hmr-1556 has been researched along with azimilide* in 3 studies
3 other study(ies) available for hmr-1556 and azimilide
Article | Year |
---|---|
I(Kr) vs. I(Ks) blockade and arrhythmogenicity in normoxic rabbit Purkinje fibers: does it really make a difference?
The electrophysiological (standard intracellular microelectrode technique) and pro-arrhythmic (occurrence of early after-depolarization) effects of five class III agents acting on delayed rectifier current (I(K)), rapid (I(Kr)), and/or slow (I(Ks)) components have been studied in rabbit Purkinje fibers taken near the septum and submitted in vitro to reduced stimulation rate (from 1 to 0.5 Hz) in the absence or presence of epinephrine (10 nm) during normoxic conditions. There were two I(Kr) blockers (d-sotalol and dofetilide), two I(Ks) blockers (chromanol 293B and HMR 1556), and a non-selective I(K) blocker (azimilide). d-sotalol, dofetilide, and azimilide lengthened APD(60) and APD(90) in a concentration-dependent manner. Both d-sotalol and dofetilide showed pro-arrhythmia at highest concentrations and in the presence of epinephrine and lower stimulation rate. Despite azimilide markedly lengthened APD(90), it was globally less pro-arrhythmic than dofetilide. Thus, in normoxic rabbit Purkinje fibers, I(Kr) blockade prolonged action potential duration (APD) and increased the incidence of early after-depolarizations, particularly so in the presence of adrenergic stimulation and bradycardia, I(Ks) blockade did neither, and non-selective I(K) blockade (by azimilide) behaved principally as I(Kr) blockade. It is concluded that in normoxic rabbit Purkinje fibers, I(Ks) blockade was neutral, whereas I(Kr) blockade was pro-arrhythmic, which may make a difference worth exploration in more complex models. Topics: Action Potentials; Animals; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Chromans; Delayed Rectifier Potassium Channels; Epinephrine; Hydantoins; Imidazolidines; In Vitro Techniques; Male; Phenethylamines; Piperazines; Potassium Channel Blockers; Potassium Channels, Voltage-Gated; Purkinje Fibers; Rabbits; Sotalol; Sulfonamides | 2011 |
Electrophysiological effects of azimilide in an in vitro model of simulated-ischemia and reperfusion in guinea-pig ventricular myocardium.
There are few investigations on azimilide effects during ischemia/reperfusion. We have therefore investigated low concentrations of azimilide (0.1 and 0.5 micromol/l) versus Controls on action potential parameters and occurrence of repetitive responses during simulated ischemia and reperfusion. An in vitro model of "border zone" in guinea-pig ventricular myocardium (n=30) was used. Azimilide 0.5 micromol/l lengthened action potential duration in normoxic but not in ischemic-like conditions. Therefore an increased dispersion of action potential duration at 90% of repolarization during simulated ischemia in presence of azimilide was seen. Upon reperfusion, both normal and reperfused myocardium showed azimilide-induced action potential duration increase. There was a neutral effect on the occurrence of arrhythmias during simulated ischemia; however azimilide showed significant (P=0.033) antiarrhythmic properties following reperfusion. To mimic I(Kr) and I(Ks) blocking properties of azimilide we further used dofetilide 10 nmol/l with HMR 1556 1 nmol/l (N=9), which was accompanied by less severe shortening (P<0.05) of action potential duration at 90% of repolarization at 30 min of ischemic-like conditions (-43+/-9%), as compared with azimilide 0.5 micromol/l (-64+/-5%) but similar to what seen with azimilide 0.1 micromol/l (-53+/-5%) and Controls (-52+/-6%). During reperfusion, 2/9 (22%) preparations had sustained activities, which was less than what observed in Controls (5/10, 50%) and with azimilide 0.5 micromol/l (0/10, 0%), although not statistically different (respectively, P=0.35 and P=0.21). Lack versus homogenous class III effects of azimilide in respectively simulated ischemia and reperfusion may explain its different efficacy on arrhythmias, although prevention of reperfusion arrhythmias calls for other than just its I(Kr) and I(Ks) blocking properties. Topics: Action Potentials; Animals; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Chromans; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Guinea Pigs; Heart Ventricles; Hydantoins; Imidazolidines; In Vitro Techniques; Male; Myocardial Ischemia; Myocardial Reperfusion Injury; Phenethylamines; Piperazines; Potassium Channel Blockers; Sulfonamides; Time Factors | 2005 |
Atrial-selective antiarrhythmic actions of novel Ikur vs. Ikr, Iks, and IKAch class Ic drugs and beta blockers in pigs.
The Kv1.5 channel, underlying IKur, is supposed to be atrial selective in pigs and humans. We investigated the effects of different potassium channel blockers, i.e. the IKur blockers AVE 0118, S9947 and S20951, with amiodarone (AM), dofetilide (DO), azimilide (AZ), ibutilide (IB), the IKs blocker HMR 1556, atropine (ATR), flecainide (FL), propafenone (PR), d,l-sotalol (SO), atenolol (ATE), and esmolol (ES), on the left and right atrial and ventricular refractoriness and left atrial vulnerability (LAV) in vivo in pigs.. In pentobarbital-anesthetized pigs (n=81), atrial and ventricular effective refractory periods (ERPs) were measured with the S1-S2-extrastimulus-method and QTc time from electrocardiograms. LAV was assessed after S2-extrastimulus to the left atrium.. All IKur blockers prolonged left stronger than right atrial ERP and did not change QTc. All IKr blockers predominantly prolonged the right vs. left atria. AM prolonged both atria equally, and ATR the left only. Pure beta blockers acted predominantly on the left atrium, as did FL and PR, while d,l-sotalol acted predominantly on the right. AVE 0118, S9947, S20951, ibutilide, and d,l-sotalol significantly decreased LAV (-100%, -100%, -82%, -53%, -42%; p<0.05), in contrast to all other drugs.. The IKur blockers exhibited stronger effects on the left atrium, which itself has shorter refractoriness, but strikingly with no effect on ventricular repolarization, while IKr blockers, IKs blockers, and d,l-sotalol exerted predominantly right atrial effects and known ventricular effects. IKur blockers inhibited atrial tachyarrhythmias stronger than all available drugs. Therefore, IKur blockers seem to be promising new atrial-selective antiarrhythmic drugs. Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Amiodarone; Animals; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Atrial Function; Atropine; Biphenyl Compounds; Chromans; Flecainide; Heart Atria; Hydantoins; Imidazoles; Imidazolidines; Male; Phenethylamines; Piperazines; Potassium Channel Blockers; Potassium Channels; Propafenone; Propanolamines; Sotalol; Sulfonamides; Swine; Ventricular Function | 2004 |