iloprost and buflomedil

Frostbite is a thermal injury caused when tissue is exposed to sub-zero temperatures (in degrees Celsius) long enough for ice crystals to form in the affected tissue. Depending on the degree of tissue damage, thrombosis, ischaemia, necrosis (tissue death), gangrene and ultimately amputation may occur. Several interventions for frostbite injuries have been proposed, such as hyperbaric oxygen therapy, sympathectomy (nerve block), thrombolytic (blood-thinning) therapy and vasodilating agents such as iloprost, reserpine, pentoxifylline and buflomedil, but the benefits and harms of these interventions are unclear.. To assess the benefits and harms of the different management options for frostbite injuries.. On 25 February 2020, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library, Ovid MEDLINE(R), Ovid MEDLINE(R) In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE(R) Daily and Ovid OLDMEDLINE(R), Embase (OvidSP), ISI Web of Science: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science (CPCI-S), as well as trials registers. Shortly before publication, we searched Clinicaltrials.gov, the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, OpenGrey and GreyLit (9 November 2020) again. We investigated references from relevant articles, and corresponded with a trial author.. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared any medical intervention, e.g. pharmacological therapy, topical treatments or rewarming techniques, for frostbite injuries to another treatment, placebo or no treatment.. Two authors independently extracted data. We used Review Manager 5 for statistical analysis of dichotomous data with risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool to assess bias in the included trial. We assessed incidence of amputations, rates of serious and non-serious adverse events, acute pain, chronic pain, ability to perform activities of daily living, quality of life, withdrawal rate from medical therapy due to adverse events, occupational effects and mortality. We used GRADE to assess the quality of the evidence.. We included one, open-label randomised trial involving 47 participants with severe frostbite injuries. We judged this trial to be at high risk of bias for performance bias, and uncertain risk for attrition bias; all other risk of bias domains we judged as low. All participants underwent rapid rewarming, received 250 mg of aspirin and 400 mg intravascular (IV) buflomedil (since withdrawn from practice), and were then randomised to one of three treatment groups for the following eight days. Group 1 received additional IV buflomedil 400 mg for one hour per day. Group 2 received the prostacyclin, iloprost, 0.5 ng to 2 ng/kg/min IV for six hours per day. Group 3 received IV iloprost 2 ng/kg/min for six hours per day plus fibrinolysis with 100 mg recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) for the first day only. The results suggest that iloprost and iloprost plus rtPA may reduce the rate of amputations in people with severe frostbite compared to buflomedil alone, RR 0.05 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.78; P = 0.03; very low-quality evidence) and RR 0.31 (95% CI 0.10 to 0.94; P = 0.04; very low-quality evidence), respectively. Iloprost may be as effective as iloprost plus rtPA at reducing the amputation rate, RR 0.14 (95% CI 0.01 to 2.56; P = 0.19; very low-quality evidence). There were no reported deaths or withdrawals due to adverse events in any of the groups; we assessed evidence for both outcomes as being of very low quality. Adverse events (including flushing, nausea, palpitations and vomiting) were common, but not reported separately by comparator arm (very low-quality evidence). The included study did not measure the outcomes of acute pain, chronic pain, ability to perform activities of daily living, quality of life or occupational effects.. There is a paucity of evidence regarding interventions for frostbite injuries. Very low-quality evidence from a single small trial indicates that iloprost, and iloprost plus rtPA, in combination with buflomedil may reduce the need for amputation in people with severe frostbite compared to buflomedil alone. However, buflomedil has been withdrawn from use. High quality randomised trials are needed to establish firm evidence for the treatment of frostbite injuries.

Topics: Amputation, Surgical; Aspirin; Bias; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epoprostenol; Fibrinolytic Agents; Frostbite; Humans; Iloprost; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyrrolidines; Recombinant Proteins; Rewarming; Tissue Plasminogen Activator; Vasodilator Agents

Topics: Adult; Aspirin; Combined Modality Therapy; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Frostbite; Humans; Iloprost; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyrrolidines; Rewarming; Tissue Plasminogen Activator; Vasodilator Agents

Peripheral arterial vascular disease is caused by atherosclerosis. The severity of peripheral arterial disease is closely associated with the risk of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and death from vascular causes. Approximately 1/3 of patients with peripheral disease have typical claudication. The goals of treatment for patients with claudication are to relieve their exertional symptoms, increase walking capacity, and globally improve their quality of life. In the peripheral arterial disease IIB stage, with claudication < 100 meters, no useful medical therapy is available. Aim of this investigation is to analyse, in a retrospective way, two groups of patients treated with vasodilator drugs or iloprost.. Data from 99 patients were registered: 79 patients were treated regularly with iloprost, administered for 10 days, 4 times a year. The 2nd group of 20 patients was treated with buflomedil 600 mg/die or pentoxifilline 1200 mg/die. The end point was the pain-free walking distance (PFWD) evaluated with treadmill test at basal conditions and at 3, 6, 12, 18 months.. Treatment groups showed no difference as for occurrence of by-pass surgery or endovascular procedures during follow-up. Improvement in PFWD was significantly more evident in patients treated with iloprost as compared with the control (P = 0.02). Even considering the PFWD variations at any follow-up step vs basal value, we always observed a statistically significant difference with iloprost, P < 0.0001.. The study suggests that iloprost may be effective in improving walking distance in severe IIB stage peripheral arterial vascular disease.

Topics: Adult; Exercise Test; Female; Humans; Iloprost; Ischemia; Leg; Male; Pentoxifylline; Pyrrolidines; Regional Blood Flow; Retrospective Studies; Vasodilator Agents; Walking