gsk573719 and fluticasone-furoate

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Androstadienes; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Drug Combinations; Fluticasone; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Androstadienes; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Drug Combinations; Fluticasone; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines

In this review, we focused on original manuscripts published in the 2017 that provided additional information on the clinical and therapeutic features of the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We have chosen eight of these studies, collected in four topics concerning the pharmacological treatment (tiotropium) of mild-moderate patients, the pharmacological (fluticasone furoate/vilanterol/umeclidinium) and non-pharmacological treatment (non-invasive mechanical ventilation) of severe patients, the etiology of acute exacerbation of COPD involving seasonal airway pathogens and the role of eosinophils with particular interest to the monoclonal antibody directed against interleukin-5 (mepolizumab). For each topic, we report a brief description of studies, take-home messages, and brief comments.

Topics: Androstadienes; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Common Cold; Disease Progression; Drug Combinations; Eosinophils; Glucocorticoids; Haemophilus Infections; Humans; Interleukin-5; Moraxellaceae Infections; Muscarinic Antagonists; Noninvasive Ventilation; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines; Seasons; Severity of Illness Index; Tiotropium Bromide

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Androstadienes; Animals; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Combinations; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Lung; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines; Recovery of Function; Research Design; Treatment Outcome

In the Informing the Pathway of COPD Treatment (IMPACT) trial, single-inhaler triple-therapy fluticasone furoate (FF), umeclidinium (UMEC), and vilanterol (VI) reduced moderate/severe exacerbation rates vs FF/VI and UMEC/VI in patients with symptomatic COPD and a history of exacerbations, with a similar safety profile.. Are trial outcomes with single-inhaler triple-therapy FF/UMEC/VI vs FF/VI and UMEC/VI affected by age in patients with symptomatic COPD and a history of exacerbations?. IMPACT was a phase III, double-blind, 52-week trial. Patients ≥ 40 years of age with symptomatic COPD and ≥ 1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the previous year were randomly assigned 2:2:1 to FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 μg, FF/VI 100/25 μg, or UMEC/VI 62.5/25 μg. End points assessed by age included annual rate of moderate/severe exacerbations, change from baseline (CFB) in trough FEV. FF/UMEC/VI reduced the rate of moderate/severe exacerbations and improved lung function and health status vs FF/VI and UMEC/VI irrespective of age for most end points, with a similar safety profile.. ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT02164513; URL: www.clinicaltrials.govCTT116855.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Androstadienes; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Drug Monitoring; Female; Health Status Disparities; Humans; Male; Nebulizers and Vaporizers; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines; Respiratory Function Tests; Respiratory System Agents; Symptom Flare Up

Blood samples were obtained from the phase IIIA CAPTAIN study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02924688), which evaluated the efficacy and safety of once-daily FF/UMEC/VI versus FF/VI in patients with uncontrolled asthma taking ICS/LABA. Samples were collected at trough (defined as ≥ 20 h after the last dose) from all subjects randomized to the six treatment groups (FF/UMEC/VI 100/31.25/25 μg, 100/62.5/25 μg, 200/31.25/25 μg, 200/62.5/25 μg; FF/VI 100/25 μg, 200/25 μg) at week 24 or the early withdrawal visit. In a subset of patients, PK samples were obtained predose at week 12, and at 5-30 min, 45-90 min, and 2-3 h postdose. For each analyte, a population PK model was developed using non-linear mixed-effects modeling. The maximum likelihood method was utilized to incorporate data below the quantifiable limit (BQL). Final models were used to derive the area under the plasma concentration-time curve and maximum observed concentration at steady-state for each analyte.. We obtained 4018, 2695, and 4032 samples from 1891, 1258, and 1891 patients, for FF, UMEC, and VI, respectively; 48%, 49%, and 50% of samples were reported as BQL for each analyte, respectively. The PK were adequately described by a two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination for FF, a two-compartment model with intravenous bolus input and first-order elimination for UMEC, and a three-compartment model with zero-order input and first-order elimination for VI. Statistically significant covariates were body weight on apparent inhaled clearance of FF, creatinine clearance on apparent clearance and body weight on apparent inhaled volume of distribution of the central compartment for UMEC, and race (East Asian, Japanese, and South East Asian heritage) on inhaled apparent volume of distribution of the central compartment for VI. However, the overall effects of covariates were marginal and thus do not warrant dose adjustment. Systemic exposures of FF or VI did not differ when administered as a single-inhaler triple (FF/UMEC/VI) or dual combination (FF/VI), and were similar to those reported for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.. Only marginal covariate effects were observed, and thus no dose adjustments are deemed necessary for FF, UMEC, or VI. There was no difference in FF or VI systemic exposure in patients with asthma when administered as either triple (FF/UMEC/VI) or dual therapy (FF/VI). Together with efficacy findings from the CAPTAIN study, our data support the use of single-inhaler FF/UMEC/VI triple therapy for patients with uncontrolled asthma currently receiving ICS/LABA.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Androstadienes; Asthma; Benzyl Alcohols; Bromides; Chlorobenzenes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Humans; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines; Treatment Outcome

This analysis of the IMPACT study assessed the cardiovascular (CV) safety of single-inhaler triple therapy with fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) versus FF/VI and UMEC/VI dual therapy.. IMPACT was a 52-week, randomized, double-blind, multicenter Phase III study comparing the efficacy and safety of FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg with FF/VI 100/25 mcg or UMEC/VI 62.5/25 mcg in patients ≥40 years of age with symptomatic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and ≥1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the previous year. The inclusion criteria for the study were intentionally designed to permit the enrollment of patients with significant concurrent CV disease/risk. CV safety assessments included proportion of patients with and exposure-adjusted rates of on-treatment CV adverse events of special interest (CVAESI) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE), as well as time-to-first (TTF) CVAESI, and TTF CVAESI resulting in hospitalization/prolonged hospitalization or death.. Baseline CV risk factors were similar across treatment groups. Overall, 68% of patients (n = 7012) had ≥1 CV risk factor and 40% (n = 4127) had ≥2. At baseline, 29% of patients reported a current/past cardiac disorder and 58% reported a current/past vascular disorder. The proportion of patients with on-treatment CVAESI was 11% for both FF/UMEC/VI and UMEC/VI, and 10% for FF/VI. There was no statistical difference for FF/UMEC/VI versus FF/VI or UMEC/VI in TTF CVAESI (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85, 1.11; p = 0.711 and HR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.78, 1.08; p = 0.317, respectively) nor TTF CVAESI leading to hospitalization/prolonged hospitalization or death (HR: 1.19, 95% CI: 0.93, 1.51; p = 0.167 and HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.72, 1.27; p = 0.760, respectively). On-treatment MACE occurred in ≤3% of patients across treatment groups, with similar prevalence and rates between treatments.. In a symptomatic COPD population with a history of exacerbations and a high rate of CV disease/risk, the proportion of patients with CVAESI and MACE was 10-11% and 1-3%, respectively, across treatment arms, and the risk of CVAESI was low and similar across treatment arms. There was no statistically significant increased CV risk associated with the use of FF/UMEC/VI versus FF/VI or UMEC/VI, and UMEC/VI versus FF/VI.. NCT02164513 (GSK study number CTT116855).

Topics: Aged; Androstadienes; Benzyl Alcohols; Cardiovascular Diseases; Chlorobenzenes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nebulizers and Vaporizers; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines

Population pharmacokinetic methods were used to characterize the pharmacokinetics of fluticasone furoate (FF), umeclidinium (UMEC), and vilanterol (VI) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) when administered as a fixed-dose combination via a single closed inhaler.. Plasma concentration data from three studies were analyzed using non-linear mixed-effects modeling in NONMEM. The pooled dataset consisted of 2948, 2589, and 3331 FF, UMEC, and VI observations from 714, 622, and 817 patients with COPD, respectively. There were 41%, 13%, and 21% of observations below the quantification limit for FF, UMEC, and VI, respectively. The pharmacokinetics of FF, UMEC, and VI were all adequately described by a two-compartment model with first-order absorption. The following covariates were statistically significant, but none were considered to be clinically relevant. For FF, Japanese heritage and FF/VI treatment on apparent inhaled clearance (CL/F) with FF CL/F 35% lower in patients of Japanese heritage across all treatments and FF CL/F 42% higher in patients with COPD following FF/VI administration. This is in line with the product label. For UMEC, weight, age, and smoking status on CL/F and weight on apparent volume of distribution (V2/F) with every 10% increase in age from 60 years of age leading to approximately a 6% decrease in UMEC CL/F and every 10% increase in weight from 70 kg leading to approximately a 6% increase in UMEC CL/F and approximately an 8% increase in UMEC V2/F. For a subject with COPD who smoked, UMEC CL/F was 28% higher. For VI, weight on CL/F and smoking status on V2/F with an approximately 4% increase in VI CL/F for every 10% increase in weight from 70 kg, and for a subject with COPD who smoked, VI V2/F was 46% higher. The majority of these covariates have been previously identified in historical analyses. None of these effects were clinically relevant in terms of systemic exposures and do not warrant dose adjustment.. All FF, UMEC, and VI plasma concentrations were well interspersed with historical data and were all adequately described by a two-compartment model with first-order absorption. There were no clinically relevant differences in FF, UMEC, or VI systemic exposures when administered as FF/UMEC/VI, FF/VI + UMEC, or the dual combinations FF/VI and/or UMEC/VI.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Androstadienes; Anticonvulsants; Benzyl Alcohols; Bromides; Chlorobenzenes; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Muscarinic Antagonists; Predictive Value of Tests; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines

The Informing the Pathway of COPD Treatment (IMPACT) study demonstrated that single-inhaler triple therapy fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) reduces moderate/severe exacerbation rates and improves lung function and health status versus FF/VI or UMEC/VI dual therapy in patients with symptomatic COPD and a history of exacerbations. This analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of FF/UMEC/VI in patients enrolled in Japan.. IMPACT was a 52-week, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study comparing FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg with FF/VI 100/25 µg or UMEC/VI 62.5/25 µg in patients ≥40 years with symptomatic COPD and ≥1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the previous year. Endpoints included annual rate of on-treatment moderate/severe exacerbations (primary endpoint), time-to-first on-treatment moderate/severe exacerbation and change from baseline at Week 52 in trough FEV. The Japan subgroup accounted for only 4% (378/10,355) of the overall IMPACT intent-to-treat (ITT) population. In the Japan subgroup, FF/UMEC/VI reduced the annual rate of on-treatment moderate/severe exacerbations by 15% (95% CI: -20, 40) versus FF/VI (compared with 15% [10, 20] in the ITT) and 36% (95% CI: 6, 57) versus UMEC/VI (compared with 25% [19, 30] in the ITT). FF/UMEC/VI reduced moderate/severe exacerbation risk (time-to-first), improved lung function and health status at Week 52 versus both dual therapies. These results were in the same direction and of a generally similar magnitude to those seen in the overall ITT population. No new safety signals were identified in the Japan subgroup compared with the ITT population. Pneumonia incidence was higher with FF/UMEC/VI and FF/VI versus UMEC/VI.. These results highlight the favorable benefit-risk profile of FF/UMEC/VI single-inhaler triple therapy compared with FF/VI or UMEC/VI dual therapy in patients in Japan with symptomatic COPD and ≥1 exacerbation in the prior year.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Androstadienes; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Health Status; Humans; Japan; Lung; Male; Middle Aged; Muscarinic Antagonists; Nebulizers and Vaporizers; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines; Recovery of Function; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) overlap (ACO) is of increasing interest because ACO patients have significantly worse outcomes, leading to greater social and economic burdens compared with asthma or COPD alone. Some guidelines for ACO recommend triple therapy with inhaled corticosteroids, long-acting β2 agonists, and long-acting muscarinic antagonists. However, this approach is based on extrapolating data from patients with asthma or COPD alone. Therapeutic studies for ACO have not previously been conducted.. A 12-week, randomized, open-label cross-over pilot study was conducted in 17 ACO patients to evaluate the effect of umeclidinium (UMEC) 62.5 µg once-daily added to fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI) 200/25 µg once-daily. A 4-week run-in, a first and a second 4-week treatment period were included. Respiratory function, respiratory impedance, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, COPD assessment test, and asthma control test scores were evaluated 0, 4, and 8 weeks after randomization.. Adding UMEC to FF/VI provides greater improvement in lung function, indicating that triple therapy is a suitable regular treatment for ACO.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androstadienes; Asthma; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines; Treatment Outcome

Previous studies have highlighted a relationship between reduction in rate of exacerbations with therapies containing inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and baseline blood eosinophil count in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The IMPACT trial showed that once-daily single-inhaler triple therapy significantly reduced exacerbations versus dual therapies. Blood eosinophil counts and smoking status could be important modifiers of treatment response to ICS. We aimed to model these relationships and their interactions, including outcomes other than exacerbations.. IMPACT was a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, 52-week global study comparing once-daily single-inhaler triple therapy (fluticasone furoate-umeclidinium-vilanterol) with dual inhaled therapy (fluticasone furoate-vilanterol or umeclidinium-vilanterol). Eligible patients had moderate-to-very-severe COPD and at least one moderate or severe exacerbation in the previous year. We used fractional polynomials to model continuous blood eosinophil counts. We used negative binomial regression for numbers of moderate and severe exacerbations, severe exacerbations, and pneumonia. We modelled differences at week 52 in trough FEV. The magnitude of benefit of regimens containing ICS (fluticasone furoate-umeclidinium-vilanterol n=4151 and fluticasone furoate-vilanterol n=4134) in reducing rates of moderate and severe exacerbations increased in proportion with blood eosinophil count, compared with a non-ICS dual long-acting bronchodilator (umeclidinium-vilanterol n=2070). The moderate and severe exacerbation rate ratio for triple therapy versus umeclidinium-vilanterol was 0·88 (95% CI 0·74 to 1·04) at blood eosinophil count less than 90 cells per μL and 0·56 (0·47 to 0·66) at counts of 310 cells per μL or more; the corresponding rate ratio for fluticasone furoate-vilanterol versus umeclidinium-vilanterol was 1·09 (0·91 to 1·29) and 0·56 (0·47 to 0·66), respectively. Similar results were observed for FEV. This analysis of the IMPACT trial shows that assessment of blood eosinophil count and smoking status has the potential to optimise ICS use in clinical practice in patients with COPD and a history of exacerbations.. GlaxoSmithKline.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Aged; Androstadienes; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Eosinophils; Female; Humans; Male; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines; Treatment Outcome

Single-inhaler fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) 100/62.5/25 μg has been shown to improve lung function and health status, and reduce exacerbations, versus budesonide/formoterol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We evaluated the non-inferiority of single-inhaler FF/UMEC/VI versus FF/VI + UMEC using two inhalers.. Eligible patients with COPD (aged ≥40 years; ≥1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the 12 months before screening) were randomized (1:1; stratified by the number of long-acting bronchodilators [0, 1 or 2] per day during run-in) to receive 24-week FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 μg and placebo or FF/VI 100/25 μg + UMEC 62.5 μg; all treatments/placebo were delivered using the ELLIPTA inhaler once-daily in the morning. Primary endpoint: change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV. Single-inhaler triple therapy (FF/UMEC/VI) is non-inferior to two inhalers (FF/VI + UMEC) on trough FEV. GSK study CTT200812; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02729051 (submitted 31 March 2016).

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Androstadienes; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nebulizers and Vaporizers; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines

The benefits of triple therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with an inhaled glucocorticoid, a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), and a long-acting β. In this randomized trial involving 10,355 patients with COPD, we compared 52 weeks of a once-daily combination of fluticasone furoate (an inhaled glucocorticoid) at a dose of 100 μg, umeclidinium (a LAMA) at a dose of 62.5 μg, and vilanterol (a LABA) at a dose of 25 μg (triple therapy) with fluticasone furoate-vilanterol (at doses of 100 μg and 25 μg, respectively) and umeclidinium-vilanterol (at doses of 62.5 μg and 25 μg, respectively). Each regimen was administered in a single Ellipta inhaler. The primary outcome was the annual rate of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations during treatment.. The rate of moderate or severe exacerbations in the triple-therapy group was 0.91 per year, as compared with 1.07 per year in the fluticasone furoate-vilanterol group (rate ratio with triple therapy, 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 0.90; 15% difference; P<0.001) and 1.21 per year in the umeclidinium-vilanterol group (rate ratio with triple therapy, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.81; 25% difference; P<0.001). The annual rate of severe exacerbations resulting in hospitalization in the triple-therapy group was 0.13, as compared with 0.19 in the umeclidinium-vilanterol group (rate ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.78; 34% difference; P<0.001). There was a higher incidence of pneumonia in the inhaled-glucocorticoid groups than in the umeclidinium-vilanterol group, and the risk of clinician-diagnosed pneumonia was significantly higher with triple therapy than with umeclidinium-vilanterol, as assessed in a time-to-first-event analysis (hazard ratio, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.22 to 1.92; P<0.001).. Triple therapy with fluticasone furoate, umeclidinium, and vilanterol resulted in a lower rate of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations than fluticasone furoate-vilanterol or umeclidinium-vilanterol in this population. Triple therapy also resulted in a lower rate of hospitalization due to COPD than umeclidinium-vilanterol. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline; IMPACT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02164513 .).

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Adult; Aged; Androstadienes; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Dyspnea; Female; Glucocorticoids; Hospitalization; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Male; Middle Aged; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quality of Life; Quinuclidines

A population pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted from a subset of samples obtained from the Lung Function and Quality of Life Assessment in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with Closed Triple Therapy trial to characterize the pharmacokinetics of fluticasone furoate, umeclidinium, and vilanterol in patients with symptomatic COPD following treatment with fluticason furoate-umeclidinium-vilanterol combined in a single inhaler. This was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study comparing 24 weeks of once-daily triple therapy (fluticason furoate-umeclidinium-vilanterol, 100 μg/62.5 μg/25 μg; Ellipta inhaler) with twice-daily dual therapy (budesonide/formoterol 400 μg/12 μg; Turbuhaler). The analyses were conducted in a subset of 74 patients who received fluticason furoate-umeclidinium-vilanterol and provided serial or sparse samples. Monte Carlo simulations and a model-based estimation approach both indicated that systemic drug concentrations of fluticasone furoate, umeclidinium, and vilanterol after administration of fluticason furoate-umeclidinium-vilanterol triple combination therapy from a single inhaler were within the ranges observed following administration of these drugs as monotherapy (fluticasone furoate, umeclidinium, and vilanterol) or as dual-combination therapy (fluticasone furoate/vilanterol or umeclidinium/vilanterol).

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Androstadienes; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Monte Carlo Method; Nebulizers and Vaporizers; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quality of Life; Quinuclidines; Random Allocation

Randomized data comparing triple therapy with dual inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting β. We compared the effects of once-daily triple therapy on lung function and health-related quality of life with twice-daily ICS/LABA therapy in patients with COPD.. The FULFIL (Lung Function and Quality of Life Assessment in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with Closed Triple Therapy) trial was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study comparing 24 weeks of once-daily triple therapy (fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol 100 μg/62.5 μg/25 μg; ELLIPTA inhaler) with twice-daily ICS/LABA therapy (budesonide/formoterol 400 μg/12 μg; Turbuhaler). A patient subgroup remained on blinded treatment for up to 52 weeks. Co-primary endpoints were change from baseline in trough FEV. These results support the benefits of single-inhaler triple therapy compared with ICS/LABA therapy in patients with advanced COPD. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02345161).

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Androstadienes; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide; Chlorobenzenes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Formoterol Fumarate; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nebulizers and Vaporizers; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quality of Life; Quinuclidines

The long-acting muscarinic antagonist, umeclidinium (UMEC), combined with the inhaled corticosteroid, fluticasone furoate (FF), improves lung function in symptomatic patients with asthma. We assessed FF/UMEC in patients with a primary diagnosis of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but physiological characteristics of both (fixed airflow obstruction and reversibility to salbutamol).. This double-blind, parallel-arm, 3-phase study randomised 338 patients (1:1:1:1:2:2) to FF 100 mcg alone or combined with UMEC (15.6, 62.5, 125, or 250 mcg) or vilanterol 25 mcg (Phase A, 4 weeks). Primary endpoint: change from baseline in clinic trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV

Topics: Adult; Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Asthma; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Muscarinic Antagonists; Peak Expiratory Flow Rate; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines

Patients with symptomatic advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who experience recurrent exacerbations are particularly at risk of poor outcomes and present a significant burden on healthcare systems. The relative merits of treating with different inhaled combination therapies e.g. inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)/long-acting β2-agonist (LABA), LABA/long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA), ICS/LABA/LAMA, in this patient group are poorly understood, as is reflected in current guidelines. The InforMing the PAthway of COPD Treatment (IMPACT) study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluticasone furoate (FF)/umeclidinium (UMEC)/vilanterol (VI) versus FF/VI or UMEC/VI over a 52-week treatment period. The study has been designed with a focus on understanding the comparative merits of each treatment modality in different phenotypes/endotypes.This is a phase III, randomised, double-blind, three-arm, parallel-group, global multicentre study comparing the rate of moderate and severe exacerbations between FF/UMEC/VI and FF/VI or UMEC/VI over a 52-week treatment period. The study aims to recruit 10 000 patients from approximately 1070 centres. Eligible patients are aged ≥40 years, with symptomatic advanced COPD (Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) group D) and an exacerbation in the previous 12 months.The first patients were recruited to the IMPACT study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02164513) in June 2014 and the anticipated completion date is July 2017.

Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Adult; Aged; Androstadienes; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Muscarinic Antagonists; Phenotype; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines

A combination of fluticasone furoate (FF) and umeclidinium (UMEC) has been considered for development for the treatment of asthma. The primary objectives were to investigate the plasma and urine pharmacokinetics (PK) of FF/UMEC in combination compared with FF and UMEC monotherapies.. This randomized, double-blind, three-period crossover, single-center study in healthy volunteers assessed the PK of FF 400 mcg and UMEC 500 mcg administered separately and in combination (four inhalations of FF/UMEC 100/125 mcg, FF 100 mcg, or UMEC 125 mcg) via dual-strip dry powder inhaler. Subjects were randomized based on codes generated using a validated computerized system (Randall, GlaxoSmithKline).. Eighteen subjects were enrolled; 17 received all three scheduled doses of study medication. Plasma FF and UMEC concentrations peaked at 0.5 and 0.08 h post-dose, respectively, for FF/UMEC and the monotherapies. FF and UMEC co-administration resulted in slightly lower or similar systemic exposure for both drugs versus the monotherapies. In post hoc sensitivity analyses (performed because two subjects administered inhalations incorrectly), the ratio of adjusted geometric means (maximum plasma concentration and area under the curve) was closer to unity than in the planned analyses. Cumulative urinary UMEC excretion (Ae) was similar for FF/UMEC and UMEC. Post hoc sensitivity analyses on Ae(0-24) suggested a small carryover effect but results were similar to those of the population as a whole. Urinary UMEC excretion following FF/UMEC was low (~1.5% over 24 h) and unlikely to have impacted upon PK comparisons. Three adverse events were reported; none were severe or led to withdrawal. There were no clinically significant effects on electrocardiogram, vital sign, or laboratory parameters.. Fluticasone furoate and umeclidinium co-administration was well tolerated and was not associated with meaningful changes in systemic or urinary PK versus the monotherapies.. GlaxoSmithKline.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adolescent; Adult; Androstadienes; Area Under Curve; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Dry Powder Inhalers; Humans; Male; Quinuclidines; Young Adult

The aim of these studies (NCT01957163; NCT02119286) was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of umeclidinium (UMEC 62.5 μg and 125 μg) added to fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI, 100/25 μg) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).. These were 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter studies. Eligible patients were randomized 1:1:1 to treatment with once-daily blinded UMEC 62.5 μg (delivering 55 μg), UMEC 125 μg (delivering 113 μg) or placebo (PBO) added to open-label FF/VI (delivering 92/22 μg; N = 1238 [intent-to-treat population]). The primary endpoint was trough forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) on Day 85; the secondary endpoint was 0-6 h post-dose weighted mean (WM) FEV1 at Day 84. Health-related quality of life was reported using St George's respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ). Adverse events (AEs) were also assessed.. In both studies, trough FEV1 was significantly improved with UMEC + FF/VI (62.5 μg and 125 μg) versus PBO + FF/VI (range: 0.111-0.128 L, all p < 0.001 [Day 85]), as was 0-6 h post-dose WM FEV1 (range: 0.135-0.153 L, all p < 0.001 [Day 84]). SGRQ results were inconsistent, with statistically significant improvements with UMEC + FF/VI versus PBO + FF/VI in one study only and with UMEC 62.5 μg only (difference in SGRQ total score from baseline between treatments: -2.16, p < 0.05). Across all treatment groups, the overall incidences of AEs were similar (30-39%), as were cardiovascular AEs of special interest (<1-3%) and pneumonia AEs (0-1%).. Overall, the addition of UMEC to FF/VI therapy resulted in significant improvements in lung function compared with PBO + FF/VI in patients with COPD, with similar safety profiles, though SGRQ results were inconsistent.. The results from these two studies demonstrate that the addition of umeclidinium (62.5 μg and 125 μg) to FF/VI (100/25 μg) provides statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in lung function compared with placebo + FF/VI in patients with COPD. Statistically significant improvements in quality of life with UMEC + FF/VI versus placebo + FF/VI were reported in one study only. Safety profiles were consistent across all treatment groups in both studies. These studies support the use of triple therapy in COPD, providing physicians with an alternative treatment option.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Androstadienes; Benzyl Alcohols; Chlorobenzenes; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quality of Life; Quinuclidines; Vital Capacity

In two dose-ranging crossover studies, the long-acting muscarinic antagonist umeclidinium (UMEC) was assessed as monotherapy in patients with asthma not treated with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) (NCT01641692 [study 1]) and combined with the ICS fluticasone furoate (FF) in patients with asthma symptomatic on ICS (NCT01573624 [study 2]). The present study aimed to further characterise the UMEC dose-response relationship with change from baseline trough forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) (day 15).. A model-based approach using non-linear mixed-effects analyses was used to assess data from studies 1 and 2.. Within the Study 1 dose range, no significant dose-response was demonstrated. In study 2, the slope-intercept on log-dose model showed a mild dose-response, with a 10 % probability of a 0.075-L FEV1 improvement with FF/UMEC 100/250 mcg; period 1 data (with an absent carryover effect) indicated an 88 % probability of a 0.075-L FEV1 improvement.. The model-based approach in study 2 identified FF/UMEC doses warranting further investigation.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Androstadienes; Asthma; Cross-Over Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Muscarinic Antagonists; Nonlinear Dynamics; Quinuclidines

Two single-center, four-way, single-dose, crossover studies assessed the systemic exposure, systemic pharmacodynamics (PD), and safety profile of the closed triple fluticasone furoate/ umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) therapy compared with dual therapies. These are the first studies where pharmacokinetic (PK) profile assessment was possible for this inhaled triple fixed-dose combination product.. Healthy volunteers were randomized to receive 4 consecutive inhalations (each administered as a single dose) via a single ELLIPT® dry powder inhaler: in study 1 (CTT116415/NCT01691547), FF/UMEC/VI at total doses of 400/500/100 μg, FF/UMEC 400/500 μg, UMEC/VI 500/100 μg, or FF/VI 400/100 μg; in study 2 (200587/NCT01894386), FF/UMEC/VI at total doses of 400/500/100 μg or 400/250/100 μg, FF/VI 400/100 μg, or UMEC/VI 250/100 μg. PK and PD parameters and safety were assessed.. Of 88 subjects, 95% completed both studies and received all planned treatments. Total systemic exposure was similar for FF, UMEC, and VI when administered as a triple therapy compared with FF/VI and UMEC/VI. No clinically significant systemic PD findings were detected. The incidence of adverse events was low and similar across treatment arms.. Systemic exposure to all three components of the closed triple therapy, following single-dose delivery, was similar to that seen with the dual therapies FF/VI and UMEC/VI. The delivered lung dose and safety profile of all three agents, delivered via a single inhaler, are expected to be similar to those of the dual therapies.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Androstadienes; Benzyl Alcohols; Chlorobenzenes; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Combinations; Female; Healthy Volunteers; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Quinuclidines

To examine the impact of initiating fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) in a single device on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations, COPD exacerbation-related costs, and all-cause and COPD-related healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs in patients with COPD.. Retrospective database analysis of patients with COPD aged ≥40 years who initiated FF/UMEC/VI between September 1, 2017, and December 31, 2018 (index date: first pharmacy claim for FF/UMEC/VI), following evidence of multiple-inhaler triple therapy (MITT) (≥30 consecutive days) in the year prior to index. COPD exacerbations, COPD exacerbation-related costs, and all-cause and COPD-related HCRU and costs were compared between the baseline period (12 months prior to and including index) and follow-up period (12 months following index).. Data from 912 patients (mean [SD] age: 71.2 [8.1], 51.2% female) were included in the analyses. Among the overall cohort, mean count of total COPD exacerbations (moderate or severe) per patient was statistically significantly lower in the follow-up period compared to baseline (1.2 vs 1.4, p=0.001). The proportion of patients with ≥1 COPD exacerbation (moderate or severe) was also statistically significantly lower in the follow-up period compared to baseline (56.4% vs 62.4%, p=0.001). All-cause and COPD-related HCRU were similar during follow-up compared to baseline, although the proportion of patients with COPD-related ambulatory visits was lower during follow-up (p<0.001). COPD-related office visit costs, emergency room visit costs, and pharmacy costs were statistically significantly lower during follow-up compared to baseline (p<0.001; p=0.019; p<0.001, respectively).. In a real-world setting, patients on MITT who subsequently initiated FF/UMEC/VI in a single device had significant reductions in the rate of COPD exacerbations (moderate or severe). Switching to FF/UMEC/VI also resulted in improvements in some HCRU and cost outcomes. These data support the use of FF/UMEC/VI among patients at high risk of exacerbation to reduce future risk and improve outcomes.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Androstadienes; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Drug Combinations; Female; Fluticasone; Humans; Male; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines; Retrospective Studies

ATS and GOLD guidelines recommend treating low-exacerbation risk COPD patients with dual (LAMA/LABA) agents and reserving triple therapy (TT; LAMA/LABA and inhaled corticosteroids [ICS]) for severe cases with higher-exacerbation risk. However, TT often is prescribed across the COPD spectrum. This study compared COPD exacerbations, pneumonia diagnosis, healthcare resource utilization, and costs for patients initiating tiotropium bromide/olodaterol (TIO/OLO) and a TT, fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI), stratified by exacerbation history.. COPD patients who initiated TIO/OLO or FF/UMEC/VI between 06/01/2015-11/30/2019 (index date=first pharmacy fill-date with ≥30 consecutive treatment days) were identified from the Optum Research Database. Patients were ≥40 years old and continuously enrolled for 12 months during the baseline period and ≥30 days during follow-up. Patients were stratified into GOLD A/B (0-1 baseline non-hospitalized exacerbation), No exacerbation (subset of GOLD A/B), and GOLD C/D (≥2 non-hospitalized and/or ≥1 hospitalized baseline exacerbation). Baseline characteristics were balanced with propensity score matching (1:1). Adjusted risks of exacerbation, pneumonia diagnosis, and COPD and/or pneumonia-related utilization and costs were evaluated.. Adjusted exacerbation risk was similar in GOLD A/B and No exacerbation subgroups, and lower in GOLD C/D for FF/UMEC/VI versus TIO/OLO initiators (hazard ratio: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.78, 0.98, p=0.020). Adjusted pneumonia risk was similar between cohorts across the GOLD subgroups. Adjusted COPD and/or pneumonia-related population annualized pharmacy costs were significantly higher for FF/UMEC/VI versus TIO/OLO initiators across subgroups, p<0.001. Adjusted COPD and/or pneumonia-related population annualized total healthcare costs were significantly higher for FF/UMEC/VI versus TIO/OLO initiators in the GOLD A/B and No exacerbation, subgroups, p<0.001 (cost ratio [95% CI]: 1.25 [1.13, 1.38] and 1.21 [1.09, 1.36], respectively), but similar in the GOLD C/D subgroup.. These real-world results support ATS and GOLD recommendations for treating low-exacerbation risk COPD patients with dual bronchodilators and TT for more severe, higher-exacerbation risk COPD patients.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adult; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Drug Combinations; Fluticasone; Humans; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Pneumonia; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines; Tiotropium Bromide

Triple therapy is recommended for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who remain symptomatic despite dual therapy. The optimal timing of triple therapy following an exacerbation of COPD is unknown. The outcomes of prompt (≤ 30 days) vs. delayed (31-180 days) initiation of single-inhaler triple therapy with fluticasone furoate, umeclidinium, and vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) following an exacerbation of COPD were examined.. This was a retrospective cohort study of linked English primary (Clinical Practice Research Datalink) and secondary (Hospital Episode Statistics) care data. Patients aged ≥ 35 years with COPD were indexed on the first and/or earliest date of exacerbation between November 15, 2017 and March 31, 2019 with subsequent FF/UMEC/VI initiation within 180 days. Patients were required to be continuously registered with a general practitioner for ≥ 12 months prior to and following index. Subsequent exacerbations, direct medical costs, and hospital readmissions were compared between prompt and delayed initiators. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for measured confounders between cohorts.. Overall, 1599 patients were included (prompt: 393, delayed: 1206). After weighting, prompt initiators had numerically lower moderate/severe exacerbations compared with delayed initiators (rate ratio: 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76-1.01, p = 0.0587). Both all-cause and COPD-related 30-day hospital readmissions were significantly lower among patients with prompt initiation compared with delayed initiators (all-cause: 23.6% vs. 34.6%, odds ratio [95% CI]: 0.58 [0.36-0.95], p = 0.0293; COPD-related: 20.3% vs. 30.6%, odds ratio [95% CI]: 0.58 [0.35-0.96], p = 0.0347). Prompt initiators also had numerically lower all-cause total costs and significantly lower COPD-related costs per-person-per year compared with delayed initiators (COPD-related: £742 vs. £801, p = 0.0016).. Prompt initiation of FF/UMEC/VI following a moderate/severe exacerbation was associated with fewer subsequent exacerbations, fewer hospital readmissions, and lower COPD-related medical costs compared with delayed initiation.. Triple therapy with an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), and a long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) is recommended for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who still experience symptoms while taking dual therapy (LABA/LAMA or ICS/LABA). Triple therapy can be taken using single or multiple inhalers. The best time to start triple therapy for patients who may benefit from it following a short-term worsening (flare-up) of their COPD symptoms is unknown. This study assesses the effect of starting treatment with triple therapy sooner compared with later in patients with COPD.Patients who experienced a flare-up of their COPD symptoms were split into two groups – those who started taking triple therapy (via a single inhaler) within 30 days of their symptom flare-up and those who started taking triple therapy 31–180 days following their symptom flare-up. Over the 12 months following the initial flare-up, patients who started triple therapy earlier (within 30 days) had fewer subsequent symptom flare-ups, fewer hospital admissions, and lower healthcare costs compared with patients who started triple therapy later (31–180 days). These findings suggest that doctors should consider prescribing triple therapy (via a single inhaler) to their patients with COPD straight away if they experience a flare-up of their symptoms.

Topics: England; Humans; Nebulizers and Vaporizers; Retrospective Studies

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an inflammatory lung disease characterized by long-term breathing problems and airflow limitations. International guidelines recommend using bronchodilators like long-acting beta- and muscarinic antagonists, and inhalational corticosteroids.. The cost-effectiveness of single-inhaler triple therapy containing fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) was compared to the treatments Fluticasone Furoate/Vilanterol (FF/VI), Umeclidinio/Vilanterol (UMEC/VI) and Fluticasone Propionate 250 mcg/Salmeterol 25mcg + Tiotropio 18 mcg (FP/SAL/TIO) for patients with COPD from the Chilean public health system perspective.. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed, including a deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis over a 25-year time horizon. Two scenarios were assessed to study the effect of a 3%-discount for costs and outcomes on FF/UMEC/VI.. The incremental cost-effectiveness (ICER) of FF/UMEC/VI versus FF/VI was $10,076/QALY, being a cost-effective alternative to a threshold of one Gross Domestic Product per capita (GDPpc), while versus FP/SAL/TIO the ICER increased to $50,288/QALY, showing to be a non-cost effective alternative to 1 GDPpc, but at a threshold of 3 GDPpc.. FF/UMEC/VI appears to be a cost-effective intervention for treating COPD compared to FF/VI. However, FF/UMEC/VI compared to FP/SAL/TIO showed an ICER above the threshold of 1 GDPpc, but, in comparison with lower price, the ICER was below 3 GDPpc.

Topics: Androstadienes; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chile; Chlorobenzenes; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Fluticasone; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Public Health; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines; Treatment Outcome

Single inhaler triple therapy (SITT) with an inhaled corticosteroid, a long-acting β. The preclinical and clinical development in COPD of fluticasone furoate (FF)/umeclidinium (UMEC)/vilanterol (VI) SITT and its use in the real world.. Findings from phase III/IV trials and the use of FF/UMEC/VI in the real-world setting support the view that it may be a useful, safe, and cost-effective option for the maintenance treatment of COPD, especially when dealing with patients who are not adequately controlled with dual ICS/LABA or LAMA/LABA therapy. Only direct head-to-head comparisons will be able to establish whether FF/UMEC/VI may be preferable to the other SITTs approved for COPD due to its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics and especially the fact that it is the only one that can be taken once-daily. In addition, there is a need for further studies, especially in the real world, to optimize the positioning of FF/UMEC/VI in the treatment of COPD, also considering the availability of FF/VI and UMEC/VI and the need for better differentiation between the three treatments.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Androstadienes; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Humans; Nebulizers and Vaporizers; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines

Topics: Androstadienes; Benzyl Alcohols; Chlorobenzenes; Humans; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines

Concerns have been raised about the practical use and clinical benefits of medications and inhalers in older patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Here, we report analyses according to age from five clinical trials evaluating medications administered using the ELLIPTA dry-powder inhaler (DPI).. Efficacy and safety according to age groups (<65 and ≥65 years) were assessed using data from five clinical trials in patients ≥40 years of age with symptomatic COPD. There was a mix of pre-specified and post hoc analyses of two 24-week trials with fluticasone furoate (FF)/vilanterol (VI) 100/25 µg; one 24-week trial with umeclidinium (UMEC) 62.5 µg; and two 12-week trials with UMEC 62.5 µg + FF/VI 100/25 µg. The primary endpoint was trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV. These data provide evidence to support the use of FF/VI, UMEC, or UMEC + FF/VI, all delivered via the ELLIPTA DPI, to treat older (≥65 years) and younger (<65 years) patients with COPD.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Androstadienes; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Humans; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Androstadienes; Benzyl Alcohols; Chlorobenzenes; Humans; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines

Topics: Androstadienes; Asthma; Benzyl Alcohols; Chlorobenzenes; Humans; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines

Topics: Androstadienes; Asthma; Benzyl Alcohols; Chlorobenzenes; Humans; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines

We assessed the cost-effectiveness of single-inhaler fluticasone furoate (FF)/umeclidinium (UMEC)/vilanterol (VI) versus FF/VI or UMEC/VI from a Canadian public healthcare perspective, incorporating data from the IMPACT trial in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (NCT02164513).. Baseline inputs and treatment effects from IMPACT were populated into the validated GALAXY-COPD disease progression model. Canadian unit costs and drug costs (Canadian dollars [C$], 2017) were applied to healthcare resource utilization and treatments. Future costs and health outcomes were discounted at 1.5% annually. Analyses were probabilistic, and outputs included exacerbation rates, costs, and life years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained.. Compared with FF/VI and UMEC/VI over a lifetime horizon, the analyses predicted that treatment with FF/UMEC/VI resulted in fewer moderate and severe exacerbations, more LYs and more QALYs gained, with a small incremental cost. The base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per QALY gained was C$18,989 (95% confidence interval [CI]: C$14,665, C$25,753) versus FF/VI and C$13,776 (95% CI: C$9787, C$19,448) versus UMEC/VI. FF/UMEC/VI remained cost-effective versus both FF/VI and UMEC/VI in all sensitivity analyses, including in scenario analyses that considered different intervention and comparator discontinuation rates, and treatment effects for subsequent therapy.. Treatment with FF/UMEC/VI was predicted to improve outcomes and be a cost-effective treatment option for patients with symptomatic COPD and a history of exacerbations compared with FF/VI or UMEC/VI, in Canada.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Androstadienes; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Canada; Chlorobenzenes; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Disease Progression; Drug Combinations; Drug Costs; Female; Humans; Lung; Male; Models, Economic; Nebulizers and Vaporizers; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quality of Life; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Quinuclidines; Recovery of Function; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The role of the anti-inflammatory and bronchodilator triple therapy, including a long acting ß2-agonist (LABA), a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) and an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), in the prevention of the exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is still not clearly established, and requires comparison with dual therapy (LABA-CSI or LABA-LAMA). IMPACT is a phase 3, double-blind randomized study comparing the tritherapy (LABA-LAMA-ICS) in a single inhaler (vilanterol 25 ?g/umeclidinium 62.5 ?g/fluticasone furoate 100 ?g) with the LABA-ICS association (vilanterol 25 ?g-fluticasone furoate 100 ?g) and the combination LABA-LAMA (vilanterol 25 ?g/umeclidinium 62.5 ?g) on the reduction of the rate of exacerbation as the primary outcome, but also on the pulmonary function, the quality of life, the dyspnea and the mortality.Triple therapy by comparison with dual therapy (LABA-ICS or LABA-LAMA) improves numerous parameters such as the rate of moderate to severe exacerbations, the symptoms, the respiratory function, the quality of life, while being well tolerated. Finally, the IMPACT study gives an "evidence base" for the GOLD guidelines proposing triple therapy in symptomatic COPD patients presenting exacerbations despite dual therapy.. La place de la trithérapie bronchodilatatrice et anti-inflammatoire, comprenant un bêta-2 mimétique à longue durée d’action (LABA), un anticholinergique à longue durée d’action (LAMA) et un corticostéroïde inhalé (CSI), dans la prévention des exacerbations de la bronchopneumopathie chronique obstructive (BPCO) n’est pas encore clairement établie, et nécessite une comparaison avec les associations de LABA-CSI ou les combinaisons LABA-LAMA. IMPACT est une étude randomisée en double aveugle de phase 3 comparant la trithérapie (LABA-LAMA-CSI) en un seul inhalateur (vilantérol 25 ?g/ uméclidinium 62,5 ?g/fluticasone furoate 100 ?g) avec une association LABA-CSI (vilantérol 25 ?g-fluticasone furoate 100 ?g) et une combinaison LABA-LAMA (vilantérol 25 ?g/uméclidinium 62,5 ?g) sur la réduction du taux d’exacerbations comme critère de jugement primaire, mais aussi sur la fonction respiratoire, la qualité de vie, la dyspnée et la mortalité. La trithérapie entraîne une diminution significative du taux d’exacerbations modérées ou sévères, améliore la dyspnée, la fonction respiratoire et la qualité de vie par rapport à l’association fluticasone-vilantérol et la bithérapie bronchodilatatrice uméclidinium-vilantérol chez des patients BPCO symptomatiques et présentant des exacerbations, tout en étant bien tolérée. Finalement, l’étude IMPACT apporte une évidence clinique aux directives du GOLD proposant la trithérapie chez des patients BPCO symptomatiques présentant toujours des exacerbations malgré une bithérapie.

Topics: Androstadienes; Benzyl Alcohols; Chlorobenzenes; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Combinations; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Muscarinic Antagonists; Nebulizers and Vaporizers; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Androstadienes; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Drug Combinations; Drug Interactions; Humans; Lung; Muscarinic Antagonists; Nebulizers and Vaporizers; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines; Treatment Outcome

The cost-effectiveness of long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) umeclidinium bromide (UMEC) 62.5 μg as add-on therapy to other maintenance COPD treatments is unknown.. For the lifetime horizon, compared with FF/VI, FP/SAL and ICS/LABAs, addition of UMEC was associated with incremental costs per quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) of £4050, £7210 and £5780, respectively, and incremental costs per life year gain of £3380, £6020 and £4940. All UMEC-containing regimens resulted in numerically lower exacerbation rates versus comparator regimens over a lifetime horizon.. Addition of UMEC to various ICS/LABA treatments was associated with higher cost than ICS/LABA alone, but was cost-effective in most scenarios.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Androstadienes; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Delayed-Action Preparations; Disease Progression; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluticasone; Humans; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Male; Middle Aged; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Androstadienes; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Drug Combinations; Dry Powder Inhalers; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines

To evaluate the in vitro dose delivery characteristics of approved asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) therapies delivered via the ELLIPTA(®) dry powder inhaler across inhalation endpoints representative of the target patient population, using the Electronic Lung (eLung™) to replicate inhaler-specific patient inhalation profiles that were previously recorded in vivo.. Selected profiles, representative of the range of inhalation endpoints achieved by patients with all severities of asthma and COPD, were replicated using the eLung breathing simulator in conjunction with an oropharyngeal cast. A Next Generation Impactor was coupled to the eLung to determine the aerodynamic particle size distribution of the ex-throat dose (ETD) of asthma and COPD therapies delivered via the ELLIPTA inhaler. Delivered dose (DD), ETD, and fine particle dose (FPD; defined as a mass of active substance less than 5 μm) were determined for fluticasone furoate (FF)/vilanterol (VI) 100/25 μg and 200/25 μg (asthma and COPD), umeclidinium (UMEC)/VI 62.5/25 μg (COPD only), FF 100 μg and 200μg monotherapy (asthma only), and UMEC 62.5 μg monotherapy (COPD only).. Inhalation profiles replicated by eLung covered a wide range of peak inspiratory flow rates (41.6-136.9 L/min), pressure drops (1.2-13.8 kPa), and inhaled volumes through the inhaler (0.7-4.2L). DD was consistent across the range of patient representative inhalation parameters for all components (FF, VI, and UMEC) of each therapy assessed; although ETD and FPD were also generally consistent, some small variation was observed. Dose delivery was consistent for each of the components, whether delivered as mono- or combination therapy.. The in vitro performance of the ELLIPTA inhaler has been demonstrated for the delivery of FF/VI, UMEC/VI, FF monotherapy, and UMEC monotherapy. Across a range of inspiratory profiles, DD was consistent, while ETD and FPD showed little flow dependency.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aerosols; Androstadienes; Asthma; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Combinations; Drug Delivery Systems; Dry Powder Inhalers; Equipment Design; Humans; Inhalation; Lung; Models, Anatomic; Models, Biological; Powders; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines; Severity of Illness Index