dodecyl-2-(n-n-dimethylamino)propionate and laurocapram

The effect of chemical enhancers and iontophoresis on the in vitro transbuccal delivery of 0.5% ondansetron HCl (ODAN HCl) was investigated using porcine buccal tissue. The chemical enhancers used were dodecyl 2-(N,N-dimethyl amino) propionate (DDAIP), its HCl salt dodecyl-2-(N,N-dimethylamino) propionate hydrochloride (DDAIP HCl), N-(4-bromobenzoyl)-S,S-dimethyliminosulfurane (Br-iminosulfurane), and azone. This study demonstrated that anodal iontophoresis at 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 mA current intensity significantly increased transbuccal delivery of ODAN HCl 3.3-fold, 5.2-fold and 7.1-fold respectively, compared to control. DDAIP HCl provided significantly higher transbuccal delivery of ODAN HCl than did DDAIP, azone and Br-iminosulfurane. It was found that DDAIP HCl in water significantly enhanced drug permeability (920 μg/cm(2)) compared to DDAIP HCl in propylene glycol (PG) (490 μg/cm(2)) during 24h. It was also found that 5% (w/v) DDAIP HCl in water alone provided higher permeation flux (29.3 μg/cm(2)/h) than iontophoresis alone at 0.3 mA (22.8 μg/cm(2)/h) during the same 8h treatment. A light microscopy study showed that treatment with chemical enhancers and iontophoresis did not cause major morphological changes in the buccal tissue. EpiOral™ MTS cytotoxicity studies demonstrated that DDAIP HCl at less than 5% (w/v) in water did not have significant detrimental effects on the cells.

Topics: Absorption; Administration, Buccal; Alanine; Animals; Azepines; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Drug Compounding; In Vitro Techniques; Iontophoresis; Kinetics; Mouth Mucosa; Ondansetron; Permeability; Sulfur Compounds; Technology, Pharmaceutical

We investigated the enhancement effect of chemical enhancers and iontophoresis on the in vitro transdermal and transbuccal delivery of lidocaine HCl (LHCl), nicotine hydrogen tartrate (NHT), and diltiazem HCl (DHCl) using porcine skin and buccal tissues. Dodecyl 2-(N,N-dimethylamino) propionate (DDAIP), dodecyl-2-(N,N-dimethylamino) propionate hydrochloride (DDAIP HCl), N-(4-bromobenzoyl)-S,S-dimethyliminosulfurane (Br-iminosulfurane), and azone (laurocapram) were used as chemical enhancers. The study results showed that the application of iontophoresis at either 0.1 mA or 0.3 mA significantly enhanced transdermal and transmucosal delivery of LHCl, NHT and DHCl. It was also demonstrated that iontophoresis had a more pronounced enhancement effect on transdermal delivery than on transbuccal delivery of LHCl, NHT and DHCl. In addition, DDAIP HCl was found to be the most effective enhancer for transbuccal delivery of LHCl and NHT.

Topics: Administration, Buccal; Administration, Cutaneous; Alanine; Animals; Azepines; Diltiazem; Drug Delivery Systems; In Vitro Techniques; Iontophoresis; Lidocaine; Mouth Mucosa; Nicotine; Skin; Skin Absorption; Sulfur Compounds; Swine

The effect of the penetration enhancers Azone, oleic acid, 1-dodecanol, dodecyl N,N-dimethylaminoacetate (DDAA), and dodecyl N,N-dimethylaminoisopropionate (DDAIP) on epithelial membrane lipids was examined using human buccal cell membranes as a model for epithelial lipid bilayer. Buccal epithelial cells (BEC) were labeled with 1,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene (DPH), 1-(4-(trimethylammonio)phenyl)-6- phenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene (TMA-DPH), and 8-anilino-1-naphthalene sulphonic acid (ANS) fluorophores to characterize enhancer-induced changes in the hydrophobic core, in the superficial polar head region, and on the exterior surface, respectively, with fluorescence anisotropy and fluorescence lifetimes. All the enhancers studied were found to decrease the BEC membrane lipid packing order in a concentration-dependent and time-dependent manner in the deep bilayer region, as shown by a 37-66% decrease in anisotropy. Oleic acid was also found to disrupt membrane lipids strongly in the polar head region, causing at least a 34% decrease in anisotropy values. Azone and DDAA were shown to alter molecular movement on the surface of the bilayers (24 and 19% decrease in anisotropy, respectively). The results suggest that interaction with membrane lipid domains is an important, but not the only, mode of action for the penetration enhancers studied.

Topics: Alanine; Azepines; Cheek; Diphenylhexatriene; Dodecanol; Drug Carriers; Esterases; Fluorescence Polarization; Glycine; Humans; Membrane Lipids; Mouth Mucosa; Oleic Acid; Oleic Acids