n = 6) and C (n = 7) were phenotyped and genotyped with the Antivirogram and the ViroSeq 2.0 genotyping system, respectively. A Bayesian network approach was used for a preliminary analysis of the collected data and the dependencies indicated by the network were statistically confirmed.. CRF02_AG samples were found to be more susceptible to nelfinavir and ritonavir than other subtypes. Hypersusceptibility to these drugs was associated with the 70R polymorphism. 37D/S/T was associated with reduced susceptibility to indinavir and 89M with reduced susceptibility to lopinavir. Susceptibility to tipranavir was the lowest among the subtype F samples and the highest for subtype G samples, with samples carrying 57R being more susceptible than samples carrying 57K.. Our study suggests that there are baseline susceptibility differences between subtypes and these differences are due to naturally occurring polymorphisms in these subtypes. The predictive value for phenotype of these polymorphisms was even valid in subtypes where these polymorphisms are less prevalent. Taking into account such polymorphisms should improve current algorithms for interpretation of genotyping results in a subtype-independent way.

Topics: Algorithms; Bayes Theorem; Drug Resistance, Viral; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Models, Genetic; Nelfinavir; Phenotype; Polymorphism, Genetic; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

In our study we examined the anti-human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (anti-HIV-1) activity of a novel HIV-1 protease inhibitor, PNU-140690 (tipranavir), against patient-derived isolates resistant to multiple other protease inhibitors (PIs). The aim of our experiments was to investigate the genotypes and the in vitro phenotypes of drug resistance of PNU-140690. We carried out drug susceptibility tests with peripheral blood mononuclear cells and a fixed amount of infectious virus (1,000 50% tissue culture infective doses) to determine the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC(50)) and IC(90), PCR assays for the detection of drug resistance mutations in RNA in plasma, and direct sequencing of PCR products. Phenotypic resistance to PIs was invariably related to genotypic mutations. The substitutions among the amino acid residues of the protease included L10I, K20R, L24I, M36I, N37D, G48V, I54V, L63P, I64V, A71V, V77I, V82A, I84V, and L90M. Isolates from all of the patients had developed a maximal degree of resistance to indinavir, ritonavir, and nelfinavir (IC(50)s, >0.1 microM). We also compared these mutations with the amino acid changes previously described in association with in vivo tipranavir administration. The mutations included the following: I15V, E35D, N37D, R41K, D60E, and A71T. Infections with IIIB, 14aPre, and N70 were inhibited by an average drug IC(90) of 0.18 +/- 0.02 microM in multiple experiments. The average mean +/- standard error of mean IC(90) for the entire group of multidrug-resistant isolates derived from the mean values for two culture wells with p24 antigen supernatant appeared to be 0.619 +/- 0.055 microM (range, 0.31 to 0.86 microM). Tipranavir retained a sustained antiviral activity against PI-MDR clinical isolates and might be useful in combination regimens with other antiretroviral agents for patients who have already failed other PI-containing therapies.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Resistance, Multiple; Gene Frequency; Genotype; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Molecular Sequence Data; Mutation; Phenotype; Protease Inhibitors; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Sulfonamides