enalapril and manidipine

The majority of patients with hypertension, and in particular high-risk patients or those with diabetes mellitus or renal dysfunction, are likely to require combination therapy with at least two antihypertensive agents (from different classes) to achieve their blood pressure (BP) target. The delapril/manidipine fixed-dose combination consists of two antihypertensive agents with different, yet complementary, mechanisms of action. Delapril/manidipine has demonstrated short- and long-term antihypertensive efficacy in a number of clinical studies in patients with hypertension with an inadequate response to monotherapy. Comparative studies have demonstrated that delapril/manidipine is as effective as enalapril/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) in patients with hypertension with an inadequate response to monotherapy, and as effective as irbesartan/HCTZ, losartan/HCTZ, olmesartan medoxomil/HCTZ, ramipril/HCTZ and valsartan/HCTZ in reducing BP in patients with hypertension and diabetes, or in obese patients with hypertension. Therapy with delapril/manidipine also appears to exert beneficial effects that extend beyond a reduction in BP, including nephroprotective activity and an improvement in fibrinolytic balance, supporting its value as a treatment option in these patient populations at high or very high cardiovascular risk because of the presence of organ damage, diabetes or renal disease.

Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Complications; Dihydropyridines; Drug Combinations; Enalapril; Humans; Hydrochlorothiazide; Hypertension; Imidazoles; Indans; Irbesartan; Losartan; Nitrobenzenes; Obesity; Olmesartan Medoxomil; Piperazines; Ramipril; Tetrazoles; Valine; Valsartan

Blood pressure reduction is associated with a reduced risk for cardiovascular events and death, particularly in patients with both hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus.. The aim of this study was to compare the antihypertensive efficacy, tolerability, and effect on metabolic risk factors of manidipine, a new dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist, and enalapril, a widely used angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension and type 2 diabetes.. This multicenter, double-blind trial compared manidipine and enalapril in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension (diastolic blood pressure [DBP] 90-104 mm Hg, systolic blood pressure [SBP] < or =190 mm Hg). Following a 3-week, single-blind placebo run-in period, eligible patients were randomized to receive either manidipine 10 mg or enalapril 10 mg once daily for 24 weeks. The dose was doubled after 3 weeks in patients who had not responded to treatment (DBP > or =90 mm Hg). The primary efficacy end point was change in DBP from baseline to the end of the study. Secondary outcomes were the responder rate (DBP <90 mm Hg and/or a DBP reduction of > or =10 mm Hg) at the end of the study. Other secondary measures were changes from baseline to the end of the study in heart rate and in the following measures obtained by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM): 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime mean DBP and SBP, and the trough:peak ratio. Blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, uric acid, and creatinine were measured at the end of the placebo run-in period and the end of treatment. The study had 80% power to detect a between-treatment difference in mean sitting DBP of >3 mm Hg.. One hundred twenty-four patients were enrolled in the study. After the placebo run-in period, 13 patients were excluded from the study: 4 for DBP values outside the specified limits, 7 at their request, and 2 for adverse events. Thus, 111 patients met the eligibility criteria and were randomized to treatment (53 manidipine, 58 enalapril). The population consisted of 61 men and 50 women with a mean (SD) age of 62 (11) years and a body mass index of 28.2 (2.4) kg/m2. Among patients who completed the study, drug doses were doubled in 67.6% (25/37) of patients in the manidipine group and 60.0% (24/40) of patients in the enalapril group (P = NS). Similar reductions in blood pressure were observed in both groups, from a mean (SD) of 164 (12)/97.5 (5) mm Hg at baseline to 141 (12)/84.5 (6) mm Hg at the end of the study in the manidipine group (P < 0.01), and from 159 (12)/98 (4) mm Hg to 139 (12)/86 (8) mm Hg in the enalapril group (P < 0.01). The proportion of responders was 66.7% (32/48) in the manidipine group and 60.0% (30/50) in the enalapril group; the difference between groups was not significant. Twenty-four-hour ABPM revealed significant (P < 0.01) and similar reductions in blood pressure in both groups, with a trough:peak ratio of approximately -50%. Neither drug affected heart rate. Among the statistically significant changes in metabolic parameters, significant reductions in HbA(1c) (from 6.7% [1.4%] to 6.2% [1.1%]) and blood glucose concentrations (from 152 [44] to 143 [44] mg/dL) were observed only in the manidipine group (P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse events was similar between groups.. In the present study, manidipine was as metabolically neutral and as effective as enalapril in reducing blood pressure in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes, providing a sustained 24-hour antihypertensive effect.

Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Calcium Channel Blockers; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dihydropyridines; Double-Blind Method; Enalapril; Female; Heart Rate; Humans; Hypertension; Lipoproteins; Male; Middle Aged; Nitrobenzenes; Piperazines

Recent studies showed that in diabetic hypertensive patients, administration of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors or calcium antagonists can effectively lower blood pressure (BP) and prevent diabetes-related cardiovascular complications with no adverse metabolic effects. We sought to assess the antihypertensive and metabolic effects of the new dihydropyridine calcium antagonist manidipine (M) in patients with diabetes mellitus and essential hypertension as compared with the ACE inhibitor enalapril (E). After 3 weeks of placebo, 101 (62 men; age range, 34-72 years) hypertensives with type II diabetes mellitus were randomized to M 10-20 mg or E 10-20 mg, od, for 24 weeks. At the end of the placebo period and the active-treatment phase, BP was measured with a mercury sphygmomanometer (office, O) and over the 24 h by ambulatory (A) monitoring. ABP recordings were analyzed to obtain 24-h, day (6 a.m. to midnight), and night (midnight to 6 a.m.) average systolic (S) and diastolic (D) BP and heart rate (HR) values. Homogeneity of the antihypertensive effect over the 24 h was assessed by the smoothness index [SI: i.e., the ratio between the average of the 24 hourly BP changes after treatment and the corresponding standard deviation (the higher the SI, the more uniform is the BP control by treatment over the 24 h]. The O SBP and DBP were significantly (p < 0.01) and similarly reduced by M (16 +/- 10 and 13 +/- 6 mm Hg, n = 49) and E (15 +/- 10 and 13 +/- 6 mm Hg, n = 45). The percentage of patients whose O DBP was reduced < or = 85 mm Hg (i.e., the value indicated to be the optimal DBP goal in diabetic hypertensives) was similar for M (37%) and E (40%). The reduction of 24-h BP also was similar between M (n = 38) and E (n = 38) for both drugs (systolic, 6 +/- 11 and 8 +/- 10 mm Hg; diastolic, 5 +/- 8 and 5 +/- 7; NS, M vs. E). The antihypertensive effect was distributed in a similar homogeneous fashion throughout the dosing interval, as shown by the similar SI values (M, 0.6 +/- 1.2 for SBP and 0.6 +/- 0.9 for DBP; E, 0.6 +/- 0.8 for SBP and 0.5 +/- 0.7 for DBP; NS, M vs. E). O and A HR were unchanged by either treatment. Markers of glucose and lipid metabolism and renal function were not significantly modified by treatment both with M and with E. In the diabetic hypertensives, M was as effective and metabolically neutral as the ACE-inhibitor E.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory; Cholesterol; Cholesterol, LDL; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diastole; Dihydropyridines; Double-Blind Method; Enalapril; Glycated Hemoglobin; Heart Rate; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Nitrobenzenes; Piperazines; Systole; Treatment Outcome; Triglycerides; Uric Acid

Cyclooxygenase inhibition restores endothelium-dependent vasodilatation in hypertension, but it is unknown whether it restores endothelial function in hypertensive patients treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors.. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effects of cyclooxygenase inhibition on endothelial function in hypertensive patients treated with ACE inhibitors.. Endothelium-dependent flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) and endothelium-independent glyceryl trinitrate-induced dilatation were investigated in 10 patients treated with enalapril (ACE group), 11 patients treated with manidipine and metoprolol (non-ACE group), and 12 normotensive control subjects. After administration of 1000 mg of aspirin, FMD was investigated once again. Plasma cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) and eicosanoids were also measured during reactive hyperemia before and after aspirin administration.. Flow-mediated dilatation was more impaired in the non-ACE group than in the ACE group (8.3 +/- 3.8%, 5.7 +/- 1.7%, respectively, p<0.04). Glyceryl trinitrate-induced dilatation was similar in the ACE group, the non-ACE group, and in the control subjects. In the ACE group, FMD was reduced after administration of aspirin (5.3 +/- 4.2%, p<0.05). The percent change in FMD after administration of aspirin correlated significantly with percent change in cGMP (r=0.77, p<0.03; y-intercept, -62.1%, p<0.01). After aspirin administration, levels of thromboxane B2 and 6-keto-prostaglandin(1alpha) were significantly decreased compared with those before aspirin administration in all groups.. Cyclooxygenase inhibition may reduce the beneficial effect on endothelium-dependent vasodilatation induced by ACE inhibitors. The results suggested that prostacyclin in addition to nitric oxide plays a significant role in the restoration of endothelial function in hypertensive patients treated with ACE inhibitors.

Topics: Administration, Sublingual; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Aspirin; Case-Control Studies; Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors; Dihydropyridines; Enalapril; Endothelium, Vascular; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Metoprolol; Middle Aged; Nitrobenzenes; Nitroglycerin; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Regional Blood Flow; Vasodilator Agents

Blood pressure and heart rate were measured by telemetry in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) and Wistar-Kyoto rats (WKY) to investigate the contribution of angiotensin II to the reflex tachycardia resulting from exaggerated hypotension caused by a high dose of a calcium channel blocker. Pre-treatment with TCV-116, an angiotensin II AT1 receptor antagonist, or enalapril partially attenuated the reflex tachycardia induced by manidipine, but TCV-116 had almost no effect on the sinus tachycardia induced by isoproterenol. The suppressive effects of TCV-116 against the reflex tachycardia tended to be more obvious in WKY than in SHR, though the difference was not statistically significant. Concurrent administration of propranolol almost completely inhibited both the reflex tachycardia and the sinus tachycardia in SHR and WKY, indicating that the sympathetic nervous system contributes to both types of tachycardia. We demonstrated that angiotensin II may be involved in the reflex tachycardia induced by calcium channel blockers probably via activation of some component of the sympathetic nervous system other than postsynaptic factors at the sinus node.

Topics: Angiotensin II; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Animals; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Calcium Channel Blockers; Dihydropyridines; Enalapril; Hemodynamics; Hypotension; Nitrobenzenes; Piperazines; Propranolol; Rats; Rats, Inbred SHR; Rats, Inbred WKY; Reflex; Tachycardia; Tachycardia, Sinus; Telemetry; Tetrazoles; Time Factors