dihydroergotoxine and aniracetam

Vinpocetine, vincamine, aniracetam, and Hydergine, compounds with purported cognition activating activity, were evaluated for their ability to prevent scopolamine-induced and hypoxia-induced impairment of passive avoidance retention (24 hr) in rats. Vinpocetine (peak effect dose [PED]= 200 mg/kg PO), aniracetam (PED = 100 mg/kg PO), vincamine (PED = 30 mg/kg PO), and Hydergine (PED = 1 mg/kg PO) prevented memory disruption by scopolamine. Vinpocetine (PED = 3 mg/kg PO) and aniracetam (PED = 30 mg/kg PO) were also effective in preventing disruption of passive avoidance retention impaired by 7% oxygen hypoxia. In contrast, Hydergine (0.05 to 3 mg/kg PO) and vincamine (0.3 to 100 mg/kg PO) were not effective against hypoxia-induced impairment. Hydergine at doses greater than 10 mg/kg PO markedly impaired motor function. In both tests the protection was dose-related for all test substances in an inverted U-shaped manner. Mecamylamine (1, 3, 10 mg/kg SC), (-)-nicotine (0.1 to 0.4 mg/kg SC), apovincaminic acid (1-400 mg/kg PO) and pemoline (1-100 mg/kg PO) did not protect against memory impairment induced by either procedure. These data support the view that vinpocetine, a compound chemically distinct from the pyrrolidinones, has a cognitive activating ability as defined in models of both scopolamine-induced and hypoxia-induced memory impairment in rats.

Topics: Animals; Avoidance Learning; Dihydroergotoxine; Hypoxia, Brain; Male; Memory Disorders; Pyrrolidinones; Rats; Rats, Inbred Strains; Reaction Time; Scopolamine; Vinca Alkaloids; Vincamine

In a previous study the decline in the motor performance of old rats was determined to be differential. In this study, whether, and to what extent, this decline can be pharmacologically influenced was tested. Therefore, 27 month old rats were orally treated with several nootropics and d-amphetamine for six weeks. Food and water intake were determined. The rats were tested on spontaneous activity and on the tilting plane, climbing, and rotarod tests. The results showed that the nootropics only effected pronounced improvements on complex motor tasks such as on the rotarod test. In contrast, amphetamine treatment caused rather negative effects. This could be observed in the motor performance as well as in the food and water intake. Young rats did not have this sort of reaction to amphetamine. The nootropics were all well tolerated. Additionally, it was obvious that the untreated rats also showed a slight improvement in motor performance due to repeated practice.

Topics: Aging; Animals; Body Weight; Dextroamphetamine; Dihydroergotoxine; Female; Meclofenoxate; Motor Activity; Piracetam; Pyrithioxin; Pyrrolidinones; Rats; Rats, Inbred Strains