Page last updated: 2024-08-23

freedom and contraceptives, postcoital

freedom has been researched along with contraceptives, postcoital in 5 studies

Research

Studies (5)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's4 (80.00)29.6817
2010's1 (20.00)24.3611
2020's0 (0.00)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Fenton, E; Lomasky, L1
Croxatto, HB; Fernández, SD1
Vischer, RK1
Charo, RA1

Other Studies

5 other study(ies) available for freedom and contraceptives, postcoital

ArticleYear
Dispensing with liberty: conscientious refusal and the "morning-after pill".
    The Journal of medicine and philosophy, 2005, Volume: 30, Issue:6

    Topics: Attitude of Health Personnel; Community Pharmacy Services; Conscience; Contraceptives, Postcoital; Ethics, Pharmacy; Female; Freedom; Humans; Legislation, Pharmacy; Morals; Patient Rights; Pharmacists; Refusal to Treat

2005
Emergency contraception - a human rights issue.
    Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology, 2006, Volume: 20, Issue:3

    Topics: Contraception, Postcoital; Contraceptives, Oral, Synthetic; Contraceptives, Postcoital; Female; Freedom; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Human Rights; Humans; Levonorgestrel; Pregnancy; Pregnancy, Unwanted; Women's Health

2006
Conscience in context: pharmacist rights and the eroding moral marketplace.
    Stanford law & policy review, 2006, Volume: 17, Issue:1

    Topics: Civil Rights; Conscience; Consensus; Contraceptives, Postcoital; Cultural Diversity; Drug Prescriptions; Economic Competition; Employment; Ethics, Business; Ethics, Professional; Federal Government; Freedom; Government Regulation; Humans; Industry; Legislation, Pharmacy; Pharmacies; Pharmacists; Professional Autonomy; Public Policy; Referral and Consultation; Refusal to Treat; Religion; Reproductive Rights; Social Values; State Government; United States

2006
Constitutional law -- free exercise clause -- Ninth Circuit rejects strict scrutiny for pharmacy dispensing requirement. -- Stormans, Inc. v. Selecky, 571 F.3d 960 (9th Cir. 2009).
    Harvard law review, 2009, Volume: 123, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Attitude of Health Personnel; Civil Rights; Conscience; Contraception; Contraceptive Agents, Female; Contraceptives, Postcoital; Drug Prescriptions; Ethics, Pharmacy; Female; Freedom; Health Services Accessibility; Humans; Jurisprudence; Morals; Pharmacists; Refusal to Treat; Religion and Medicine; United States

2009
The Supreme Court decision in the Hobby Lobby Case: conscience, complicity, and contraception.
    JAMA internal medicine, 2014, Volume: 174, Issue:10

    Topics: Abortion, Induced; Complicity; Conscience; Contraceptives, Postcoital; Female; Freedom; Health Benefit Plans, Employee; Humans; Insurance Coverage; Insurance, Health; Intrauterine Devices; Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Pregnancy; Pregnancy, Unplanned; Pregnancy, Unwanted; Private Sector; Religion; Supreme Court Decisions; United States

2014