gluma and fluorapatite

Cervical tooth erosion is increasingly observed among adults and frequently associated with dentin sensitivity (DS). This study evaluated the effectiveness on DS of a biomimetic mineralization system (BIMIN) in comparison to the current standard treatment (Gluma(®) Desensitizer, Gluma).. In this single-blind, 2-arm study, 40 patients with confirmed cervical DS were randomized to either the test group or the positive control group. A Visual-Analog-Scale (VAS) was used to assess DS following stimulation of the exposed dentin with a 2-s air blast. Assessments were made at baseline (pre-treatment), 2 days, 4, 8 and 12 weeks, and 12 months after treatment. Two-stage replicas were obtained from the treated teeth and gold sputtered at baseline, and 2 days, 3 and 12 months after treatment. Surface topography of the treated cervical lesions and occlusion of dentinal tubules were investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).. Both treatments led to a statistically significant reduction (P<0.0001) in DS that persisted over the entire 12-month observation period. Differences in DS between the treatments were not statistically significant. SEM photomicrographs demonstrated that a mineral layer concealed the dentinal tubules in the test group. In contrast, numerous dentinal tubules remained visible in cervical defects that were treated with Gluma.. A biomimetic mineralization kit was successfully used to treat patients exhibiting DS. The effect was similar to using Gluma, and was likely the result of the deposition of an enamel-like layer on the exposed cervical dentin.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Apatites; Biomimetic Materials; Calcium; Dentin; Dentin Desensitizing Agents; Dentin Permeability; Dentin Sensitivity; Female; Fluorides; Glutaral; Humans; Male; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; Middle Aged; Phosphates; Polymethacrylic Acids; Replica Techniques; Single-Blind Method; Tooth Cervix; Tooth Erosion; Tooth Remineralization; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult