hr-810 and carumonam

hr-810 has been researched along with carumonam* in 3 studies

Other Studies

3 other study(ies) available for hr-810 and carumonam

ArticleYear
[Comparative studies on activities of antimicrobial agents against causative organisms isolated from patients with urinary tract infections (2004). I. Susceptibility distribution].
    The Japanese journal of antibiotics, 2006, Volume: 59, Issue:3

    The bacterial strains isolated from 490 patients diagnosed as having urinary tract infections (UTIs) in 14 institutions in Japan were collected between August 2004 and July 2005. The susceptibilities of them to many kinds of antimicrobial agents were measured. Of them, 577 strains were estimated as causative bacteria and used for the measurement. The strains consisted of 156 gram-positive bacterial strains (27.0%) and 421 gram-negative bacterial strains (73.0%). Against Staphylococcus aureus, arbekacin (ABK), vancomycin (VCM) showed the strongest activity and prevented the growth of all strains with 2 microg/mL. Against Enterococcus faecalis, ampicillin (ABPC) and VCM showed a strong antibacterial activity. The antibacterial activity of cephems to Escherichia coli was generally good, and especially cefozopran (CZOP) and cefpirome (CPR) showed the strongest activity (MIC90: < or = 125 microg/mL). Quinolone resistant E. coli [MIC of ciprofloxacin (CPFX): > or = 4 microg/mL] was detected at frequency of 18.8%, which was higher than that in the last year. Against Klebsiella pneumoniae, CZOP, meropenem (MEPM), and carumonam (CRMN) showed the strongest activity and prevented the growth of all strains with 0.125 microg/mL or less. The antibacterial activity of the other cephems was relatively good, and decrease in their activity observed in the last year study was not recognized. Against Serratia marcescens, imipenem (IPM) and gentamicin (GM) had the strongest antibacterial activity. Against Proteus mirabilis, CRMN showed the strongest activity and prevented the growth of all strains with 0.125 microg/mL or less. MEPM prevented the growth of all strains with 0.25 microg/mL. Next, cefmenoxime (CMX), ceftazidime (CAZ), CZOP, cefixime (CFIX), cefpodoxime (CPDX), and cefditoren (CDTR) showed a strong activity. The antibacterial activity of the drugs to Pseudomonas aeruginosa was generally low, and MIC90 of all the drugs was ranged from 32 to > 128 microg/mL except IPM and MEPM having 16 microg/mL. The antibacterial activities of CZOP and CAZ were considered to be relatively good on MIC50 comparison (MIC50: 2 microg/mL).

    Topics: Aminoglycosides; Ampicillin; Anti-Infective Agents; Aztreonam; Cefixime; Cefozopran; Cefpirome; Cefpodoxime; Ceftizoxime; Cephalosporins; Dibekacin; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Enterococcus faecalis; Escherichia coli; Gentamicins; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Gram-Positive Bacteria; Humans; Imipenem; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Proteus mirabilis; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Quinolones; Serratia marcescens; Staphylococcus aureus; Thienamycins; Urinary Tract Infections; Vancomycin

2006
[Antibacterial activity of carumonam and cefpirome on hospital strains resistant to gentamicin and cephalothin: comparison with other beta-lactam antibiotics, new fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides and other antibiotics].
    Pathologie-biologie, 1990, Volume: 38, Issue:6

    The antibacterial in vitro activity of carumonam, a new monobactam, and cefpirome, a new cephalosporin, was studied on 483 hospital strains resistant to gentamicin and cephalothin, in comparison with amikacin, azlocillin, aztreonam, cefmenoxim, cefoperazone, cefotaxim, cefsulodin (for Pseudomonas), ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefuroxim, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, enoxacin, netilmicin, norfloxacin, pefloxacin, piperacillin, rifampicin, tobramycin and trimethoprim. In general the two compounds have a very good in vito activity on Enterobacteriaceae but are less active on non-fermenting microorganisms. For the Enterobacteriaceae the minimal inhibitory concentrations 90% for carumonam was less than or equal to 1.1 mg/l excepted for Enterobacter spp. (43,6 mg/l) and M. morganii (56.8 mg/l) . All the Enterobacteriaceae are susceptible to cefpirome (minimal inhibitory concentrations 90% less than or equal to 5.3 mg/l). The activity of carumonam and cefpirome on Enterobacteriaceae is comparable with that of the third generation cephalosporins. Carumonam is more active than cefpirome and other beta-lactams, ceftazidime excepted, on Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pseudomonas spp. On the other hand, both compounds reveal to have only a low activity on the other non-fermenters which minimal inhibitory concentrations 90% values of 115.4 mg/l for carumonam and 32.0 mg/l for cefpirome.

    Topics: Aminoglycosides; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Aztreonam; Cefpirome; Cephalosporins; Cephalothin; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Gentamicins; Gram-Negative Bacteria; In Vitro Techniques; Quinolones

1990
Comparative in-vitro activity of cefodizime, cefpirome, carumonam and RU-28965 with other antimicrobials against anaerobes.
    The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 1987, Volume: 19, Issue:5

    Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Aztreonam; Bacteria, Anaerobic; Cefotaxime; Cefpirome; Cephalosporins; Leucomycins; Microbial Sensitivity Tests

1987