heparitin-sulfate and coumarin

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is caused by heparin-dependent, platelet-activating IgG antibodies that increase thrombin generation in vivo, producing a prothrombotic phenotype. In addition to platelet activation, there is in vitro evidence that activation of endothelium and monocytes occurs, perhaps directly by HIT antibodies, but more likely through activated platelet (or microparticle)-endothelial-leukocyte interactions. Patients with cardiac disease receiving heparin present important diagnostic and therapeutic issues when unexpected thrombocytopenia arises. Concomitant vascular disease burden and intravascular catheter use further increase risk of HIT-associated arterial thrombosis in this patient population. Whether arterial thrombosis simply reflects the "hypercoagulability state" of HIT interacting with diseased or injured arteries, or whether arterial "white clots" reflect additional prothrombotic effects of HIT via endothelial and monocyte activation, remains uncertain. Patients with HIT can also develop deep-vein thrombosis, which can progress to limb loss if coumarin (warfarin) leads to severe protein C depletion (coumarin-induced venous limb gangrene). Therapy for patients strongly suspected to have HIT should focus on inhibiting thrombin (or its generation) pharmacologically. Two direct thrombin inhibitors (lepirudin, argatroban) are approved for treating HIT. When using these agents, coumarin anticoagulation should be delayed pending substantial resolution of thrombocytopenia, before cautiously introducing overlapping coumarin therapy.

Topics: Antibodies; Anticoagulants; Cardiovascular Diseases; Coumarins; Heparin; Heparitin Sulfate; Humans; Immunoglobulin G; Models, Biological; Monocytes; Phenotype; Platelet Activation; Platelet Factor 4; Thrombin; Thrombocytopenia; Thrombosis

Randomized controlled trials evaluating treatment of acute, transient, but uncommon diseases are difficult to perform. The prothrombotic adverse drug reaction, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), is such an example. During the mid-1980s, the defibrinogenating snake venom, ancrod (+/-warfarin, Canada), or coumarin (warfarin, Canada; phenprocoumon, Germany) alone, were often used to treat HIT. During the 1990s, danaparoid+/-coumarin began to replace ancrod (+/-coumarin), or coumarin alone, for treating HIT, despite danaparoid not being approved for treatment of HIT.. We performed a retrospective evaluation of treatment outcomes from 1986 to 1999, comparing danaparoid+/-coumarin (n=62) versus ancrod+/-coumarin or coumarin alone (controls, n=56).. The predefined composite endpoint of adjudicated new, progressive, or recurrent thrombosis (including thrombotic death), or limb amputation, at day 7 (maximum, one event per patient) was significantly lower in danaparoid-treated patients, compared with controls: 8/62=12.9% (95% CI, 4.3-21.5) vs. 22/56=39.3% (95% CI, 26.1-52.5); p=0.0014. We also found a lower frequency of the composite endpoint at end of study (day 35) in danaparoid-treated patients: 12/62=19.4% vs. 24/56=42.9% (p=0.0088). Major bleeding (by day 7) occurred in 7/62 (11.3%) and 16/56 (28.6%) of danaparoid-treated and control patients, respectively (p=0.0211).. The replacement of ancrod+/-coumarin, or coumarin alone, by danaparoid (+/-coumarin) in the mid-1990s for the treatment of HIT was justified by improved efficacy and safety.

Topics: Aged; Ancrod; Canada; Chondroitin Sulfates; Cohort Studies; Coumarins; Dermatan Sulfate; Female; Germany; Heparin; Heparitin Sulfate; Humans; Male; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Platelet Count; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Retrospective Studies; Survival Analysis; Thrombocytopenia