diethyl-maleate and ethyl-acrylate

Chairs and sofas imported from China to Europe were shown to contain dimethyl fumarate (DMF), a sensitizing, volatile chemical. Many of the sensitized patients also had positive patch test reactions to acrylates.. To analyse the occurrence and strength of DMF sensitization and the appearance of concomitant reactions.. Patch testing with DMF in concentrations of 0.1-0.00001% was carried out in 37 patients. Diethyl fumarate (DEF), diethyl maleate (DEM), dimethyl maleate (DMM), ethyl acrylate (EA), methyl acrylate (MA), and methyl methacrylate (MMA) were also tested with a dilution series at equimolar concentrations.. The lowest concentration of DMF eliciting a reaction varied between 0.0001% and 0.1% and all but four patients reacted concurrently to DEF. DEM elicited positive patch test reactions in 21/37 patients and DMM reactions were seen in all 9 patients tested. EA elicited positive reactions in 13/37 patients and a positive MA reaction was seen in 7/37 patients, 2 of whom also reacted to MMA.. The strength of the sensitization to DMF showed variation and concurrent reactions were common. Concurrent reactions to (meth)acrylates were seen in patients, who reacted to lower (0.001% or less) DMF concentration probably elicited by cross-reactivity.

Topics: Acrylates; Adult; China; Dermatitis, Allergic Contact; Dimethyl Fumarate; Female; Finland; Fumarates; Humans; Interior Design and Furnishings; Male; Maleates; Methylmethacrylate; Middle Aged; Patch Tests; United Kingdom

Acute administration of a single dose of ethyl acrylate (EA) to F344 rats by gavage caused time- and dose-dependent forestomach edema. Evidence from our laboratory and others suggested that EA is hydrolyzed to acrylic acid (AA) and ethanol both in vivo and in vitro. The major metabolites detected in teh urine of rats treated with EA were derivatives of the glutathione conjugates of EA and AA. The current work was undertaken to investigate the effects of sulfhydryl-depleting agents (diethylmaleate and fasting) and sulfhydryl-containing agents (cysteine and cysteamine) on EA-induced forestomach edema. Results presented in this report revealed that pretreatment of rats with sulfhydryl-containing chemicals such as cysteine or cysteamine has potentiated EA-induced forestomach edema. In contrast, depletion of indigenous sulfhydryls by fasting of rats or pretreatment with diethylmaleate (DEM) protected against EA-induced forestomach edema. Furthermore, repetitive daily administration of EA by gavage induced mucosal forestomach hyperplasia. Co-administration of cysteamine and EA resulted in a significant enhancement of the severity of EA-induced forestomach mucosal hyperplasia. In conclusion, current data suggest that modulation of indigenous sulfhydryls play a role in EA-induced forestomach toxicity; however, the exact mechanism underlying this role remains to be characterized.

Topics: Acrylates; Administration, Oral; Animals; Cysteamine; Cysteine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Edema; Fasting; Male; Maleates; Mutagens; Rats; Rats, Inbred F344; Stomach Diseases