formocresol and tricalcium-silicate

This meta-analysis aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic success rate of Biodentine as an alternative to Formocresol to provide a critical appraisal of the available literature and evidence-based conclusion as well as update the previous systematic review.. MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases were searched up to 20 October 2021 to identify RCTs evaluating pulpotomy with Biodentine/Formocresol in carious primary molars among children ≤ 10 years old. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB-2 tool. RRs and corresponding 95% CIs were calculated to pool results that RR ˃ 1 indicated a higher success rate in the Biodentine group and RR < 1 indicated a higher success rate in the Formocresol group. Heterogeneity was calculated using the I. Nine RCTs were identified and eight RCTs were included in the meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. The obtained evidence showed no significant difference between Biodentine and Formocresol in terms of clinical efficacy. However, considering the radiographic success rate the results of the meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis significantly favoured Biodentine.. Within the limitations of the present review and based on the retrieved findings it has been clearly shown that Biodentine is superior compared to Formocresol in terms of radiographic success rate with firm evidence in this regard. Although the performed meta-analysis showed no significant clinical difference between Biodentine and Formocresol, however, trial sequential analysis revealed a lack of firm evidence in this regard.

Topics: Aluminum Compounds; Calcium Compounds; Child; Drug Combinations; Formocresols; Humans; Molar; Pulpotomy; Silicates; Tooth, Deciduous

Introduction A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of Biodentine compared to formocresol for pulpotomies in the deciduous dentition.Data sources and study selection Four electronic data bases were searched (Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science). Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which compared the use of Biodentine with formocresol were included in the screening. Two reviewers screened the titles and abstracts of the RCTs independently for inclusion in the review and a third reviewer was consulted in the case of any disagreements. Thirteen articles were used for full-text reading and nine were included in the review. Two investigators assessed risk of bias (RoB) by allocating a score of either high, low or unclear, in line with the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Failure to blind practitioners paired with a lack of standardised application protocol results in high RoB.Data extraction and synthesis Data was extracted from the included studies using customised forms, including: sample size, patient ages, treatment and clinical and radiographic follow-up and results. Meta-analysis of the results was completed using ReviewManager version 5.4.0.Results In total, 626 children were assessed in the RCTs. All teeth were restored with a preformed metal crown placed directly after the procedure, except for two studies, which placed them 24 and 48 hours later. The primary outcomes of clinical failure were defined as pain, tenderness to percussion, swelling, abscess, fistula and pathological tooth mobility at 12 months. These showed that Biodentine had significantly lower failure rates (RR 0.16; 95% CI 0.003-0.87; N = 394). Radiographic failure rates defined as either internal or pathological external root resorption, furcation radiolucencies or a widened periodontal ligament showed significantly lower failure rates (RR 0.19; 95% CI 0.08-0.49; N = 393). However, the results showed no significant difference for secondary outcomes which assessed the teeth both clinically and radiographically at intervals up to 48 months. Outcomes were assessed using GRADE; this showed all results to be of low certainty due to the high RoB.Conclusions Biodentine may be the superior material to formocresol for pulpotomy in the deciduous dentition. However, the results for both primary and secondary outcomes have a very low to low GRADE rating due to high RoB; therefore, robust future studies sh

Topics: Child; Formocresols; Humans; Molar; Pulpotomy; Systematic Reviews as Topic; Tooth, Deciduous

To assess and compare the clinical and radiographic success rates of biodentine and formocresol for pulpotomy in human primary teeth.. A randomized, split-mouth, double-blind, controlled clinical trial was carried out in 37 healthy 4- to 8-year-old children with 56 pairs (112 teeth) of contralateral primary molars indicated for pulpotomy. Matched teeth in each pair were randomized to undergo either biodentine (n = 56 teeth) or formocresol (n = 56 teeth) pulpotomy. In both groups, the teeth were restored with stainless steel crowns. The teeth were evaluated clinically and radiographically at 3 and 6 months by two blinded, standardized, and calibrated examiners. The data were analyzed using chi-square and McNemar tests with a P value of < .05 considered significant.. At both the 3- and 6-month follow-ups, all the 37 children with 112 treated teeth were evaluated. Clinical and radiographic success was similar for biodentine (100%) and formocresol (100%), without any statistically significant difference (P = 1). Pulp canal obliteration was radiographically observed in 10/56 (17.9%) and 7/56 (12.5%) cases in the biodentine and formocresol groups, respectively.. Both pulpotomy techniques showed favorable clinical and radiographic outcomes at 3 and 6 months posttreatment without any significant difference. Hence, biodentine has the potential to become a substitute for formocresol in primary molar pulpotomies.

Topics: Calcium Compounds; Child; Child, Preschool; Crowns; Double-Blind Method; Female; Formocresols; Humans; Male; Molar; Pulpotomy; Silicates; Tooth, Deciduous; Treatment Outcome

To compare the clinical and radiographic success rates of three different pulpotomy agents in primary molars after 18 months.. The study was carried out with 51 primary molars of children aged 5-9 years old. The teeth were randomly assigned to the experimental or control groups. After coronal pulp removal and haemostasis, the remaining pulp tissue was covered with Biodentine. Forty-five teeth were available for follow up at the end of 18 months. All of the available teeth for mineral trioxide aggregate and Biodentine. Mineral Trioxide aggregate and Biodentine

Topics: Aluminum Compounds; Calcium Compounds; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Combinations; Follow-Up Studies; Formocresols; Humans; Molar; Oxides; Pulpotomy; Silicates