hr-810 and flomoxef

The in vitro antibacterial activities of cefozopran (CZOP), an agent of cephems, against various clinical isolates obtained between 1996 and 2001 were yearly evaluated and compared with those of other cephems, oxacephems and carbapenems. A total of 3,245 strains in 32 species of Gram-negative bacteria were isolated from the clinical materials annually collected from January to December, and consisted of Moraxella subgenus Branhamella catarrhalis, Escherichia coli, Citrobacter freundii, Citrobacter koseri, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella oxytoca, Enterobacter aerogenes, Enterobacter cloacae, Serratia marcescens, Proteus mirabillis, Proteus vulgaris, Morganella morganii, Providencia spp. (P. alcalifaciens, P. rettgeri, P. stuartii), Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas putida, Burkholderia cepacia, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Haemophilus influenzae, Acinetobactor baumannii, Acinetobactor lwoffii, Bacteroides fragilis group (B. fragilis, B. vulgatus, B. distasonis, B. ovatus, B. thetaiotaomicron), and Prevotella spp. (P. melaninogenica, P. intermedia, P. bivia, P. oralis, P. denticola). CZOP possessed stable antibacterial activities against M. (B.) catarrhalis, E. coli, C. freundii, C. koseri, K. pneumoniae, K. oxytoca, E. aerogenes, E. cloacae, S. marcescens, P. mirabilis, P. vulgaris, M. morganii, Providencia spp., P. aeruginosa, and A. lwoffii throughout 6 years. The MIC90 of CZOP against those strains were consistent with those obtained from the studies performed until the new drug application approval. On the other hand, the MIC90 of CZOP against H. influenzae yearly obviously increased with approximately 64-time difference during the study period. The MIC90 of cefpirome, cefepime, and flomoxef against H. influenzae also yearly tended to rise. The present results demonstrated that CZOP had maintained the antibacterial activity against almost Gram-negative strains tested. However, the decrease in antibacterial activities of CZOP against B. cepacia, and H. influenzae was suggested.

Topics: Cefepime; Cefoperazone; Cefozopran; Cefpirome; Cephalosporins; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Escherichia coli; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Humans; Moraxella

In this study, we evaluated the current effectiveness of 11 beta-lactam antibiotics for treatment of orofacial odontogenic infections by determining the antimicrobial susceptibility of the major pathogens. The antimicrobial susceptibilities of viridans streptococci (n = 47), Peptostreptococcus (n = 67), Porphyromonas (n = 18), Fusobacterium (n = 57), black-pigmented Prevotella (n = 59) and non-pigmented Prevotella (n = 47) isolated from pus specimens of 93 orofacial odontogenic infections to penicillin G, cefmetazole, flomoxef, cefoperazone, cefoperazone/sulbactam, ceftazidime, cefpirome, cefepime, cefoselis, imipenem and faropenem were determined using the agar dilution method. Penicillin G, most cephalosporins, imipenem and faropenem worked well against viridans streptococci, Peptostreptococcus, Porphyromonas and Fusobacterium. Penicillin G and most cephalosporins, including fourth-generation agents, were not effective against beta-lactamase-positive Prevotella, though they were effective against beta-lactamase-negative strains. Cefmetazole, cefoperazone/sulbactam, imipenem and faropenem expressed powerful antimicrobial activity against beta-lactamase-positive Prevotella. In conclusion, penicillins have the potential to be first-line agents in the treatment of orofacial odontogenic infections. Most of the other beta-lactam antibiotics, including fourth-generation cephalosporins, were not found to have greater effectiveness than penicillins. In contrast, cefmetazole, cefoperazone/sulbactam, imipenem and faropenem were found to have greater effectiveness than penicillins.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteria; Bacterial Infections; Bacteroidaceae Infections; beta-Lactams; Cefepime; Cefmetazole; Cefoperazone; Cefpirome; Ceftazidime; Ceftizoxime; Cephalosporins; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fusobacterium; Fusobacterium Infections; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Humans; Imipenem; Lactams; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Mouth Diseases; Penicillin G; Penicillins; Peptostreptococcus; Porphyromonas gingivalis; Prevotella; Streptococcal Infections; Streptococcus; Sulbactam

Vancomycin (VCM) was intravenously administered to rats for 14 days at doses of 150 mg/kg/day and 250 mg/kg/day alone or in combination with 1,000 mg/kg/day of latamoxef (LMOX), flomoxef (FMOX) or cefpirome (CPR) or 250 mg/kg/day of fosfomycin (FOM), and the influences of combined antibiotics on the VCM-induced renal damage were studied. The renal impairment caused by VCM alone was, morphologically, demonstrated mainly as regeneration of tubular epithelium: slight regeneration was observed in a half of rats administered 150 mg/kg/day and slight to extensive regeneration in all the rats administered 250 mg/kg/day. Clinical examinations found apparent increases in urinary LDH and MDH activities in rats administered 250 mg/kg/day, thus showing a good correlation with renal pathological changes. In addition, increase in kidney weight and increase in urinary NAG activity were noted, while changes in plasma urea-N and creatinine were mild, and gamma-GTP activity and protein in urine could not be used as a parameter of the renal impairment. The slight renal impairment as noted in rats administered VCM 150 mg/kg/day alone was not observed at all when LMOX or FMOX was administered concomitantly, and less pronounced even when FOM was administered concomitantly. When CPR was administered concomitantly, the changes were the same as those observed with VCM alone. The renal impairment in rats administered VCM 250 mg/kg/day was apparently less severe when combined with LMOX, FMOX and FOM than that in rats administered VCM alone, and this was supported by apparent reduction of clinical examination values as the parameter of VCM-induced nephrotoxicity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Topics: Animals; Cefpirome; Cephalosporins; Drug Therapy, Combination; Kidney; Male; Moxalactam; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Vancomycin

The therapeutic perspectives of flomoxef, SCE 2787, cefpirome, cefepime, latamoxef, cefotaxime and of piperacillin plus tazobactam were comparatively evaluated by their in vitro activity against 1119 clinical isolates of 83 bacterial species. Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp. Enterobacter sakazakii, Proteus spp. and Shigella spp. were about equally susceptible to the cephalosporins (MIC90: 0.06 to 0.5 mg/l), while the MIC90 for piperacillin plus tazobactam was between 2 and 16 mg/l. Enterobacter cloacae, Enterobacter aerogenes and Serratia spp. were most susceptible to SCE 2787, cefpirome and cefepime (MIC90: 0.06 to 2 mg/l) followed by latamoxef, cefotaxime, flomoxef and piperacillin plus tazobactam. For Citrobacter spp., Providencia spp. and Yersinia enterocolitica MIC90 were between 0.06 and 0.5 mg/l. Flomoxef was between 2 to 4 log2 less active against these species but more active than piperacillin plus tazobactam (MIC90: 2 and 8 mg/l). Morganella morganii and Hafnia alvei were most susceptible to cefepime, cefpirome and latamoxef (MIC90: 0.13 to 0.5 mg/l) while cefotaxime (MIC90: 8 mg/l) and piperacillin plus tazobactam (MIC90: 8 and greater than 64 mg/l) were the least active compounds. SCE 2787, cefepime and cefpirome were the most potent beta-lactams against the majority of the 13 species of non-fermentative bacilli (NFB) investigated (MIC90: 0.5 to 16 mg/l). The oxacephems were the least active compounds against NFB. Cefepime was the most active of the compounds included against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MIC90: 16 mg/l). Haemophilus spp., Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Bordetella pertussis were most susceptible to cefotaxime (MIC90: 0.03 to 0.06 mg/l). Latamoxef had the lowest activity of all compounds against gram-positive cocci. Flomoxef was the most active compound against penicillinase producing Staphylococcus aureus and about equally active as the other betalactams against methicillin susceptible staphylococci of other staphylococcal species.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; beta-Lactamases; Cefotaxime; Cefozopran; Cefpirome; Cephalosporins; Drug Stability; Enterobacteriaceae; Hydrolysis; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Moxalactam; Penicillanic Acid; Piperacillin; Tazobactam