dynorphins and 3-(2-hydroxy-4-(1-1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl)-4-(3-hydroxypropyl)cyclohexanol

Recent studies demonstrate the possible existence of tonic modulatory control of nociceptive input mediated by spinal cannabinoid receptors (CB1). Accordingly, it is predicted that a reduction in the spinal CB1 receptors may enhance sensitivity to sensory stimuli and a decrease in spinal antinociceptive potency to cannabinoid agonists. An antisense oligodeoxynucleotide (ODN) specific to the CB1 receptor was used to 'knock-down' CB1 receptors in the lumbar spinal cord and dorsal root ganglia by the local, repeated intrathecal (i.th.) administration of the ODN. This treatment resulted in a decrease in lumbar spinal CB1 receptor expression accompanied by a decrease in the response thresholds to both innocuous tactile and noxious thermal stimuli. The antinociceptive action of the CB1 agonist, WIN 55,212-2, by i.th. administration was also significantly attenuated after treatment with the antisense ODN. Similar treatment using a mismatch control ODN had no effect on receptor protein or on sensory thresholds. The effects of the antisense ODN treatment on sensory thresholds were fully reversed after discontinuation of the ODN injection. The antisense ODN treated rats also showed a significant increase in lumbar spinal dynorphin A. Acute i.th. injection of MK-801 or an antidynorphin antiserum blocked the antisense ODN-induced tactile and thermal hypersensitivity. These data support the possibility of endogenous inhibitory cannabinoid tone to limit spinal afferent input of thermal and tactile stimuli. Lifting of this inhibitory tone through a 'knock-down' of spinal CB1 receptors apparently lowers the thresholds for sensory input, as reflected by the actions of MK-801 to block tactile and thermal hypersensitivity. The increased spinal dynorphin may act to further promote afferent outflow and abnormal pain because sequestration of spinal dynorphin with antiserum also reverses the manifestations of abnormal pain following knock-down of CB1 receptors.

Topics: Analgesics; Animals; Antibodies; Benzoxazines; Cyclohexanols; Dizocilpine Maleate; Dynorphins; Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred ICR; Morpholines; Naphthalenes; Oligodeoxyribonucleotides, Antisense; Pain; Receptors, Cannabinoid; Receptors, Drug; Spinal Cord; Tritium

The endogenous opioid dynorphin B was evaluated for its role in cannabinoid-induced antinociception. Previous work in our laboratory has shown that the synthetic, bicyclic cannabinoid, CP55,940, induces the release of dynorphin B whilst the naturally occurring cannabinoid, Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC), releases dynorphin A. The dynorphins contribute in part to the antinociceptive effects of both cannabinoids at the level of the spinal cord. The present study compares dynorphin B released from perfused rat spinal cord in response to acute administration of anandamide (AEA), Delta(9)-THC and CP55,940 at two time points, 10 min and 30 min post administration, and attempts to correlate such release with antinociceptive effects of the drugs. Dynorphin B was collected from spinal perfusates of rats pretreated with Delta(9)-THC, CP55,940 or AEA. The supernatant was lyophilized and the concentrations of dynorphin B were measured via radioimmunoassay. At a peak time of antinociception (10 min), CP55,940 and Delta(9)-THC induced significant two-fold increases in the release of dynorphin B. AEA did not significantly release dynorphin B. Upon a 30-min pretreatment with the drugs, no significant dynorphin B release was observed, although antinociceptive effects persisted for CP55,940 and Delta(9)-THC. Previous work indicates that Delta(9)-THC releases dynorphin A while AEA releases no dynorphin A. This study confirms that although all three test drugs produced significant antinociception at 10 min, the endocannabinoid, AEA, does not induce antinociception via dynorphin release. Thus, our data indicate a distinct mechanism which underlies AEA-induced antinociception.

Topics: Analgesia; Analgesics; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Animals; Arachidonic Acids; Calcium Channel Blockers; Cannabinoid Receptor Modulators; Cannabinoids; Cyclohexanols; Dronabinol; Dynorphins; Endocannabinoids; Endorphins; Male; Pain; Polyunsaturated Alkamides; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Spinal Cord

Intrathecal administration of anandamide, delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and (-)-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethyheptyl)ptyl)phenyl]-4-(3-hydr oxypropyl)-cicloexan-1-ol (CP55,940) induced spinal antinociception accompanied by differential kappa-opioid receptor involvement and dynorphin A peptide release. Antinociception using the tail-flick test was induced by the classical cannabinoid THC and was blocked totally by 17,17'-bis(cyclopropylmethyl)-6',6,7,7'-tetrahydro-4,5,4'5'-diepoxy++ +-6,6'-(imino)[7,7'-bimorphinan]-3,3',14,14'-tetrol (norbinaltorphimine) indicating a significant and critical kappa-opioid receptor component. The endogenous cannabinoid, anandamide and the non-classical bicyclic cannabinoid, CP55,940, induced non-nor-BNI-sensitive effects. The N-piperidino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-3-pyrazo le-carboxamide (SR141716A)-mediated attenuation of spinal antinociception imparted by the various cannabinoids indicates cannabinoid CB1 receptor involvement. THC-induced an enhancement of immunoreactive dynorphin A release which coincided with the onset, but not duration antinociception. The release of dynorphin A was also attenuated by SR141716A suggesting it is cannabinoid CB1 receptor-mediated. These data indicate a critical role for dynorphin A release in the initiation of the antinociceptive effects of the cannabinoids at the spinal level.

Topics: Analgesics; Animals; Cannabinoids; Cyclohexanols; Dimethyl Sulfoxide; Dronabinol; Dynorphins; Injections, Spinal; Male; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Nociceptors; Pain; Pain Measurement; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Rimonabant

Intrathecal administration of delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta 9-THC) but not the cannabinoid agonist CP55,940 enhances the antinociception produced by morphine. In addition, CP55,940- and delta 9-THC-induced antinociception is blocked by the kappa opioid antagonist norbinaltorphimine, and both cannabinoids are cross-tolerant to kappa agonists but do not act directly at the kappa receptor. Previous work in our laboratory has implicated dynorphins in the antinociceptive effects of delta 9-THC and its enhancement of morphine-induced antinociception. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the role of dynorphins in the antinociceptive effects of CP55,940 at the spinal level. Pretreatment of mice with antisera to dynorphin A(1-17), dynorphin A(1-8) or alpha-neoendorphin, all of which have been shown to retain specificity for blockade of their respective peptide in vivo, blocked the antinociceptive effects of delta 9-THC but not CP55,940. Dynorphin B produced antinociceptive effects on intrathecal administration to mice. Like CP55,940, dynorphin B failed to enhance the antinociceptive effects of morphine, whereas dynorphin A(1-17) and alpha-neoendorphin enhanced the antinociceptive effects of morphine. Using spinal catheterization of the rat, CP55,940 administration was shown to produce a significant release of dynorphin B concurrent with the production of antinociception. Our data suggest that CP55,940 induces a release of spinal dynorphin B that contributes at least in part to its antinociceptive effects in the spinal cord.

Topics: Analgesics; Animals; Cannabinoids; Cyclohexanols; Dynorphins; Endorphins; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred ICR; Rats; Spinal Cord

The endogenous ligand for the cannabinoid receptor, arachidonylethanolamide (anandamide), has been shown to produce antinociception using the tail-flick test following intrathecal administration. Anandamide was administered i.p. (40 mg kg) to mice four times per day for 3 days. Tolerance developed to anandamide: the ED50 for anandamide (i.t.) was shifted from 40 (26-61) to 139 (79-248) micrograms/mouse. Anandamide-tolerant mice were cross-tolerant to delta 9-THC and CP55,940, but not cross-tolerant to mu-, delta- or kappa- opioids, including dynorphins. Conversely, delta 9-THC-tolerant mice are cross-tolerant to anandamide, CP55,940 and kappa agonists. Our data indicate that anandamide and delta 9-THC differ in the mechanisms by which they induce tolerance, in particular the interaction with endogenous dynorphinergic systems.

Topics: Analgesics; Animals; Arachidonic Acids; Cannabinoids; Cyclohexanols; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Dronabinol; Drug Tolerance; Dynorphins; Endocannabinoids; Injections, Intraperitoneal; Injections, Spinal; Mice; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Pain Measurement; Polyunsaturated Alkamides; Receptors, Cannabinoid; Receptors, Drug