indinavir-sulfate and abacavir

Although the reduction in HIV-1-related deaths with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is similar in adults and children, the extent of the changes in two important surrogate markers HIV-1 RNA levels and CD4+ T cell counts, differs widely. In most paediatric studies virological response rates to HAART are inferior to those in adults. This review provides an overview of the paediatric clinical studies using HAART and seeks to improve the understanding of factors that may contribute to success or failure of HAART in children. An overview of all current articles on paediatric clinical trials using HAART is provided. 23 papers were available. HIV-1 RNA loads and CD4+ T cell counts were used as primary outcome measures. Virological response rates were highly variable, both among the different antiretroviral drugs but also among different studies using the same medication. Four studies in which dosages of the administrated protease inhibitor (PI) were adjusted after pharmacokinetic evaluation had superior virological response rates compared with those in which fixed dosages were used. Immunological response rates were more uniform than virological responses. In almost all studies increases of CD4+ T cell counts are reported independent of the extent of the virological response. Side-effects of HAART were generally mild, transient, and of gastrointestinal origin. Significant percentages of patients with serum lipid abnormalities were reported in three paediatric studies. However, signs of clinical lipodystrophy were not observed. The inferior virological response rates, which have been reported in HIV-1 infected children treated with HAART form a reflection of the challenges that are encountered in the treatment of these children. Difficulties with adherence and with the pharmacokinetics of PIs in children require an intensive, child-adjusted approach. A practical approach to therapy in institutions without tertiary care facilities may be induction therapy with a lopinavir containing regimen (lacking a need for therapeutic drug monitoring), to reduce high viral load levels followed by an easily tolerated maintenance regimen, for example containing abacavir or nevirapine.

Topics: Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; Child; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cyclopropanes; Dideoxynucleosides; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Nelfinavir; Nevirapine; Oxazines; Ritonavir; Saquinavir

Deaths related to the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and the incidence of opportunistic infections have been drastically decreased in the industrialized world. These reductions are mainly due to recent advances in the management of HIV infection, including the availability of new therapies. Until November 1995, the antiretroviral drugs available and approved by the Food and Drug Administration for clinical use in the United States consisted of only four nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors: zidovudine, zalcitabine, didanosine, and stavudine. Since then, 2 new classes of agents and 10 new agents have been approved; thus, the number of available antiretroviral drugs has more than tripled. Additional drugs and newer classes of antiretrovirals are in various stages of development. Because of the availability of more drugs, the complexity of HIV treatment has increased. Selecting an appropriate antiretroviral therapeutic regimen involves addressing multiple interdependent issues, including patient adherence, pharmacokinetic properties of the drugs (including food effects and drug-drug interactions), drug resistance, and overlapping adverse effects.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Delavirdine; Didanosine; Dideoxynucleosides; Female; Furans; HIV Infections; Humans; Indinavir; Lamivudine; Nelfinavir; Nevirapine; Oxazines; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Protease Inhibitors; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Stavudine; Sulfonamides; Zalcitabine; Zidovudine

Topics: Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Delavirdine; Didanosine; Dideoxynucleosides; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Lamivudine; Nelfinavir; Nevirapine; Oxazines; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Stavudine; Zalcitabine; Zidovudine

An equivalence (non-inferiority) trial comparing antiviral response, tolerability, and adherence with a triple nucleoside regimen containing abacavir 300 mg (ABC) plus a lamivudine 150-mg/zidovudine 300-mg combination tablet (COM) twice daily vs. a regimen containing the protease inhibitor indinavir (IDV) 800 mg three times daily plus COM twice daily (IDV/COM) in antiretroviral-naïve, HIV-infected patients.. Adult patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels > or = 5000 copies/mL and CD4+ cell counts > or = 100 cells/mm(3) were randomized to receive open-label ABC/COM (n = 169) or IDV/COM (n = 173) for 48 weeks. The intent-to-treat (ITT) population was the primary population evaluated. ITT: switch/missing equals failure (ITT: S/M = F) and as-treated (AT) analyses were used for assessing the proportion of patients achieving plasma HIV-1 RNA level < 400 and < 50 copies/mL at each clinic visit. In the ITT: S/M = F analysis, patients who switched treatment or had missing values were considered treatment failures; the AT analysis examined virologic data only while patients received study treatment. ABC/COM was considered equivalent (non-inferior) to IDV/COM if the lower limit of the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) about the difference in proportions of ABC/COM- vs. IDV/COM-treated patients attaining plasma HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL exceeded -15% at week 48.. The study population was diverse with respect to ethnicity (38% Asian, 27% Hispanic, 28% white, 3% black, 4% other) and gender (39% women, 61% men). Baseline median HIV-1 RNA was 4.80 log(10) copies/mL and CD4+ cell count was 315 cells/mm(3). ABC/COM met the criterion of equivalence to IDV/COM. In the ITT: S/M = F analysis at Week 48, a greater proportion of ABC/COM-treated patients achieved HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL (66% [109/164] vs. 50% [82/165]; treatment difference 16.6%, 95% CI (6.0, 27.2), p = 0.002) and HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL (60% [99/164] vs. 50% [83/165]; treatment difference 9.6%, 95% CI [-1.1, 20.2]), whereas the AT analysis showed similar proportions achieving these endpoints (< 400 copies/mL: 85 vs. 83%; < 50 copies/mL: 79 vs 81%). Comparable proportions of patients with screening HIV-1 RNA values > 100 000 copies/mL achieved HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL (ABC/COM: 60% [35/58]; IDV/COM: 51% [33/65]; treatment difference 9.6%, 95% CI [-7.9, 27.1]; ITT: S/M = F analysis). A significantly greater proportion taking ABC/COM were > or = 95% adherent (72% [109/151] vs. 45% [70/154] with IDV/COM, p < 0.001). Median increases from baseline in CD4+ cell counts were similar in the two treatment groups (+148 vs. +152 cells/mm(3)). Significantly more patients on IDV/COM reported drug-related adverse events (87% [142/165] vs. 65% [108/164] with ABC/COM, p < 0.001), similar proportions discontinued treatment due to adverse events (13 vs. 10%), and a slightly greater proportion in the ABC/COM group reported serious adverse events (13 vs. 8%). About half of the latter comprised suspected ABC-related hypersensitivity reactions (overall rate, 6%). Most adverse events were gastrointestinal in nature in both treatment groups.. ABC/COM was at least equivalent to IDV/COM over 48 weeks in the treatment of antiretroviral-naïve patients. ABC/COM was associated with a significantly higher adherence rate and lower incidence of drug-related adverse events than IDV/COM. The study was limited in that it was not powered to determine equivalence of treatments within high vs. low viral load strata, adherence was not monitored electronically, and bias could not be ruled out due to the open-label study design.

Topics: Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Lamivudine; Male; Patient Compliance; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; RNA; Surveys and Questionnaires; Therapeutic Equivalency; Treatment Outcome; Zidovudine

To compare dosing convenience and adherence with abacavir (ABC) 300 mg plus a fixed-dose lamivudine 150 mg/zidovudine 300 mg combination tablet (COM) twice daily versus indinavir (IDV) plus COM twice daily in treatment-naïve, HIV-1-infected adults; and to evaluate the association among difficulty taking antiretroviral regimens, adherence, and virologic efficacy.. An open-label, randomized, multicenter, international study compared the COM/ABC and IDV/COM regimens with respect to self-reported adherence and regimen convenience over 48 weeks. Logistic regression analysis (LRA) was done on a patient sub-sample from both groups to evaluate predictors of adherence and virologic response at last time-point on randomized therapy (LTORT).. The study population was diverse with respect to ethnicity (38% Asian, 27% Hispanic, 28% white, 3% black, 4% other) and gender (39% women, 61% men). Baseline median HIV-1 RNA was 4.80 log(10) copies/mL and CD4+ cell count was 315 cells/mm(3). Of 329 patients who were randomized and received treatment, 315 (96%) provided adherence data. Significantly more patients in the ABC/COM group than in the IDV/COM group reported > or = 95% adherence to therapy (76 vs 58%, p < 0.001) and no difficulty in taking their regimen (91 vs 61%, p < 0.001). In both groups, the highest probability of HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL occurred when median adherence was > or = 95%. The probability of HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL declined more rapidly in the IDV/COM group as adherence rates decreased. LRA showed that no difficulty taking any of the drugs in the regimen, ABC/COM treatment group, and male gender were independent significant predictors of > or = 95% adherence (p < 0.05). Median adherence and baseline HIV-1 RNA were significant predictors of HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL (p < 0.05).. Patients reported greater ease of use and superior adherence to ABC/COM than IDV/COM. Patient-reported difficulty taking drugs in a regimen was predictive of reduced adherence, and both of the latter factors were predictive of poorer virologic outcome. Adherence levels of > or = 95% in both treatment groups maximized the probability of patients achieving an HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL.

Topics: Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Lamivudine; Male; Patient Compliance; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome; Zidovudine

Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group (AACTG) Protocol 886 examined the dispositions of indinavir, efavirenz, and abacavir in human immunodeficiency virus-infected subjects who received indinavir at 1,000 mg every 8 h (q8h) and efavirenz at 600 mg q24h or indinavir at 1,200 mg and efavirenz at 300 mg q12h with or without abacavir 300 at mg q12h. Thirty-six subjects participated. The median minimum concentration in plasma (C(min)) for indinavir administered at 1,200 mg q12h was 88.1 nM (interquartile range [IR], 61.7 to 116.5 nM), whereas the median C(min) for indinavir administered at 1,000 mg q8h was 139.3 nM (IR, 68.8 to 308.7 nM) (P = 0.19). Compared to the minimum C(min) range for wild-type virus (80 to 120 ng/ml) estimated by the AACTG Adult Pharmacology Committee, the C(min) for indinavir administered at 1,200 mg q12h (54 ng/ml) is inadequate. The apparent oral clearance (CL/F) (P = 0.28), apparent volume of distribution at steady state (V(ss)/F) (P = 0.25), and half-life (t(1/2)) (P = 0.80) of indinavir did not differ between regimens. The levels of efavirenz exposure were similar between regimens. For efavirenz administered at 600 mg q24h and 300 mg q12h, the median maximum concentrations in plasma (C(max)s) were 8,968 nM (IR, 5,784 to 11,768 nM) and 8,317 nM (6,587 to 10,239 nM), respectively (P = 0.66), and the C(min)s were 4,289 nM (IR, 2,462 to 5,904 nM) and 4,757 nM (IR, 3,088 to 6,644 nM), respectively (P = 0.29). Efavirenz pharmacokinetic parameters such as CL/F (P = 0.62), V(ss)/F (P = 0.33), and t(1/2) (P = 0.37) were similar regardless of the dosing regimen. The median C(max), C(min), CL/F, V(ss)/F, and t(1/2) for abacavir were 6,852 nM (IR, 5,702 to 7,532), 21.0 nM (IR, 21.0 to 87.5), 43.7 liters/h (IR, 37.9 to 55.2), 153.9 liters (IR, 79.6 to 164.4), and 2.0 h (IR, 1.8 to 2.8), respectively. In summary, when indinavir was given with efavirenz, the trough concentration of indinavir after administration of 1,200 mg q12h was inadequate. Abacavir did not influence the pharmacokinetics or exposure parameters of either indinavir or efavirenz. The levels of efavirenz exposure were similar in subjects receiving efavirenz q12h or q24h.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Male; Oxazines; RNA, Viral

TMC125, a next generation, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), demonstrated a remarkable decline of plasma HIV-1 RNA during a phase IIa study. We compared the initial rate of decline of plasma HIV-1 RNA achieved by TMC125 monotherapy with that of a triple class, five-drug regimen, containing drugs from all three currently licensed classes (zidovudine, lamivudine, abacavir, indinavir and nevirapine).. The decline in plasma HIV-1 RNA of 12 HIV-1 infected, antiretroviral (ART) naive patients treated for 1 week with TMC125 monotherapy was compared with that observed in the ERA study (n = 11). The plasma HIV-1 RNA elimination rate constant was calculated based on at least four plasma HIV-1 RNA measurements during the first week of treatment (first-order elimination) and compared using the Student's t test.. Median ages were 23 and 38 years for TMC125 and ERA patients, respectively (P = 0.001), median baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA levels were 4.2 and 4.8 log10 copies/ml (P = 0.001) and median baseline CD4 T-cell counts were 458 x 10(6) and 360 x 10(6) cells/l (P = 0.08). The median plasma HIV-1 RNA elimination rate constant was 0.68/day in TMC125 treated patients, and 0.56/day in ERA participants (P = 0.24). The median decline in plasma HIV-1 RNA after 7 days was 1.92 and 1.76 log10 copies (P = 0.77) and the median increase of CD4 T cells was 119 x 10(6) and 60 x 10(6) cells/l, respectively (P = 0.29).. Monotherapy with TMC125 in ART-naive, HIV-1-infected individuals resulted in a similar rate of decline of plasma HIV-1 RNA during 1 week of therapy as therapy with a five-drug regimen.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Dideoxynucleosides; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Lamivudine; Male; Nevirapine; Nitriles; Pyridazines; Pyrimidines; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; RNA, Viral; Treatment Outcome; Zidovudine

Topics: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Adenine; Adult; Alkynes; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Dideoxynucleosides; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Genotype; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Male; Nelfinavir; Organophosphonates; Oxazines; Phenotype; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Treatment Failure

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) of HIV disease is associated with effective virologic control, immune reconstitution, and clinical improvements. This study addresses the potential for improvements in lymphocyte phenotype and virologic responses of HIV-infected persons with extensive experience with dual nucleoside reverse transcriptase (NRTI) treatment and advanced HIV disease after a change to a potent antiretroviral therapy (NRTI + protease inhibitor). The majority of participants achieved virologic success. There was a median rise in CD4+ lymphocytes of 99 cells/mm(3) by 48 weeks, because of an increase in memory CD4+ cells at 4 and 16 weeks, followed by a later increase in naive CD4+ cells between weeks 16 and 48. The proportion of activated, DR+ CD38+ CD8+ lymphocytes decreased during the 48 weeks of follow-up. The immunologic findings (increased memory and naive T cells and reduced activation levels) were significantly improved in participants with persistent suppression of viral replication over the 48 weeks of the study. Baseline HIV RNA copy number was lower (median, 14,784 copies/ml) in persons who responded virologically than in those not suppressing viral replication (median, 49,454 copies/ml). CD4+ cell counts above the median (125/mm(3)) at time 0 for the participants, was the only baseline immunologic marker significantly associated with viral suppression at week 48. Participants older than 40 years of age demonstrated less immunologic recovery. The results of the study show that patients with extensive experience with NRTIs respond both virologically and immunologically during the first 48 weeks of therapy with a potent antiretroviral regimen.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antigens, CD; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; Biomarkers; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Cyclopropanes; Didanosine; Dideoxynucleosides; Double-Blind Method; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Lamivudine; Male; Middle Aged; Oxazines; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; RNA, Viral; Stavudine; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Zidovudine

Management of antiretroviral treatment failure in patients receiving protease inhibitor (PI)-containing regimens is a therapeutic challenge.. To assess whether adding a second PI improves antiviral efficacy of a 4-drug combination in patients with virologic failure while taking a PI-containing regimen.. Multicenter, randomized, 4-arm trial, double-blind and placebo-controlled for second PI, conducted between October 1998 and April 2000, for which there was a 24-week primary analysis with extension to 48 weeks.. Thirty-one participating AIDS (acquired immunodeficiency syndrome) Clinical Trials Units in the United States.. A total of 481 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected persons with prior exposure to a maximum of 3 PIs and viral load above 1000 copies/mL.. Selectively randomized assignment (per prior PI exposure) to saquinavir (n = 116); indinavir (n = 69); nelfinavir (n = 139); or placebo twice per day (n = 157); in combination with amprenavir, abacavir, efavirenz, and adefovir dipivoxil.. Primary efficacy analysis involved the proportion with viral load below 200 copies/mL at 24 weeks. Other measures were changes in viral load and CD4 cell count from baseline, adverse events, and HIV drug susceptibility.. Of 481 patients, 148 (31%) had a viral load below 200 copies/mL at week 24. The proportions of patients with a viral load below 200 copies/mL in the saquinavir, indinavir, nelfinavir, and placebo arms were 34% (40/116), 36% (25/69), 34% (47/139), and 23% (36/157), respectively. The proportion in the combined dual-PI arms was higher than in the amprenavir-plus-placebo arm (35% [112/324] vs 23% [36/157], respectively; P =.002). Overall, a higher proportion of nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-naive patients had a viral load below 200 copies/mL compared with NNRTI-experienced patients (43% [115/270] vs 16% [33/211], respectively; P<.001). Baseline HIV-1 hypersusceptibility to efavirenz (< or = 0.4-fold difference in susceptibility compared with reference virus) was associated with suppression of viral load at 24 weeks to below 200 copies/mL (odds ratio [OR], 3.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.62-7.33; P =.001), and more than 10-fold reduction in efavirenz susceptibility, with less likelihood of suppression at 24 weeks (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.09-0.87; P =.03).. In this study of antiretroviral-experienced patients with advanced immunodeficiency, viral load suppression to below 200 copies/mL was achieved in 31% of patients with regimens containing 4 or 5 new drugs. Use of 2 PIs, being naive to NNRTIs, and baseline hypersusceptibility to efavirenz were associated with a favorable outcome.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; Carbamates; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cyclopropanes; Dideoxynucleosides; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Male; Nelfinavir; Organophosphonates; Oxazines; Proportional Hazards Models; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Saquinavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Failure; Viral Load

Abacavir, a nucleoside analogue, has demonstrated suppression of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) replication alone and in combination therapy. However, the role of abacavir in a triple nucleoside combination regimen has not been evaluated against a standard protease inhibitor-containing regimen for initial antiretroviral treatment.. To evaluate antiretroviral equivalence and safety of an abacavir-lamivudine-zidovudine regimen compared with an indinavir-lamivudine-zidovudine regimen.. A multicenter, phase 3, randomized, double-blind trial with an enrollment period from August 1997 to June 1998, with follow-up through 48 weeks at 73 clinical research units in the United States, Canada, Australia, and Europe.. Five hundred sixty-two antiretroviral-naive, HIV-infected adults with a plasma HIV RNA level of at least 10 000 copies/mL and a CD4 cell count of at least 100 x 10(6)/L.. Patients were stratified by baseline HIV RNA level and randomly assigned to receive a combination tablet containing 150 mg of lamivudine and 300 mg of zidovudine twice daily plus either 300 mg of abacavir twice daily and indinavir placebo or 800 mg of indinavir every 8 hours daily plus abacavir placebo. After 16 weeks, patients with confirmed HIV RNA levels greater than 400 copies/mL were eligible to continue receiving randomized treatment or receive open-label therapy.. Virologic suppression, defined as HIV RNA concentration of 400 copies/mL or less at week 48.. The proportion of patients who met the end point of having an HIV RNA level of 400 copies/mL or less at week 48 was equivalent in the abacavir group (51% [133/262]) and in the indinavir group (51% [136/265]) with a treatment difference of -0.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], -9% to 8%). In patients with baseline HIV RNA levels greater than 100 000 copies/mL, the proportion of patients achieving less than 50 copies/mL was greater in the indinavir group than in the abacavir group with 45% (45/100) vs 31% (30/96) and a treatment diference of -14% (95% CI, -27% to 0%). The 2 treatments were comparable with respect to their effects on CD4 cell count. There was no difference between groups in the frequency of treatment-limiting adverse events or laboratory abnormalities. One death in the abacavir group was attributed to hypersensitivity reaction, which occurred following rechallenge with abacavir, approximately 3 weeks after initiating study treatment.. In this study of antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected adults, the triple nucleoside regimen of abacavir-lamivudine-zidovudine was equivalent to the regimen of indinavir-lamivudine-zidovudine in achieving a plasma HIV RNA level of less than 400 copies/mL at 48 weeks.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Dideoxynucleosides; Double-Blind Method; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Female; Genotype; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV Reverse Transcriptase; Humans; Indinavir; Lamivudine; Male; Middle Aged; Mutation; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Survival Analysis; Therapeutic Equivalency; Viral Load; Zidovudine

Twenty human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients experiencing virologic failure of an indinavir- or ritonavir-containing treatment regimen were evaluated in a prospective, open-label study. Subjects received nelfinavir, saquinavir, abacavir, and either another nucleoside analog (n=10) or nevirapine (n=10). Patients treated with the nevirapine-containing regimen experienced significantly greater virologic suppression at week 24 than those not treated with nevirapine (P=.04). Baseline phenotypic drug susceptibility was strongly correlated with outcome in both treatment arms. Subjects with baseline virus phenotypically sensitive to 2 or 3 drugs in the salvage regimen experienced significantly greater virus load suppression than those with baseline virus sensitive to 0 or 1 drug (median week-24 change=-2.24 log and -0.35 log, respectively; P=.01). In conclusion, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors may represent a potent drug in salvage therapy regimens after failure of an indinavir or ritonavir regimen. Phenotypic resistance testing may provide a useful tool for selecting more effective salvage regimens.

Topics: Adult; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Male; Nelfinavir; Nevirapine; Phenotype; Prospective Studies; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Salvage Therapy; Saquinavir

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Alkynes; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Dideoxynucleosides; Hepatitis B, Chronic; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Hepatitis D, Chronic; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Nephrolithiasis; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Stavudine; Tenofovir

The effects of HIV infection, highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), and specific antiretroviral agents on lipoproteins in women are not well described.. In a cross-sectional substudy of the Women's Interagency HIV Study with 623 HIV-negative and 1556 HIV-positive women (636 untreated, 419 on non-protease inhibitor [PI] HAART, and 501 on PI-containing HAART), we performed multivariate analyses of associations among fasting lipoprotein levels, HIV infection, and HAART.. Untreated HIV-positive women had lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and higher triglycerides (TGs) but not lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) than HIV-negative women and were the most likely to have unfavorable HDL-C by National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) guidelines. PI HAART users had higher LDL-C than untreated HIV-infected women (107 vs. 100 mg/dL, P = 0.0006) and were the most likely to have unfavorable LDL-C and TGs by NCEP guidelines. HIV-negative women and non-PI HAART users had similar HDL-C levels (55 and 53 mg/dL, respectively), which were higher than those in untreated HIV-infected women and PI HAART users (42 and 49 mg/dL, respectively; P < 0.001 for all). Lamivudine, didanosine, nevirapine, and efavirenz were independently associated with higher HDL-C (P < 0.001 for all). Ritonavir, indinavir/ritonavir, and nelfinavir were associated with higher LDL-C (P < 0.01 for all). Stavudine, abacavir, and all ritonavir-containing regimens were associated with higher TGs (P < 0.05 for all), and tenofovir was associated with lower TGs (P = 0.009).. A dyslipidemic pattern was associated with HIV infection itself, was more severe in users of PI-containing HAART, but was not present in women taking non-PI HAART.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; Black People; Cholesterol; Cross-Sectional Studies; Cyclopropanes; Didanosine; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasting; Female; Hispanic or Latino; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV Seronegativity; HIV Seropositivity; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Lamivudine; Lipids; Lipoproteins, HDL; Lipoproteins, LDL; Multivariate Analysis; Nelfinavir; Nevirapine; Organophosphonates; Ritonavir; Stavudine; Tenofovir; Triglycerides; United States; White People

Chronic viral hepatitis is common among persons with HIV-1 infection, because of shared modes of transmission, and coinfection results in accelerated liver damage, compared with persons with chronic viral hepatitis alone. The use of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has led to a significant decrease in the morbidity and mortality associated with HIV-1 infection. A number of the medications that are commonly used in HAART regimens are metabolized by the hepatic CYP enzymes, which raises the possibility of significant interactions between antiretroviral medications and hepatic impairment induced by chronic viral hepatitis. Although the data are still very scant, the pharmacokinetics of several antiretroviral medications have been shown to be significantly altered in the presence of liver disease. In the present report, we review the available data and consider potential options, such as dose adjustment and therapeutic drug monitoring, for the administration of antiretroviral therapy to patients with significant hepatic impairment.

Topics: Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hepatitis; HIV Infections; Humans; Indinavir; Liver Function Tests; Lopinavir; Nelfinavir; Nevirapine; Oxazines; Protease Inhibitors; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Zidovudine

Simplification of combined antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected patients is possible, but virological success can be compromised by the development or emergence of resistant viruses.. Worsening renal functioning in a patient under successful combination antiretroviral therapy resulted led to the replacement of indinavir by abacavir. Eight weeks later, his viral load rose and he developed a mutant virus resistant to all the nucleoside analogs.. Our case report illustrates the danger of streamlining combined antiretroviral therapy composed only of nucleoside analogs in patients already successfully treated with nucleoside analogs, by exposing them to the risk of the emergence of a mutant virus.

Topics: Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Male; Mutation; Viral Load

Topics: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Antiviral Agents; Brain; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cidofovir; Cytosine; Dideoxynucleosides; Encephalitis; False Negative Reactions; Fatal Outcome; Humans; Immunocompromised Host; Indinavir; JC Virus; Lamivudine; Leukoencephalopathy, Progressive Multifocal; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Organophosphonates; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Time Factors; Virus Activation; Zidovudine

To analyze factors associated with long-term (>or=2 years) suppression of virus load (VL), we performed a nested case-control analysis of 1235 Human Immunodeficiency Virus Outpatient Study cohort participants who were well characterized by multiple VL and CD4(+) cell count determinations. Of these patients, 286 (23.1%) had maintained undetectable VLs (i.e., <400 copies/mm(3) or <50 copies/mm(3)) for >or=2 years. Being treatment naive at the start of antiretroviral therapy was associated with a greater likelihood of achieving long-term suppression of VL (odds ratio [OR], 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-2.0; P=.028). In multivariate models, abacavir, indinavir, efavirenz, and drug combinations that included both lamivudine and indinavir were the most effective treatments for achieving long-term suppression of VL (adjusted OR for each, >3.6; P value for each, <.01). Long-term suppression of VL is more likely in treatment-naive than in treatment-experienced patients, but there were several drugs--abacavir, efavirenz, indinavir, and drug combinations including lamivudine and indinavir--that appeared to be effective, whether they were part of a first or subsequent drug regimen.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; Case-Control Studies; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cohort Studies; Cyclopropanes; Dideoxynucleosides; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Male; Outpatients; Oxazines; Prospective Studies; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; RNA, Viral; Viral Load

The treatment of HIV-1-infected patients with triple-drug combination therapy results in profound suppression of viral replication. In most therapy-naive patients plasma HIV-1-RNA levels (pVL) drop below the lower limit of quantification (LLQ) of currently used assays. In a large percentage of such patients, more sensitive assays provide evidence of residual viral replication. The question is whether more potent therapy can further suppress this residual replication.. Thirty control patients who, using very strict criteria, had not experienced virological failure during 3 years of standard therapy, were compared with 10 patients treated with a five-drug regimen, consisting of three different classes of antiretroviral drugs (alternative multidrug regimen). A modified ultrasensitive assay with an LLQ of 5 copies/ml was used to re-test plasma obtained at week 48 and at three timepoints at and around week 144.. At weeks 48 and 144 pVL could be quantified significantly more frequently in control patients than in patients using the alternative multidrug regimen (week 48: 42 versus 0% with quantifiable pVL, P = 0.017; week 144: 60 versus 14% with at least one quantifiable pVL, P = 0.036, respectively). A low baseline CD4T cell count was predictive of quantifiable pVL in control patients, but not in alternative multidrug patients.. This proof-of-principle study demonstrates that the use of an alternative multidrug regimen results in stronger long-term suppression of pVL compared with clinically successful treatment with standard therapy.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Dideoxynucleosides; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Lamivudine; Middle Aged; Nevirapine; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; RNA, Viral; Time Factors; Viral Load; Virus Replication; Zidovudine

Clinical cohort studies suggest that as many as 60% of patients experience virologic failure of a first-line antiretroviral regimen. Second-line and rescue (or salvage) regimens have a poorer success record: Most studies presented to date show a short-term virologic response rate of only approximately 30% in treatment-experienced individuals. That rate will improve with better understanding of what causes initial virologic failure, continued development of new antiretroviral agents (including drugs with new mechanisms of action) and new treatment strategies (including dual-protease inhibitor regimens), and more widespread use of resistance testing. Further clinical research is needed to improve salvage options, and physicians should consider enrolling treatment-experienced patients in clinical trials.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Carbamates; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Therapy, Combination; Furans; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Lopinavir; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Mutation; Nelfinavir; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrimidinones; Retroviridae; Retroviridae Infections; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Sulfonamides; Time Factors; Treatment Failure; Viral Load

Penetration of antiretroviral drugs into anatomical HIV-1 reservoirs such as the male genital tract and the central nervous system is important. Data on indinavir (IDV) concentrations in seminal plasma are lacking and IDV concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid are at best borderline.. Thirteen patients were treated with zidovudine (or stavudine), lamivudine, abacavir, nevirapine and IDV (1000 mg three times daily). When nevirapine led to low IDV concentrations, IDV was changed into the combination IDV/ritonavir (RTV) 800/100 mg twice daily to improve the pharmacokinetic profile of IDV.. A serum pharmacokinetic profile, a semen sample and a cerebrospinal fluid sample were collected at weeks 8, 24, 48 and 72.. Addition of RTV increased the median IDV trough concentration in serum from 65 to 336 ng/ml (P = 0.005). Median IDV concentration in seminal plasma increased from 141 to 1634 ng/ml (P = 0.002) (n = 9) and in cerebrospinal fluid from 39 (n = 12) to 104 (n = 7) ng/ml (P < 0.001). In six patients with samples collected both before and after the addition of RTV, the IDV concentration in seminal plasma increased 8.2 times [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.2-11.6], and in cerebrospinal fluid 2.4 times (95% CI 1.8-3.9).. IDV penetrates well into the male genital tract. The addition of low-dose RTV not only increases IDV concentrations in serum but also in seminal plasma and cerebrospinal fluid, thereby probably improving the potency of the regimen in these anatomical HIV reservoirs. Higher serum trough levels alone can not sufficiently explain the observed increases in seminal plasma and cerebrospinal fluid concentrations. Inhibition of P-glycoprotein-mediated transport by RTV might be an additional mechanism.

Topics: Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Dideoxynucleosides; Disease Reservoirs; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Lamivudine; Male; Middle Aged; Nevirapine; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Semen; Stavudine; Viral Load; Zidovudine

To compare the viral suppression of two antiretroviral regimens using three drugs or five drugs.. Two open-label studies using a three-drug (zidovudine, lamivudine and ritonavir) and a five-drug regimen (zidovudine, lamivudine, abacavir, indinavir and nevirapine) in study-drug-naive patients, except for one in the five-drug study.. Participants with > or = 10 000 HIV-1 RNA copies/ml in plasma at baseline were compared by means of Kaplan-Meier curves for time to < 50 copies/ml, as well as linear regression analysis for the first phase of decline using log-transformed copy numbers.. The elimination rate constants for HIV-1 RNA in 15 participants of the three-drug study were compared with nine participants of the five-drug study. The level of < 50 copies/ml was reached earlier when using the five-drug than when using the three-drug regimen (P log rank = 0.0005): median time to reach this level was 4 weeks and 12 weeks, respectively. No differences were found in HIV-1 RNA elimination rate constants in the first 2 weeks after the initiation of therapy. When the viral load declines were calculated from day 2 onwards, adjusting for differences in pharmacological delay of the drugs used, again no differences in early viral load decline were found between the two regimens.. With the five drugs used in this study, the median time to reach < 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/ml was 8 weeks shorter than with the three-drug regimen. This finding shows that suppression of viral load in HIV-infection by standard triple-drug therapy can be improved upon.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Lamivudine; Male; Nevirapine; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Virus Replication; Zidovudine

Topics: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Anti-HIV Agents; Carbamates; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Therapy, Combination; Furans; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Nelfinavir; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

New anti-HIV drugs that are expected to become available in the future are discussed. The potent protease inhibitor amprenavir (Agenerase) is expected to be available in pharmacies by early 1999. Results of a study of treatment-naive, HIV-positive people showed that those taking amprenavir as part of a three-drug combination therapy, with AZT and 3TC, had better viral reduction than those using AZT and 3TC alone. In a French study of the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor Nevirapine, and a similar study of Delavirdine, a majority of participants had HIV RNA levels below the limit of detection. Further comparative studies are needed between Nevirapine, Delavirdine and the more costly, highly publicized competitor, efavirenz. Several studies of regimens that include protease inhibitors compare dosing twice daily to three times a day. A Canadian study describes salvage therapies, for people who have failed previous treatment with protease inhibitors, that can include up to nine drugs. Because there is a shortage in the development of new types of HIV drugs, people are encouraged to carefully consider when to begin treatment and what medical options are available.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Carbamates; Delavirdine; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drugs, Investigational; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Nevirapine; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Salvage Therapy; Sulfonamides