guanosine-triphosphate and phenylalanyl-leucyl-arginyl-phenylalaninamide

guanosine-triphosphate has been researched along with phenylalanyl-leucyl-arginyl-phenylalaninamide* in 1 studies

Other Studies

1 other study(ies) available for guanosine-triphosphate and phenylalanyl-leucyl-arginyl-phenylalaninamide

ArticleYear
Excitation evoked by FMRFamide and FLRFamide in the heart of Buccinum undatum and evidence for inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate as an RF-tetrapeptide second messenger.
    Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology, 2000, Volume: 170, Issue:5-6

    In this study the relative potencies of four established molluscan cardioexcitatory agents were examined on Buccinum heart. The potencies were, in decending order: phenylalanine-leucine-arginine-phenylalanine-NH2 (FLRFamide) > phenylalanine-methionine-arginine-phenylalanine-NH2 (FMRFamide; 80% of maximum) > 5-hydroxytryptamine (5HT; 60% of maximum) > guanosine triphosphate (GTP; 15% of maximum). FMRFamide and FLRFamide had similar dose-response curve patterns with thresholds at 10(-9) mol l(-1) but FLRFamide was more potent than FMRFamide. The superfused atrium was much less sensitive to all agonists than the internally perfused ventricle. FLRFamide and FMRFamide induced small depolarizations (1-2 mV) which triggered a burst of action potentials of about 5 mV which on reaching 4 mV triggered a burst of fast twitch contractions. Lithium, at high concentrations inhibited FMRFamide and 5-HT responses of internally perfused ventricles. Neomycin also inhibited peptide responses, but was without effect on 5-HT responses. Heparin, however, for technical reasons was without effect on ventricular responses to all three agonists. FMRFamide and FLRFamide appear to share a common receptor, the potency difference being due to the substitution of leucine for methionine in FLRFamide. The RF N-terminal sequence appears crucial for receptor activation. The Phospholipase C inhibitor neomycin equally inhibits responses to the two peptides while 5-HT responses are unaffected. This implicates a peptide/receptor interaction which activated inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) as a second messenger.

    Topics: Animals; Anticoagulants; Antimanic Agents; Bivalvia; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; FMRFamide; Guanosine Triphosphate; Heparin; Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate; Lithium Chloride; Membrane Potentials; Myocardial Contraction; Myocardium; Neomycin; Oligopeptides; Protein Synthesis Inhibitors; Second Messenger Systems; Serotonin; Type C Phospholipases

2000