glycyllysine and glycylsarcosine

The human intestinal oligopeptide transporter (PEPT1) facilitates the absorption of dipeptides, tripeptides, and many peptidomimetic drugs. In this study, a large number of peptides were selected to investigate the structural features required for PEPT1 transport. Binding affinity was determined in a Gly-Sar uptake inhibition assay, whereas functional transport was ranked in a membrane depolarization assay. Although most of the peptides tested could bind to PEPT1, not all were substrates. As expected, single amino acids and tetrapeptides could not bind to or be transported by PEPT1. Dipeptide transport was influenced by charge, hydrophobicity, size, and side chain flexibility. The extent of transport was variable, and unexpectedly, some dipeptides were not substrates of PEPT1. These included dipeptides with two positive charges or extreme bulk in either position 1 or 2. Our results identify key features required for PEPT1 transport in contrast to most previously described pharmacophores, which are based on the inhibition of transport of a known substrate.

Topics: Animals; Binding Sites; Biological Transport; Cell Line; Dipeptides; Dogs; Electricity; Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions; Models, Molecular; Peptide Transporter 1; Proline; Protein Binding; Protein Conformation; Structure-Activity Relationship; Symporters

Peptide transporters PEPT1 and PEPT2 transport numerous compounds including small peptides, peptide-like drugs and nonpeptidic compounds such as valacyclovir. PEPT1 and PEPT2 show low and high affinity for most substrates, respectively, but beta-lactam antibiotics without an alpha-amino group are the only known substrates that prefer PEPT1 to PEPT2. The aim of this study was to compare the recognition and affinity of various substrates between rat PEPT1 and rat PEPT2, and to determine the structural requirements influencing the substrate affinity. [14C]Glycylsarcosine uptake by PEPT1- or PEPT2-expressing transfectant was inhibited by di- and tripeptides, but not by amino acids, tetrapeptides or most cyclic dipeptides. All dipeptides and tripeptides examined showed more potent inhibition of [14C]glycylsarcosine uptake via PEPT2 than via PEPT1, irrespective of their charge and structure. Modification of the alpha-amino group of dipeptides reduced their substrate affinity to both transporters, as compared to unmodified dipeptides, but these dipeptides still showed potent inhibitory effects on PEPT2. Among the nonpeptidic substrates tested, only the eight-amino-octanoic acid displayed stronger inhibition of [14C]glycylsarcosine uptake in PEPT1 than in PEPT2. These findings suggest that alpha- or beta-amino carbonyl function is the key structure responsible for the higher affinity for PEPT2 than for PEPT1.

Topics: Animals; Binding, Competitive; Carrier Proteins; Dipeptides; LLC-PK1 Cells; Molecular Conformation; Peptide Transporter 1; Peptides; Peptides, Cyclic; Substrate Specificity; Swine; Symporters