gestodene and 16-alpha-ethyl-21-hydroxy-19-nor-4-pregnene-3-20-dione

The effects of two classes of progestagens, e.g. pregnane [Org 2058, medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), R5020, progesterone (PROG)] and 19-nortestosterone derived progestagens [3-ketodesogestrel (KDG), levonorgestrel (LNG), gestodene (GES), norethisterone (NE), Org 30659] on proliferation of three estradiol (E2)-dependent human breast tumor MCF-7 cell lines of different origin [Van der Burg (B), Litton bionetics (L) and McGrath (M)] were studied. The pregnane derivatives hardly stimulated cell growth at 10(-6) M in MCF-7 B and L cells except for Org 2058 in B cells, whereas in M cells a statistically significant growth induction was observed except for PROG. The 19-nortestosterone derivatives induced cell growth at doses at 10(-7) M or higher in all three cell lines. NE, GES and Org 30659 were more potent stimulators than KDG and LNG at 10(-7) M. E2 already showed maximal stimulation at 10(-10) M. For all three cell lines, the effects and ranking of the individual progestagens were similar. Antiprogestagens, like RU 38486 and Org 31710 could not block these stimulatory effects while antiestrogens like 4-hydroxytamoxifen and ICI 164,384 could. This suggests that cell growth by the above-mentioned progestagens occurs via an interaction with the estrogen receptor. Indeed, displacement studies with cytosol from MCF-7 M cells revealed that at very high concentrations NE, GES and Org 30659 were able to displace 50% of the radiolabelled E2, while KDG and LNG could not. Relative binding affinities (RBAs) were 0.010, 0.025 and 0.015% for NE, GES and Org 30659, respectively. The effect of the two classes of progestagens on cell proliferation was also investigated at several dose levels in combination with E2 (10(-10) M) in the MCF-7 B cell line. This resulted in a statistically significant inhibition of cell growth with R5020, MPA and most of the 19-nortestosterone derivatives at concentrations of 10(-8) M. Org 2058 and NE did not have any influence on E2-induced growth. The inhibitory effects could not be blocked by antiprogestagens. In summary these studies with 3 subclones of MCF-7 cells show that the pregnane derived progestagens stimulate growth only in one subclone, whereas the 19-nortestosterone derived progestagens do so in all three subclones. The progestagens possess estrogenic activity only at high pharmacological doses, being 10,000 times weaker than estradiol. In combination with estrogens most progestagens gave a reduction of E2-stimulated growth in t

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Breast Neoplasms; Cell Division; Desogestrel; Estradiol; Estrogen Antagonists; Female; Humans; Levonorgestrel; Medroxyprogesterone Acetate; Models, Statistical; Nandrolone; Norethindrone; Norpregnenes; Pregnanes; Pregnenediones; Progesterone; Promegestone; Receptors, Androgen; Receptors, Estrogen; Receptors, Progesterone; Tumor Cells, Cultured

Two classes of progestagens, e.g. pregnane [Org 2058, progesterone (PROG), R5020, medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA)] and 19-nortestosterone derived progestagens [norethisterone (NE), levonorgestrel (LNG), 3-ketodesogestrel (KDG), gestodene (GES), Org 30659] were studied for their effect on cell growth of two human breast tumor T47D cell lines of different origin, i.e. from ATCC (A) and Sutherland (S) et al. [Sutherland et al., Cancer Res. 48 (1988) 5084-5091]. The effect of estradiol (E2) and progestagens alone as well as the combined effect of E2 (10(-10) M) and progestagens were investigated at several dose levels. Compared with E2-induced growth at 10(-10) M, pregnane and 19-nortestosterone derived progestagens at 10(-6) M alone did enhance cell growth in T47D-A cells up to 25 and 100% respectively, whereas in T47D-S cells they did not influence growth. All these progestagens at 10(-6) M did not affect E2-induced growth in T47D-A cells, whereas in T47D-S cells they completely reduced cell proliferation at doses between 10(-10) and 10(-8) M. The involvement of progestagen (PR) and estrogen (ER) receptors with respect to growth stimulation was studied by using specific antihormones. In T47D-A cells, the antiprogestagens RU 38486 and Org 31710 could not block progestagen-induced growth. Antiestrogens, like 4-hydroxytamoxifen and ICI 164,384, inhibited the 19-nortestosterone derivative-induced cell growth by approx. 50%. Remarkably, both antiprogestagens alone could also inhibit E2-induced growth in T47D-A cells by about 50%. In T47D-S cells, E2-induced cell growth was completely blocked by both antiprogestagens and antiestrogens. Both antiprogestagens in T47D-S cells were equipotent to 4-hydroxytamoxifen and 10-fold more potent than ICI 164,384. In conclusion pregnane and 19-nortestosterone-derived progestagens stimulated cell growth in T47D-A cells at high unphysiological concentrations, whereas they did not affect cell growth in T47D-S cells. The 19-nortestosterone derivative induced growth in T47D-A cells could partially be inhibited by antiestrogens. In T47D-A cells, E2-induced cell growth was not influenced by both classes of progestagens, whereas in T47D-S cells all tested progestagens, antiprogestagens, and antiestrogens inhibited E2-induced cell growth completely. These results with T47D cells as well as those obtained previously with MCF-7 cells show that subclones of cell lines may respond differently to various types of progestagens in the pres

Topics: Breast Neoplasms; Carcinoma; Cell Division; Desogestrel; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Estradiol; Estrenes; Estrogen Antagonists; Female; Furans; Humans; Levonorgestrel; Medroxyprogesterone Acetate; Mifepristone; Nandrolone; Norethindrone; Norpregnenes; Pregnanes; Pregnenediones; Progesterone; Promegestone; Tumor Cells, Cultured

The relative binding affinities (RBAs) of four progestational compounds (norethisterone, levonorgestrel, 3-keto-desogestrel and gestodene) for the human progesterone and androgen receptors were measured in MCF-7 cytosol and intact MCF-7 cells. For the binding to the progesterone receptor, both Org 2058 and Org 3236 (or 3-keto-desogestrel) were used as labelled ligands. The following ranking (low to high) for the RBA of the nuclear (intact cells) progesterone receptor irrespective of the ligand used is found: norethisterone much less than levonorgestrel less than 3-keto-destogestrel less than gestodene. The difference between the various progestagens is significant with the exception of that between 3-keto-desogestrel and gestodene, when Org 2058 is used as ligand. For the cytosolic progesterone receptor, the same order is found with the exception that similar RBAs are found for gestodene and 3-keto-desogestrel. The four progestagens clearly differ with respect to binding to the androgen receptor using dihydrotestosterone as labelled ligand in intact cells; the ranking (low to high) is: norethisterone less than 3 keto-desogestrel less than levonorgestrel and gestodene. The difference between 3-keto-desogestrel and levonorgestrel or gestodene is significant. The selectivity indices (ratio of the mean RBA for the progesterone receptor to that of androgen receptor) in intact cells are significantly higher for 3-keto-desogestrel and gestodene than for levonorgestrel and norethisterone. From these results we conclude that the introduction of the 18-methyl in norethisterone (levonorgestel) increases both the binding to the progesterone and androgen receptors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Topics: Cell Line; Cytosol; Desogestrel; Dihydrotestosterone; In Vitro Techniques; Levonorgestrel; Norethindrone; Norgestrel; Norpregnenes; Pregnenediones; Receptors, Androgen; Receptors, Progesterone; Tritium