fluticasone-propionate--salmeterol-xinafoate-drug-combination and montelukast

We studied the relationship between body mass index (BMI) on responses to asthma therapy using a retrospective analysis of four previously reported clinical trials. Fluticasone propionate (FP)/salmeterol via Diskus 100/50 microg twice daily and montelukast (MON) 10 mg daily were compared. BMI was classified as underweight (less than 20 kg/m(2)), normal (20-24.9 kg/m(2)), overweight (25-29.9 kg/m(2)), obese-1 (30-34.9 kg/m(2)), obese-2 (35-39.9 kg/m(2)), or obese-3 (at least 40 kg/m(2)). Outcomes assessed included forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)), asthma symptom score, and albuterol use. FP/salmeterol produced greater improvements compared to MON in each of the asthma outcomes studied over the entire BMI range at the week-12 endpoint, with statistically significant differences noted among normal, overweight, obese-1, and obese-3 subjects. The within-treatment responses to FP/salmeterol across BMI ranges at the week-12 endpoint was statistically significantly greater in normal compared to obese-3 for FEV(1) and albuterol use, and in overweight compared to the obese-3 for each outcome studied. The within-treatment comparisons of MON across BMI ranges were significant for albuterol use in normal and underweight compared to obese-3 at the week-12 endpoint. Compared to subjects with normal BMI, the onset to peak FEV(1) may require longer treatment exposure in the very obese. Treatment responses to FP/salmeterol were consistently greater compared to MON and persisted at higher BMI.

Topics: Acetates; Adult; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthma; Body Mass Index; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Obesity; Overweight; Quinolines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfides; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate, administered twice daily via a multidose dry powder inhaler (Seretide/Advair Diskus), Seretide Accuhaler or metered-dose hydrofluoroalkane (chlorofluorocarbon-free) inhaler (Seretide Evohaler), is a combination of the long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist (beta(2)-agonist) [LABA] salmeterol and the corticosteroid fluticasone propionate. Maintenance therapy with combined salmeterol/fluticasone propionate is at least as effective in improving lung function and symptoms and is as well tolerated in patients with asthma as concurrent salmeterol plus fluticasone propionate. In patients previously receiving as-required short-acting beta(2)-agonists (SABAs) or inhaled corticosteroids, salmeterol/fluticasone propionate was significantly more effective in providing asthma control than fluticasone propionate and in improving lung function and asthma symptoms than inhaled corticosteroids (at equivalent or higher dosages), salmeterol or montelukast (as monotherapy or in combination with fluticasone propionate). Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate was more effective in improving asthma symptoms than adjusted-dose budesonide/formoterol in patients with uncontrolled asthma despite treatment with inhaled corticosteroids with or without a LABA in a well designed 1-year study. In pharmacoeconomic analyses, salmeterol/fluticasone propionate compared favourably with inhaled corticosteroids and mono- or combination therapy with oral montelukast. Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate is, therefore, an effective, well tolerated and cost-effective option for the maintenance treatment of patients with asthma.

Topics: Acetates; Administration, Inhalation; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Asthma; Asthma, Exercise-Induced; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cyclopropanes; Drug Combinations; Economics, Pharmaceutical; Ethanolamines; Fluticasone; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Formoterol Fumarate; Humans; Quinolines; Salmeterol Xinafoate; Sulfides; Therapeutic Equivalency

Childhood asthma clusters, or subclasses, have been developed by computational methods without evaluation of clinical utility.. To replicate and determine whether childhood asthma clusters previously identified computationally in the Severe Asthma Research Program (SARP) are associated with treatment responses in Childhood Asthma Research and Education (CARE) Network clinical trials.. A cluster assignment model was determined by using SARP participant data. A total of 611 participants 6 to 18 years old from 3 CARE trials were assigned to SARP pediatric clusters. Primary and secondary outcomes were analyzed by cluster in each trial.. CARE participants were assigned to SARP clusters with high accuracy. Baseline characteristics were similar between SARP and CARE children of the same cluster. Treatment response in CARE trials was generally similar across clusters. However, with the caveat of a smaller sample size, children in the early-onset/severe-lung function cluster had best response with fluticasone/salmeterol (64% vs 23% 2.5× fluticasone and 13% fluticasone/montelukast in the Best ADd-on Therapy Giving Effective Responses trial; P = .011) and children in the early-onset/comorbidity cluster had the least clinical efficacy to treatments (eg, -0.076% change in FEV1 in the Characterizing Response to Leukotriene Receptor Antagonist and Inhaled Corticosteroid trial).. In this study, we replicated SARP pediatric asthma clusters by using a separate, large clinical trials network. Early-onset/severe-lung function and early-onset/comorbidity clusters were associated with differential and limited response to therapy, respectively. Further prospective study of therapeutic response by cluster could provide new insights into childhood asthma treatment.

Topics: Acetates; Adolescent; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents; Child; Cross-Over Studies; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Fluticasone; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Leukotriene Antagonists; Male; Quinolines; Sulfides

Topics: Acetates; Adolescent; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthma; Black or African American; Child; Cross-Over Studies; Cyclopropanes; Drug Combinations; Drug Monitoring; Eczema; Female; Fluticasone; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Hispanic or Latino; Humans; Male; Quinolines; Sulfides; White People

In this study, 647 subjects stable on fluticasone propionate/salmeterol Diskus 100/50 mcg BID (FSC) were randomized to continue FSC 100/50 mcg BID or "step down" to either fluticasone propionate (FP) 100 mcg BID, salmeterol (SAL) 50 mcg BID, or montelukast (MON) 10 mg once daily for 16 weeks. Overall asthma control significantly improved in the FSC group; whereas, "stepping down" to FP, SAL, or MON resulted in deterioration in asthma control, as determined by decreased measures of lung function and clinical features. This study provides support that treatment of both inflammation and smooth muscle dysfunction may be necessary to achieve and maintain asthma control in patients uncontrolled on ICS.

Topics: Acetates; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthma; Cyclopropanes; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Fluticasone; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Forced Expiratory Flow Rates; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Patient Satisfaction; Peak Expiratory Flow Rate; Quinolines; Salmeterol Xinafoate; Sulfides; Surveys and Questionnaires

Few studies have compared treatment strategies in patients with asthma poorly controlled on low dose inhaled corticosteroids, and little is known about the effects of different treatments on airway inflammation. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study, we compared the effects of salmeterol plus fluticasone propionate (FP) (Seretide; SFC) and FP plus montelukast (FP/M) on sputum inflammatory markers, airway responsiveness, lung function, and symptoms in adult asthmatics.. Sixty-six subjects were randomised to SFC or FP/M for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was changes in neutrophil, eosinophil, macrophage, lymphocyte, and epithelial cell levels in induced sputum. Additional outcomes included the change in other sputum markers of airway inflammation, airway responsiveness, symptom control, and lung function.. Both treatments had no significant effect on induced sputum inflammatory cells, although there was a trend for a reduction in sputum eosinophils. Both treatments significantly improved airway responsiveness, whereas SFC generally led to greater improvements in symptom control and lung function than FP/M. FP/M led to significantly greater reductions in sputum cysteinyl leukotrienes than SFC (treatment ratio 1.80; 95% CI 1.09, 2.94).. Both treatments led to similar control of eosinophilic airway inflammation, although PEF and symptom control were better with SFC. STUDY NUMBER: SAM40030 (SOLTA).

Topics: Acetates; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Adult; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthma; Bronchial Hyperreactivity; Cyclopropanes; Cysteine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Fluticasone; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Forced Expiratory Volume; Histamine; Humans; Interleukin-8; Leukotriene Antagonists; Leukotrienes; Lung; Male; Quinolines; Spirometry; Sputum; Sulfides; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United Kingdom

The choice of treatment can have a major impact on the total costs associated with asthma care.. To determine the relative cost-effectiveness of twice-daily treatment with inhaled fluticasone propionate-salmeterol via Diskus, 100/50 microg, with that of once-daily treatment with oral montelukast as initial maintenance therapy in patients with persistent asthma uncontrolled with a short-acting beta2-agonist alone.. Data from a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, 12-week clinical trial were analyzed. Efficacy end points included (1) symptom-free days (SFDs) during the 12-week period and (2) a 12% or greater increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) from baseline. The economic analysis was performed from a payer's perspective, and hence only direct costs were included in the analysis. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), which is the mean difference in average costs divided by the mean difference in average effectiveness, was calculated for both effectiveness outcomes (SFDs and FEV1).. For the SFDs end point, the ICER for fluticasone propionate-salmeterol vs montelukast was $2.87 (95% confidence interval, -$1.08 to $6.65), indicating that it costs, on average, an extra $2.87 per day for an additional SFD with fluticasone propionate-salmeterol than with montelukast. With regard to FEV1, the ICER was $1.79 (95% confidence interval, -$0.72 to $3.86), indicating that it costs, on average, an extra $1.79 per day to achieve a lung function improvement of 12% or greater from baseline with fluticasone propionate-salmeterol than with montelukast. At a widely acceptable ceiling ratio of $9.95 per day, the probability of fluticasone propionate-salmeterol being more cost-effective than montelukast was 99.8% for SFDs and was almost 100% for an FEV1 improvement of 12% of greater.. Treating 2 main components of asthma, inflammation and smooth muscle dysfunction, using fluticasone propionate-salmeterol is more cost-effective than using a single mediator antagonist alone, such as montelukast, as initial maintenance therapy for persistent asthma in patients treated with a short-acting beta2-agonist only.

Topics: Acetates; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthma; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Drug Costs; Female; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Humans; Leukotriene Antagonists; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Quinolines; Respiratory Function Tests; Sulfides

Topics: Acetates; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Asthma; Autism Spectrum Disorder; Bronchodilator Agents; Child; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Humans; Quinolines; Rhinitis, Allergic; Risperidone; Sulfides; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acetates; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthma; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cyclopropanes; Drug Combinations; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Humans; Leukotriene Antagonists; Quinolines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Respiratory Function Tests; Sulfides

Due to common features of asthma and allergic rhinitis, a single therapeutic approach to treating both of these conditions has been proposed.. To compare and contrast the use of rhinitis medications in a group of children initiating various controller therapies for asthma.. A retrospective, observational study using an integrated managed care database of children aged 4-17 years with an initial medical claim for asthma and an initial pharmacy claim for fluticasone propionate (FP) and salmeterol in a single inhaler (FSC), FP alone, montelukast (MON), or combination FP + MON. Outcomes included the percentage of children initiating controller asthma therapy with prescriptions for non-sedating antihistamine (NSA) and intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) and the mean number of prescriptions for NSA and INCS.. A total of 5247 children were included. The percentage of children who filled prescriptions for NSA or INCS and the mean number of prescriptions dispensed was similar among children treated with FSC, FP, MON, and FP + MON. There were no significant differences in the relative risk of dispensing either a NSA or INCS across cohorts. Observational studies are limited by their use of administrative data and lack of access to patient records.. Children started on common asthma controller therapy are frequent users of rhinitis medications. The quantity and frequency of these medications is not different between dispensed asthma regimens.

Topics: Acetates; Administration, Intranasal; Adolescent; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Cyclopropanes; Drug Combinations; Drug Prescriptions; Fluticasone; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Hypersensitivity; Leukotriene Antagonists; Quinolines; Retrospective Studies; Rhinitis; Sulfides

Asthma, owing to its chronic nature, is associated with a substantial economic burden. Healthcare providers need to compare the cost effectiveness of alternative asthma treatment options to ensure that they obtain the best value for money from the resources they control. The objective of the current study was to compare the cost effectiveness of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate in combination with fluticasone propionate plus montelukast in patients with symptomatic asthma uncontrolled with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) monotherapy.. Direct healthcare resource data were prospectively collected during a double-blind, randomized, 12-week clinical study of inhaled salmeterol/fluticasone propionate 50/100 microg twice daily (n = 356) and inhaled fluticasone propionate 100 microg twice daily plus oral montelukast 10mg daily (n = 369). Resources were costed in Dutch guilders (NLG) from the perspective of The Netherlands healthcare system using 1999/2000 prices, but have been presented in US dollars and euros. The primary effectiveness measure was the proportion of successfully treated weeks (based on mean morning PEF values). Secondary measures were episode-free days, symptom-free days, and symptom-free nights.. Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate was more effective than fluticasone propionate plus montelukast as measured by the proportion of successfully treated weeks mean 63.3% vs 39.0%; median difference 25%; p < 0.001). Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate was also more effective than fluticasone propionate plus montelukast according to the secondary effectiveness measures. The mean total direct daily healthcare costs per patient were 16% higher with fluticasone propionate plus montelukast than with salmeterol/fluticasone propionate mainly due to higher drug costs in the former group (2.25 US dollars vs 1.94; 1.92 euro vs 1.66, respectively; the NLG was fixed against the euro at a rate of 1 euro = NLG2.2 on 31 December 1998; 1 US dollars = NLG1.883, June 2003; 1 US dollars= 0.848 euro, June 2003). Incremental cost-effectiveness analyses showed that salmeterol/fluticasone propionate was dominant over fluticasone propionate plus montelukast and sensitivity analyses showed these results to be robust.. Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate is a more cost-effective treatment option than fluticasone propionate plus montelukast for patients with symptomatic asthma uncontrolled by ICS.

Topics: Acetates; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cyclopropanes; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluticasone; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Humans; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Netherlands; Quinolines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfides