diethyl-maleate and imidacloprid

Neonicotinoid insecticides are harmful to non-target soil invertebrates, which are crucial for sustainable agriculture. Gene expression biomarkers could provide economic and high-throughput metrics of neonicotinoid exposure and toxicity to non-target invertebrates. Thereby, biomarkers can help guide remediation efforts or policy enforcement. Gene expression of Glutathione S-Transferase 3 (GST3) has previously been proposed as a biomarker for the neonicotinoid imidacloprid in the soil ecotoxicological model species Folsomia candida (Collembola). However, it remains unclear how reliably gene expression of neonicotinoid biomarkers, such as GST3, can indicate the exposure to the broader neonicotinoid family under putative GST enzymatic inhibition. In this work, we exposed springtails to two neonicotinoids, thiacloprid and imidacloprid, alongside diethyl maleate (DEM), a known GST metabolic inhibitor that imposes oxidative stress. First, we determined the influence of DEM on neonicotinoid toxicity to springtail fecundity. Second, we surveyed the gene expression of four biomarkers, including GST3, under mutual exposure to neonicotinoids and DEM. We observed no effect of DEM on springtail fecundity. Moreover, the expression of GST3 was only influenced by DEM under mutual exposure with thiacloprid but not with imidacloprid. The results indicate that GST3 is not a robust indicator of neonicotinoid exposure and that probable GST enzymatic inhibition mediates the toxicity of imidacloprid and thiacloprid differentially. Future research should investigate biomarker reliability under shifting metabolic conditions such as provided by DEM exposure.

Topics: Animals; Arthropods; Biomarkers; Glutathione Transferase; Insecticides; Invertebrates; Neonicotinoids; Nitro Compounds; Reproducibility of Results; Soil

Amsacta albistriga is one of the important pests of oilseed crops in India. This pest has developed high resistance to organophosphate (OP) insecticide in field. Therefore, cypermethrin insecticide was used as an alternative for this pest. After 20 generations of selection with cypermethrin, the LD50 value for A. albistriga was increased by 21.5-folds. The synergism ratio of piperonyl butoxide (PBO) and triphenyl phosphate (TPP) was increased by 10- and 9.6-fold in resistant strains and comparatively, 3.9 and 4.2-fold in susceptible strains. Detoxification enzyme analysis and native PAGE electrophoresis of esterase isoenzyme further revealed that esterase and mixed function oxidase may be involved in cypermethrin resistance in CypRes strain. In addition to enzyme analysis overexpression of CYP4M44, CYP9A77 and CYP6B47 (ortholog) can confer metabolic resistance in the CypRes strain. These data provide a foundation for further study of cypermethrin resistance mechanism observed in A. albistriga.

Topics: Animals; Esterases; Glutathione Transferase; Imidazoles; Insect Proteins; Insecticide Resistance; Insecticides; Larva; Lepidoptera; Maleates; Mixed Function Oxygenases; Monocrotophos; Neonicotinoids; Nitro Compounds; Organophosphates; Pesticide Synergists; Phylogeny; Piperonyl Butoxide; Pyrethrins