himbacine and 4-fluorohexahydrosiladifenidol

Acetylcholine outflow can be modulated through inhibitory presynaptic muscarinic autoreceptors. This study was to identify which subtype is involved in mouse cortex. Five muscarinic antagonists and their ability to elevate stimulation-induced (S-I) acetylcholine outflow were tested in the presence of neostigmine, which decreased S-I outflow. The potency of each antagonist was determined, expressed as a ratio of the potency of each other antagonist and compared with the potency ratios of the antagonists for each of the defined muscarinic receptors (M(1)-M(4)), as recorded in the literature. Linear regression analysis revealed that the data fitted the M(2) (r(2)>0.97) and M(4) (r(2)>0.85) subtypes best, with no correlation for the M(1) and M(3) subtypes.

Topics: Acetylcholine; Alkaloids; Animals; Atropine; Autoreceptors; Binding, Competitive; Cerebral Cortex; Furans; Male; Mice; Muscarinic Antagonists; Naphthalenes; Neostigmine; Parasympatholytics; Parasympathomimetics; Piperidines; Pirenzepine; Receptor, Muscarinic M2; Receptor, Muscarinic M4; Receptors, Muscarinic

1. The effects of seven muscarinic receptor antagonists were used to characterize the receptors which mediate carbachol-evoked contractions of intertaenial circular and taenial longitudinal muscle in human isolated colon. The effects of these antagonists were studied upon colon contractions induced by cumulatively added carbachol which had mean EC50 values of 11.7 +/- 2.3 microM (n = 8) and 12.6 +/- 2.3 microM (n = 8) respectively upon circular and longitudinal smooth muscle. 2. All antagonists displaced concentration-response curves to carbachol to the right in a parallel manner. The maximum concentration of each antagonist added (30 nM-10 microM) did not significantly suppress the maximum response. 3. In circular muscle, the M3 muscarinic receptor antagonists, 4-diphenylacetoxy-N-methylpiperidine methiodide (4-DAMP), hexahydrosiladiphenidol (HHSiD) and para-fluoro-hexahydrosiladiphenidol (p-F-HHSiD) inhibited responses with pA2 values of 9.41 +/- 0.23, 7.17 +/- 0.07, 6.94 +/- 0.18 respectively. The M2 muscarinic receptor antagonist, AF-DX 116, the M2/M4 muscarinic receptor antagonist, himbacine, and the M1 muscarinic receptor antagonist, pirenzepine, yielded pA2 values of 7.36 +/- 0.43, 7.47 +/- 0.14 and 7.23 +/- 0.48 respectively. The non-selective antagonist, atropine, had a pA2 of 8.72 +/- 0.28. 4. In longitudinal muscle 4-DAMP, HHSiD, p-F-HHSiD, AF-DX 116, himbacine and pirenzepine gave pA2 values of 9.09 +/- 0.16, 7.45 +/- 0.43, 7.44 +/- 0.21, 6.44 +/- 0.1, 7.54 +/- 0.40, 6.87 +/- 0.38 respectively. Atropine yielded a pA2 value of 8.60 +/- 0.08. 5. The pharmacological profile of antagonist affinities at the muscarinic receptor population responding to muscarinic agonist-evoked contraction is similar to that widely accepted as characterizing the activation of an M3 muscarinic receptor subtype, although pA2 values of some antagonists are lower than that seen in other investigations.

Topics: Alkaloids; Atropine; Carbachol; Carcinoma; Colon; Colonic Neoplasms; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Furans; Humans; In Vitro Techniques; Muscarinic Antagonists; Muscle Contraction; Muscle, Smooth; Naphthalenes; Piperidines; Pirenzepine

1. The muscarine receptor mediating electrically-stimulated acid secretion in the mouse isolated stomach was characterized using a variety of muscarine receptor antagonists confirming the M1 nature of the antagonist effect of telenzepine. 2. Field stimulation (7 V, 10 Hz, 0.5 ms) resulted in a plateau acid secretion over at least 90 min which was completely blocked by either 1 mumol/l TTX or H2 receptor antagonists (100 mumol/l cimetidine or 10 mumol/l lupitidine). Ranitidine, which is known to potently inhibit mucosal acetylcholine esterase, was ineffective. Compound 48/80 at 100 mumol/l, which depletes mucosal histamine stores, initially mimicked electrical stimulation but subsequently prevented it from inducing acid secretion. 3. 10 muscarine receptor antagonists with differing relative affinities for M1, M2 and M3 receptors were introduced at 1 mumol/l to inhibit electrically-stimulated acid secretion. The percentages inhibition were plotted against binding affinities of the antagonists at either M1, M2 or M3 binding sites. A statistically significant correlation between functional and binding data was detected only when based on M1 affinities. 4. It is concluded that field stimulation, which probably mimicks vagal drive, results in muscarinic M1 receptor activation on paracrine cells to release histamine. Histamine then stimulates parietal cells to secrete acid. Hence, according to the present and our previous data, telenzepine inhibits acid secretion under these conditions by blocking M1 receptors at least partially located on histamine-releasing paracrine cells.

Topics: Acetylcholine; Alkaloids; Animals; Anti-Ulcer Agents; Electric Stimulation; Furans; Gastric Acid; Gastric Mucosa; Histamine; Mice; Muscarinic Antagonists; Naphthalenes; p-Methoxy-N-methylphenethylamine; Parasympatholytics; Piperidines; Pirenzepine; Stomach; Thiazepines; Vagus Nerve