hygromycin-a and bialaphos

hygromycin-a has been researched along with bialaphos* in 2 studies

Reviews

1 review(s) available for hygromycin-a and bialaphos

ArticleYear
Development of gateway binary vectors R4L1pGWB possessing the bialaphos resistance gene (bar) and the tunicamycin resistance gene as markers for promoter analysis in plants.
    Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry, 2013, Volume: 77, Issue:8

    We have developed a new series of R4L1 Gateway binary vectors (R4L1pGWB), which carry the bialaphos resistance gene (bar) or the UDP-N-acetylglucosamine:dolichol phosphate N-acetylglucosamine-1-P transferase (GPT) gene as selection markers that confer BASTA® and tunicamycin resistance on plants respectively. R4L1pGWBs have an attR4-attL1-reporter and can accept an attL4-promoter-attR1 entry clone for easy construction of an attB4-promoter-attB1-reporter clone. The new R4L1pGWBs facilitate promoter:reporter analysis in pre-existing transgenic plants that are resistant to kanamycin or hygromycin.

    Topics: Biomarkers; Cinnamates; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Genetic Vectors; Hygromycin B; Kanamycin; Organophosphorus Compounds; Plants, Genetically Modified; Promoter Regions, Genetic; Tunicamycin; Uridine Diphosphate Sugars

2013

Other Studies

1 other study(ies) available for hygromycin-a and bialaphos

ArticleYear
[A comparison study of hpt and bar as selection marker gene of transgenic rice].
    Yi chuan = Hereditas, 2012, Volume: 34, Issue:12

    The decision of using selection marker is one of the key factors for success of plant genetic transformation and offspring screening. As two commonly used selection markers, hpt and bar genes are widely used in tissue culture-based rice transformation. To experimentally compare their performance, we investigated the efficiency of two transformation systems using Hygromycin and Bialaphos as the selection agents, respectively. The result indicated that the system using hpt gene as the selection marker saved 10 days and had double transformation efficiency and lower transgene copy number in comparison to the system using bar gene. Then, we assessed the feasibility of screening transgenic rice in the field by soaking the wild-type and transgenic seeds in a series of solutions containing step diluted hygromycin for two days. We targeted the suitable concentration for distinguishing the transgenic seeds from WT Kitaake seeds was 167 mg L(-1). However, the cost of screening by hygromycin is still much higher than that of Basta in field test. Therefore, this study experimentally demonstrated the advantages and disadvantages of the hpt and bar gene as the selection markers and thus provided a reference for choose of an appropriate selection marker according to the practical applications.

    Topics: Cinnamates; Genetic Markers; Herbicides; Hygromycin B; Organophosphorus Compounds; Oryza; Phosphotransferases (Alcohol Group Acceptor); Plant Proteins; Plants, Genetically Modified; Transgenes

2012