hymecromone and 3-3--5-5--tetramethylbenzidine

hymecromone has been researched along with 3-3--5-5--tetramethylbenzidine* in 3 studies

Other Studies

3 other study(ies) available for hymecromone and 3-3--5-5--tetramethylbenzidine

ArticleYear
Quality assurance in immunoassay performance--comparison of different enzyme immunoassays for the determination of caffeine in consumer products.
    Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2013, Volume: 405, Issue:5

    Enzyme immunoassays with optical detection are amongst the most widely used bioanalytical tools. We defined seven parameters for the quality assessment of immunoassays that were addressed in a systematic study of direct and indirect immunoassays, using the enzymes horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and alkaline phosphatase (AP), the chromogenic substrates 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) and para-nitrophenyl phosphate, and the fluorescent substrates 3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)propionic acid and 4-methylumbelliferyl phosphate. The same monoclonal antibody against caffeine was used throughout the study. The four quality parameters regarding the standard curve were the test midpoint (sensitivity), the measurement range, the relative dynamic range of the signal, and the goodness of fit of the adjusted four-parameter logistic function. All HRP immunoassays showed a higher sensitivity compared to the AP assays. On the basis of all four criteria, it was established that the direct assay format is superior to the indirect format, the immunoassay using HRP TMB fulfilling all requirements best. In a second step, caffeine concentrations in 24 beverage and cosmetics samples were determined and three more quality parameters were assessed with this application. The direct HRP TMB assay showed one of the best intra- and inter-plate precisions and the best accuracy, defined by the correlation of results with those from the chosen reference method liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Considering all criteria, HRP TMB seems to be the enzyme substrate system of choice preferably used in the direct assay format.

    Topics: Alkaline Phosphatase; Animals; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Benzidines; Beverages; Caffeine; Chromatography, Liquid; Cosmetics; Fluorescent Dyes; Horseradish Peroxidase; Hymecromone; Immunoenzyme Techniques; Nitrophenols; Organophosphorus Compounds; Phenylpropionates; Sensitivity and Specificity; Tandem Mass Spectrometry

2013
Comparative study of amplification systems in immunoenzyme assays for the diagnosis of American tegumentary leishmaniasis.
    Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2009, Volume: 23, Issue:3

    We compared the accuracy and reliability of three amplification systems for enzyme immunoassays in the detection of specific IgG antibodies for the diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis in patients from an endemic area in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Partially soluble antigens obtained from the promastigote forms of L. (V.) braziliensis were used. For development of the reaction, two chromogens, 1,2-orthophenylenediamine (OPD) and 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB), and a fluorogen, 4-methylumbelliferylphosphate (MUP), were tested. The performance of each system was compared using the following parameters: accuracy, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Sensitivity was the same (97.4%) for all systems. The reliability was excellent (ICC = 98.6, 98.7, and 99.1%) and specificity was 93.7, 95.8, and 97.4% for OPD, MUP, and TMB, respectively, showing no statistical significance. Despite the absence of differences in the performance of the three systems, the use of TMB is suggested because of its operational advantages, such as low cost compared with fluorogens, easy manipulation, greater stability, and lower toxicity.

    Topics: Animals; Antigens, Protozoan; Benzidines; Confidence Intervals; Humans; Hymecromone; Immunoenzyme Techniques; Immunoglobulin G; Leishmania braziliensis; Leishmaniasis, Cutaneous; Phenylenediamines; Predictive Value of Tests; Reproducibility of Results; ROC Curve; Sensitivity and Specificity

2009
A comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of enzyme immunoassays and time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay.
    Journal of immunological methods, 1991, Sep-20, Volume: 143, Issue:1

    Time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay (TR-FIA) and various enzyme immunoassays (EIA) were compared in order to determine the detection system which showed the greatest degree of sensitivity without sacrificing specificity. The system chosen for the evaluation of these assays was the detection of antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). For EIA, horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and alkaline phosphatase (AP) were investigated, each with a number of different substrates. HRP with its fluorogenic substrate, 3-(p-hydroxyphenyl)propionic acid (HPPA) was 1.6 times (p less than 0.01) more sensitive than with 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) and four times (p less than 0.001) more sensitive than with 2,2'-azino-di(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS). AP with its fluorogenic substrate, 4-methylumbelliferyl phosphate (4MeUP), was 6-7 times (p less than 0.001) more sensitive than with phenolphthalein monophosphate (PMP) and 8-13 times (p less than 0.001) more sensitive than with p-nitrophenyl phosphate (pNPP). TR-FIA with Eu3(+)-labelled anti-human IgG was equivalent in sensitivity to HRP with TMB and AP with 4MeUP.

    Topics: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Alkaline Phosphatase; Aniline Compounds; Benzidines; Benzothiazoles; Chromogenic Compounds; Fluoroimmunoassay; HIV; Horseradish Peroxidase; Humans; Hymecromone; Immunoenzyme Techniques; Organophosphorus Compounds; Phenolphthaleins; Phenylpropionates; Sensitivity and Specificity; Sulfonic Acids

1991