digoxin and ibopamine

digoxin has been researched along with ibopamine* in 9 studies

Trials

8 trial(s) available for digoxin and ibopamine

ArticleYear
Heart rate variability in patients with mild to moderate heart failure: effects of neurohormonal modulation by digoxin and ibopamine. The Dutch Ibopamine Multicenter Trial (DIMT) Study Group.
    Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1995, Volume: 26, Issue:4

    This study assessed the effects of digoxin and ibopamine on variables of heart rate variability in relation to neurohormonal activation.. Analysis of heart rate variability can be used to study the autonomic dysfunction that characterizes chronic heart failure. In the Dutch Ibopamine Multicenter Trial, patients with heart failure were found to have increased neurohormonal activation with placebo therapy but not with digoxin and ibopamine therapy.. We studied 59 patients with mild to moderate heart failure (mean [+/- SEM] age 60 +/- 1 years, mean ejection fraction 0.30 +/- 0.01). Patients were randomized to double-blind treatment with digoxin (0.25 mg [n = 22]), ibopamine (100 mg three times a day [n = 19]) or placebo (n = 18); background therapy consisted of furosemide (up to 80 mg).. After 3 months, plasma norepinephrine levels had increased with placebo, whereas they decreased with digoxin (+31 vs. -60 pg/ml, respectively, p < 0.01). With ibopamine, nonsignificant decrease was observed (-27 pg/ml, p = 0.10). All variables of heart rate variability showed a deterioration in the placebo group. With digoxin, the percent differences between successive RR intervals > 50 ms (pNN50) increased (+ 1.7 +/- 0.9%, p < 0.01), along with absolute and normalized high frequency power (+ 40 +/- 33 ms2, p < 0.05 and + 2.4 +/- 1.7%, p < 0.01, respectively). These changes were observed during daytime hours only and were most pronounced in patients with the most impaired baseline heart rate variability. With ibopamine, nonsignificant trends similar to the changes with digoxin were observed.. In patients with early stages of heart failure, digoxin may prevent a progressive deterioration in heart rate variability, whereas ibopamine does not show statistically significant effects. The changes in heart rate variability with digoxin parallel an observed decrease in neurohormonal activation. Digoxin apparently enhances cardiac vagal tone in the setting of neuroendocrine activation.

    Topics: Aldosterone; Cardiotonic Agents; Deoxyepinephrine; Digoxin; Diuretics; Dopamine Agonists; Double-Blind Method; Electrocardiography, Ambulatory; Female; Furosemide; Heart Failure; Heart Rate; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Norepinephrine; Renin; Time Factors

1995
Progression of mild untreated heart failure during six months follow-up and clinical and neurohumoral effects of ibopamine and digoxin as monotherapy. DIMT Study Group. Dutch Ibopamine Multicenter Trial.
    The American journal of cardiology, 1995, Apr-15, Volume: 75, Issue:12

    There is increasing evidence that clinical deterioration in manifest chronic heart failure is related to both hemodynamic and neurohumoral factors. Only few data are available, however, on the progression of disease in its early stages, when treatment has not yet been initiated. The aim of this study was therefore to examine the changes in clinical and neurohumoral variables that occur over 6 months in patients with clinically stable and untreated heart failure, and to evaluate the influence of drugs that may affect these variables. Accordingly, we studied 64 patients with heart failure who were in New York Heart Association functional class II (88%) and III (12%). They were randomized to double-blind treatment with the oral dopamine agonist ibopamine (100 mg 3 times daily; n = 22), digoxin (0.25 mg once daily; n = 22) or placebo (n = 20). Their age (mean +/- SD) was 60 +/- 8 years, and left ventricular ejection fraction (mean +/- SD) was 0.33 +/- 0.08. Of the 64 patients, 56 (88%) completed the 6-month study period (p = NS between groups). Exercise time decreased in patients treated with placebo after 6 months (median -62 seconds; p < 0.05 vs baseline), but it increased with ibopamine (+48 seconds), and digoxin (+17 seconds; both p < 0.05 vs placebo). Plasma norepinephrine increased in the placebo group after 6 months (median + 31 pg/ml, p < 0.05 vs baseline), but decreased in patients receiving active drug treatment (ibopamine: -24 pg/ml, digoxin: -98 pg/ml, both p < 0.05 vs placebo). Plasma renin and aldosterone levels were unchanged after 6 months in the placebo group, but digoxin therapy slightly reduced plasma renin concentration (-5 microU/ml; p < 0.05 vs placebo).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Cardiac Output, Low; Cardiotonic Agents; Deoxyepinephrine; Digoxin; Disease Progression; Dopamine Agonists; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Netherlands; Neurotransmitter Agents; Norepinephrine; Physical Exertion; Placebos; Renin; Stroke Volume; Ventricular Function, Left

1995
Double-blind placebo-controlled study of ibopamine and digoxin in patients with mild to moderate heart failure: results of the Dutch Ibopamine Multicenter Trial (DIMT).
    Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1993, Nov-15, Volume: 22, Issue:6

    This study was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of long-term treatment with the orally active dopamine agonist ibopamine in patients with mild to moderate chronic congestive heart failure and to compare the results with those of treatment with digoxin and placebo.. Ibopamine and digoxin are drugs that exert hemodynamic and neurohumoral effects. Because there is accumulating evidence that progression of disease in chronic heart failure is related not only to hemodynamic but also to neurohumoral factors, both drugs might be expected to have a favorable long-term effect.. We studied 161 patients with mild to moderate chronic heart failure (80% in New York Heart Association functional class II and 20% in class III), who were treated with ibopamine (n = 53), digoxin (n = 55) or placebo (n = 53) for 6 months. Background therapy consisted of furosemide (0 to 80 mg); all other drugs for heart failure were excluded. Clinical assessments were made at baseline and after 1, 3 and 6 months.. Of the 161 patients, 128 (80%) completed the study. Compared with placebo, digoxin but not ibopamine significantly increased exercise time after 6 months (p = 0.008 by intention to treat analysis). Ibopamine was only effective in patients with relatively preserved left ventricular function, as it significantly increased exercise time in this subgroup (for patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction > 0.30; p = 0.018 vs. placebo). No patient receiving digoxin withdrew from the study because of progression of heart failure, compared with six patients receiving ibopamine and two receiving placebo. At 6 months, plasma norepinephrine was decreased with digoxin and ibopamine therapy (-106 and -13 pg/ml, respectively) but increased with placebo administration (+62 pg/ml) (both p < 0.05 vs. placebo). Plasma aldosterone was unaffected, but renin was decreased by both agents after 6 months (p < 0.05 vs. placebo). Total mortality and ambulatory arrhythmias were not significantly affected by the two drugs.. Ibopamine and digoxin both inhibit neurohumoral activation in patients with mild to moderate chronic heart failure. However, the clinical effects of these drugs are different and appear to be related to the degree of left ventricular dysfunction.

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aldosterone; Cardiotonic Agents; Deoxyepinephrine; Digoxin; Dopamine Agents; Double-Blind Method; Electrocardiography, Ambulatory; Exercise Test; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Netherlands; Norepinephrine; Prospective Studies; Renin; Severity of Illness Index

1993
Safety of ibopamine therapy in congestive heart failure. Ibopamine cohort study: baseline and 1-year results.
    Arzneimittel-Forschung, 1991, Volume: 41, Issue:4

    The study was designed to evaluate the safety of ibopamine (3,4-diisobutyryl ester of N-methyldopamine. SB(-)-505. Inopamil; CAS 66195-31-1) for the chronic treatment of congestive heart failure. It was conducted as a comparative cohort survey, versus digitalis. A third cohort was made with patients who received both drugs in association. Any differences between cohorts at baseline were dealt with by identifying explanatory variables with linear discriminant analysis and by performing multivariate statistical analysis by Cox's proportional hazard model. During 16 months, 3.330 patients were enrolled and then followed-up for a median time of 1 year. Baseline characteristics are reported as well as follow-up results on mortality, disease progression, anginal episodes, arrhythmias, need for cointervention and other undesired on-therapy events. Results pointing to efficacy are consistent with the favourable results from controlled randomized double blind medium--long term clinical trials. In addition, data from the present study do indeed provide strong evidence on the safety of long-term treatment with ibopamine. At variance with inotropic agents ibopamine did not increase mortality. The results rather suggest that long-term treatment with ibopamine affords an increase in survival and a delay in the progression of the disease, without adverse effects on cardiac rhythm and myocardial oxygen balance, and with a general improvement in the patients' quality of life.

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angina Pectoris; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Blood Pressure; Cardiotonic Agents; Deoxyepinephrine; Digoxin; Drug Prescriptions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Electrocardiography; Female; Heart Failure; Heart Rate; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Prognosis; Risk Factors

1991
Ibopamine versus digoxin in the treatment of mild congestive heart failure. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
    Cardiology, 1990, Volume: 77 Suppl 5

    We describe a randomized double-blind 4-week study on the efficacy of monotherapy with ibopamine 200 mg b.i.d. in comparison to placebo and open titrated digoxin in patients with mild congestive heart failure NYHA class I and II. A total of 60 patients (22 males and 38 females) were evaluated for body weight, signs and symptoms score and the need for additional diuretic treatment for adequate symptom control. Mean decreases in body weight in the ibopamine group exceeded mean decreases in body weight in the placebo group (3.03 kg). The signs and symptoms score was improved in 7 out of 20 patients in the placebo group, in all patients treated with ibopamine and in 21 of 22 patients of the digoxin subgroup while the patient-questionnaire score improved in 23.5% (placebo), 100% (ibopamine) and 81.2% (digoxin) of the cases, respectively. There were no treatment failures in the ibopamine and digoxin group. However, 8 of 20 patients receiving placebo had need of additional diuretic therapy. No adverse drug reactions were reported in the ibopamine-treated patients. We conclude that ibopamine monotherapy over 4 weeks has favourable effects on body weight and signs and symptoms of mild congestive heart failure without exerting major side effects. The efficacy is comparable to digoxin therapy.

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiotonic Agents; Deoxyepinephrine; Digoxin; Double-Blind Method; Female; Heart Failure; Hemodynamics; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Vasodilator Agents

1990
Ibopamine vs. digoxin in chronic heart failure: a double-blind, crossover study.
    Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology, 1989, Volume: 14 Suppl 8

    Ibopamine, a dopamine derivative suitable for oral administration, is reported to improve cardiac function in patients with chronic heart failure. In order to evaluate the inotropic effect of ibopamine and to compare it with that of digoxin, we studied 10 patients with chronic heart failure (NYHA II-III). All patients were in sinus rhythm. After a washout period of 5 days, when the patients received a constant diuretic dosage and a placebo, ibopamine 100 mg t.i.d. or digoxin 0.25 mg o.d. was randomly given double-blind. The active treatment was continued for a 10-day period, and was followed by a second washout period of 5 days. Subsequently, the patients received digoxin if previously on ibopamine or ibopamine if previously on digoxin for 10 days. Diuretic was continued at the same dosage throughout the study. At the end of the two washout periods, all patients performed a static (hand grip) and a dynamic exercise (bicycle ergometer). Both ibopamine and digoxin improved cardiac response to both types of exercise compared to the washout periods. In particular, PEP/LVET decreased (p less than 0.001 for both drugs) and O2 consumption improved (from 586 +/- 48 to 716 +/- 35 ml/min for ibopamine and from 585 +/- 38 to 713 +/- 52 ml/min for digoxin). No difference was noted between the two drugs in the improvement of exercise tolerance. No side effects were noted with the two drugs. These data indicate that ibopamine could be a valid alternative to digoxin in heart failure patients in sinus rhythm when given for 10 days. More data are needed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of ibopamine.

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Cardiotonic Agents; Chronic Disease; Deoxyepinephrine; Digoxin; Dopamine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Evaluation; Exercise Test; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Oxygen Consumption; Physical Endurance; Random Allocation; Vasodilator Agents

1989
Ibopamine as a substitute for digitalis in patients with congestive heart failure on chronic digoxin therapy. Smith Kline and French Ibopamine Group.
    International journal of cardiology, 1989, Volume: 22, Issue:3

    The substitution of digoxin with ibopamine, a new inotropic and vasodilating agent, was evaluated in a multicenter study in 58 patients with mild-to-moderate congestive heart failure, stabilized on diuretics, and digoxin therapy. The study was a parallel, double-blind, randomized trial of four weeks duration in which half of the group continued the pre-study medication (diuretics and digoxin) and half of the group was treated with diuretics and ibopamine (100 mg, three times a day). At baseline evaluation, the two groups were similar for age, sex, underlying cardiac disease, duration of congestive heart failure, symptom score, cardiothoracic ratio, echocardiographic parameters of left ventricular function and exercise tolerance as measured by bicycle ergometry. After four weeks, no clinical deterioration was found in the patients treated with ibopamine in any measured parameter. There were two deaths during the study: a sudden death and one following an acute myocardial infarction. Both patients were on digoxin. This study suggests that in patients with mild-to-moderate congestive heart failure, ibopamine therapy may effectively and safely substitute digoxin therapy for up to four weeks, representing an option for patients requiring inotropic support but are at risk for potential digoxin toxicity.

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Deoxyepinephrine; Digoxin; Dopamine; Echocardiography; Exercise Test; Female; Heart Failure; Heart Ventricles; Humans; Male; Middle Aged

1989
Effects of digoxin, placebo and ibopamine on exercise tolerance and cardiac rhythm of patients with chronic post-infarct left ventricular failure.
    Arzneimittel-Forschung, 1986, Volume: 36, Issue:2A

    This study compares the effects of digoxin, placebo and ibopamine (SB-7505), the orally active 3,4-diisobutyryl ester of N-methyl-dopamine, on exercise tolerance and cardiac rhythm of 14 patients whose left ventricular heart failure (end-diastolic pressure, 26.3 +/- 5.9 mmHg; ejection fraction, 0.42 +/- 0.10%) depended on a previous myocardial infarction. Patients were admitted to the study while on chronic oral digoxin treatment (serum levels between 1.1 and 1.9 ng/ml). Placebo instead of digoxin was given for the following month. Thereafter ibopamine 50 mg t.i.d. for one month was given. A sequence of one-month treatments with digoxin, placebo and ibopamine was repeated, then ibopamine was administered continuously for the next two months. The concurrent treatment (diuretics in all patients, nitroderivates in twelve, calcium antagonists in two) remained unchanged during the observation period. Symptoms-limited exercise tests and 24-h Holter recordings were obtained at admission, at the end of each one-month treatment and at the end of the observation period. Two patients developed unstable angina without increase of serum creatine phosphokinase while on ibopamine and were withdrawn. Out of the 12 patients that concluded the trial, one required supplementary doses of diuretic at the end of the second period on placebo. The results obtained during the trial suggest that: a) therapeutic plasma levels of digoxin have no deleterious effect on cardiac rhythm nor significantly increase exercise tolerance as compared with placebo; b) diuretics and nitrates appear to sustain the clinical stability of these patients as a group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

    Topics: Aged; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Cardiotonic Agents; Deoxyepinephrine; Digoxin; Dopamine; Female; Heart Failure; Heart Rate; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Physical Exertion

1986

Other Studies

1 other study(ies) available for digoxin and ibopamine

ArticleYear
Clinical pharmacokinetics of ibopamine on different diseases and conditions.
    Arzneimittel-Forschung, 1988, Volume: 38, Issue:8

    The pharmacokinetics of ibopamine was studied after single dose and after single and multiple dosing. The studies after single dose were conducted in normal subjects (NS) and in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) of NYHA functional classes II, III and IV, in patients with chronic renal impairment (CRI), with hepatic cirrhosis (HC) and in elderly patients. Furthermore, ibopamine-quinidine pharmacokinetic interaction and the effects of food on plasma kinetics were evaluated in NS. The studies after single and multiple dosing were conducted in CHF patients. The effects were also studied of chronic oral ibopamine treatment on the pharmacokinetics of digoxin after chronic oral dosing and of treatment with digoxin on ibopamine pharmacokinetics. Ibopamine appears to be rapidly and extensively absorbed, quickly hydrolyzed to epinine and then excreted mainly through the kidneys either after being sulpho-conjugated or oxidized to homovanillic acid and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid. Epinine is thought to be the therapeutically active moiety of the drug. In patients with CHF epinine pharmacokinetics does not depend on the NYHA functional class, and it falls within the same area as that in NS; the pharmacokinetics of epinine does not vary during the repeated administration of the drug for one month. In patients with CHF the pharmacokinetic data do not suggest the need to adjust the dose according to the NYHA functional class. In patients with CRI the pharmacokinetics of epinine does not vary with the degree of renal impairment. In HC patients AUC and Cmax of epinine seem to be higher than in NS; in these patients a higher amount of epinine is excreted into urine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

    Topics: Absorption; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Biological Availability; Chemical Phenomena; Chemistry; Deoxyepinephrine; Digoxin; Dopamine; Dopamine Agents; Drug Interactions; Female; Food; Heart Failure; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Middle Aged; Quinidine; Vasodilator Agents

1988