dorzolamide-timolol-combination and brinzolamide

Azarga is a new fixed combination product that consists of the carbonic anhydrase inhibitor brinzolamide 1% and the betablocker timolol 0,5%. Its efficacy in lowering intraocular pressure is similar to that of Cosopt, a fixed combination that combines another carbonic anhydrase inhibitor (eg dorzolamide 2%) with the betablocker timolol 0,5%. The main difference between these two ocular hypotensive agents lies in their safety profiles with Cosopt causing more ocular discomfort to appear while instilling (burning,stinging and smarting sensations) probably due to the differences between the pH of these two fixed combinations agents. Its similar efficacy and enhanced tolerability compared with Cosopt make Azarga represent a resonable alternative for the patients who do not achieve an adequate intraocular pressure control while treating with a monotherapeutic agent.

Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors; Drug Combinations; Glaucoma; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Ophthalmic Solutions; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfonamides; Thiazines; Thiophenes; Timolol; Treatment Outcome; Vision, Ocular

Modern fixed-combination products simplify medication dose regimen without sacrificing their effectiveness.Potential benefits of the therapy with fixed-combination products are enhanced tolerability increased convenience,better compliance,cost and time economy and removal of the wash out effect. Regarding intraocular pressure lowering effect, fixed-combination agents are superior to monotherapy with the two medication components, with the exception of Duotrav that is not superior to travoprost action.Fixed-combination products are noninferior to concomitant administration of the two components of medication (nonfixed-combination agents) relative to their ocular hypotensive efficacy with the exception of Ganfort that is however inferior to concurrent administration of both the bimatoprost and timolol.

Topics: Amides; Antihypertensive Agents; Bimatoprost; Brimonidine Tartrate, Timolol Maleate Drug Combination; Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors; Cloprostenol; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glaucoma; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Latanoprost; Ophthalmic Solutions; Prostaglandins F, Synthetic; Quinoxalines; Sulfonamides; Thiazines; Thiophenes; Timolol; Travoprost; Treatment Outcome

To compare the additive effects and safety of 1% brinzolamide/0.5% timolol fixed combination (BTFC) versus the low-dose regimen of 1% dorzolamide/0.5% timolol fixed combination (DTFC) in patients with open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension (OAG/OH) following treatment with prostaglandin analogues (PGAs).. A prospective, randomized, double-masked, multicentre, parallel-group and active-controlled study included 201 Japanese OAG/OH patients who had been treated with PGA. Efficacy was assessed as the change in intra-ocular pressure (IOP) from baseline after weeks 4 and 8. Safety was assessed with adverse event rates, ocular discomfort score, blur scale, blood pressure and heart rates, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and slit lamp examinations.. Intra-ocular pressure (IOP) change from baseline at 9 AM/11 AM pooled over the 8 weeks was -3.3/-3.3 mmHg in the BTFC group and -2.9/-3.4 mmHg in the DTFC group, demonstrating non-inferiority of BTFC to DTFC. Ocular irritation was frequently seen in DTFC group. Although blurred vision was frequently seen in BTFC group, it was transient and blurring became the equivalent 3 min after instillation between two groups. No noteworthy issue was observed in other safety outcome.. Non-inferiority of BTFC to DTFC in IOP reduction was demonstrated after adding onto PGA therapy in Japanese OAG/OH patients. Although the score of blurred vision was transiently higher in BTFC than DTFC, treatment difference decreased and disappeared with time. Thus, BTFC can be considered as a safe and effective agent for glaucoma treatment.

Topics: Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Follow-Up Studies; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Intraocular Pressure; Ocular Hypertension; Ophthalmic Solutions; Prospective Studies; Prostaglandins, Synthetic; Sulfonamides; Thiazines; Thiophenes; Time Factors; Timolol; Tonometry, Ocular; Treatment Outcome

To compare the efficiency of brinzolamide/brimonidine fixed combination vs the dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination.. Forty-four eyes of 44 patients were divided in 2 groups treated either with dorzolamide/timolol twice a day (group A) or with brinzolamide/brimonidine twice a day (group B). Complete ophthalmic examination including Goldmann applanation tonometry was performed before treatment administration and 1, 4, 8, and 12 weeks afterwards. The intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured twice a day (morning at 9 AM and afternoon at 4 PM).. At the end of the follow-up period (12 weeks), mean morning IOP reduction was 7.0 ± 2.8 mm Hg in group A and 8.4 ± 1.9 mm Hg in group B. A significant difference was found (p = 0.0343). In contrast, mean afternoon IOP reduction was 8.6 ± 2.7 mm Hg in group A and 7.9 ± 1.6 mm Hg in group B and no significant difference was found (p = 0.3413). No significant adverse effects were observed in either group.. Brinzolamide/brimonidine seems to be an effective and safe alternative β-blocker free fixed combination, especially for patients with comorbidities, having its own antihypertensive profile.

Topics: Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Male; Middle Aged; Ocular Hypertension; Ophthalmic Solutions; Prospective Studies; Sulfonamides; Thiazines; Thiophenes; Timolol; Tonometry, Ocular; Treatment Outcome

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of brinzolamide/timolol (BT) and dorzolamide/timolol (DT) fixed combinations on intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction.. Patients with primary open angle glaucoma or normal tension glaucoma were randomized to receive either BT or DT. IOPs were measured at baseline, 2 weeks, and 1, 2, and 3 months. The primary outcome measures were the mean change in IOP from baseline at each visit. Secondary outcome measures included the tolerability of each fixed combination.. Seventy-three patients (73 eyes) were included; 37 eyes in BT group and 36 eyes in DT group. Baseline mean IOP were 24.14 ± 4.5 and 29.53 ± 6 mmHg for BT and DT, respectively (P < 0.001). Both BT and DT provided statistically significant mean IOP reductions from baseline values within each group at all study visits (P < 0.001). DT provided greater mean IOP reductions from baseline than BT at each visit which was statistically significant at 2 weeks (P = 0.037). Mean percentage of IOP reduction was 24.35% and 46.33% at 2 weeks (P < 0.001), and 24.65% and 47% at 3 months (P < 0.001) for BT and DT, respectively. Patients' tolerability appeared to be better for DT than for BT with complete ocular comfort without any ocular adverse effects in 31 patients (81.1%) in DT group and 11 patients (29.7%) in BT group (P < 0.001).. Both drops provide effective IOP reduction which was greater, and patients were more likely to achieve lower target pressures with DT than with BT.

Topics: Administration, Topical; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors; Drug Combinations; Egypt; Female; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Hospitals, University; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Low Tension Glaucoma; Male; Middle Aged; Ophthalmic Solutions; Prospective Studies; Sulfonamides; Thiazines; Thiophenes; Timolol; Tonometry, Ocular

The aim of this study was to compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering efficacy and to determine patient preference based on ocular discomfort with fixed combination brinzolamide/timolol and fixed combination dorzolamide/timolol in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who required a change in therapy due to elevated IOP while receiving IOP-lowering medication.. This was a 3-month, randomized, double-blinded, active-controlled, parallel-group trial. Patients had open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension, which could not be controlled with monotherapy and were randomized to twice daily therapy with either brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% or dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5%. IOP assessments were taken at 8 AM, 10 AM, and 4 PM at week 2 as well as at months 1, 2, and 3. Patients completed ocular discomfort assessments (based on stinging, burning, feeling of heat or warmth, or sharp pain) on their current IOP lowering therapy at baseline.. Of the 114 patients enrolled, 57 received Brinz/Tim and 57 received Dorz/Tim twice daily. Both medications produced statistically relevant IOP reductions, which were similar in both groups at each visit. The IOP reductions with Brinz/Tim ranged from 6.42 to 9.74 mmHg (26.09%-37.46%), whereas Dorz/Tim produced mean IOP reductions ranging from 8.16 to 12.41 mmHg (31.19%-41.44%) (P>0.05). Brinz/Tim showed significantly less ocular irritation (0.5% vs. 15.7%, respectively; P=0.0004) than Dorz/Tim.. Both Brinz/Tim and Dorz/Tim showed similar significant and clinically relevant IOP-lowering efficacy, whereas Brinz/Tim provided superior outcomes in terms of ocular comfort.

Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Male; Middle Aged; Ocular Hypertension; Patient Preference; Sulfonamides; Thiazines; Thiophenes; Timolol; Treatment Outcome