guanosine-triphosphate and luzindole

guanosine-triphosphate has been researched along with luzindole* in 2 studies

Other Studies

2 other study(ies) available for guanosine-triphosphate and luzindole

ArticleYear
Receptor-mediated modulation of avian caecal muscle contraction by melatonin: role of tyrosine protein kinase.
    Journal of pineal research, 2002, Volume: 32, Issue:3

    Abstract: Melatonin receptors in the quail caecum were studied by 2[125I]iodomelatonin binding assay and the involvement of tyrosine protein kinase in the melatonin-induced contraction was explored. The binding of 2[125I]iodomelatonin in the quail caecum membrane preparations was saturable, reversible and of high affinity with an equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd) of 24.6 +/- 1.1 pm (n = 7) and a maximum number of binding sites (Bmax) of 1.95 +/- 0.09 fmol (mg/protein) (n = 7). The relative order of potency of indoles in competing for 2[125I]iodomelatonin binding was: 2-iodomelatonin > melatonin > 2-phenylmelatonin > 6-chloromelatonin > 6-hydroxymelatonin > N-acetylserotonin, indicating that ML(1) receptors are involved. The binding was inhibited by Mel1b melatonin receptor antagonists, luzindole and 4-phenyl-2-propionamidotetralin (4-P-PDOT) as well as by non-hydrolyzable analogs of GTP like GTPgammaS and Gpp(NH)p but not by adenosine nucleotides. The latter suggests that the action of melatonin on the caecum is G-protein linked. Cumulative addition of melatonin (1-300 nM) potentiated both the amplitude and frequency of spontaneous contractions in the quail caecum. The potentiation of rhythmic contractions was blocked by both luzindole and 4-P-PDOT. Antagonists of tyrosine kinase, genistein(2 microM) and erbstatin(4 microM) suppressed the modulation of spontaneous contractions by melatonin, but not inhibitors of protein kinase C (PKC) or protein kinase A (PKA). Melatonin-induced increment in spontaneous contraction was blocked by nifedipine (0.4 nM). Thus, we suggest that melatonin potentiates spontaneous contraction in the quail caecum via interacting with G-protein-coupled Mel(1b) receptor which may activate L-type Ca2+ channels by mobilizing tyrosine kinases.

    Topics: 1-(5-Isoquinolinesulfonyl)-2-Methylpiperazine; Animals; Apamin; Binding, Competitive; Cecum; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Enzyme Inhibitors; Guanosine 5'-O-(3-Thiotriphosphate); Guanosine Triphosphate; Indoles; Melatonin; Muscle Contraction; Muscle, Smooth; Naphthalenes; Potassium Channels; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Quail; Receptors, Cell Surface; Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear; Receptors, Melatonin; Tetrahydronaphthalenes; Tryptamines

2002
Thermodynamic analysis of agonist and antagonist binding to the chicken brain melatonin receptor.
    British journal of pharmacology, 1994, Volume: 111, Issue:1

    1. The binding of 2-[125I]-iodomelatonin to chicken brain membranes, and the inhibition of binding by melatonin, N-acetyltryptamine and luzindole, were examined at temperatures between 4 degrees C and 37 degrees C. 2. At all temperatures studied, the binding affinity (Kd or Ki) for 2-[125I]-iodomelatonin, melatonin (both agonists) and, to a lesser extent, N-acetyltryptamine (a partial agonist) was reduced by inclusion of guanosine triphosphate (GTP, 1 mM) in the assay. GTP did not affect the Ki for luzindole, a melatonin receptor antagonist. 3. The maximal density of binding sites (Bmax) was not affected by temperature but the Kd showed a peak at 21 degrees C with lower values at both higher and lower temperatures giving curvilinear van't Hoff plots (lnKA vs l/temperature). 4. Derived changes in entropy (delta S degree) and enthalpy (delta H degree) of binding for all of the melatonin ligands decreased as temperature increased. 5. The affinity, and thus the free energy of binding, delta G degree, of these ligands at the melatonin receptor have identical values at several temperatures yet at these temperatures delta S degree and delta H degree were very different, implying that more than one intermolecular force must be involved in the binding of ligand and receptor. 6. Conceivably, the large positive delta S degree observed at low temperatures, perhaps as a result of hydrophobic interactions, is compensated by a corresponding, but opposite, change in enthalpy at higher temperatures. However, it is not clear what type of binding force(s) would show such a temperature-dependence. 7. These studies suggest that caution must be exercised in the molecular interpretation of derived measures of delta S degree and delta H degree obtained from direct measurements of delta G degree.

    Topics: Animals; Binding Sites; Brain; Chickens; Guanosine Triphosphate; Iodine Radioisotopes; Kinetics; Melatonin; Receptors, Cell Surface; Receptors, Melatonin; Regression Analysis; Temperature; Thermodynamics; Tryptamines

1994