e-5555 and vorapaxar

Acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel are two antiplatelet agents currently used in the therapy of peripheral arterial disease. Cilostazol also inhibits platelet aggegration. These agents present limitations that novel antiplatelet agents may overcome.. The aim of this manuscript is to review current data on the use of novel antiplatelet agents in peripheral arterial disease.. An extensive search in the English medical literature has yielded a number of publications on a number of novel antiplatelet agents; atopaxar, vorapaxar, cangrelor, ticagrelor, elinogrel, and prasugrel.. Data on atopaxar, vorapaxar, cangrelor, ticagrelor, elinogrel and prasugrel come mainly from cardiology publications. Limitations, side effects and effectiveness of each of these agents are studied, but their use in peripheral arterial disease is limited, especially for those agents that have not still been approved for this indication. As expected, main side effect of most of these agents is haemorrhage, but other important side effects limit the use of some of these agents in specific subgroups of patients.. Novel antiplatelet agents demonstrate a range of promising characteristics, but further study and clinical trials are necessary for them to be considered safe and effective.

Topics: Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Imines; Lactones; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Pyridines; Quinazolinones; Sulfonamides; Ticagrelor

Atherothrombosis and its clinical manifestations are among the leading causes of death in the developed world. The current standard-of-care antiplatelet therapy for the treatment of such events comprises aspirin and a thienopyridine or ticagrelor. However, recurrent ischemic events due to residual cardiovascular risk are a common phenomenon in these patients. It is believed that this residual risk is caused, at least in part, by thrombin, which signals through protease-activated receptors (PARs) and especially PAR-1. Thus, PAR-1 antagonism could represent an effective approach in the treatment of atherothrombotic disease. In this context, two potent and selective agents have been developed, vorapaxar and atopaxar. However, only vorapaxar has completed phase 3 clinical trials. In the present review, the main pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of the PAR-1 antagonists are briefly described and the latest clinical data on vorapaxar are presented.

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Coronary Artery Bypass; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemorrhage; Humans; Imines; Lactones; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyridines; Receptor, PAR-1; Receptors, Thrombin; Stents; Stroke; Thrombosis

Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) usually receive acetylsalicylic acid plus an adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor inhibitor to reduce the long-term risk of recurrent events. However, patients receiving standard antiplatelet prophylaxis still face a substantial risk of recurrent events. Strategies involving 3 antithrombotic agents with different modes of action have now been tested. In Thrombin Receptor Antagonists for Clinical Event Reduction (TRA-CER), compared with standard care alone, bleeding complications including intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) were increased with the addition of vorapaxar, without efficacy benefit. In Trial to Assess the Effects of SCH 530348 in Preventing Heart Attack and Stroke in Patients With Atherosclerosis (TRA 2°P-TIMI 50), the addition of vorapaxar reduced recurrent events compared with standard care in stable patients with prior myocardial infarction. This study was terminated early in patients with prior stroke owing to excess ICH, though an increased risk of ICH or fatal bleeding was not detected in patients with prior myocardial infarction. The Apixaban for Prevention of Acute Ischemic and Safety Events 2 (APPRAISE-2) trial of standard-dose apixaban added to standard care in patients with ACS was also stopped early owing to excess serious bleeding. However, in Rivaroxaban in Combination With Aspirin Alone or With Aspirin and a Thienopyridine in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes (ATLAS ACS 2 TIMI 51), fatal bleeding or fatal ICH did not increase with low-dose rivaroxaban added to low-dose acetylsalicylic acid-based standard care compared with standard care alone. In that trial, a significant reduction of recurrent vascular events was shown with 3 antithrombotic regimens compared with standard care. Therefore, depending on drug dose and patient population, further reductions in recurrent vascular events after ACS may be possible in future clinical practice, with a favorable benefit-risk profile.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Coronary Thrombosis; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Imines; Lactones; Morpholines; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Thiophenes; Thrombin

Topics: Animals; Drug Discovery; Humans; Hypertension, Pulmonary; Imines; Lactones; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Pulmonary Artery; Pulmonary Circulation; Pyridines; Receptor, PAR-1; Receptors, Proteinase-Activated; Signal Transduction; Vascular Resistance; Vasoconstriction

Platelets are the key in the pathogenesis of atherothrombotic disease such as acute coronary syndromes, stroke, and peripheral arterial disease. Current anti-platelet treatments are mainly based on inhibition of two important pathways of platelet activation: thromboxane A2 (TXA2) mediated (aspirin) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-P2Y12 receptor mediated (clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor). Despite the dual anti-platelet therapy with aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitors have reduced ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), the rate of recurrent ischemic complication after ACS remains high. Combination of multiple anti-platelet agents is also associated with increased risk of bleeding. Thrombin is a potent platelet agonist and the increase of its activity has been reported in patients with ACS. Platelet effects of thrombin are mediated by protease-activated receptors (PAR), and PAR-1 is the most important receptor in human platelets. Two PAR-1 antagonists, vorapaxar and atopaxar, have undergone clinical investigation. In this review, we will describe the pharmacology of PAR-1 antagonists and will review and discuss results of randomized clinical trials with PAR-1 antagonists.

Topics: Animals; Blood Platelets; Cardiovascular Diseases; Drug Design; Humans; Imines; Lactones; Ligands; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyridines; Receptor, PAR-1; Signal Transduction; Thrombin; Treatment Outcome

Vorapaxar (SCH 530348) and atopaxar (E5555) are oral protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) antagonists with high bioavailability. They inhibits thrombin induced platelet aggregation by competitively inhibiting PAR-1. We systematically evaluated the evidence for the efficacy and safety of all PAR-1 antagonists as well as for the individual drugs vorapaxar and atopaxar in different databases-PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane register of Controlled Clinical Trials (CENTRAL).We selected randomized controlled trials of PAR-1 antagonists that reported on cardiovascular mortality as a clinical outcome. The random-effects Mantel-Haenszel model was used to evaluate the effect of PAR-1 antagonists on cardiovascular mortality. Seven trials were selected (N = 42,355) for analysis. PAR-1 antagonists as a class, as well as individually, were associated with a non-significant numerically lower risk of cardiovascular mortality than that seen with agents used in the control group; RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.83-1.04; P = 0.20). No heterogeneity was noted. However, PAR-1 antagonists also appeared to increase the risk of bleeding significantly. PAR-1 antagonists appear to be associated with some reduction in the risk of cardiovascular mortality; however the significantly higher bleeding risk noted with PAR-1 antagonists appear to mandate a very careful selection of patients that may benefit without a substantially increased risk of bleeds.

Topics: Coronary Artery Disease; Hemorrhage; Humans; Imines; Lactones; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; PubMed; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptor, PAR-1

Platelet activation is a key process in the pathogenesis of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Of the many triggers involved in this process, three are presumed to be critical: thromboxane A(2) (TBXA(2)) via the TBXA(2) receptor, adenosine diphosphate via the P2Y(12) receptor, and thrombin via the protease-activated receptor (PAR)-1. Despite the effective inhibition of the first two pathways with aspirin and an expanding family of P2Y(12) inhibitors, the incidence of recurrent ischemic events remains high after ACS. PAR-1 inhibitors are a novel class of antiplatelet agents that inhibit thrombin-mediated platelet activation. Preclinical data and phase 2 clinical trials in patients with stable and unstable coronary disease support the potential of these compounds to improve clinical outcome. In this review we discuss the rationale for developing this novel class of agents with a focus on the two compounds in most advanced clinical development, vorapaxar (SCH 530348) and atopaxar (E5555).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Female; Humans; Imines; Lactones; Male; Myocardial Ischemia; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptor, PAR-1; Recurrence; Treatment Outcome

Ischemic heart disease remains the number one cause of death in the world despite advances in invasive and pharmacologic therapies. An ongoing area of research is the central role of platelets in atherothrombosis. Many therapeutic strategies have been developed over the last few decades affecting different platelet receptors to alter platelet-mediated thrombosis including targeting the receptors for thromboxane A(2), adenosine diphosphate, and fibrinogen. However, despite the use of pharmacologic agents directed at these pathways, residual morbidity and mortality still exist. Therefore, identifying agents that more favorably balance a reduction in ischemic events while minimizing bleeding events is an ongoing mission. Thrombin is known to be the most potent stimulant of platelet-mediated thrombosis whose action on the platelet is through a family of receptors known as the protease-activated receptors (PARs). Activation through the PAR-1 receptor, in particular, results in an early and intense response by the platelet to thrombin, and it is the primary thrombin receptor on platelets, thus making it a potentially desirable target for therapy. Most recently, two PAR-1 antagonists, atopaxar and vorapaxar, have been tested in clinical trials. Generally, the results show a reduction in ischemic event rates, but an increase in bleeding event rates. This article will summarize the current state of the literature and consider the role these drugs might play in the future for the prevention of ischemic heart disease events.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Blood Platelets; Coronary Artery Disease; Hemorrhage; Humans; Imines; Lactones; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyridines; Receptor, PAR-1; Thrombin; Treatment Outcome

Thrombin receptor antagonists blocking protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) on platelets represent a new class of oral antiplatelet agents for patients with atherothrombotic disease manifestations.. We investigated the safety and efficacy of PAR-1 antagonists in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).. Randomized, placebo-controlled trials of the PAR-1 antagonists atopaxar or vorapaxar in CAD patients were identified. The primary safety endpoint was the composite of Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) clinically significant bleeding. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke.. A total of 41 647 patients from eight trials were included. PAR-1 antagonists were associated with higher risks of TIMI clinically significant (odds ratio [OR] 1.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.39-1.57, P < 0.001), major (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.28-1.67, P < 0.001) and minor (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.40-2.00, P < 0.001) bleeding than placebo in the fixed-effects model. PAR-1 antagonists reduced the composite of death, MI or stroke as compared with placebo (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.81-0.92, P < 0.001), driven by a lower risk of MI (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.78-0.92, P < 0.001). Conversely, PAR-1 antagonists and placebo did not differ in terms of risk of death (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.90-1.09, P = 0.81) or stroke (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.84-1.10, P = 0.59).. PAR-1 antagonists decrease ischemic events in patients with CAD as compared with placebo, mainly driven by a reduction in MI, at the cost of an increased risk of clinically significant bleeding.

Topics: Blood Platelets; Chi-Square Distribution; Coronary Artery Disease; Evidence-Based Medicine; Hemorrhage; Humans; Imines; Lactones; Myocardial Infarction; Odds Ratio; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptor, PAR-1; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

The unifying basis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is the complication of a vulnerable coronary plaque, an event primarily mediated by platelet activation. Three major pathways are predominantly involved in this process: thromboxane A(2) via the thromboxane A(2) receptor, adenosine diphosphate via the P2Y(12) receptor, and thrombin via the protease-activated receptor (PAR)-1, with the latter being the most potent platelet activator. Despite the effective inhibition of the first two pathways with aspirin and an expanding family of P2Y(12) inhibitors, respectively, the recurrence of ischemic events in patients with ACS remains high. There is also a growing concern regarding the safety profile in terms of bleeding with more powerful antiplatelet agents, which has tempered expectations of newly developed compounds. PAR-1 inhibitors are a novel class of antiplatelet agents that inhibit thrombin-mediated platelet activation. Preliminary data indicate that these compounds have the potential to improve ischemic prognosis without increasing the bleeding risk. In this chapter we will discuss the rationale for developing this novel class of antiplatelet agents and specifically, the two compounds in most advanced clinical development, vorapaxar and atopaxar.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Animals; Humans; Imines; Lactones; Myocardial Ischemia; Platelet Aggregation; Pyridines; Receptor, PAR-1; Receptors, Thrombin

Stroke and myocardial infarction are leading causes of death and disability worldwide. Typically, these events are triggered by the rupture or erosion of "vulnerable" atherosclerotic plaque, a phenomenon termed atherothrombosis.Three platelet activation pathways are presumed to be particularly important in the genesis of atherothrombosis and are triggered by 1) cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-1 mediated thromboxane A2 (TXA2) synthesis and activation via the TXA2 receptor, 2) adenosine diphosphate (ADP) via the P2Y12 receptor, and 3) thrombin via the protease activated receptor (PAR)-1.Despite the efficacy of aspirin and of a growing family of P2Y12 receptor antagonists on the first 2 pathways, major cardiovascular events continue to occur in patients with coronary and cerebrovascular disease, suggesting that thrombin-mediated platelet activation may contribute to these adverse events.Recently, a novel class of antiplatelet agents able to inhibit thrombin-mediated platelet activation has been developed, PAR-1 inhibitors. In this chapter, we will discuss the rationale underlying the development of this novel class of agents focus on the two drugs in the most advanced stages of development: vorapaxar (SCH530348) and atopaxar (E5555).

Topics: Animals; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Imines; Lactones; Plaque, Atherosclerotic; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyridines; Receptor, PAR-1; Thrombosis

Recent clinical trial data suggest that protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) antagonists may increase the risk of intracranial hemorrhage. Our objective was to investigate the qualitative and quantitative risks of intracranial hemorrhage in patients receiving PAR-1 antagonist therapy.. Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Clinicaltrials.gov from 1966 to May 2012, were searched to identify relevant studies. We included randomized controlled trials that included a comparison of PAR-1 antagonist with placebo and in which the total number of patients and intracranial hemorrhage events were reported separately for active treatment and control groups. Summary incidence rates, relative risks, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic.. In 9 PAR-1 antagonist trials with 42000 patients with a history of thrombotic vascular disease or acute coronary syndrome, PAR-1 antagonist treatment was associated with increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage (0.59% vs 0.30%; relative risk, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.46-2.68; P<0.00001; number needed to harm, 345). There was no heterogeneity across trials (P=0.84; I2=0%), PAR-1 antagonist agent (P=0.52), treatment duration (P=0.38), or trial-qualifying event (P=0.59). Risk of death from any cause or a cardiovascular cause did not differ between active treatment and control groups.. In a pooled analysis of data from 9 trials, PAR-1 antagonist therapy was associated with an increased risk for intracranial hemorrhage.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Humans; Imines; Incidence; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Lactones; Placebos; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptor, PAR-1; Risk Factors; Thrombosis

Activated platelets stimulate thrombus formation in response to rupture of an atherosclerotic plaque or endothelial cell erosion, promoting atherothrombotic disease. Multiple pathways contribute to platelet activation. Aspirin, an irreversible inhibitor of thromboxane A2 synthesis, in combination with clopidogrel, an inhibitor of P2Y(12) adenosine diphosphate platelet receptors, represent the current standard-of-care of antiplatelet therapy for patients with acute coronary syndrome and for those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Although these agents have demonstrated significant clinical benefit, the increased risk of bleeding and the recurrence of thrombotic events represent substantial limitations. Thrombin is one of the most important platelet activators. The inhibition of protease-activated receptor 1 showed a good safety profile in preclinical studies. In fact, phase II studies with vorapaxar (SCH530348) and atopaxar (E5555) showed no increase of bleeding events in addition to the current standard-of-care of antiplatelet therapy. Although the results of phase III trials for both drugs are awaited, this family is a promising new addition to the current clinical practice for patients with atherothrombotic disease, not only as an alternative, but also as additional therapy.

Topics: Aspirin; Blood Platelets; Humans; Imines; Lactones; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyridines; Receptors, Thrombin; Thrombosis

Clinical manifestations of atherothrombotic disease, such as acute coronary syndromes, cerebrovascular events, and peripheral arterial disease, are major causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Platelet activation and aggregation are ultimately responsible for the progression and clinical presentations of atherothrombotic disease. The current standard of care, dual oral antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and the P2Y(12) adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor inhibitor clopidogrel, has been shown to improve outcomes in patients with atherothrombotic disease. However, aspirin and P2Y(12) inhibitors target the thromboxane A(2) and the ADP P2Y(12) platelet activation pathways and minimally affect other pathways, while agonists such as thrombin, considered to be the most potent platelet activator, continue to stimulate platelet activation and thrombosis. This may help explain why patients continue to experience recurrent ischaemic events despite receiving such therapy. Furthermore, aspirin and P2Y(12) receptor antagonists are associated with bleeding risk, as the pathways they inhibit are critical for haemostasis. The challenge remains to develop therapies that more effectively inhibit platelet activation without increasing bleeding complications. The inhibition of the protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) for thrombin has been shown to inhibit thrombin-mediated platelet activation without increasing bleeding in pre-clinical models and small-scale clinical trials. PAR-1 inhibition in fact does not interfere with thrombin-dependent fibrin generation and coagulation, which are essential for haemostasis. Thus PAR-1 antagonism coupled with existing dual oral antiplatelet therapy may potentially offer more comprehensive platelet inhibition without the liability of increased bleeding.

Topics: Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Imines; Lactones; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyridines; Receptor, PAR-1; Thrombosis

Atherothrombotic disease is the leading cause of death worldwide. Currently, dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and ADP receptor antagonists has shown improved short- and long-term clinical outcomes but is associated with increased bleeding risk, and the rates of recurrent ischemic events still remain high. Selective inhibition of the principal protease-activated receptor (PAR)-1 for thrombin, the most potent platelet activator, represents a promising novel strategy to reduce ischemic events without increasing the risk of bleeding. Two PAR-1 antagonists are currently being tested in clinical trials: SCH 530348 and E5555. Both have demonstrated an antiplatelet effect without increasing bleeding time in preclinical trials. Results of Phase II trials showed that SCH 530348, in addition to standard antiplatelet therapy, was well tolerated and not associated with increased bleeding risk. The safety and tolerability of E5555 is being evaluated in patients with coronary artery disease and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome in four Phase II clinical trials. Two large-scale Phase III trials assessing the efficacy of SCH 530348 in addition to the standard of care are currently ongoing. This article provides an overview of the current status of knowledge on platelet thrombin receptor antagonists, focusing on pharmacologic properties and clinical development.

Topics: Animals; Clinical Trials as Topic; Hemorrhage; Humans; Imines; Lactones; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyridines; Receptor, PAR-1; Receptors, Thrombin; Thrombosis

Platelet activation, achieved through a variety of surface receptors and biochemical mediators, represents a key event in the pathogenesis of atherothrombosis and its clinical manifestations. The major pathways involved in platelet activation are triggered by thromboxane A(2), adenosine diphosphate and thrombin, with the latter being the most potent of these agonists. Despite the effective inhibition of the first two pathways with aspirin and several generations of P2Y(12) receptor antagonists, respectively, the recurrence of ischaemic events in patients with atherothrombosis remains high. In addition, there is a growing concern over the safety profile of increasingly powerful antiplatelet drugs in terms of bleeding, which has tempered expectations of newly developed compounds. Thrombin receptor antagonists are a novel class of antiplatelet agents that inhibit thrombin-mediated platelet activation. Preliminary data indicate that these compounds may have the potential to improve ischaemic outcomes without significantly increasing the bleeding liability. Currently, two agents of this class are under clinical development: vorapaxar (previously known as SCH 530348) and E-5555. In this review we discuss this novel class of antiplatelet agents, focusing in particular on their therapeutic potential.

Topics: Atherosclerosis; Humans; Imines; Lactones; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyridines; Receptors, Thrombin; Thrombosis

Despite the availability of dual antiplatelet therapy comprised of aspirin and clopidogrel, there is still significant unmet medical need for treating and preventing arterial thrombotic diseases. To achieve further reduction of cardiovascular events without exceeding bleeding tolerability and safety limits, novel antiplatelet strategies might need to trade in antiplatelet efficacy by partial inhibition of an important platelet activation pathway or by differentially targeting pathological versus physiological thrombogenesis pathways. Thrombin, the central enzyme in coagulation and the most potent platelet agonist tested in vitro, is one of the key factors driving the formation of occlusive thrombi. Platelet thrombin receptors, namely protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR-1) and protease-activated receptor 4 (PAR-4), act in concert to elicit robust platelet responses to thrombin. PAR-1 is the high affinity thrombin receptor and represents a novel antithrombotic target. PAR-4 is a low affinity thrombin receptor with less understood function. This review discusses the genetic and pharmacological evidence for PAR-1 target validation and highlights the progresses and challenges in developing oral PAR-1 antagonists, especially SCH 530348 from Merck/Schering-Plough and E-5555 from Eisai Co. Recent patents disclosing several novel chemical series of PAR-1 antagonists from Sanofi-Aventis and Pierre Fabre are also presented.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Cardiovascular Diseases; Humans; Imines; Lactones; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyridines; Receptor, PAR-1; Receptors, Thrombin; Thrombin; Thrombosis

Aspirin, an irreversible inhibitor of thromboxane A(2) production, in combination with clopidogrel, an inhibitor of PY(12) ADP platelet receptors, represents the current standard-of-care of antiplatelet therapy for patients with acute coronary syndrome and those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Although these agents have demonstrated significant clinical benefit, the increased risk of bleeding and the recurrence of thrombotic events represent substantial limitations.. The inhibition of protease-activated receptors (PAR)-1, is the target for novel antiplatelet drugs, which showed a good safety profile in preclinical studies. The drugs most developed are vorapaxar (SCH530348) and atopaxar (E5555), which will be further evaluated in ongoing Phase III and II clinical trials respectively.. This review is focused on the current knowledge of PAR-1 antagonists, analyzing the pharmacological and early phase clinical investigation findings on these new drugs.. The PAR-1 receptor offers a new target for the inhibition of platelet activation and aggregation. Preliminary results showed the good safety profile of these new agents. The results of the Phase III ongoing trials will provide important clinical insight into the blockade of thrombin-induced platelet activation.

Topics: Animals; Atherosclerosis; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Imines; Lactones; Pyridines; Receptor, PAR-1; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

The role of antiplatelet therapy in the management of coronary artery disease and its sequalae is of great significance. Acetil Salycilic Acid (ASA) has continued to dominate the field as a potent antiplatelet agent, due to its ease of use and cost effectiveness. In addition to this, clopidogrel has also been widely used with better long term administration results in patients with atherosclerotic disease. However, interpatient variability and resistance to clopidogrel has opened the doors for further investigative research to find another agent which potentially meets the pharmacokinetic demands whilst having a satisfactory safety profile. Prasugrel and other novel nonthienopyridine derivatives are currently under investigation, with previous trials showing very reassuring outcomes. Patented inventions along with large trials have shown that prasugrel significantly reduces ischemic end points, ultimately resulting in a decrease in Myocardial infarctions, thromboocculusive episodes and death. Further studies are required to support these findings before we are aware of all clinical effects of Prasugrel.

Topics: Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Humans; Imines; Lactones; Patents as Topic; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Pyridines; Receptor, PAR-1; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Receptors, Thrombin; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Antiplatelet therapy remains a cornerstone of modern management of atherothrombotic vascular disease. For many years, aspirin has been the mainstay of initial antiplatelet drug management in coronary heart disease, while the need for inhibition of other platelet activation pathways has led to the development of various other antiplatelet drugs, such as clopidogrel. An improved understanding of the underlying mechanisms involved in thrombogenesis has paved the way for further development of newer antiplatelet drug therapies. Various clinical studies have probed the effectiveness and risk profile of the newer antiplatelet drugs, such as prasugrel, in comparison with currently available drugs. Some newer agents such as prasugrel are close to being approved for clinical use, whereas other agents such as cangrelor and AZD6140 are in phase 3 clinical trials. New drug classes, such as the thromboxane receptor antagonists (such as NCX-4016 and S18886), as well as platelet adhesion antagonists and thrombin receptor antagonists are similarly being evaluated for their efficacy and risk profile in phase I and II trials.

Topics: Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Aspirin; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Design; Humans; Imines; Lactones; Naphthalenes; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Propionates; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Pyridines; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Several classes of ligands for Protease-Activated Receptors (PARs) have shown impressive anti-inflammatory and cytoprotective activities, including PAR2 antagonists and the PAR1-targeting parmodulins. In order to support medicinal chemistry studies with hundreds of compounds and to perform detailed mode-of-action studies, it became important to develop a reliable PAR assay that is operational with endothelial cells, which mediate the cytoprotective effects of interest. We report a detailed protocol for an intracellular calcium mobilization assay with adherent endothelial cells in multiwell plates that was used to study a number of known and new PAR1 and PAR2 ligands, including an alkynylated version of the PAR1 antagonist RWJ-58259 that is suitable for the preparation of tagged or conjugate compounds. Using the cell line EA.hy926, it was necessary to perform media exchanges with automated liquid handling equipment in order to obtain optimal and reproducible antagonist concentration-response curves. The assay is also suitable for study of PAR2 ligands; a peptide antagonist reported by Fairlie was synthesized and found to inhibit PAR2 in a manner consistent with reports using epithelial cells. The assay was used to confirm that vorapaxar acts as an irreversible antagonist of PAR1 in endothelium, and parmodulin 2 (ML161) and the related parmodulin RR-90 were found to inhibit PAR1 reversibly, in a manner consistent with negative allosteric modulation.

Topics: Allosteric Regulation; Benzamides; Calcium; Cell Line; Endothelial Cells; Humans; Imines; Indazoles; Lactones; Ligands; Oligopeptides; Phenylenediamines; Pyridines; Receptor, PAR-1; Receptor, PAR-2; Technology, Pharmaceutical; Urea

Topics: Humans; Imines; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Lactones; Pyridines; Receptor, PAR-1

Emergency department physicians, along with hospitalists and interventional cardiologists, provide first-line care for patients experiencing symptoms potentially associated with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Because these health care providers encounter and manage patients with varying degrees of risk, a clear understanding of the modes of action, benefits, and limitations of various therapeutic options is crucial for achieving optimal outcomes in the acute-care setting. Oral antiplatelet therapy has a major role in the acute care of patients with suspected ACS due to the critical role of platelets in the pathophysiology of disease. The current standard-of-care oral antiplatelet therapy for ACS is aspirin in combination with a P2Y12 adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonist, most commonly clopidogrel. Aspirin and P2Y12 antagonists have both demonstrated efficacy in reducing morbidity and mortality in patients with ACS, but are also associated with increased bleeding risk compared with controls. Additionally, despite dual oral antiplatelet therapy, patients remain at substantial residual risk for ischemic events due to thrombotic episodes driven by platelet activation pathways that are not inhibited by these agents, including the protease-activated receptor (PAR)-1 platelet activation pathway, stimulated by thrombin. Novel oral antiplatelet agents in advanced clinical development include a direct and more readily reversible P2Y12 antagonist, ticagrelor, as well as a new class of PAR-1 antagonists, which includes vorapaxar and atopaxar. Ticagrelor has shown a significant ischemic benefit and an increase in non-surgical bleeding over clopidogrel in the large phase 3 Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes trial. Results of phase 2 trials with PAR-1 antagonists suggest that these agents may provide incremental reduction in ischemic events without a bleeding liability. This hypothesis is being evaluated in 2 large ongoing phase 3 trials with vorapaxar, including the Thrombin Receptor Antagonist for Clinical Event Reduction in Acute Coronary Syndrome (TRA*CER) trial in patients with non-ST-segment elevation ACS.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Administration, Oral; Aspirin; Cardiology; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emergency Medicine; Hemorrhage; Hospitalists; Humans; Imines; Lactones; Patient Selection; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Pyridines; Receptor, PAR-1; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome