clozapine and ziprasidone

The dose-response relationships of antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia are not well defined, but such information would be important for decision making by clinicians. The authors sought to fill this gap by conducting dose-response meta-analyses.. A search of multiple electronic databases (through November 2018) was conducted for all placebo-controlled dose-finding studies for 20 second-generation antipsychotic drugs and haloperidol (oral and long-acting injectable, LAI) in people with acute schizophrenia symptoms. Dose-response curves were constructed with random-effects dose-response meta-analyses and a spline model. The outcome measure was total score reduction from baseline on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale or the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. The authors identified 95% effective doses, explored whether higher or lower doses than the currently licensed ones might be more appropriate, and derived dose equivalencies from the 95% effective doses.. Sixty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The 95% effective doses and the doses equivalent to 1 mg of oral risperidone, respectively, were as follows: amisulpride for patients with positive symptoms, 537 mg/day and 85.8 mg; aripiprazole, 11.5 mg/day and 1.8 mg; aripiprazole LAI (lauroxil), 463 mg every 4 weeks and 264 mg; asenapine, 15.0 mg/day and 2.4 mg; brexpiprazole, 3.36 mg/day and 0.54 mg; haloperidol, 6.3 mg/day and 1.01 mg; iloperidone, 20.13 mg/day and 3.2 mg; lurasidone, 147 mg/day and 23.5 mg; olanzapine, 15.2 mg/day and 2.4 mg; olanzapine LAI, 277 mg every 2 weeks and 3.2 mg; paliperidone, 13.4 mg/day and 2.1 mg; paliperidone LAI, 120 mg every 4 weeks and 1.53 mg; quetiapine, 482 mg/day and 77 mg; risperidone, 6.3 mg/day and 1 mg; risperidone LAI, 36.6 mg every 2 weeks and 0.42 mg; sertindole, 22.5 mg/day and 3.6 mg; and ziprasidone, 186 mg/day and 30 mg. For amisulpride and olanzapine, specific data for patients with predominant negative symptoms were available. The authors have made available on their web site a spreadsheet with this method and other updated methods that can be used to estimate dose equivalencies in practice.. In chronic schizophrenia patients with acute exacerbations, doses higher than the identified 95% effective doses may on average not provide more efficacy. For some drugs, higher than currently licensed doses might be tested in further trials, because their dose-response curves did not plateau.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Clozapine; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Haloperidol; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Isoxazoles; Lurasidone Hydrochloride; Olanzapine; Paliperidone Palmitate; Piperazines; Piperidines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Thiazoles; Thiophenes

Up to 75% of people with serious mental illness (SMI) such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder have co-occurring substance use disorders (dual diagnosis). Dual diagnosis can have an adverse effect on treatment and prognosis of SMI.. To evaluate the effects of risperidone compared to treatment with other antipsychotics (first-generation and other second-generation antipsychotics) used in people with serious mental illness and co-occurring substance misuse.. On 6 January 2016 and 9 October 2017, we searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register of Trials (including trial registers).. We selected randomised trials of risperidone versus any other antipsychotic in people with SMI and substance abuse (dual diagnosis). We included trials meeting our inclusion criteria and reporting useable data. We excluded trials that either did not meet our inclusion criteria or met our inclusion criteria but did not report any useable data.. We independently inspected citations and selected studies. For included studies, we independently extracted data and appraised study quality. For binary outcomes we calculated the risk ratios (RRs) and their 95% confidence intervals. For continuous outcomes we calculated the mean differences (MDs) and their 95% confidence intervals. We pooled data using random-effects meta-analyses and assessed the quality of evidence, creating a 'Summary of findings' table using the GRADE approach.. We identified eight randomised trials containing a total of 1073 participants with SMI and co-occurring substance misuse. Seven of these contributed useable data to the review. There was heterogeneity in trial design and measurement. Risperidone was compared to clozapine, olanzapine, perphenazine, quetiapine and ziprasidone. Few trials compared risperidone with first-generation agents. Few trials examined participants with a dual diagnosis from the outset and most trials only contained separate analyses of subgroups with a dual diagnosis or were secondary data analyses of subgroups of people with a dual diagnosis from existing larger trials.For risperidone versus clozapine we found no clear differences between these two antipsychotics in the reduction of positive psychotic symptoms (1 randomised controlled trial (RCT), n = 36, mean difference (MD) 0.90, 95% CI -2.21 to 4.01, very low quality evidence), or reduction in cannabis use (1 RCT, n = 14, risk ratio (RR) 1.00, 95% CI 0.30 to 3.35, very low quality evidence), improvement in subjective well-being (1 RCT, n = 36, MD -6.00, 95% CI -14.82 to 2.82, very low quality evidence), numbers discontinuing medication (1 RCT, n = 36, RR 4.05, 95% CI 0.21 to 78.76, very low quality evidence), extrapyramidal side-effects (2 RCTs, n = 50, RR 2.71, 95% CI 0.30 to 24.08; I² = 0%, very low quality evidence), or leaving the study early (2 RCTs, n = 45, RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.10 to 2.51; I² = 34%, very low quality evidence). Clozapine was associated with lower levels of craving for cannabis (1 RCT, n = 28, MD 7.00, 95% CI 2.37 to 11.63, very low quality evidence).For risperidone versus olanzapine we found no clear differences in the reduction of positive psychotic symptoms (1 RCT, n = 37, MD -1.50, 95% CI -3.82 to 0.82, very low quality evidence), reduction in cannabis use (1 RCT, n = 41, MD 0.40, 95% CI -4.72 to 5.52, very low quality evidence), craving for cannabis (1 RCT, n = 41, MD 5.00, 95% CI -4.86 to 14.86, very low quality evidence), parkinsonism (1 RCT, n = 16, MD -0.08, 95% CI -1.21 to 1.05, very low quality evidence), or leaving the study early (2 RCT, n = 77, RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.35; I² = 0%, very low quality evidence).For risperidone versus perphenazine, we found no clear differences in the number of participants leaving the study early (1 RCT, n = 281, RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.20, low-quality evidence).For risperidone versus quetiapine, we found no clear differences in the number of participants leaving th. There is not sufficient good-quality evidence available to determine the effects of risperidone compared with other antipsychotics in people with a dual diagnosis. Few trials compared risperidone with first-generation agents, leading to limited applicability to settings where access to second-generation agents is limited, such as in low- and middle-income countries. Moreover, heterogeneity in trial design and measurement of outcomes precluded the use of many trials in our analyses. Future trials in this area need to be sufficiently powered but also need to conform to consistent methods in study population selection, use of measurement scales, definition of outcomes, and measures to counter risk of bias. Investigators should adhere to CONSORT guidelines in the reporting of results.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry); Humans; Mental Disorders; Olanzapine; Patient Dropouts; Perphenazine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Substance-Related Disorders; Thiazoles

To summarize and evaluate the existing literature regarding medications to treat Parkinson's disease (PD) psychosis.. MEDLINE (1946 to March 2017), EMBASE (1980 to March 2017), CINAHL (1982 to March 2017), and PsychInfo (1887 to March 2017) were searched using the following terms: Parkinson disease, Parkinson's disease, psychotic disorders, psychosis, delusions, and hallucinations.. The search was limited to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting human outcomes. Data extracted included the following: study design, population, setting, intervention, control, outcomes related to psychosis and safety, and potential biases assessed using Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Assessment Tool.. After assessment, 16 of 235 studies were included; 11 articles reported comparisons between active drug and placebo, whereas 5 compared clozapine and an active comparator. Placebo-controlled trials demonstrated benefit for clozapine (n = 2) and pimavanserin (n = 2), with no firm benefits observed for quetiapine (n = 4) or olanzapine (n = 3). Comparative studies demonstrated improved efficacy in symptom scores when clozapine or comparator agent (n = 2, quetiapine; n = 1, olanzapine; n = 1, risperidone; and n = 1, ziprasidone) was assessed alone. However, no comparator data suggest that one agent is better than another, and none are yet available for pimavanserin. Overall risk of bias across all studies was moderate to high.. Despite lack of rigor in study designs, published data to date suggest that clozapine and pimavanserin should be considered drugs of choice to treat PD psychosis.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Olanzapine; Parkinson Disease; Piperazines; Piperidines; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Thiazoles; Urea

Insufficient treatment of psychosis often manifests as violent and aggressive behaviors that are dangerous to the patient and others, and that warrant treatment strategies which are not considered first-line, evidence-based practices. Such treatment strategies include both antipsychotic polypharmacy (simultaneous use of 2 antipsychotics) and high-dose antipsychotic monotherapy. Here we discuss the hypothesized neurobiological substrates of various types of violence and aggression, as well as providing arguments for the use of antipsychotic polypharmacy and high-dose monotherapy to target dysfunctional neurocircuitry in the subpopulation of patients that is treatment-resistant, violent, and aggressive. In this review, we focus primarily on the data supporting the use of second-generation, atypical antipsychotics both at high doses and in combination with other antipsychotics.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Brain; Clozapine; Dibenzocycloheptenes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings; Humans; Impulsive Behavior; Isoxazoles; Lurasidone Hydrochloride; Olanzapine; Paliperidone Palmitate; Piperazines; Piperidines; Polypharmacy; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Risperidone; Thiazoles; Violence

In many countries, second-generation ('atypical') antipsychotic drugs have become the first-line drug treatment for people with schizophrenia. It is not clear how the effects of the various second-generation antipsychotic drugs differ.. To evaluate the effects of quetiapine compared with other second-generation (atypical) antipsychotic drugs in the treatment of people with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like psychoses.. We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (May 2010), inspected references of all identified studies, and contacted relevant pharmaceutical companies, drug approval agencies and authors of trials for additional information.. We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing oral quetiapine with other oral forms of atypical antipsychotic medication in people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like psychoses.. We extracted data independently. For dichotomous data, we calculated risk ratios (RRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) on an intention-to-treat basis based on a random-effects model. We calculated number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) where appropriate. For continuous data, we calculated mean differences (MDs), again based on a random-effects model.. Efficacy data tended to favour the control drugs over quetiapine (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score vs olanzapine: 11 RCTs, n = 1486, mean quetiapine endpoint score 3.67 higher, CI 1.95 to 5.39, low quality; vs risperidone: 13 RCTs, n = 2155, mean quetiapine endpoint score 1.74 higher, CI 0.19 to 3.29, moderate quality; vs paliperidone: 1 RCT, n = 319, mean quetiapine endpoint score 6.30 higher, CI 2.77 to 9.83, moderate quality), but the clinical meaning of these data is unclear. No clear mental state differences were noted when quetiapine was compared with clozapine, aripiprazole or ziprasidone. Compared with olanzapine, quetiapine produced slightly fewer movement disorders (7 RCTs, n = 1127, RR use of antiparkinson medication 0.51, CI 0.32 to 0.81, moderate quality) and less weight gain (8 RCTs, n = 1667, RR 0.68, CI 0.51 to 0.92, moderate quality) and glucose elevation, but increased QTc prolongation (3 RCTs, n = 643, MD 4.81, CI 0.34 to 9.28). Compared with risperidone, quetiapine induced slightly fewer movement disorders (8 RCTs, n = 2163, RR use of antiparkinson medication 0.5, CI 0.36 to 0.69, moderate quality), less prolactin increase (7 RCTs, n = 1733, MD -35.25, CI -43.59 to -26.91) and some related adverse effects but greater cholesterol increase (6 RCTs, n = 1473, MD 8.57, CI 4.85 to 12.29). On the basis of limited data, compared with paliperidone, quetiapine induced fewer parkinsonian side effects (1 RCT, n = 319, RR use of antiparkinson medication 0.64, CI 0.45 to 0.91, moderate quality) and less prolactin increase (1 RCT, n = 319, MD -49.30, CI -57.80 to -40.80) and weight gain (1 RCT, n = 319, RR weight gain of 7% or more of total body weight 2.52, CI 0.5 to 12.78, moderate quality). Compared with ziprasidone, quetiapine induced slightly fewer extrapyramidal adverse effects (1 RCT, n = 522, RR use of antiparkinson medication 0.43, CI 0.2 to 0.93, moderate quality) and less prolactin increase. On the other hand, quetiapine was more sedating and led to greater weight gain (2 RCTs, n = 754, RR 2.22, CI 1.35 to 3.63, moderate quality) and cholesterol increase when compared with ziprasidone.. Available evidence from trials suggests that most people who start quetiapine stop taking it within a few weeks (around 60%). Comparisons with amisulpride, sertindole and zotepine do not exist. Although efficacy data favour olanzapine and risperidone compared with quetiapine, the clinical meaning of these data remains unclear. Quetiapine may produce fewer parkinsonian effects than paliperidone, aripiprazole, ziprasidone, risperidone and olanzapine. Quetiapine appears to have a similar weight gain profile to risperidone, as well as clozapine and aripiprazole (although data are very limited for the latter two comparators). Quetiapine may produce greater weight gain than ziprasidone and less weight gain than olanzapine and paliperidone. Most data that have been reported within existing comparisons are of very limited value because of assumptions and biases within them. Much scope is available for further research into the effects of this widely used drug.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Medication Adherence; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles

In many countries of the industrialised world second-generation ("atypical") antipsychotics (SGAs) have become the first line drug treatment for people with schizophrenia. The question as to whether and if so how much the effects of the various SGAs differ is a matter of debate. In this review we examined how the efficacy and tolerability of risperidone differs from that of other SGAs.. To evaluate the effects of risperidone compared with other atypical antipsychotics for people with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like psychosis.. 1. Electronic searching We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (April 2007) which is based on regular searches of BIOSIS, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO.2. Reference searching We inspected the references of all identified studies for more trials.3. Personal contact We contacted the first author of each included study for missing information.4. Drug companies We contacted the manufacturers of all atypical antipsychotics included for additional data.. We included all randomised, blinded trials comparing oral risperidone with oral forms of amisulpride, aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, sertindole, ziprasidone or zotepine in people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like psychosis.. We extracted data independently. For dichotomous data we calculated risk ratio (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) on an intention-to-treat basis based on a random-effects model. We calculated numbers needed to treat/harm (NNT/NNH) where appropriate. For continuous data, we calculated mean differences (MD), again based on a random-effects model.. The review currently includes 45 blinded RCTs with 7760 participants. The number of RCTs available for each comparison varied: four studies compared risperidone with amisulpride, two with aripiprazole, 11 with clozapine, 23 with olanzapine, eleven with quetiapine, two with sertindole, three with ziprasidone and none with zotepine. Attrition from these studies was high (46.9%), leaving the interpretation of results problematic. Furthermore, 60% were industry sponsored, which can be a source of bias.There were few significant differences in overall acceptability of treatment as measured by leaving the studies early. Risperidone was slightly less acceptable than olanzapine, and slightly more acceptable than ziprasidone in this regard.Risperidone improved the general mental state (PANSS total score) slightly less than olanzapine (15 RCTs, n = 2390, MD 1.94 CI 0.58 to 3.31), but slightly more than quetiapine (9 RCTs, n = 1953, MD -3.09 CI -5.16 to -1.01) and ziprasidone (3 RCTs, n = 1016, MD -3.91 CI -7.55 to -0.27). The comparisons with the other SGA drugs were equivocal. Risperidone was also less efficacious than olanzapine and clozapine in terms of leaving the studies early due to inefficacy, but more efficacious than ziprasidone in the same outcome.Risperidone produced somewhat more extrapyramidal side effects than a number of other SGAs (use of antiparkinson medication versus clozapine 6 RCTs, n = 304, RR 2.57 CI 1.47 to 4.48, NNH 6 CI 33 to 3; versus olanzapine 13 RCTs, n = 2599, RR 1.28 CI 1.06 to 1.55, NNH 17 CI 9 to 100; versus quetiapine 6 RCTs, n = 1715, RR 1.98 CI 1.16 to 3.39, NNH 20 CI 10 to 100; versus ziprasidone 2 RCTs, n = 822, RR 1.42 CI 1.03 to 1.96, NNH not estimable; parkinsonism versus sertindole 1 RCT, n = 321, RR 4.11 CI 1.44 to 11.73, NNH 14 CI 100 to 8). Risperidone also increased prolactin levels clearly more than all comparators, except for amisulpride and sertindole for which no data were available.Other adverse events were less consistently reported, but risperidone may well produce more weight gain and/or associated metabolic problems than amisulpride (weight gain: 3 RCTs, n = 585, MD 0.99 CI 0.37 to 1.61), aripiprazole (cholesterol increase: 1 RCT, n = 83, MD 22.30 CI 4.91 to 39.69) and ziprasidone (cholesterol increase 2 RCTs, n = 767, MD 8.58 CI 1.11 to 16.04) but less than clozapine (weight gain 3 RCTs n = 373, MD -3.30 CI -5.65 to -0.95), olanzapine (weight gain 13 RCTs, n = 2116, MD -2.61 CI -3.74 to -1.48), quetiapine (ch. Risperidone seems to produce somewhat more extrapyramidal side effects and clearly more prolactin increase than most other SGAs. It may also differ from other compounds in efficacy and in the occurrence of other adverse effects such as weight gain, metabolic problems, cardiac effects, sedation and seizures. Nevertheless, the large proportion of participants leaving studies early and incomplete reporting of outcomes makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions. Further large trials, especially comparing risperidone with those other new drugs for which only a few RCTs are available, are needed.

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sulpiride; Thiazoles

In many countries of the industrialised world second generation ('atypical') antipsychotic drugs have become the first line drug treatment for people with schizophrenia. It is not clear how the effects of the various second generation antipsychotic drugs differ.. To evaluate the effects of quetiapine compared with other second generation antipsychotic drugs for people with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like psychosis.. We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (April 2007), inspected references of all identified studies, and contacted relevant pharmaceutical companies, drug approval agencies and authors of trials for additional information.. We included all randomised control trials comparing oral quetiapine with oral forms of amisulpride, aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, sertindole, ziprasidone or zotepine in people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like psychosis.. We extracted data independently. For dichotomous data we calculated relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) on an intention-to-treat basis based on a random-effects model. We calculated numbers needed to treat/harm (NNT/NNH) where appropriate. For continuous data, we calculated weighted mean differences (WMD) again based on a random-effects model.. The review currently includes 21 randomised control trials (RCTs) with 4101 participants. These trials provided data on four comparisons - quetiapine versus clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone or ziprasidone.A major limitation to all findings is the high number of participants leaving studies prematurely (57.6%) and the substantial risk of biases in studies. Efficacy data favoured olanzapine and risperidone compared with quetiapine (PANSS total score versus olanzapine:10 RCTs, n=1449, WMD 3.66 CI 1.93 to 5.39; versus risperidone: 9 RCTs, n=1953, WMD 3.09 CI 1.01 to 5.16), but clinical meaning is unclear. There were no clear mental state differences when quetiapine was compared with clozapine or ziprasidone.Compared with olanzapine, quetiapine produced slightly fewer movement disorders (6 RCTs, n=1090, RR use of antiparkinson medication 0.49 CI 0.3 to 0.79, NNH 25 CI 14 to 100) and less weight gain (7 RCTs, n=1173, WMD -2.81 CI -4.38 to -1.24) and glucose elevation, but more QTc prolongation (3 RCTs, n=643, WMD 4.81 CI 0.34 to 9.28). Compared with risperidone, quetiapine induced slightly fewer movement disorders (6 RCTs, n=1715, RR use of antiparkinson medication 0.5 CI 0.3 to 0.86, NNH 20 CI 10 to 100), less prolactin increase (6 RCTs, n=1731, WMD -35.28 CI -44.36 to -26.19) and some related adverse effects, but more cholesterol increase (5 RCTs, n=1433, WMD 8.61 CI 4.66 to 12.56). Compared with ziprasidone, quetiapine induced slightly fewer extrapyramidal adverse effects (1 RCT, n=522, RR use of antiparkinson medication 0.43 CI 0.2 to 0.93, NNH not estimable) and prolactin increase. On the other hand quetiapine was more sedating and led to more weight gain (2 RCTs, n=754, RR 2.22 CI 1.35 to 3.63, NNH 13 CI 8 to 33) and cholesterol increase than ziprasidone.. Best available evidence from trials suggests that most people who start quetiapine stop taking it within a few weeks. Comparisons with amisulpride, aripiprazole, sertindole and zotepine do not exist. Most data that has been reported within existing comparisons are of very limited value because of assumptions and biases within them. There is much scope for further research into the effects of this widely used drug.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Medication Adherence; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles

In many countries of the industrialised world second generation ("atypical") antipsychotics have become the first line drug treatment for people with schizophrenia. The question as to whether, and if so how much, the effects of the various second generation antipsychotics differ is a matter of debate. In this review we examined how the efficacy and tolerability of olanzapine differs from that of other second generation antipsychotics.. To evaluate the effects of olanzapine compared to other atypical antipsychotics for people with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like psychosis.. 1. Electronic searching We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (April 2007) which is based on regular searches of BIOSIS, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO.2. Reference searching We inspected the reference of all identified studies for more trials.3. Personal contact We contacted the first author of each included study for missing information.4. Drug companies We contacted the manufacturers of all atypical antipsychotics included for additional data.. We included all randomised trials that used at least single-blind (rater-blind) design, comparing oral olanzapine with oral forms of amisulpride, aripiprazole, clozapine, quetiapine, risperidone, sertindole, ziprasidone or zotepine in people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like psychosis.. We extracted data independently. For dichotomous data we calculated relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) on an intention-to-treat basis based on a random effects model. We calculated numbers needed to treat/harm (NNT/NNH) where appropriate. For continuous data, we calculated weighted mean differences (WMD) again based on a random effects model.. The review currently includes 50 studies and 9476 participants which provided data for six comparisons (olanzapine compared to amisulpride, aripiprazole, clozapine, quetiapine, risperidone or ziprasidone). The overall attrition from the included studies was considerable (49.2%) leaving the interpretation of results problematic.Olanzapine improved the general mental state (PANSS total score) more than aripiprazole (2 RCTs, n=794, WMD -4.96 CI -8.06 to -1.85), quetiapine (10 RCTs, n=1449, WMD -3.66 CI -5.39 to -1.93), risperidone (15 RCTs, n=2390, WMD -1.94 CI -3.31 to -0.58) and ziprasidone (4 RCTs, n=1291, WMD -8.32 CI -10.99 to -5.64), but not more than amisulpride or clozapine. This somewhat better efficacy was confirmed by fewer participants in the olanzapine groups leaving the studies early due to inefficacy of treatment compared to quetiapine (8 RCTs, n=1563, RR 0.56 CI 0.44 to 0.70, NNT 11 CI 6 to 50), risperidone (14 RCTs, n=2744, RR 0.78 CI 0.62 to 0.98, NNT 50 CI 17 to 100) and ziprasidone (5 RCTs, n=1937, RR 0.64 CI 0.51 to 0.79, NNT 17, CI 11 to 33).Fewer participants in the olanzapine group than in the quetiapine (2 RCTs, n=876, RR 0.56 CI 0.41 to 0.77, NNT 11 CI 7 to 25) and ziprasidone (2 RCTs, n=766, RR 0.65 CI 0.45 to 0.93, NNT 17 CI 9 to 100) treatment groups, but not in the clozapine group (1 RCT, n=980, RR 1.28 CI 1.02 to 1.61, NNH not estimable), had to be re-hospitalised in the trials.Except for clozapine, all comparators induced less weight gain than olanzapine (olanzapine compared to amisulpride: 3 RCTs, n=671, WMD 2.11kg CI 1.29kg to 2.94kg; aripiprazole: 1 RCT, n=90, WMD 5.60kg CI 2.15kg to 9.05kg; quetiapine: 7 RCTs, n=1173, WMD 2.68kg CI 1.10kg to 4.26kg; risperidone: 13 RCTs, n=2116, WMD 2.61kg CI 1.48kg to 3.74kg; ziprasidone: 5 RCTs, n=1659, WMD 3.82kg CI 2.96kg to 4.69kg). Associated problems such as glucose and cholesterol increase were usually also more frequent in the olanzapine group.Other differences in adverse effects were less well documented. Nevertheless, olanzapine may be associated with slightly more extrapyramidal side effects than quetiapine (use of antiparkinson medication (6 RCTs, n=1090, RR 2.05 CI 1.26 to 3.32, NNH 25 CI 14 to 100), but less than risperidone (use of antiparkinson medication 13 RCTs, n=2599, RR 0.78 CI 0.65 to 0.95, NNH 17 CI 9 to 100) and ziprasidone (use of antiparkinson medication 4 RCTs, n=1732, RR 0.70 CI 0.50 to 0.97, NNH not estimable). It may also increase prolactin somewhat more than. Olanzapine may be a somewhat more efficacious drug than some other second generation antipsychotic drugs. This small superiority in efficacy needs to be weighed against a larger weight gain and associated metabolic problems than most other second generation antipsychotic drugs, except clozapine. These conclusions are tentative due to the large number of people leaving the studies early which possibly limits the validity of the findings. Further large, well-designed trials are necessary to establish the relative effects of different second generation antipsychotic drugs.

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sulpiride; Thiazoles

Women who are pregnant and who have a history of psychosis are commonly managed with antipsychotic medications. The evidence regarding the use of antipsychotics in pregnancy has been insufficient to provide adequate support for this practice and is a concern for clinicians and women alike. This review presents literature surrounding the use of antipsychotic medications in pregnancy, providing an overview of the historical and contemporary perspectives which influence clinicians prescribing practices. Data were sourced from Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFo, using the terms antipsychotics with pregnancy and psychosis or schizophrenia. This was expanded to include the most common atypical antipsychotics: olanzapine, risperidone, clozapine, quetiapine, ziprasidone and aripiprazole. Literature was found reporting the use of antipsychotic medications in pregnancy since the introduction of antipsychotics in the 1950s, comprising mainly of authors' reviews of the literature, case studies, retrospective reports, drug company registries and more recently a prospective comparative study. This review identifies that the literature provides no clear answer for clinicians as to the risk associated with the use of antipsychotics in pregnancy. To this effect, recently in Australia, the National Register of Antipsychotic Medications in Pregnancy was established to prospectively collect information regarding outcomes for mother and baby, when antipsychotic medications have been used during pregnancy.

Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Diabetes, Gestational; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risperidone; Thiazoles

The metabolic side effects of second-generation antipsychotics (SGA) are serious and have not been compared head to head in a meta-analysis. We conducted a meta-analysis of studies comparing the metabolic side effects of the following SGAs head-to-head: amisulpride, aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, sertindole, ziprasidone, zotepine.. We searched the register of the Cochrane schizophrenia group (last search May 2007), supplemented by MEDLINE and EMBASE (last search January 2009) for randomized, blinded studies comparing the above mentioned SGA in the treatment of schizophrenia or related disorders. At least three reviewers extracted the data independently. The primary outcome was weight change. We also assessed changes of cholesterol and glucose. The results were combined in a meta-analysis.. We included 48 studies with 105 relevant arms. Olanzapine produced more weight gain than all other second-generation antipsychotics except for clozapine where no difference was found. Clozapine produced more weight gain than risperidone, risperidone more than amisulpride, and sertindole more than risperidone. Olanzapine produced more cholesterol increase than aripiprazole, risperidone and ziprasidone. (No differences with amisulpride, clozapine and quetiapine were found). Quetiapine produced more cholesterol increase than risperidone and ziprasidone. Olanzapine produced more increase in glucose than amisulpride, aripiprazole, quetiapine, risperidone and ziprasidone; no difference was found with clozapine.. Some SGAs lead to substantially more metabolic side effects than other SGAs. When choosing an SGA for an individual patient these side effects with their potential cause of secondary diseases must be weighed against efficacy and characteristics of the individual patient.

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Cholesterol; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sulpiride; Thiazoles; Weight Gain

Clozapine is an atypical antipsychotic demonstrated to be superior in the treatment of refractory schizophrenia which causes fewer movement disorders. Clozapine, however, entails a significant risk of serious blood disorders such as agranulocytosis which could be potentially fatal. Currently there are a number of newer antipsychotics which have been developed with the purpose to find both a better tolerability profile and a superior effectiveness.. To compare the clinical effects of clozapine with other atypical antipsychotics (such as amisulpride, aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, sertindole, ziprasidone and zotepine) in the treatment of schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like psychoses.. We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Groups Register (June 2007) and reference lists of all included randomised controlled trials. We also manually searched appropriate journals and conference proceedings relating to clozapine combination strategies and contacted relevant pharmaceutical companies.. All relevant randomised, at least single-blind trials, comparing clozapine with other atypical antipsychotics, any dose and oral formulations, for people with schizophrenia or related disorders.. We selected trials and extracted data independently. For dichotomous data we calculated relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) based on a random-effects model. We calculated numbers needed to treat/harm (NNT/NNH) where appropriate. For continuous data, we calculated mean differences (MD) again based on a random-effects model.. The review currently includes 27 blinded randomised controlled trials, which involved 3099 participants. Twelve randomised control trials compared clozapine with olanzapine, five with quetiapine, nine with risperidone, one with ziprasidone and two with zotepine. Attrition from these studies was high (overall 30.1%), leaving the interpretation of results problematic. Clozapine had a higher attrition rate due to adverse effects than olanzapine (9 RCTs, n=1674, RR 1.60 CI 1.07 to 2.40, NNT 25 CI 15 to 73) and risperidone (6 RCTs, n=627, RR 1.88 CI 1.11 to 3.21, NNT 16 CI 9 to 59). Fewer participants in the clozapine groups left the trials early due to inefficacy than risperidone (6 RCTs, n=627, RR 0.40 CI 0.23 to 0.70, NNT 11 CI 7 to 21), suggesting a certain higher efficacy of clozapine.Clozapine was more efficacious than zotepine in improving the participants general mental state (BPRS total score: 1 RCT, n=59, MD -6.00 CI -9.83 to -2.17), but not consistently more than olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone and ziprasidone. There was no significant difference between clozapine and olanzapine or risperidone in terms of positive or negative symptoms of schizophrenia. According to two studies from China quetiapine was more efficacious for negative symptoms than clozapine (2 RCTs, n=142, MD 2.23 CI 0.99 to 3.48).Clozapine produced somewhat fewer extrapyramidal side-effects than risperidone (use of antiparkinson medication: 6 RCTs, n=304, RR 0.39 CI 0.22 to 0.68, NNT 7 CI 5 to 18) and zotepine (n=59, RR 0.05 CI 0.00 to 0.86, NNT 3 CI 2 to 5). More participants in the clozapine group showed decreased white blood cells than those taking olanzapine, more hypersalivation and sedation than those on olanzapine, risperidone and quetiapine and more seizures than people on olanzapine and risperidone. Also clozapine produced an important weight gain not seen with risperidone.Other differences in adverse effects were less documented and should be replicated, for example, clozapine did not alter prolactin levels whereas olanzapine, risperidone and zotepine did; compared with quetiapine, clozapine produced a higher incidence of electrocardiogram (ECG) alterations; and compared with quetiapine and risperidone clozapine produced a higher increase of triglyceride levels. Other findings that should be replicated were: clozapine improved social functioning less than risperidone and fewer participants in the clozapine group had to be hospitalised to avoid suicide attempts compared. Clozapine may be a little more efficacious than zotepine and risperidone but further trials are required to confirm this finding. Clozapine differs more clearly in adverse effects from other second generation antipsychotics and the side-effect profile could be key in the selection of treatment depending on the clinical situation and a patient's preferences. Data on other important outcomes such as cognitive functioning, quality of life, death or service use are currently largely missing, making further large and well-designed trials necessary. It is also important to take into account that the large number of people leaving the studies early limits the validity and interpretation of our findings.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Dibenzothiepins; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles

The prevalence of Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is becoming a serious public health problem. The use of atypical antipsychotics has been associated with disruption of the glucose metabolism and therefore with causing DM. The underlying mechanisms are unknown, but knowledge of the differences between the pharmacological features of various antipsychotics combined with their diabetogenic profile might help us to understand those mechanisms. This article describes how the binding of various essential receptors or transporters in essential body tissues, adipose tissue, pancreatic tissue and liver and skeletal muscle tissue can cause disruption of the glucose metabolism. With such knowledge in mind one can try to explain the differences between the diabetogenic propensities of various antipsychotics. It is well known that clozapine and olanzapine cause weight gain and DM, whereas aripiprazole and ziprasidone have much less disruptive clinical profiles. The most significant risk factor for adiposity seems to be strong blocking of histaminergic receptors. An agonistic activity on serotonergic-1a receptors, with a very low affinity for muscarinergic-3 receptors, might protect against the development of DM. More data will become available which may help to solve the puzzle.

Topics: Adiponectin; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Clozapine; Diabetes Mellitus; Humans; Leptin; Obesity; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quinolones; Receptor, Muscarinic M3; Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT1A; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Receptors, Histamine; Serotonin 5-HT1 Receptor Agonists; Thiazoles; Weight Gain

Akathisa is one of the most common and distressing neuroleptic-induced extrapyramidal side effects. Although it is well recognized in the context of conventional antipsychotic medications, there have been recent concerns raised by clinicians and researchers that this syndrome is overlooked in relation to second-generation or atypical antipsychotics. This review examines the recent literature relevant to second-generation antipsychotic (SGA)-induced akathisia.. Recent studies using large databases clearly indicate that extrapyramidal side effects, in particular akathisia, do occur with the SGAs, although the frequency is not as high as with the conventional antipsychotics. Risk factors include use of high doses, high potency SGAs, or combinations of SGAs with other psychotropic drugs, bipolar depression, palliative care settings, and comorbid substance abuse in psychosis. The dopamine hypothesis remains plausible for understanding the pathophysiology of akathisia. There is emerging evidence that mirtazapine may be useful in the treatment of acute akathisia.. Even though akathisia is less prevalent with SGAs than with the first-generation drugs, it remains clinically important and all clinicians should be conversant with its recognition and management.

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Isoxazoles; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Piperidines; Prevalence; Psychomotor Agitation; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risk Factors; Risperidone; Sulpiride; Thiazoles

Although clozapine has been shown to be the treatment of choice in people with schizophrenia that are resistant to treatment, one third to two thirds of people still have persistent positive symptoms despite clozapine monotherapy of adequate dosage and duration. The need to provide effective therapeutic interventions to patients who do not have an optimal response to clozapine is the most common reason for simultaneously prescribing a second antipsychotic drug in combination with clozapine.. To determine the efficacy and tolerability of various clozapine combination strategies with antipsychotics in people with treatment resistant schizophrenia.. We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (March 2008) and MEDLINE (up to November 2008). We checked reference lists of all identified randomised controlled trials and requested pharmaceutical companies marketing investigational products to provide relevant published and unpublished data.. We included only randomised controlled trials recruiting people of both sexes, aged 18 years or more, with a diagnosis of treatment-resistant schizophrenia (or related disorders) and comparing clozapine plus another antipsychotic drug with clozapine plus a different antipsychotic drug.. Two review authors independently extracted data and resolved disagreement by discussion with third member of the team. When insufficient data were provided, we contacted the study authors.. Three small (range of number of participants 28 to 60) randomised controlled trials were included in the review. Even though results from individual studies did not find that one combination strategy is better than the others, the methodological quality of included studies was too low to allow authors to use the collected data to answer the research question correctly.. In this review we considered the risk of bias too high because of the poor quality of the retrieved information (small sample size, heterogeneity of comparisons, flaws in the design, conduct and analysis). Although clinical guidelines recommend a second antipsychotic in addition to clozapine in partially responsive patients with schizophrenia, the present systematic review was not able to show if any particular combination strategy was superior to the others. New, properly conducted, randomised controlled trials independent from the pharmaceutical industry need to recruit many more patients to give a reliable estimate of effect or of no effect of antipsychotics as combination treatment with clozapine in patients who do not have an optimal response to clozapine monotherapy.

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sulpiride; Thiazoles

In many countries of the industrialised world second generation ('atypical') antipsychotics have become the first line drug treatment for people with schizophrenia. The question as to whether, and if so how much, the effects of the various new generation antipsychotics differ is a matter of debate. In this review we examined how the efficacy and tolerability of ziprasidone differs from that of other second generation antipsychotics.. To evaluate the effects of ziprasidone compared with other atypical antipsychotics for people with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like psychoses.. We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Specialised Register (April 2007) and references of all identified studies for further trial citations. We contacted pharmaceutical companies and authors of trials for additional information.. We included all randomised, at least single-blind, controlled trials comparing oral ziprasidone with oral forms of amisulpride, aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone or zotepine in people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like psychoses.. We extracted data independently. For continuous data, we calculated weighted mean differences (MD) for dichotomous data we calculated relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) on an intention-to-treat basis based on a random-effects model. We calculated numbers needed to treat/harm (NNT/NNH) where appropriate.. The review currently includes nine randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with 3361 participants. The overall rate of premature study discontinuation was very high (59.1%). Data for the comparisons of ziprasidone with amisulpride, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine and risperidone were available. Ziprasidone was a less acceptable treatment than olanzapine (leaving the studies early for any reason: 5 RCTs, n=1937, RR 1.26 CI 1.18 to 1.35, NNH 7 CI 5 to 10) and risperidone (3 RCTs, n=1029, RR 1.11 CI 1.02 to 1.20, NNH 14 CI 8 to 50), but not than the other second generation antipsychotic drugs. Ziprasidone was less efficacious than amisulpride (leaving the study early due to inefficacy: 1 RCT, n=123, RR 4.72 CI 1.06 to 20.98, NNH 8 CI 5 to 50) olanzapine (PANSS total score: 4 RCTs, n=1291, MD 8.32 CI 5.64 to 10.99) and risperidone (PANSS total score: 3 RCTs, n=1016, MD 3.91 CI 0.27 to 7.55). Based on limited data there were no significant differences in tolerability between ziprasidone and amisulpride or clozapine. Ziprasidone produced less weight gain than olanzapine (5 RCTs, n=1659, MD -3.82 CI -4.69 to -2.96), quetiapine (2 RCTs, n=754, RR 0.45 CI 0.28 to 0.74) or risperidone (3 RCTs, n=1063, RR 0.49 CI 0.33 to 0.74). It was associated with less cholesterol increase than olanzapine, quetiapine and risperidone. Conversely ziprasidone produced slightly more extrapyramidal side-effects than olanzapine (4 RCTs, n=1732, RR 1.43 CI 1.03 to 1.99, NNH not estimable) and more prolactin increase than quetiapine (2 RCTs, n=754, MD 4.77 CI 1.37 to 8.16), but less movement disorders (2 RCTs, n=822, RR 0.70 CI 0.51 to 0.97, NNT not estimable) and less prolactin increase (2 RCTs, n=767, MD -21.97 CI -27.34 to -16.60) than risperidone.. Ziprasidone may be a slightly less efficacious antipsychotic drug than amisulpride, olanzapine and risperidone. Its main advantage is the low propensity to induce weight gain and associated adverse effects. However, the high overall rate of participants leaving the studies early limits the validity of any findings.

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sulpiride; Thiazoles

Atypical antipsychotics are emerging as the first-line pharmacologic treatment for irritability (i.e., aggression, self-injurious behavior, and severe tantrums) in children and adolescents with autistic and other pervasive developmental disorders. Results from placebo-controlled and open-label studies of clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, ziprasidone, and aripiprazole in this subject population are reviewed. Additional placebo-controlled trials and studies of longer-term safety and tolerability are needed.

Topics: Adolescent; Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Autistic Disorder; Benzodiazepines; Child; Child Development Disorders, Pervasive; Child, Preschool; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Humans; Obesity; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risperidone; Thiazoles

Early-onset psychotic illnesses in children and adolescents are not as rare as is commonly believed. These disorders, which include schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder with psychotic features, and major depression with psychotic features, often have a chronic and severe course and poor long-term outcome. Many patients with early-onset schizophrenia have greater functional impairments than most patients with adult-onset schizophrenia. Magnetic resonance imaging studies show that patients with early-onset schizophrenia experience substantial gray matter loss during adolescence, which is not observed in studies of patients with adult-onset schizophrenia. The chronic course, severe functional impairments, and poor prognosis of early-onset psychosis create a great need to identify effective and safe treatments for youth with psychosis. Although atypical anti-psychotics have been considered superior to traditional antipsychotics, there has been little controlled information to inform clinical decisions until recently. Over the past 5 years, several studies have been initiated to address these questions. The results of the studies completed to date are reviewed.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age of Onset; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Brain Diseases; Child; Chronic Disease; Clozapine; Comorbidity; Disease Progression; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Prognosis; Psychotic Disorders; Quinolones; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Treatment Failure

To retrospectively examine published cases of neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) in patients aged 18 and below who had been treated with atypical antipsychotics (clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, ziprasidone, and aripiprazole).. Information was collected via MEDLINE searches in February 2006 and May 2007. The term neuroleptic malignant syndrome was used and cross-referenced with individual atypical antipsychotics. The authors also contacted (by telephone and in writing) pharmaceutical companies that produce and market atypical antipsychotics for any data on NMS.. Twenty case reports (written in English only and published from 1991-2007) were identified and reviewed. These publications all described symptoms of NMS in patients aged 18 or younger who had been treated with atypical antipsychotics.. Data were reviewed and compared with 3 diagnostic criteria (DSM-IV-TR, Levenson's, and Caroff and Mann's) for NMS. Interventions and outcomes were also reviewed.. Twenty case reports were identified and presented with a descriptive approach. Sixteen cases met criteria for NMS, with at least 1 of the diagnostic sets utilized. The majority of cases involved male subjects. All patients recovered.. Young patients can develop NMS during treatment with atypical antipsychotics. Symptoms of this disorder are consistent with those described in adults. Although NMS is rare in this population, clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion. Appropriate caution in treating children and adolescents with any antipsychotic is warranted.

Topics: Adolescent; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Child; Child, Preschool; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Retrospective Studies; Risperidone; Thiazoles

Studies have found that a large percentage of depressed patients may have limited response and remission rates when treated with traditional antidepressants. Options for augmenting antidepressant treatment include buspirone, lithium, and triiodothyronine. There are also increasing data concerning the use of atypical antipsychotics as augmenting agents in the treatment of unipolar, nonpsychotic, treatment-resistant depression. Aripiprazole has recently received an indication from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for adjunctive treatment in unipolar, nonpsychotic depression, the first indication of its kind, after two double-blind trials; doses were slightly lower than those recommended for monotherapy in schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. Olanzapine and risperidone have several controlled clinical trials indicating the efficacy of both of these agents, generally at low doses. One trial of quetiapine suggested that it may not be effective in the treatment of unipolar, nonpsychotic depression. One open-label trial of ziprasidone indicated some efficacy. According to these results, aripiprazole, olanzapine, and risperidone are reasonable choices as augmentation agents, with only aripiprazole currently having an FDA indication for this use. Given the preliminary results, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials with quetiapine and ziprasidone are needed, as well as studies comparing atypical antipsychotic agents with traditional augmentation agents in the treatment of depression.

Topics: Antidepressive Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Depressive Disorder, Major; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Thiazoles

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Diabetes Mellitus; Dibenzothiazepines; Dyslipidemias; Glucose Metabolism Disorders; Humans; Insulin Resistance; Mental Disorders; Obesity; Olanzapine; Phenothiazines; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles

Second generation antipsychotic agents are increasingly used in the management of acute mania. A systematic review of the efficacy and safety of these agents, as both monotherapy and in combination with mood stabilisers, was performed to establish the evidence for their use. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were critically appraised in more detail than studies that presented lower levels of evidence such as case reports, case series and open label follow up studies. We found 11 RCTs reporting on patients treated with second generation antipsychotics for acute bipolar mania, of which three included randomisation between the second generation antipsychotic and placebo, and eight between a mood stabiliser combined with either the second generation antipsychotic or placebo. Data from non-randomised trials is also presented.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

Thirty years ago, psychiatrists had only a few choices of old neuroleptics available to them, currently defined as conventional or typical antipsychotics, as a result schizophrenics had to suffer the severe extra pyramidal side effects. Nowadays, new treatments are more ambitious, aiming not only to improve psychotic symptoms, but also quality of life and social reinsertion. Our objective is to briefly but critically review the advances in the treatment of schizophrenia with antipsychotics in the past 30 years. We conclude that conventional antipsychotics still have a place when just the cost of treatment, a key factor in poor regions, is considered. The atypical antipsychotic drugs are a class of agents that have become the most widely used to treat a variety of psychoses because of their superiority with regard to extra pyramidal symptoms. We can envisage different therapeutic strategies in the future, each uniquely targeting a different dimension of schizophrenia, be it positive, negative, cognitive or affective symptoms.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Receptors, Dopamine; Receptors, Serotonin; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles

Atypical antipsychotic medications (second-generation antipsychotics) have been increasingly used in the treatment of a number of psychotic disorders since their introduction in 1988, with the newest medication introduced in 2002. Justification for their use includes claims of equal or improved antipsychotic activity over first-generation antipsychotics, increased tolerability, and decreased side effects. However, there are still significant adverse effects and toxicities with this class of medications. Toxicologic exposures and fatalities associated with atypical antipsychotics continue to increase in the United States, with 32,422 exposures and 72 deaths in 2003. There have also been Food and Drug Administration warnings in the past year about how some atypical antipsychotics have been marketed to minimize the potentially fatal risks and claiming superior safety to other atypical antipsychotics without adequate substantiation, indicating the toxicologic potential of these agents may be underestimated.. Continued research to evaluate adverse effects and tolerability of atypical antipsychotics compared with first-generation antipsychotics and each other is reviewed. This article also reviews the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and drug interactions with these medications. New therapeutic monitoring recommendations for this class of medications have also been proposed. Finally, clinical toxicity in overdose and management are reviewed.. While new atypical antipsychotic medications may have a safer therapeutic and overdose profile than first-generation antipsychotic medications, many adverse and toxic effects still need to be considered in therapeutic monitoring and overdose management.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Cardiomyopathies; Child; Clozapine; Diabetes Mellitus; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Interactions; Drug Overdose; Dry Eye Syndromes; Humans; Hyperlipidemias; Hypotension; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risperidone; Seizures; Thiazoles

To assess the potential role of atypical antipsychotics as mood stabilizers.. A MedLine, PsychLIT, PubMed, and EMBASE literature search of papers published up to December 2004 was conducted using the names of atypical antipsychotics and a number of key terms relevant to bipolar disorder. Additional articles were retrieved by scrutinizing the bibliographies of review papers and literature known to the authors. Data pertinent to the objective was reviewed according to the various phases of bipolar disorder.. The data is most substantive for the use of atypical antipsychotics in mania, to the extent that an argument for a class effect of significant efficacy can be made. This does not extend to bipolar depression, however, good data is now emerging for some agents and will need to be considered for each individual agent as it accumulates. As regards mixed states and rapid cycling the evidence is thus far sparse and too few maintenance studies have been conducted to make any firm assertions. However, with respect to long-term therapy the atypical antipsychotics do have clinically significant side-effects of which clinicians need to be aware.. Based on the evidence thus far it is perhaps premature to describe the atypical antipsychotics as mood stabilizers. Individual agents may eventually be able to claim this label, however, much further research is needed especially with respect to maintenance and relapse prevention.

Topics: Affect; Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Secondary Prevention; Sulpiride; Thiazoles

Tardive dyskinesia (TD), the principal adverse effect of long-term conventional antipsychotic treatment, can be debilitating and, in many cases, persistent. We sought to explore the incidence and management of TD in the era of atypical antipsychotics because it remains an important iatrogenic adverse effect.. We conducted a review of TD incidence and management literature from January 1, 1965, to January 31, 2004, using the terms tardive dyskinesia, management, therapy, neuroleptics, antipsychotics, clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, ziprasidone, and aripiprazole. Additional articles were obtained by searching the bibliographies of relevant references. We considered articles that contributed to the current understanding of both the incidence of TD with atypical antipsychotics and management strategies for TD.. The incidence of TD is significantly lower with atypical, compared with typical, antipsychotics, but cases of de novo TD have been identified. Evidence suggests that atypical antipsychotic therapy ameliorates long-standing TD. This paper outlines management strategies for TD in patients with schizophrenia.. The literature supports the recommendation that atypical antipsychotics should be the first antipsychotics used in patients who have experienced TD as a result of treatment with conventional antipsychotic agents. The other management strategies discussed may prove useful in certain patients.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Humans; Incidence; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles

The authors presents the state of knowledge on the prevalence and proposed mechanisms leading to weight gain during treatment with atypical antipsychotics. A short review on the therapeutic approaches is also supplied.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Body Weight; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Hyperlipidemias; Leptin; Piperazines; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Thiazoles; Weight Gain

The development of new "atypical" antipsychotic agents, which are safer than classical neuroleptics and also active against the negative symptoms and neurocognitive deficits caused by the illness, has produced a significant advancement in the treatment of schizophrenia. The atypical (or "second generation") antipsychotics have several therapeutical properties in common, however they can significantly differ with regard to clinical potency and side effects. The main features regarding pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and pharmacological interactions of the most important atypical antipsychotics, namely clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine and risperidone, are treated herein. Several analytical methods available for the therapeutic drug monitoring of these drugs are also presented, as well as the novel formulations, which can notably improve the therapy of schizophrenia. Other very recent atypical agents, such as ziprasidone, aripiprazole, iloperidone, sertindole and zotepine will also be briefly described.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clozapine; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Interactions; Drug Monitoring; Humans; Molecular Structure; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles

Undoubtedly, the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia has changed dramatically over the last 10 years. Large, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials have ushered the availability of each new antipsychotic. However, there has been an information lag because of the relative paucity of long term, comparative studies among second-generation antipsychotics. While we await such evidence, naturalistic studies have helped to provide useful information on the pattern of use, patient response, and tolerability of these new agents in clinical practice. This review provides an account of representative studies for each second generation antipsychotic, which illustrate the contributions of naturalistic studies to our understanding of the evolving pharmacotherapy of schizophrenia.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Olanzapine; Patient Compliance; Piperazines; Polypharmacy; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Research Design; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

Second generation antipsychotics have become the standard of modern pharmacotherapy of schizophrenia. Amisulprid, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, sertindol, ziprasidone are the second generation antipsychotics registered in Hungary. They are more efficacious and their side effects are less stigmatizing than those of the first generation of antipsychotic drugs. Their use is limited by the availability of different formulations, by the lack of experience of some physicians, however the main limitation is the economic barrier.

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Serotonin Antagonists; Sulpiride; Thiazoles

Atypical antipsychotics offer superior safety and similar efficacy compared with conventional agents in adults with psychotic disorders. Consequently, atypical antipsychotics have been increasingly used in children and adolescents. Because most information now available on pediatric use comes from case reports and small open-label studies rather than large controlled trials, treatment in pediatric patients is often guided by experience with adults or based on limited evidence in youths. Although the literature contains reports on the use of each agent in this class in children, risperidone has been the focus of the greatest number of reports. However, the atypical antipsychotics are not interchangeable; each has a unique pharmacologic profile and may differ considerably in terms of adverse effects. Evidence on the use of atypical antipsychotics in children and adolescents is summarized in this review.

Topics: Adolescent; Age Factors; Antipsychotic Agents; Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Child; Child Development Disorders, Pervasive; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Mental Disorders; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Tic Disorders

The Texas Medication Algorithm Project (TMAP) has been a public-academic collaboration in which guidelines for medication treatment of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder were used in selected public outpatient clinics in Texas. Subsequently, these algorithms were implemented throughout Texas and are being used in other states. Guidelines require updating when significant new evidence emerges; the antipsychotic algorithm for schizophrenia was last updated in 1999. This article reports the recommendations developed in 2002 and 2003 by a group of experts, clinicians, and administrators.. A conference in January 2002 began the update process. Before the conference, experts in the pharmacologic treatment of schizophrenia, clinicians, and administrators reviewed literature topics and prepared presentations. Topics included ziprasidone's inclusion in the algorithm, the number of antipsychotics tried before clozapine, and the role of first generation antipsychotics. Data were rated according to Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality criteria. After discussing the presentations, conference attendees arrived at consensus recommendations. Consideration of aripiprazole's inclusion was subsequently handled by electronic communications.. The antipsychotic algorithm for schizophrenia was updated to include ziprasidone and aripiprazole among the first-line agents. Relative to the prior algorithm, the number of stages before clozapine was reduced. First generation antipsychotics were included but not as first-line choices. For patients refusing or not responding to clozapine and clozapine augmentation, preference was given to trying monotherapy with another antipsychotic before resorting to antipsychotic combinations.. Consensus on algorithm revisions was achieved, but only further well-controlled research will answer many key questions about sequence and type of medication treatments of schizophrenia.

Topics: Algorithms; Ambulatory Care; Ambulatory Care Facilities; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Clozapine; Decision Trees; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Piperazines; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Quinolones; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Texas; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

Weight overload and obesity became these last years a major health problem. However gain weight is a frequent side effect of a large number of psychotropics. This article proposes to discuss this potential while reviewing various molecules. This reveals that the atypical antipsychotics are most likely to induce weight gain, in particular clozapine and olanzapine. The tricyclic antidepressants and mirtazapine come next, with the majority of the mood stabilizers. The old antipsychotics seem to involve less gain of weight. The SSRI make lose weight in the first weeks of treatment, but induce a moderate weight gain on the long term.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amisulpride; Antidepressive Agents; Antimanic Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Child; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fructose; Haloperidol; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Male; Obesity; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Placebos; Psychotropic Drugs; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Socioeconomic Factors; Sulpiride; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Topiramate; Valproic Acid; Weight Gain

Five new antipsychotic drugs introduced in the United States in the last decade offer physicians the ability to treat patients with schizophrenia and bipolar mania without the adverse effects of the first-generation antipsychotics. In this article, the authors discuss the advantages and side effects of these agents and present a guide to help physicians choose the optimal drug in the most favorable formulation for each patient.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Hyperprolactinemia; Mental Disorders; Olanzapine; Patient Compliance; Piperazines; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prescription Fees; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risk Assessment; Risperidone; Thiazoles; Torsades de Pointes; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risperidone; Serotonin Antagonists; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; United States

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Dementia; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Olanzapine; Parkinson Disease; Piperazines; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risperidone; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

The effect of funding source on the outcome of randomized controlled trials has been investigated in several medical disciplines; however, psychiatry has been largely excluded from such analyses. In this article, randomized controlled trials of second generation antipsychotics in schizophrenia are reviewed and analyzed with respect to funding source (industry vs. non-industry funding).. A literature search was conducted for randomized, double-blind trials in which at least one of the tested treatments was a second generation antipsychotic. In each study, design quality and study outcome were assessed quantitatively according to rating scales. Mean quality and outcome scores were compared in the industry-funded studies and non-industry-funded studies. An analysis of the primary author's affiliation with industry was similarly performed.. Results of industry-funded studies significantly favored second generation over first generation antipsychotics when compared to non-industry-funded studies. Non-industry-funded studies showed a trend toward higher quality than industry-funded studies; however, the difference between the two was not significant. Also, within the industry-funded studies, outcomes of trials involving first authors employed by industry sponsors demonstrated a trend toward second generation over first generation antipsychotics to a greater degree than did trials involving first authors employed outside the industry (p=0.05).. While the retrospective design of the study limits the strength of the findings, the data suggest that industry bias may occur in randomized controlled trials in schizophrenia. There appears to be several sources by which bias may enter clinical research, including trial design, control of data analysis and multiplicity/redundancy of trials.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Drug Industry; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Research Support as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

The role of lithium carbonate in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder is well established. Unfortunately, many patients fail to respond adequately to this agent or are unable to tolerate its adverse effects. Divalproex has become a commonly used alternative to lithium, but it also is ineffective or poorly tolerated in many patients. This article attempts to review the available data on maintenance therapy in bipolar disorder with a variety of anticonvulsants and antipsychotics (both conventional and novel), with reference to relevant studies in acute mania and bipolar depression as well.. Evidence on maintenance therapy and relevant acute-phase data were collected using MEDLINE database searches.. Data on maintenance therapy with agents other than lithium and divalproex are sparse, and often derived from open, uncontrolled studies. Implications and flaws of available data are discussed.. Other than lithium, there are few robust double-blind data to support the use of a variety of agents in the maintenance phase. However, uncontrolled data suggest that a number of agents merit further study.

Topics: Acetates; Amines; Anticonvulsants; Antimanic Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Calcium Channel Blockers; Carbamazepine; Clozapine; Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids; Dibenzothiazepines; Donepezil; Fatty Acids, Omega-3; Fructose; Gabapentin; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Humans; Indans; Lamotrigine; Lithium Carbonate; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Piperidines; Pirenzepine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Thiazoles; Topiramate; Treatment Outcome; Triazines; Valproic Acid

Both first-generation and second-generation antipsychotic medications can lower the seizure threshold, increasing the chances of seizure induction. This article reviews the published literature concerning the seizure-lowering effects of first- and second-generation antipsychotic medication. Unfortunately, rigorously controlled studies are relatively infrequent, and case reports form a large part of the available literature, limiting the confidence with which firm conclusions can be drawn. Of the first-generation antipsychotic medications, chlorpromazine appears to be associated with the greatest risk of seizure provocation, although other first-generation antipsychotics also lower seizure threshold. Conversely, molindone, haloperidol, fluphenazine, pimozide and trifluoperazine are associated with a lower risk of seizure induction. Clozapine is the second-generation antipsychotic most frequently associated with seizures, with risperidone appearing to confer a relatively low risk. Other factors such as history of seizure activity, concurrent use of other drugs that lower seizure threshold, rapid dose titration, slow drug metabolism, metabolic factors and drug-drug interactions appear to increase the chances of an antipsychotic medication inducing seizure activity.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Pirenzepine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risperidone; Seizures; Thiazoles

Innovation in atypical antipsychotic agents continues with new preparations of available drugs as well as novel agents. In this article, we provide an update on these novel products by reviewing information from a computerised literature search, recent abstracts and discussions with industry representatives. A generic formulation of clozapine is now available. It may be less well absorbed and/or less effective than Clozaril, although evidence is conflicting. A fatty acid amide derivative of clozapine is in early development. A liquid formulation of risperidone is currently available, which may be a useful treatment for psychotic agitation as well as a preferable alternative to tablets for some patients. A depot formulation is in development for the long-term management of psychosis. An orally disintegrating tablet formulation of olanzepine is a useful alternative to standard tablets. A short-acting injectable formulation of the drug is in development for psychotic agitation. Sachets and slow-release formulations of quetiapine are in development. Ziprasidone, a recently launched agent, is available in tablet form for schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder, psychotic depression and mania. A short-acting injectable formulation is in development for psychotic agitation. Aripiprazole (tablets) and iloperidone (tablets and depot injection) are two antipsychotics in development for schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder (available information regarding iloperidone is very limited). These new formulations and agents should broaden options for the treatment of psychosis.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clozapine; Dosage Forms; Humans; Isoxazoles; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Piperidines; Pirenzepine; Quinolones; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles

"Atypical" antipsychotics represent a new generation of antipsychotics with a significantly lower incidence of extrapyramidal side effects (EPS), as well as little or no effect on prolactin elevation. These advantages constitute a major improvement in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia. The exact mechanisms that make these drugs atypical is not clear. However, a preferential action on serotonin 5-HT2 or D4 receptors, or a more rapid dissociation from the dopamine D2 receptor, may account for atypicality. Although the atypical antipsychotics have overcome EPS, other side effects such as weight gain and impaired glucose tolerance/lipid abnormalities have come to the fore. Thus, the challenges are far from over. The current atypicals are much more effective against the psychosis of schizophrenia than against the other, more enduring aspects of this disorder, e.g. negative symptoms and cognitive dysfunction. At present, the atypicals use a "pharmacological shotgun" strategy to treat aspects of the disease in all patients. A more sophisticated and perhaps effective approach to schizophrenia may lie in independently targeting the pathophysiological mechanisms of each clinical dimension (i.e. positive, negative, cognitive, and affective) with more selective drugs that can be combined and individually titrated to the needs of each patient.

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Dibenzothiepins; Dopamine Antagonists; Drug Monitoring; Haloperidol; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Pirenzepine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Receptors, Dopamine D4; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Serotonin Antagonists; Sulpiride; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

In general, antipsychotic agents have diverse actions on a wide range of neurotransmitter systems. Data strongly suggest that a number of these systems may play a role in the regulation of body weight. In addition to having very distinct pharmacologic profiles, individual agents possess discrete weight gain liabilities. This article briefly reviews the evidence for the involvement of specific neurotransmitter systems in the control of body weight and describes the relevant pharmacologic characteristics of individual antipsychotic agents. By comparing the pharmacologic profiles of specific antipsychotic agents with their respective weight gain liabilities, this article attempts to gain an insight into the specific receptors underlying a drug's propensity to induce weight gain. However, there is still much to be learned concerning weight control mechanisms, and the role of many of the receptors at which antipsychotic agents are active remains unclear. In spite of this, an overview of current knowledge in the field may facilitate prediction of a potential novel antipsychotic agent's weight gain liability.

Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Eating; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Pirenzepine; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Rats; Receptors, Neurotransmitter; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Weight Gain

Prescribing an antipsychotic for a patient with schizophrenia requires a risk-benefit analysis. Weight gain has become an issue recently as a result of reports that 2 of the atypical antipsychotic agents, clozapine and olanzapine, are associated with a higher risk than other drugs of causing excessive weight gain. Some degree of weight gain may occur with any atypical antipsychotic agent, particularly early in treatment. A more important consideration is the long-term effects of the atypical antipsychotic on body weight, since many of the patients in this population require chronic therapy. This is important because weight gain is an adverse effect that is associated with noncompliance and medical problems. In this article, I review recent reports about the weight effects of different atypical antipsychotic drugs. To provide accurate understanding of the effects of atypical antipsychotic agents, data analyses should include both short-term and long-term findings, the relationship of changes in body weight to pretreatment body mass index (BMI), relationship to dose, both intent-to-treat and complete analyses, and presentation of both mean and median changes in weight. It is also important to know whether the studies have been done in an inpatient or outpatient setting, since patients who are institutionalized may be less likely to exhibit increases in body weight. Such complete information and multidimensional analysis would minimize obfuscation about the true nature of a drug's impact on body weight.

Topics: Ambulatory Care; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Hospitalization; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Pirenzepine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Research Design; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Weight Gain

Cumulative data indicate that atypical antipsychotics can serve as adjunctive as well as alternative agents in the treatment of drug-resistant mood disorders. Olanzapine and risperidone add-on treatment was found to be effective for major depression with psychotic features and good results were achieved with currently available atypical antipsychotics (clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine and ziprasidone) in reducing symptoms of acute mania, especially when added to mood stabilizers. The role of atypical antipsychotics in maintenance and prophylactic treatment is not yet clear. Although there are differences in the side effect profiles of the various atypical antipsychotics, their use is limited by adverse effects such as extrapyramidal symptoms, weight gain, somnolence and sexual dysfunction.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clozapine; Depressive Disorder, Major; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Pirenzepine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Thiazoles

Depressive symptoms and syndromal depression commonly occur in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia is also associated with aggression directed at self and others. For this article, the available literature regarding the efficacy of clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, and ziprasidone in the treatment of depression, hostility, and suicidality in patients with schizophrenia was reviewed. These studies suggest that atypical antipsychotics may exert therapeutic effects on depression and hostility as well as psychosis and that clozapine and olanzapine may reduce suicidality in patients with schizophrenia. These therapeutic actions appear to represent additional advantages of atypical antipsychotics compared with standard agents.

Topics: Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clozapine; Depression; Depressive Disorder; Dibenzothiazepines; Hostility; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Pirenzepine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Suicide; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

The results of controlled studies of the efficacy of the new atypical neuroleptics in treating negative symptoms show that these antipsychotics have a more pronounced effect on negative symptoms in acute schizophrenic patients than the classical neuroleptics. Supplementary complex statistical analyses substantiate that the increased efficacy of the atypical neuroleptics in treating negative symptoms can only partially be explained by indirect effects of better extrapyramidal tolerability, better effects on productive psychotic symptoms, etc. Instead, it is due largely to the stronger direct effect of these atypical neuroleptics. Clinical studies to evaluate their efficacy in chronic schizophrenic patients with stable, predominantly negative symptoms are still mostly lacking. First results support the presumption that atypical neuroleptics have a direct effect. Parallel to the evaluation of the new atypical neuroleptics, important progress has been made in the methodology of clinical studies in this area.

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Dibenzothiepins; Double-Blind Method; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Neurotransmitter Agents; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Pirenzepine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Sulpiride; Thiazoles

To review systematically data relating to weight changes with atypical antipsychotics.. We conducted a Medline search on October 29 1999 and covered the period 1980-99. All recovered papers were examined for further relevant reports. In addition, we wrote to pharmaceutical manufacturers and 10 practising clinicians to ask them to provide other relevant reports known to them.. Eighty reports mentioning change in body weight were retrieved. Data relating to weight changes were of variable quality. Weight changes were indicated by a variety of measures. The majority of reports related to short-term changes.. All atypical drugs, with the exception of ziprasidone, have been associated with weight increases. Clozapine seems to have the highest risk of weight gain, followed by olanzapine and quetiapine. There is probably a lower risk with risperidone, sertindole and zotepine and a still lower risk with amisulpride. Ziprasidone appears not to be associated with weight gain. In the absence of more compelling data, these rankings must be considered approximate and preliminary. Longer, more robust trials are needed.

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Dibenzothiepins; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Pirenzepine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Sulpiride; Thiazoles; Weight Gain

The introduction of conventional antipsychotics revolutionized the management of psychotic disorders in the 1950s. The use of these agents has been marked by several shortcomings, including their association with severe motor disturbances and their limited efficacy in treating the negative and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia. Patients noncompliance has largely been the result of subjectively distressing extrapyramidal motor side-effects (EPMS). It was therefore necessary to develop antipsychotic drugs with selective pharmacological profiles, e.g. limbic selectivity. A defining characteristic of atypical neuroleptics is a higher ratio of serotonin receptor blockade to D2 receptor blockade. Their primary advantage is their superior side-effect profile. The implications of EPMS reduction touch several domains of pathology in schizophrenia such as short- and long-term movement disorders, noncompliance, relapse rate, negative symptoms and cognitive dysfunction. Novel antipsychotics may represent the second pharmacological revolution in the treatment of psychotic disorders. There is, however, still a need for a critical evaluation of the risk-benefit-ratio of differing atypical agents.

Topics: Aged; Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Dibenzothiazepines; Dibenzothiepins; Haloperidol; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Pirenzepine; Placebos; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Serotonin Antagonists; Sulpiride; Thiazoles

The purpose of this study was to estimate and compare the effects of antipsychotics-both the newer ones and the conventional ones-on body weight.. A comprehensive literature search identified 81 English- and non-English-language articles that included data on weight change in antipsychotic-treated patients. For each agent, a meta-analysis and random effects metaregression estimated the weight change after 10 weeks of treatment at a standard dose. A comprehensive narrative review was also conducted on all articles that did not yield quantitative information but did yield important qualitative information.. Placebo was associated with a mean weight reduction of 0.74 kg. Among conventional agents, mean weight change ranged from a reduction of 0.39 kg with molindone to an increase of 3.19 kg with thioridazine. Among newer antipsychotic agents, mean increases were as follows: clozapine, 4.45 kg; olanzapine, 4.15 kg; sertindole, 2.92 kg; risperidone, 2.10 kg; and ziprasidone, 0.04 kg. Insufficient data were available to evaluate quetiapine at 10 weeks.. Both conventional and newer antipsychotics are associated with weight gain. Among the newer agents, clozapine appears to have the greatest potential to induce weight gain, and ziprasidone the least. The differences among newer agents may affect compliance with medication and health risk.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clozapine; Confidence Intervals; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Molindone; Piperazines; Placebos; Psychotic Disorders; Research Design; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

Since the discovery of the neuroleptics in 1952, french psychiatrists have proposed a classification of neuroleptics taking into account the pharmalogical and therapeutic differences between these drugs. They distinguished three different clinical effects of neuroleptics: sedative effects, effects on the positive symptoms of schizophrenia and effects on the negative symptoms. However these agents have many side effects including the extrapyramidal syndrome (EPS), akathisia, dystonia and parkinsonism. These side effects occur in up to 75% of patients receiving typical neuroleptics and are the main cause of non-compliance. Since the eighties, clozapine was introduced for use in refractory patients because it has a better efficacy (than haloperidol) specifically on negative symptoms, a better tolerance and fewer effects. After clozapine, several new antipsychotic agents are now available, such as risperidone, olanzapine, sertindole, quietapine, ziprasidone ... Their therapeutical effects are probably linked with a dual antagonist effect on 5HT2 and D2 receptors. The present article reviews the evolution of the use of these new agents, their real efficacy, their adverse effects and their expanding indications. Future research will more clearly establish appropriate treatment guidelines for their use. These new antipsychotics should add a positive modification in schizophrenia care and in some mood disorders. The approach consisting on individualizing dimensions and clusters analysis might be useful to test the efficiency of each antipsychotic on a syndromic dimension.

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Pirenzepine; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Sulpiride; Thiazoles

The comparative antidepressant effects of clozapine and other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia remain elusive, leading us to examine this question using the data from the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness phase 2E.. Ninety-nine patients who discontinued treatment with olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, or ziprasidone because of inadequate efficacy were randomly assigned to open-label treatment with clozapine (n=49) or double-blind treatment with another atypical antipsychotic not previously received in the trial (olanzapine [n=19], quetiapine [n=15], or risperidone [n=16]). The primary outcome was the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) total score. Antidepressant effects of clozapine and the other atypical antipsychotics were compared in patients with chronic schizophrenia and those with a major depressive episode (MDE) at baseline (i.e. ≥6 on the CDSS), using mixed models.. No differences in the baseline CDSS total scores were found between the treatment groups regardless of presence of an MDE. Clozapine was more effective than quetiapine in antidepressant effects for chronic schizophrenia (p<.01 for the whole sample and p=.01 for those with an MDE), and comparable to olanzapine and risperidone.. The present findings suggest that clozapine demonstrates superior antidepressant effects to quetiapine and comparable effects to olanzapine and risperidone in chronic schizophrenia regardless of presence of MDE. Given the indication of clozapine for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) and the negative impacts of depressive symptoms on clinical outcomes in schizophrenia, further research is warranted to investigate antidepressant effects of clozapine in TRS with an MDE.

Topics: Antidepressive Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Clozapine; Depressive Disorder, Major; Double-Blind Method; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

The present 16-week double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was aimed to explore the efficacy of ziprasidone add-on pharmacotherapy on clinical symptoms and cognitive functioning in 40 schizophrenic patients (active group, n = 20; placebo group, n = 20) with residual symptoms (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale mean [SD] baseline total score in active group vs placebo, 40.4 [5.9] vs 37.9 [6.8]) despite receiving clozapine monotherapy at the highest tolerated dosage. The results obtained evidenced that ziprasidone augmentation of clozapine significantly reduced Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale "Negative" (P = 0.006, mean change [SD] in active group vs placebo, -2.7 [2.3] vs 1.1 [2.1], Cohen d = 1.7) and "General Psychopathology" (P = 0.009, mean change [SD] in active group vs placebo, -5.3 [3.8] vs -0.7 [2.0], Cohen d = 1.5). Regarding cognitive domains, ziprasidone was more effective than placebo in improving semantic fluency (P < 0.0001, mean change [SD] in active group vs placebo, 4.4 [3.5] vs -0.1 [4.1], Cohen d = 1.2). Ziprasidone had only a small effect on prolongation of heart-rate corrected QT interval (QTc) of the electrocardiogram, not significantly different from placebo (QTc milliseconds, mean [SD], week 16 in active group vs placebo, 408.17 [20.85] vs 405.45 [17.11], P = 0.321); within-group comparison revealed that QTc prolongation induced by ziprasidone was statistically significant (baseline vs week 16, P = 0.002). Ziprasidone added to clozapine was effective on negative and cognitive symptoms, although it may be proposed as a helpful treatment in schizophrenia, mainly for those patients who partially respond to clozapine monotherapy.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Cognition; Double-Blind Method; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Electrocardiography; Female; Heart Rate; Humans; Italy; Male; Middle Aged; Piperazines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

The risks of antipsychotic drugs on metabolic syndrome (MS) present many challenges for psychiatrists.. To evaluate the effectiveness and influences on glucolipid metabolism in patients with schizophrenia and metabolic disorders switched from clozapine to ziprasidone.. Schizophrenic patients with metabolic syndrome who had been treated with clozapine for ≥ 2 years were enrolled in the open-label study. All the patients were switched to ziprasidone from clozapine and followed up for 24-week. The primary endpoints included body mass index (BMI), fasting glucose (FG), triglycerides (TG), HDL cholesterol (HDL-c) and systolic pressure (SP)/diastolic pressure (DP). Secondary endpoints included scores on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and treatment emergent symptom scale (TESS).. A total of 213 cases satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria, but only 194 cases eventually completed the 24-week follow-up and were divided into ziprasidone group (n=68, complete substitution) and combined treatment group (n=126, partial substitution). In the ziprasidone group, TG at 4th and 24th week, BMI and HDL-c at 24th week were significantly improved (p < 0.05), while cognitive scores and total score of the PANSS at 4th and 24th week, negative factor, the factor of anxiety and depression at 24th week were significantly lower than those at the baseline (p < 0.05); In the combined group, cognitive factor scores (4 weekend, 24 weekends) and total score of PANSS (24 weeks) was significantly lower than baseline (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the TESS score (p > 0.05).. Ziprasidone completely or partially substituting clozapine can improve both glucolipid metabolism disorders, and cognitive disorders and affective disorders of schizophrenia.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Mass Index; Cholesterol, HDL; Clozapine; Cognition Disorders; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Metabolic Syndrome; Middle Aged; Piperazines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Triglycerides

Treatment resistance in schizophrenia often leads to add-on of atypical antipsychotics to clozapine.. In a randomized trial, we recently obtained evidence for comparable efficacy and differential side effects of clozapine in combination with ziprasidone (CZ, N=12) versus risperidone (CR, N=12). Here, we present the open-label, long-term evaluations of these patients after 26 and 52 weeks.. Sustained improvements of psychopathology as assessed by PANSS (positive and negative syndrome scale), SANS (scale for the assessment of negative symptoms), and HAMD (Hamilton depression scale) were documented in both subsamples being treated according to protocol, while dropouts reduced the study sample after 26 (CZ: reduced by -4; CR: -2) and 52 weeks (CZ: -0; CR: -5). We observed a slight increase of akathisia in the CZ group whereas general clozapine-associated side effects improved.. The combinations of clozapine with ziprasidone or risperidone exhibit long-term efficacy, but the level of evidence is limited. Further head-to-head comparisons of atypical antipsychotics as add-on to clozapine are necessary.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Middle Aged; Piperazines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Risperidone; Serotonin Antagonists; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Patients suffering from schizophrenic psychoses sometimes insufficiently respond to antipsychotic monotherapy and then combination approaches are preferred. We aimed in validating the add-on of ziprasidone and risperidone to clozapine, and we performed a randomised head-to-head trial. Patients with partial response to clozapine were randomly attributed to augmentation with ziprasidone (n = 12) or risperidone (n = 12). Efficacy assessments included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD), the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) and the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). Furthermore, several safety and tolerability measures were obtained. After six weeks, both groups showed significant reductions of positive and negative symptoms. In addition, affective state, psychosocial functioning and clozapine side effects improved without significant differences between the groups. Both approaches were well tolerated. However, the ziprasidone group experienced a small elongation of the QTc interval and a reduction of extrapyramidal symptoms. Patients under clozapine-risperidone therapy developed a rise of serum prolactin levels. The clozapine augmentation with ziprasidone or risperidone resulted in significant psychopathological improvements. The side effects differed between the treatment groups. Further head-to-head comparisons of atypical antipsychotics as add-on to clozapine are necessary.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Long QT Syndrome; Male; Middle Aged; Piperazines; Prolactin; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Severity of Illness Index; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

This 18-week, randomized, flexible-dose, double-blind, double-dummy trial evaluated ziprasidone as an alternative to clozapine in treatment-refractory schizophrenia patients. Patients had a DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia, a history of resistance and/or intolerance to at least three acute cycles with different antipsychotics given at therapeutic doses, PANSS score >or=80, and CGI-S score >or=4. Patients were randomized to ziprasidone (80-160 mg/day, n=73) or clozapine (250-600 mg/day, n=74). On the primary ITT-LOCF analysis, baseline-to-endpoint decreases in PANSS total scores were similar in the ziprasidone (-25.0+/-22.0, 95% CI -30.2 to -19.8) and clozapine (-24.5+/-22.5, 95% CI -29.7 to -19.2) groups. A progressive and significant reduction from baseline in PANSS total score was observed from day 11 in both study arms. There were also significant improvements on PANSS subscales, CGI-S, CG-I, CDSS, and GAF, without between-drug differences. The two treatment groups had similar rates of early discontinuations due to AEs. AEs were mostly of similar mild-moderate severity in the two groups. There were also no detrimental effects on prolactin, renal and liver function, hematology, and cardiovascular parameters. However, ziprasidone but not clozapine showed a significant reduction of SAS and AIMS scores. Moreover, when compared with clozapine, ziprasidone also had a more favorable metabolic profile, with significant endpoint differences in weight, fasting glucose, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides. In conclusion, this trial indicates that both ziprasidone and clozapine, having comparable efficacy coupled with satisfactory general safety and tolerability, may be regarded as valuable options for the short-term treatment of difficult-to-treat schizophrenia patients with a history of multiple resistance and/or intolerance to antipsychotics. The more favorable metabolic profile of ziprasidone may represent an added value that could guide clinicians, at least in the presence of patients at high risk for metabolic disorders.

Topics: Adult; Analysis of Variance; Antipsychotic Agents; Body Weight; Clozapine; Disease Progression; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucose; Humans; Italy; Lipids; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Compliance; Piperazines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quality of Life; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Thiazoles; Young Adult

This study sought to examine the effect of ziprasidone on olanzapine or clozapine-associated medical morbidity such as insulin resistance, diabetes mellitus (DM) and impaired fasting glucose, obesity, and hyperlipidemia in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.. This was a 6-week, open label trial of ziprasidone 160 mg/day added to a stable dose of olanzapine or clozapine in 21 schizophrenia or schizoaffective patients with DM, impaired fasting glucose, or insulin resistance.. Ten olanzapine-treated subjects and 11 clozapine-treated subjects were enrolled in the study. There were no significant differences between the two groups at baseline for age, gender, education, ethnicity, BMI, cholesterol levels, or fasting glucose. At week 6, there were no significant changes in weight, BMI, cholesterol levels, or fasting glucose. There was no significant difference in psychotic, negative, or depressive symptoms. QTc significantly increased at week 2 but not at week 6.. The addition of 160 mg/day of ziprasidone was well tolerated but did not produce significant improvement in fasting glucose, insulin resistance, hyperlipidemia or lead to weight loss in olanzapine- or clozapine-treated subjects with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Chronic Disease; Clozapine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Insulin Resistance; Male; Middle Aged; Morbidity; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Time Factors

To investigate the neurocognitive effectiveness of haloperidol, risperidone, and olanzapine in first-episode schizophrenia-spectrum disorders.. This prospective, randomized, open-label study was conducted from February 2001 to February 2005. Data for the present investigation were obtained from a large epidemiologic and 3-year longitudinal intervention program of first-episode psychosis (DSM-IV criteria) conducted at the outpatient clinic and the inpatient unit at the University Hospital Marques de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain. One hundred four patients randomly assigned to haloperidol (N = 35), olanzapine (N = 30), or risperidone (N = 39) who completed clinical and cognitive evaluations at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year were included in the final analysis. Thirty-seven healthy individuals were also longitudinally assessed. A neuropsychological battery that comprised 9 cognitive domains was used. The contribution of clinical changes, concomitant medications, and the severity of motor side effects to cognitive changes was controlled. The main outcome measure was cognitive changes at 1-year follow-up.. The 3 treatment groups showed a significant improvement in cognitive scores after 1 year. The differential cognitive effectiveness between antipsychotics was insignificant. The magnitude of cognitive changes was similar in the 3 treatment groups and controls, although a greater improvement on the Finger Tapping Test, Trail Making Test B, and Rey Complex Figure Test was found in the treatment groups. Clinical changes, use of concomitant medications, and the emergence of motor side effects did not significantly account for cognitive changes over time.. Haloperidol, olanzapine, and risperidone were equally effective in treating cognitive deficits of psychosis. The effect of practice clearly contributes to cognitive score improvements after treatment with antipsychotics. Our results provide important information regarding the practical utility of antipsychotic treatments to improve cognition and could have implications for developing novel approaches for cognitive pharmacotherapy in schizophrenia.

Topics: Adult; Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brain; Clozapine; Cognition Disorders; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Perphenazine; Piperazines; Prospective Studies; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Severity of Illness Index; Sulpiride; Thiazoles

This 18-week, randomized, flexible-dose, double-blind, double-dummy trial evaluated ziprasidone as an alternative to clozapine in treatment-refractory schizophrenia patients. Patients had a DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia, a history of resistance and/or intolerance to at least three acute cycles with different antipsychotics given at therapeutic doses, PANSS score >or= 80, and CGI-S score >or= 4. Patients were randomized to ziprasidone (80-160 mg/day, n = 73) or clozapine (250-600 mg/day, n = 74). On the primary ITT-LOCF analysis, baseline-to-endpoint decreases in PANSS total scores were similar in the ziprasidone (- 25.0 +/- 22.0, 95% CI - 30.2 to - 19.8) and clozapine (- 24.5 +/- 22.5, 95% CI - 29.7 to - 19.2) groups. A progressive and significant reduction from baseline in PANSS total score was observed from day 11 in both study arms. There were also significant improvements on PANSS subscales, CGI-S, CG-I, CDSS, and GAF, without between-drug differences. The two treatment groups had similar rates of early discontinuations due to AEs. AEs were mostly of similar mild-moderate severity in the two groups. There were also no detrimental effects on prolactin, renal and liver function, hematology, and cardiovascular parameters. However, ziprasidone but not clozapine showed a significant reduction of SAS and AIMS scores. Moreover, when compared with clozapine, ziprasidone also had a more favorable metabolic profile, with significant endpoint differences in weight, fasting glucose, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides. In conclusion, this trial indicates that both ziprasidone and clozapine, having comparable efficacy coupled with satisfactory general safety and tolerability, may be regarded as valuable options for the short-term treatment of difficult-to-treat schizophrenia patients with a history of multiple resistance and/or intolerance to antipsychotics. The more favorable metabolic profile of ziprasidone may represent an added value that could guide clinicians, at least in the presence of patients at high risk for metabolic disorders.

Topics: Adult; Analysis of Variance; Antipsychotic Agents; Body Weight; Clozapine; Disease Progression; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucose; Humans; Italy; Lipids; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Compliance; Piperazines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quality of Life; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Thiazoles; Young Adult

Recent data have suggested few differences in the cognitive effects of antipsychotic medications. However, assessment of such effects can be complex, due to a number of factors. Clozapine has previously shown greater clinical and lesser cognitive benefits than other atypicals. This study compared the cognitive benefits of clozapine and ziprasidone in schizophrenia patients (n=130) with a history of either failure to respond to or intolerance of previous adequate antipsychotic treatments.. Patients were randomized (double-blind) to either clozapine or ziprasidone in a single country (Italy), multi-site trial. The cognitive assessments examined episodic memory (RAVLT), executive functioning (Stroop test), and processing speed (Trail-making test (TMT) Parts A and B).. Analyses found statistically significant within-group improvements for ziprasidone in learning and delayed recall on the RAVLT and on TMT Parts A and B. Clozapine-treated patients improved on the RAVLT, but not on the TMT. A composite cognitive score improved from baseline in both groups, but the improvements were significantly larger in the ziprasidone group (p=.029).. These results indicated that cognitive functioning improved following treatment with ziprasidone in patients with a history of either treatment resistance or intolerance, and that the effects are comparable or greater than those observed with clozapine. One interpretation of these findings is that clozapine treatment interferes with the performance benefits associated with practice.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Cognition Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Drug Resistance; Drug Tolerance; Female; Humans; Italy; Male; Memory Disorders; Neuropsychological Tests; Piperazines; Placebos; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Thiazoles; Trail Making Test; Treatment Outcome

This study examined the relative effects of the second-generation antipsychotic drugs and an older representative agent on psychosocial functioning in patients with chronic schizophrenia.. Consenting patients were enrolled in the NIMH Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) project. In phase 1, patients were randomly assigned to receive olanzapine, perphenazine, quetiapine, risperidone, or ziprasidone for up to 18 months. Clozapine was included for patients who chose this pathway after discontinuing phase 1 due to inefficacy; all other patients received another second-generation antipsychotic. Psychosocial functioning was assessed using the Quality of Life Scale.. Psychosocial functioning modestly improved for the one-third of phase 1 patients who reached the primary Quality of Life Scale analysis endpoint of 12 months (average effect size 0.19 SD units). Although for several of the drugs individually there were significant changes from baseline, overall there were no significant differences between the different agents. Results were similar at 6 and 18 months. There were no significant differences among the treatment groups in the amount of change in the Quality of Life Scale total score or subscale scores at 6, 12, or 18 months. Patients treated with clozapine in the efficacy pathway made comparable gains. Early treatment discontinuations, especially among patients most impaired at baseline, limited the ability to achieve more substantial functional gains.. All antipsychotic treatment groups in all phases made modest improvements in psychosocial functioning. There were no differences among them after 6, 12, or 18 months. More substantial improvements would likely require more intensive adjunctive psychosocial rehabilitation interventions.

Topics: Adaptation, Psychological; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Follow-Up Studies; Health Status; Humans; National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.); Olanzapine; Patient Dropouts; Perphenazine; Piperazines; Quality of Life; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Social Adjustment; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; United States

When a schizophrenia patient has an inadequate response to treatment with an antipsychotic drug, it is unclear what other antipsychotic to switch to and when to use clozapine. In this study, the authors compared switching to clozapine with switching to another atypical antipsychotic in patients who had discontinued treatment with a newer atypical antipsychotic in the context of the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials for Interventions Effectiveness (CATIE) investigation.. Ninety-nine patients who discontinued treatment with olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, or ziprasidone in phase 1 or 1B of the trials, primarily because of inadequate efficacy, were randomly assigned to open-label treatment with clozapine (N=49) or blinded treatment with another newer atypical antipsychotic not previously received in the trial (olanzapine [N=19], quetiapine [N=15], or risperidone [N=16]).. Time until treatment discontinuation for any reason was significantly longer for clozapine (median=10.5 months) than for quetiapine (median=3.3), or risperidone (median=2.8), but not for olanzapine (median=2.7). Time to discontinuation because of inadequate therapeutic effect was significantly longer for clozapine than for olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone. At 3-month assessments, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total scores had decreased more in patients treated with clozapine than in patients treated with quetiapine or risperidone but not olanzapine. One patient treated with clozapine developed agranulocytosis, and another developed eosinophilia; both required treatment discontinuation.. For these patients with schizophrenia who prospectively failed to improve with an atypical antipsychotic, clozapine was more effective than switching to another newer atypical antipsychotic. Safety monitoring is necessary to detect and manage clozapine's serious side effects.

Topics: Adult; Agranulocytosis; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Clozapine; Cross-Over Studies; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Monitoring; Drug Resistance; Eosinophilia; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Prospective Studies; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

Metabolic side effects have been found earlier during treatment with second-generation antipsychotics. Among those disturbances serum lipids are less investigated. We conducted a prospective, open study in schizophrenia patients in order to compare body weight and serum lipids during treatment with amisulpride, ziprasidone, clozapine or olanzapine over a period of 4 weeks. Body mass index, total cholesterol and triglycerides increased in patients treated with clozapine and olanzapine whereas high-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased in those patients. In patients treated with amisulpride or ziprasidone, we found a decrease in body mass index and total cholesterol whereas high-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased. Our results indicate that treatment with ziprasidone and amisulpride is more favourable than treatment with clozapine and olanzapine with respect to the risk to induce weight gain and hyperlipidaemia. These results are important with regard to the increased risk for cardiovascular complications in patients with schizophrenia.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Amisulpride; Analysis of Variance; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Cholesterol; Clozapine; Humans; Lipids; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Prospective Studies; Schizophrenia; Sulpiride; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Triglycerides

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperazines; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

Packed with hemoglobin, an essential protein for oxygen transport, human erythrocytes are a suitable model system for testing the pleiotropic effects of lipophilic drugs. Our study investigated the interaction between antipsychotic drugs clozapine, ziprasidone, sertindole, and human hemoglobin under simulated physiological conditions. Analysis of protein fluorescence quenching at different temperatures and data obtained from the van't Hoff diagram and molecular docking indicate that the interactions are static and that the tetrameric human hemoglobin has one binding site for all drugs in the central cavity near αβ interfaces and is dominantly mediated through hydrophobic forces. The association constants were lower-moderate strength (~10

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Humans; Molecular Docking Simulation; Olanzapine

The administration of NMDA receptor (NMDAR) antagonists constitutes a widely used model that produce both positive (e.g., hyperactivity) and negative (e.g., social withdrawal) symptoms relevant for schizophrenia in rodents. These effects can be reversed with the administration of atypical (second and third generation) antipsychotics.. In this study we combined the NMDAR-antagonist model with the Roman High-Avoidance (RHA) strain, a psychogenetically selected model of schizophrenia-relevant features. We also studied whether some atypical antipsychotic drugs (clozapine, ziprasidone, and aripiprazole) would be able to attenuate or reverse the behavioural alterations induced by MK801 and whether such effects might be dependent on the rat strain.. MK801 dose-response study was conducted in RHA and Roman Low-Avoidance (RLA) male rats. After that, the 0.15 mg/kg MK801 dose was selected to carry out pharmacological studies versus atypical antipsychotics.. In the first experiment we establish that MK801 (dizocilpine), a NMDAR antagonist, produces dose-related hyperactivity and social withdrawal, which are more marked in RHA than RLA rats. The administration of the atypical antipsychotics clozapine (2.5 mg/kg) or ziprasidone (2.5 mg/kg) partially reversed or attenuated some of the social behaviour deficits and hyperactivity induced by the administration of MK801. Aripiprazole (3 mg/kg), a third-generation antipsychotic, reversed or attenuated the social preference deficit, the hyperactivity and the impairment of social latency induced by MK801.. These results seem to be in line with previous studies with the NMDAR-antagonist model and add face (MK801-induced social withdrawal and hyperactivity) and predictive (attenuation of MK801-induced effects by atypical antipsychotics) validity to the RHA rat strain as a model of schizophrenia-relevant features.

Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Clozapine; Dizocilpine Maleate; Male; Rats; Schizophrenia; Social Isolation

Sexual dysfunction, as a noticeable adverse effect of atypical antipsychotic drugs (APDs) for the treatment of schizophrenia, has not been investigated in detail. A study was undertaken to investigate whether 28-day long treatment with clozapine, ziprasidone or sertindole (using a recommended daily dose for atypical antipsychotic therapy), induced histopathological changes both in rat testicles and prostate, changed the activity of the antioxidant defence system and altered blood testosterone and prolactin. Clozapine, ziprasidone and sertindole induced histopathological changes in rat testicular tissue, which could be attributed to a disturbed testicular antioxidant defence system in addition to an altered prolactin to testosterone ratio. None of the APD treatments induced histopathological changes in prostate. Our results demonstrate that APDs have the capacity to change both redox and endocrinological balance. One or both outcomes could underline testicular degeneration and disturbed spermatogenesis.

Topics: Animals; Antioxidants; Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Homeostasis; Male; Oxidation-Reduction; Prolactin; Rats; Testis; Testosterone

Chronic use of atypical antipsychotics may produce hepatic damage. Atypical antipsychotics, including clozapine, sertindole, and ziprasidone, are extensively metabolized by the liver and this process generates toxic-free radical metabolic intermediates which may contribute to liver damage. The aim of this study was to investigate whether clozapine, sertindole, or ziprasidone affected hepatic antioxidant defense enzymes which consequently led to disturbed redox homeostasis. The expression and activity of antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), glutathione reductase (GR), catalase (CAT), and glutathione-S-transferases (GST) were measured in rat livers at doses corresponding to human antipsychotic therapy. Clozapine increased activity of SOD types 1 and 2, GR and GST, but reduced CAT activity. Sertindole elevated activities of both SODs. In ziprasidone-treated rats only decreased CAT activity was found. All three antipsychotics produced mild-to-moderate hepatic histopathological changes categorized as regenerative alterations. No apparent signs of immune cell infiltration, microvesicular or macrovesicular fatty change, or hepatocytes in mitosis were observed. In conclusion, a 4-week long daily treatment with clozapine, sertindole, or ziprasidone altered hepatic antioxidant enzyme activities and induced histopathological changes in liver. The most severe alterations were noted in clozapine-treated rats. Data indicate that redox disturbances may contribute to liver dysfunction after long-term atypical antipsychotic drug treatment.

Topics: Animals; Antioxidants; Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Imidazoles; Indoles; Liver; Liver Diseases; Male; Piperazines; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Thiazoles

We report four cases of 12- to 17-year-old patients with schizophrenia, two of them suffering from catatonia, which were treated by ECT. Under a combined treatment with either ziprasidone or clozapine, and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), they improved markedly. Severity and course of acute schizophrenia were evaluated by the Brief Psychiatric rating Scale (BPRS), severity and course of catatonia were evaluated with the Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS). This article underlines the benefit, the safety and the tolerability of ECT in younger patients with schizophrenic disorders.. Wir berichten über vier Patienten im Alter von 12 bis 17 Jahren mit schizophrenen Psychosen, zwei davon mit katatoner Symptomatik, die erfolgreich und sicher mit Elektrokonvulsionstherapie (EKT) behandelt wurden. Unter einer kombinierten Therapie aus EKT und entweder Ziprasidon oder Clozapin verbesserte sich der Zustand aller Patienten erheblich. Schweregrad und Verlauf der akuten Schizophrenie wurden mit der Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) evaluiert. Schweregrad und Verlauf der Katatonie wurden mit der Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS) gemessen. Die Fälle bestätigen frühere Berichte zur Wirksamkeit, zur Sicherheit und Verträglichkeit von EKT bei der Behandlung von Kindern und Jugendlichen mit Schizophrenie.

Topics: Adolescent; Catatonia; Child; Clozapine; Combined Modality Therapy; Electroconvulsive Therapy; Humans; Piperazines; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

Antipsychotic drugs (AP) are widely prescribed for the treatment of schizophrenia and psychosis. The pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia is often performed with the simultaneous use of two or more antipsychotic agents to achieve the desired control of psychotic symptoms Available AP include both conventional (typical) and new (atypical) antipsychotic medications. Atypical AP, such as quetiapine, now account for the vast majority of AP prescriptions. In forensic toxicology, AP are of considerable interest because of their potential abuse and their involvement in intoxications and suicides. The authors retrospectively examined AP positive cases detected in samples collected during autopsies performed in the Forensic Clinical and Pathology Service of National Institute of Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences Centre Branch or in other autopsies carried out in the central region of Portugal, between January 2016 and December 2018. A quantitative liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay was developed for the simultaneous determination of 16 AP (amisulpride, aripiprazole, chlorpromazine, clozapine, cyamemazine, fluphenazine, haloperidol, levomepromazine, melperone, olanzapine, paliperidone, promethazine, quetiapine, risperidone, sulpiride and ziprasidone) in blood samples of postmortem cases. The Laboratory of Forensic Chemistry and Toxicology received 3,588 requests for toxicological analysis: 1,413 cases were positive for drugs from which 351 (24.8%) cases were positive for AP, 60.1% from male individuals and 39.9% from female. Quetiapine was the most prevalent AP (36.5%) followed by olanzapine (20.8%). During this period, there were 25 postmortem cases with AP blood concentrations above therapeutic range, in which 36% of those are in agreement with the information received (psychological history or acute intoxication suspicion) and the manner of death was suicide. Our results point that antipsychotics are an increasingly prevalent class of drugs. AP must be measured not only in toxic concentrations but also in therapeutic levels in postmortem cases; therefore, it is important to come up with a sensitive method to cover the low therapeutic range in which AP are usually present.

Topics: Adult; Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Chromatography, Liquid; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Forensic Toxicology; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Paliperidone Palmitate; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Retrospective Studies; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Substance Abuse Detection; Suicide; Sulpiride; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Thiazoles

Antipsychotic drugs interfere with the antioxidant defense system provoking complex and often toxicological effects. Here we examined differences in plasma albumin reduced free thiol (SH) group content and its reactivity as a consequence of clozapine (CLZ) and ziprasidone (ZIP) binding. Chronic administration of CLZ reduced, whereas treatment with ZIP increased albumin-SH content in rats. Regardless of the ratio of stearic acid (SA) bound to protein, in vitro binding of ZIP to human serum albumin (HSA) increased both the SH group level and reactivity. In contrast, the effect of CLZ on HSA-SH reactivity was dependent on HSA to SA molar ratio. CLZ binding was accompanied by an increase in HSA-SH reactivity in samples with normal, but a reduction of its reactivity level with higher SA/HSA ratio, compared to drug-free samples. We demonstrate by steady-state fluorescence quenching studies that an increase in SA binding to HSA is associated with a significant reduction of binding constant for both antipsychotics. In addition, this is the first report of quantitative characterization of ZIP binding to HSA. Our findings suggest that albumin-SH content and reactivity is modulated by ZIP towards an increased antioxidant defense capacity in circulation, as opposed to CLZ, which can contribute to the safer, more effective treatment of schizophrenia.

Topics: Animals; Clozapine; Fatty Acids; Humans; Male; Piperazines; Protein Binding; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Serum Albumin; Spectrometry, Fluorescence; Spectrophotometry; Sulfhydryl Compounds; Thiazoles

The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the effects of a new antipsychotic, aripiprazole (unique due to its mechanism of action), with the effects of selected antipsychotic drugs, such as quetiapine, olanzapine, clozapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone (at the final concentrations corresponding to clinically effective doses used for the treatment of acute episodes of schizophrenia) on lipid peroxidation in human plasma measured by the level of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), which is a marker of oxidative stress.. The levels of TBARS were measured spectrophotometrically, according to the modification of the Rice-Evans method.. Our results indicate that antipsychotics at doses recommended for the treatment of acute episodes of schizophrenia may induce distinct changes in the levels of lipid peroxidation products (TBARS) in plasma. Aripiprazole had no effect on the level of a lipid peroxidation marker in plasma, although used at lower doses it showed insignificant prooxidative properties similar to clozapine. Quetiapine had the strongest antioxidant properties, contrary to prooxidative action of risperidone, ziprasidone or haloperidol, and clozapine at lower doses. Olanzapine reduced the level of TBARS in plasma only at a lower dose.. Antipsychotics at doses recommended for the treatment of acute episode in schizophrenia may induce the distinct changes in plasma lipid peroxidation. Aripiprazole did not induce significant changes in plasma lipid peroxidation. In further studies, the role of oxidative stress in schizophrenic patients together with their clinical symptomatology and use of antipsychotics should be taken into account.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Blood; Clozapine; Female; Humans; Lipid Peroxidation; Male; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Thiazoles; Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substances; Young Adult

Atypical antipsychotics produce severe side effects including myocarditis that may be attributed to oxidative stress. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of clozapine, ziprasidone, and sertindole on rat heart morphology and determine whether redox imbalane plays a role in development of histopathological changes. Adult 3-month-old male Wistar rats were treated with recommended daily dose for selected drugs. After 4 week treatment histopathological analysis of the heart was performed and expression and activity of antioxidant enzymes determined. All examined drugs induced histopathological changes that were characterized as toxic myocarditis. Degenerative changes in cardiomyocytes were accompanied by lymphocytic infiltration as well as pericardial histopathological alterations in all treated groups. The least prominent changes were observed in sertindole-treated animals, and most severe with clozapine. Clozapine increased superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) activity while ziprasidone reduced glutathione reductase (GR) activity. Sertindole exerted no marked effect on antioxidant enzyme function in the heart even though myocardial degeneration was noted. In conclusion, treatment with clozapine or ziprasidone induced pathophysiological alterations in rat heart, which appeared to be associated disturbances in antioxidant capacity. Abbreviation: AAP, Atypical antipsychotics; ROS, reactive oxygen species; SOD1, Copper-zinc superoxide dismutase; SOD2, Manganese superoxide dismutase; CAT, Catalase; GPx, Glutathione peroxidase; GR, Glutathione reductase; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin stain; TNF- α, tumor necrosis factor alpha.

Topics: Animals; Antioxidants; Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Heart; Imidazoles; Indoles; Male; Myocardium; Oxidation-Reduction; Piperazines; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Thiazoles

Although the etiopathogenic mechanisms of schizophrenia (SCZ) are unknown, evidences suggest that excessive free radical production or oxidative stress may be involved in the pathophysiology of SCZ. Antipsychotics are the drugs used in the treatment of SCZ but it remains controversial the impact that typical vs. atypical antipsychotics has on the oxidative stress status in SCZ patients. In vitro, the antioxidant capacity of six antipsychotics was assessed by their ability to: decrease or scavenge reactive oxygen species in the neutrophil respiratory burst; donate hydrogen and stabilize the free radical 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH); and scavenge 2,2'-azino-di-(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS(+)). This study demonstrated that both clozapine and olanzapine have antioxidant effects, in vitro, by scavenging superoxide anion on the respiratory burst, donating electron in the ABTS(+) assay and stabilizing the radical DPPH. Ziprasidone significantly scavenged ABTS(+) and stabilized the radical DPPH whereas risperidone significantly reduced the respiratory burst. Haloperidol and quetiapine lacked antioxidant effects. The chemical structure-related antioxidant capacity suggests a possible neuroprotective mechanism of these drugs on the top of their antipsychotic mechanism of action.

Topics: Antioxidants; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Biphenyl Compounds; Clozapine; Free Radical Scavengers; Haloperidol; Humans; Models, Biological; Neutrophil Activation; Neutrophils; Olanzapine; Picrates; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Reactive Oxygen Species; Risperidone; Tetradecanoylphorbol Acetate; Thiazoles

The use of atypical antipsychotic drugs (APD) was reported to be associated with adverse effects on the kidneys. Thus, the aim of this study was to examine whether APD exerted their adverse effects by interfering with the renal antioxidant defense system. Male 3-mo-old Wistar rats were treated for 28 d with ziprasidone (ZIP), clozapine (CLO), or sertindole (SER) using a daily dose recommended for antipsychotic drug therapy. The expression and activities of antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase (SOD) type 1 and type 2, catalase (CAT), glutathione reductase (GR), and glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) activity were measured in the kidneys. Changes in the kidneys were also evaluated histologically. Ziprasidone, CLO, and SER reduced renal SOD type 1 and type 2 activities. Decreased CAT activity was observed only in SER-treated rats. An inhibition in GR activity and increased activity of GST was found only after treatment with CLO. Histological analysis showed dilatation of proximal tubules in kidneys with all three drugs. In conclusion, data indicate that redox disturbances may contribute to renal morphologic alterations in proximal tubules in rats treated with all APD.

Topics: Animals; Antioxidants; Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Imidazoles; Indoles; Kidney; Male; Oxidative Stress; Piperazines; Random Allocation; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Thiazoles

Dopaminergic systems have been known to be involved in the regulation of locomotor activity and development of psychosis. However, the observations that some Parkinson's disease patients can move effectively under appropriate conditions despite low dopamine levels (eg, kinesia paradoxia) and that several psychotic symptoms are typical antipsychotic resistant and atypical antipsychotic sensitive indicate that other systems beyond the dopaminergic system may also affect locomotor activity and psychosis. The present study showed that dopamine-deficient (DD) mice, which had received daily L-DOPA injections, could move effectively and even be hyperactive 72 h after the last L-DOPA injection when dopamine was almost completely depleted. Such hyperactivity was ameliorated by clozapine but not haloperidol or ziprasidone. Among multiple actions of clozapine, muscarinic acetylcholine (ACh) activation markedly reduced locomotor activity in DD mice. Furthermore, the expression of choline acetyltransferase, an ACh synthase, was reduced and extracellular ACh levels were significantly reduced in DD mice. These results suggest that the cholinergic system, in addition to the dopaminergic system, may be involved in motor control, including hyperactivity and psychosis. The present findings provide additional evidence that the cholinergic system may be targeted for the treatment of Parkinson's disease and psychosis.

Topics: Acetylcholine; Akathisia, Drug-Induced; Animals; Anti-Dyskinesia Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Choline O-Acetyltransferase; Clozapine; Corpus Striatum; Disease Models, Animal; Dopamine; Dopamine Agents; Extracellular Space; Haloperidol; Levodopa; Locomotion; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Piperazines; Psychomotor Agitation; Thiazoles

To compare the cost-effectiveness of alternate treatment strategies using second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) for patients with schizophrenia.. We developed a Markov model to estimate the costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for different sequences of treatments for 40-year-old patients with schizophrenia. We considered first-line treatment with one of the four SGAs: olanzapine (OLZ), risperidone (RSP), quetiapine (QTP), and ziprasidone (ZSD). Patients could switch to another of these antipsychotics as second-line therapy, and only clozapine (CLZ) was allowed as third-line treatment. We derived parameter estimates from the Clinical Antipsychotic Trial of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) study and published sources.. The ZSD-QTP strategy (first-line treatment with ZSD, change to QTP if ZSD is discontinued, and switch to CLZ if QTP is discontinued) was most costly while yielding the greatest QALYs, with an incremental cost-effective ratio (ICER) of $542,500 per QALY gained compared with the ZSD-RSP strategy. However, the ZSD-RSP strategy had an ICER of $5,200/QALY gained versus the RSP-ZSD strategy and had the greatest probability of being cost-effective given a willingness-to-pay threshold between $50,000 and $100,000 per QALY. All other treatment strategies were more costly and less effective than another strategy or combination of other strategies. Results varied by different time horizons adopted.. The ZSD-RSP strategy was most cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold between $5,200 and $542,500 per QALY. Our results should be interpreted with caution because they are based largely on the CATIE trial with potentially limited generalizability to all patient populations and doses of SGAs used in practice.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Markov Chains; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Brain Injuries; Clozapine; Cognition Disorders; Drug Therapy, Combination; Employment, Supported; Humans; Piperazines; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles

Oxidative injury in schizophrenia can be caused by the disease itself and probably by antipsychotics treatment. The aim of the study was to establish whether there is a difference between ziprasidone, clozapine and haloperidol effect on lipid peroxidation in human plasma, measured by the level of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS). The samples of plasma from healthy subjects were incubated with the drugs (1 and 24 h) and compared with control samples. The levels of TBARS were measured spectrophotometrically, according to the Rice-Evans method. The multifactorial variance analysis ANOVA II test showed that the differences in TBARS levels significantly depended on the studied drugs (ziprasidone 40 ng/ml, haloperidol 4 ng/ml and clozapine 350 ng/ml) (F = 3.248 p = 0.047) and (ziprasidone 139 ng/ml, haloperidol 20 ng/ml and clozapine 420 ng/ml) (F = 2.248, p = 2.9 × 10(-5)). Statistically increased levels of TBARS after 24 h incubation of plasma with ziprasidone 139 ng/ml and haloperidol 20 ng/ml (p < 0.001, p < 0.05 respectively) in comparison with control samples were observed. Clozapine did not significantly (p > 0.05) increase TBARS level in plasma in comparison with control samples. The results obtained in the study showed that ziprasidone and haloperidol contrary to clozapine induced a significant increase in plasma lipid peroxidation.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; In Vitro Techniques; Lipid Peroxidation; Male; Piperazines; Thiazoles; Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substances

This study was set out to examine the impact of atypical antipsychotic drugs: aripiprazole, clozapine, ziprasidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, sertindole and amisulpride on the activity of antioxidant defence enzymes in human erythrocytes in vitro.. Cu,Zn-superoxide dismutase (SOD1), catalase (CAT), selenium-dependent glutathione peroxidase and glutathione reductase activities were determined after drugs incubation with blood of 15 apparently healthy non-smoking male volunteers (ages 23-39) for 1 h at 37 °C.. A statistically significant increase in SOD1 activity was found in samples incubated with aripiprazole (p < 0.01) and quetiapine (p < 0.05) compared with incubated control. SOD1 activity profile following native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis indicates that aripiprazole and quetiapine protect enzyme activity from inhibition with hydrogen peroxide. Our results showed that sertindole decreases activity of CAT comparing with control non-treated erythrocytes. Moreover, in sertindole treated erythrocytes, negative correlation between SOD1 and glutathione peroxidase activities was found. Increased amount of hydrogen peroxide in such situation may leave erythrocytes and transform their role in circulation from anti-oxidative to pro-oxidative.. Our results indicate that mechanism through sertindole could express its in vivo toxic effects and point toward possible (neuro)protective effects of aripiprazole and quetiapine.

Topics: Adult; Amisulpride; Antioxidants; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Catalase; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Enzyme Activation; Erythrocytes; Glutathione Peroxidase; Glutathione Reductase; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Male; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Sulpiride; Superoxide Dismutase; Superoxide Dismutase-1; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Patients taking atypical antipsychotics are frequented by serious metabolic (eg, hyperglycemia, obesity, and diabetes) and cardiac effects. Surprisingly, chronic treatment also appears to lower free fatty acids (FFAs). This finding is paradoxical because insulin resistance is typically associated with elevated not lower FFAs. How atypical antipsychotics bring about these converse changes in plasma glucose and FFAs is unknown. Chronic treatment with olanzapine, a prototypical, side effect prone atypical antipsychotic, lowered FFA in Sprague-Dawley rats. Olanzapine also lowered plasma FFA acutely, concomitantly impairing in vivo lipolysis and robustly elevating whole-body lipid oxidation. Increased lipid oxidation was evident from accelerated losses of triglycerides after food deprivation or lipid challenge, elevated FFA uptake into most peripheral tissues (∼2-fold) except heart, rises in long-chain 3-hydroxylated acyl-carnitines observed in diabetes, and rapid suppression of the respiratory exchange ratio (RER) during the dark cycle. Normal rises in RER following refeeding, a sign of metabolic flexibility, were severely blunted by olanzapine. Increased lipid oxidation in muscle could be explained by ∼50% lower concentrations of the negative cytoplasmic regulator of carnitine palmitoyltransferase I, malonyl-CoA. This was associated with loss of anapleurotic metabolites and citric acid cycle precursors of malonyl-CoA synthesis rather than adenosine monophosphate-activated kinase activation or direct ACC1/2 inhibition. The ability of antipsychotics to lower dark cycle RER in mice corresponded to their propensities to cause metabolic side effects. Our studies indicate that lipocentric mechanisms or altered intermediary metabolism could underlie the FFA lowering and hyperglycemia (Randle cycle) as well as some of the other side effects of atypical antipsychotics, thereby suggesting strategies for alleviating them.

Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Carnitine; Clozapine; Energy Metabolism; Fatty Acids, Nonesterified; Female; Haloperidol; Insulin Resistance; Lipolysis; Male; Malonyl Coenzyme A; Mice; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Risperidone; Thiazoles; Vitamin B Complex

The Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) was a series of effectiveness trials. The results of these trials began publication in September 2005. Among other findings, these studies were interpreted to suggest that (1) second-generation antipsychotics might have fewer advantages over first-generation antipsychotics than had been generally thought; (2) among the agents assessed, olanzapine had the best efficacy outcome; and (3) after treatment failure with a second-generation antipsychotic, the most efficacious second-line medication is clozapine. To examine the actual impact on practice of these publications, we looked at change in physician prescribing behavior based on these 3 conclusions before and after publication of CATIE.. Rates of antipsychotic medication prescriptions to 51,459 patients with an ICD-9 code of 295 for schizophrenia were extracted from a Missouri Medicaid claims database. χ² Tests were used to compare the rates of prescribing antipsychotic medications before and after each of 3 key CATIE publications (time 1 was September 2005, time 2 was December 2006, and time 3 was April 2006).. At all time points, we demonstrated a decrease in prescriptions by all prescribers for olanzapine (P < .0001). One year after time 1, we found an increase in prescriptions by all prescribers for aripiprazole (P < .0001). No statistically significant increases in clozapine prescribing were observed. Also, a small but statistically significant increase was seen in prescriptions of perphenazine (P < .02 at time 3). However, this increase occurred only for prescriptions written by psychiatrists and not other prescribers.. We found some evidence in our sample that the publication of the results from CATIE had a small but statistically significant effect on prescribing habits of psychiatrists but not other physicians in our sample population. However, larger changes occurred in prescribing behavior that were largely unrelated to the CATIE trial. We propose a hypothesis to explain the direction of observed changes.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Chi-Square Distribution; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Missouri; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

Brown adipose tissue is specialized to burn lipids for thermogenesis and energy expenditure. Second-generation antipsychotics (SGA) are the most commonly used drugs for schizophrenia with several advantages over first-line drugs, however, it can cause clinically-significant weight gain. To reveal the involvement of brown adipocytes in SGA-induced weight gain, we compared the effect of clozapine, quetiapine, and ziprasidone, SGA with different propensities to induce weight gain, on the differentiation and the expression of brown fat-specific markers, lipogenic genes and adipokines in a mouse brown preadipocyte cell line. On Oil Red-O staining, the differentiation was inhibited almost completely by clozapine (40 μM) and partially by quetiapine (30 μM). Clozapine significantly down-regulated the brown adipogenesis markers PRDM16, C/EBPβ, PPARγ2, UCP-1, PGC-1α, and Cidea in dose- and time-dependent manners, whereas quetiapine suppressed PRDM16, PPARγ 2, and UCP-1 much weakly than clozapine. Clozapine also significantly inhibited the mRNA expressions of lipogenic genes ACC, SCD1, GLUT4, aP2, and CD36 as well as adipokines such as resistin, leptin, and adiponectin. In contrast, quetiapine suppressed only resistin and leptin but not those of lipogenic genes and adiponectin. Ziprasidone (10 μM) did not alter the differentiation as well as the gene expression patterns. Our results suggest for the first time that the inhibition of brown adipogenesis may be a possible mechanism to explain weight gain induced by clozapine and quetiapine.

Topics: Adipocytes, Brown; Adipogenesis; Adipokines; Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Cell Differentiation; Cell Line; Cell Survival; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Gene Expression Regulation; Humans; Mice; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Weight Gain

Atypical antipsychotic drugs (AADs) are the standard treatment for both the acute and long-term management of schizophrenia and an augmentation to mood stabilizers for bipolar disorder (BD). Yet many individuals who take AADs do not fully respond to them, while others experience side effects that include weight gain and metabolic disorder. This in vitro pharmacogenetic study examined whether allelic variants in the 5-hydroxytryptamine (HT)(2A) receptor alter the in vitro pharmacology of six AADs (clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, ziprasidone, and aripiprazole). We selected 4 functional single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for investigation (Thr25Asn, Ile197Val, Ala447Val, and His452Tyr), conducted site-directed mutagenesis studies to induce variants into human HEK-293 cell lines, and screened allelic variants for their effects on 5-HT( 2A) receptors in the cell lines. We conducted numerous binding assays and fluorescence-based assay system (FLEX station) experiments using the six AADs. Our results indicated that three polymorphic 5-HT(2A) receptors (Ile197Val, Ala447Val, and His452Tyr) exhibited statistically significant, though modest, changes in atypical antipsychotic affinity. In addition, three polymorphic receptors (Thr25Asn, Ile197Val, and His452Try) altered AAD potency. Our findings support in vivo evidence that functional SNPs in genes encoding neuroreceptor drug targets could explain interindividual differences in AAD drug response and tolerability. We suggest that more in vivo pharmacogenetic studies of well-characterized patients who are prescribed AADs be indicated. Future pharmacogenetic studies of well-characterized patients will likely involve tagging SNPs and the use of haplotypes related to other genes encoding neuroreceptor drug targets.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Resistance; HEK293 Cells; Humans; Mutagenesis, Site-Directed; Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome; Nursing Research; Olanzapine; Pharmacogenetics; Piperazines; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2A; Risperidone; Thiazoles

Weight gain and metabolic abnormalities are serious side effects associated with the use of several second generation antipsychotics (SGA). The adipose tissue has been considered a direct SGA target involved in the development of these adverse effects. Recent studies, mainly using murine cells, have suggested that SGA increase both adipogenesis of preadipocytes and lipid accumulation in mature adipocytes. However, to date there has been little research comparing the effects of antipsychotics with different propensities to induce weight gain on human in vitro models of white adipose tissue neoformation and metabolism. The present study aimed to investigate the effects of antipsychotics either strongly associated with weight gain, such as the SGA clozapine and olanzapine, or not, such as the SGA ziprasidone and the classical antipsychotic haloperidol, on proliferation and adipocyte differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) and lipogenesis in human mature adipocytes. Whereas ziprasidone induced elevated levels of cell death during adipogenesis and could not be investigated further, we observed that clozapine, olanzapine and haloperidol had slight stimulatory effects on the transcriptional program of ADSCs adipogenesis. However, the observed changes in adipocyte-specific genes were not accompanied by a significant increase in triglyceride accumulation within differentiated adipocytes. Our data also showed that these three antipsychotics displayed inhibitory effects on the proliferation rates of undifferentiated ADSCs. Regarding mature adipocyte metabolism, we observed that olanzapine slightly inhibited insulin-stimulated lipogenesis at the highest concentration used, and haloperidol exerted the strongest inhibitory effects on both basal and insulin-stimulated lipogenesis. Taken together, our results suggest that a direct and potent effect of clozapine and olanzapine on adipose tissue biology is not an important mechanism by which these SGA induce metabolic disturbances in humans. On the other hand, the haloperidol-mediated downregulation of the lipogenic capacity of human adipose tissue may be a possible mechanism contributing to its lower propensity to induce serious metabolic side effects.

Topics: Adipocytes; Adipogenesis; Adipose Tissue; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Thiazoles; Weight Gain

The aim of our study was to assess the time to 'first improvement' associated with specific atypical (AAP) and typical (TAP) antipsychotic drugs in patients with early-onset schizophrenia and other related psychotic disorders.. This study involved a systematic chart review of all patients receiving routine clinical care in our department, with selected AAPs and TAPs, for schizophrenic psychoses, between 1997 and 2007. During this period, our review identified 296 teenage patients (141 males, 155 females; mean age 16.0 ± 1.5 years). The time to first improvement could be estimated in 258 patients; of these, 195 patients (76%) had been treated with AAPs and 63 patients (24%) with TAPs. We found that most patients were taking risperidone (N = 96), followed by olanzapine (64 patients). Other patient numbers were as follows: ziprasidone (16 patients), quetiapine (12 patients), clozapine (7 patients), haloperidol (15 patients), perphenazine (28 patients), and sulpiride (20 patients).. The mean time to first improvement was 6.9 (± 4.2) days in the AAP group and 5.8 (± 3.5) days in the TAP group; the difference was significant at the trend level (p=0.063). With respect to individual drugs, the mean time to first improvement was 7.1 (± 4.1) days for risperidone, 6.7 (± 4.2) days for olanzapine, 6.5 (± 5.2) days for ziprasidone, 6.1 (± 4.4) days for quetiapine, 7.4 (± 3.0) days for clozapine, 5.2 (± 2.4) days for haloperidol, 5.9 (± 3.8) days for perphenazine, and 6.0 (± 3.9) days for sulpiride. Differences among drugs were not significant (p=0.680).. Analysis revealed a significant group level trend indicating that typical antipsychotic drugs have faster onsets of action than atypical antipsychotic drugs.

Topics: Adolescent; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Medical Records; Olanzapine; Perphenazine; Piperazines; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sulpiride; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The purpose of this study was to identify children in a state Medicaid population who were newly treated with second-generation antipsychotics from 2001 through 2005, to classify each use of these agents as evidence based or not depending on the child's diagnoses, and to identify factors associated with the likelihood of evidence-based use of the medication.. A Medicaid claims database was used to retrospectively identify enrollees receiving initial outpatient treatment with a second-generation antipsychotic between 2001 and 2005. To capture all relevant treatments and diagnoses, claims were examined from January 2000 through December 2006. The final sample included 11,700 children under age 18. The primary measure of interest was the proportion for whom use of the antipsychotic was based on evidence. Evidence-based use (categorized as strong, plausible, or weak evidence) was defined as any use of the agent for a diagnosis supported by a clinical trial published before the end of 2005. Trend analysis and logistic regression were used.. The number of children newly treated with second-generation antipsychotics increased from 1,482 in 2001 to 3,110 in 2005. Of the new users of these agents during the study period, 41.3% had no diagnosis for which such treatment was supported by a published study. The medication with the highest level of non-evidence-based use was aripiprazole (77.1%), and risperidone had the lowest (30.6%).. The number of children receiving second-generation antipsychotics doubled in this Medicaid population between 2001 and 2005, and a large proportion of the treatments were not supported by evidence from clinical studies.

Topics: Adolescent; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Child; Child, Preschool; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Utilization; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Humans; Infant; Insurance Claim Review; Male; Medicaid; Mental Disorders; Off-Label Use; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risperidone; Thiazoles; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Long-term persistence of use, lack of co-prescribed anticholinergic antiparkinson drugs and low mortality may indicate effectiveness and safety of antipsychotic drugs. We aimed to assess 3-year prescription persistence, concomitant use of anticholinergics and mortality related to the use of all antipsychotic agents available in Norway.. Data were drawn from the Norwegian Prescription Database on the sales of antipsychotic and anticholinergic antiparkinson agents in 2004 to a total of 52,427 patients. The primary study group was a subgroup of 34,494 patients who were prescribed only one antipsychotic agent in 2004. The patients were re-investigated in 2007. For each of the 13 antipsychotic agents studied, assumed prescription persistence was assessed in light of use of anticholinergic antiparkinson agents in 2004, and casualty rates were noted.. The highest persistence was demonstrated for zuclopenthixol (69.8%) and clozapine (88.4%). Zuclopenthixol was often co-prescribed with anticholinergics (22.2%), in contrast to clozapine (3.6%). Ziprasidone was associated with a low mortality (OR = 0.08), while chlorprotixene and haloperidol were associated with a high mortality (OR = 1.34 and 3.97, respectively) compared to levomepromazine.. Clozapine demonstrated a high degree of continuity of prescription and a low level of concomitant use of anticholinergics. Zuclopenthixol also demonstrated a high degree of continuity of prescription, despite a considerable degree of co-prescribed anticholinergics. We did not find that any antipsychotic other than ziprasidone was associated with a low mortality. The use of haloperidol seemed to confer a mortality risk three times that of any of the other antipsychotic agents included.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Chlorprothixene; Cholinergic Antagonists; Clopenthixol; Clozapine; Drug Prescriptions; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Haloperidol; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Methotrimeprazine; Middle Aged; Mortality; Norway; Odds Ratio; Piperazines; Registries; Thiazoles

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Piperazines; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Weight Loss

The aim of our study was to investigate the impact of typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs on leptin concentration in blood and changes in the receptor expression in the hypothalamus of male Wistar rats.. From the age of 13 to 18 weeks, three groups of 20 animals were fed an average dose of 3.5 + 0.03 mg/ kg body weight (BW) haloperidol; 30.6 + 0.22 mg/kg BW clozapine; or 14.9 + 0.13 mg/kg BW ziprasidone in ground food pellets containing 15% fat. Twenty control animals received no drugs. Blood samples were taken at week 14, 16, and 19. Locomotor activity and exploratory behavior were measured using the alcove test at weeks 15 and 17. The expression of the hypothalamic leptin receptor in rat brains was determined by using a Western blot.. Rats medicated with haloperidol and ziprasidone showed a significantly decreased percentage weight gain and food consumption. We observed no differences in the alcove test, but locomotor activity was significantly reduced in the haloperidol group. Except for rats in the clozapine and ziprasidone groups, after 2 weeks of drug application, we found no changes in the leptin blood concentrations among the four groups or animals within each group. Moreover, we did not find specific differences in hypothalamic leptin receptor expression among the groups.. We concluded that in male Wistar rats during this treatment period, the tested drugs did not act directly on the leptin regulatory system. We recommend further studies using long-term treatment of different rat strains.

Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Blotting, Western; Clozapine; Eating; Exploratory Behavior; Haloperidol; Hypothalamus; Leptin; Male; Motor Activity; Piperazines; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Receptors, Leptin; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Weight Gain

Typical antipsychotics such as haloperidol exert their therapeutic effects via blockade of dopamine (DA) D(2) receptors, leading to extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) in humans and catalepsy in rodents. In contrast, atypical antipsychotics and new generation D(2)/5-HT(1A) antipsychotics have low cataleptogenic potential. However, there has been no systematic comparative study on the effects of these different classes of antipsychotics in non-human primates, a species displaying a more sophisticated repertoire of behavioural/motor activity than rats. Once weekly, six young adult female non-haloperidol-sensitised cynomolgus monkeys were treated i.m. with a test compound and videotaped to score catalepsy-associated behaviour (CAB: static postures, unusual positions and crouching). Haloperidol, risperidone, olanzapine, nemonapride and remoxipride induced, to different extents, an increase in unusual positions (a response akin to dystonia), some crouching and static postures. In contrast, clozapine, quetiapine, ziprasidone and aripiprazole produced much lower or no unusual positions; clozapine also produced marked increases in static postures and crouching. Among novel D(2)/5-HT(1A) antipsychotics, SLV313 and F15063 augmented the number of unusual positions, albeit at doses 16-63 times higher than those of haloperidol for approximately the same score. SSR181507 and bifeprunox produced moderate static postures, little crouching and negligible unusual positions. These data provide the first comparative analysis in cynomolgus monkeys of EPS liability of conventional, atypical and novel D(2)/5-HT(1A) antipsychotics. They indicate that the latter are less prone than haloperidol to produce CAB, and provide a basis for comparison with rodent catalepsy studies.

Topics: 8-Hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin; Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzamides; Benzodiazepines; Benzoxazoles; Catalepsy; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Dioxanes; Dopamine Antagonists; Female; Haloperidol; Macaca fascicularis; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Remoxipride; Risperidone; Serotonin Receptor Agonists; Thiazoles; Tropanes; Video Recording

The purpose of this study was to examine the association between atypical antipsychotics, including the newer agents, aripiprazole and ziprasidone, and newly treated diabetes, using the largest post-marketing cohort of patients exposed to these newer treatments that has been studied to date.. Identified two overlapping cohorts-a simple cohort (all antipsychotic users) and an inception cohort (new users of antipsychotics)-using automated data from three United States sites (60.4 million covered lives). Patients exposed to antipsychotics > or = 45 days were identified and followed for incident diagnoses of treated diabetes. Data analysis accounted for drug switching and non-consistent drug use.. In the 55 287-member inception cohort, 357 cases of newly treated diabetes were identified. Compared with current use of typical antipsychotics, current users of aripiprazole (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50-1.76), quetiapine (aHR 1.04, 95%CI, 0.67-1.62), risperidone (aHR 0.85, 95%CI, 0.54-1.36) and ziprasidone (aHR 1.05, 95%CI, 0.54-2.08) had similar low risk of diabetes. Patients exposed to olanzapine had an increased risk of diabetes (aHR 1.71, 95%CI, 1.12-2.61), and although the effect estimate is imprecise, clozapine-exposed patients had a trend towards an elevated hazard ratio (aHR 2.58, 95%CI, 0.76-8.80). Results for the simple cohort were similar.. Relative to typical antipsychotics, aripiprazole, ziprasidone, risperidone and quetiapine were not associated with an increased risk of diabetes; olanzapine and clozapine were associated with an increased risk. This analysis constitutes the largest post-marketing pharmacoepidemiologic study to date that includes the newer agents.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus; Female; Humans; Male; Mental Disorders; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quinolones; Retrospective Studies; Thiazoles; United States

Several novel antipsychotics activate serotonin 5-HT1A receptors as well as antagonising dopamine D2/3 receptors. Such a pharmacological profile is associated with a lowered liability to produce extrapyramidal side effects and enhanced efficacy in treating negative and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia. However, 5-HT1A receptor agonists increase plasma corticosterone and many antipsychotics disturb the regulation of glucose. Here, we compared the influence on plasma glucose and corticosterone of acute treatments with 'new generation' antipsychotics which target dopamine D2/3 receptors and 5-HT1A receptors, with that of atypical antipsychotics, and with haloperidol. Olanzapine and clozapine, antipsychotics that are known to produce weight gain and diabetes in humans, both at 10 mg/kg p.o., substantially increased plasma glucose (from 0.8 to 1.7 g/l) at 1 h after administration, an effect that returned to control levels after 4 h. In comparison, F15063 (40 mg/kg p.o.) was without effect at any time point. Olanzapine and clozapine dose-dependently increased plasma glucose concentrations as did SLV313 and SSR181507. Haloperidol and risperidone had modest effects whereas aripiprazole, ziprasidone and bifeprunox, antipsychotics that are not associated with metabolic dysfunction in humans, and F15063 had little or no influence on plasma glucose. The same general pattern of response was found for plasma corticosterone levels. The present data provide the first comparative study of conventional, atypical and 'new generation' antipsychotics on glucose and corticosterone levels in rats. A variety of mechanisms likely underlie the hyperglycemia and corticosterone release observed with clozapine and olanzapine, whilst the balance of dopamine D2/3/5-HT1A interaction may contribute to the less favourable impact of SLV313 and SSR181507 compared with that of bifeprunox and F15063.

Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Benzofurans; Benzoxazoles; Benzylamines; Blood Glucose; Clozapine; Corticosterone; Cyclopentanes; Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Haloperidol; Male; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quinolones; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT1A; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Thiazoles

Sub-chronic phencyclidine (PCP) treatment mimics certain aspects of schizophrenia symptomology in rats. However, there is a marked lack of attempts to model negative symptomology such as social behaviour deficits in female rats. This study was conducted to assess whether sub-chronic PCP treatment produces social interaction deficits in female rats and to ascertain if these deficits can be reversed by either typical (haloperidol) or atypical (clozapine and ziprasidone) antipsychotics.

Topics: Analysis of Variance; Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Behavior, Animal; Clozapine; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Interactions; Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists; Female; Haloperidol; Matched-Pair Analysis; Phencyclidine; Piperazines; Rats; Rats, Inbred Strains; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Social Behavior; Social Behavior Disorders; Thiazoles

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Therapy; Haloperidol; Humans; Olanzapine; Perphenazine; Piperazines; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles

Glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK3) has been recognized as an important enzyme that modulates many aspects of neuronal function. Accumulating evidence implicates abnormal activity of GSK3 in mood disorders and schizophrenia, and GSK3 is a potential protein kinase target for psychotropics used in these disorders. We previously reported that serotonin, a major neurotransmitter involved in mood disorders, regulates GSK3 by acutely increasing its N-terminal serine phosphorylation. The present study was undertaken to further determine if atypical antipsychotics, which have therapeutic effects in both mood disorders and schizophrenia, can regulate phospho-Ser-GSK3 and inhibit its activity. The results showed that acute treatment of mice with risperidone rapidly increased the level of brain phospho-Ser-GSK3 in the cortex, hippocampus, striatum, and cerebellum in a dose-dependent manner. Regulation of phospho-Ser-GSK3 was a shared effect among several atypical antipsychotics, including olanzapine, clozapine, quetiapine, and ziprasidone. In addition, combination treatment of mice with risperidone and a monoamine reuptake inhibitor antidepressant imipramine or fluoxetine elicited larger increases in brain phospho-Ser-GSK3 than each agent alone. Taken together, these results provide new information suggesting that atypical antipsychotics, in addition to mood stabilizers and antidepressants, can inhibit the activity of GSK3. These findings may support the pharmacological mechanisms of atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of mood disorders.

Topics: Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Animals; Antidepressive Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brain; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Synergism; Enzyme Inhibitors; Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Olanzapine; Phosphorylation; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Serine; Thiazoles; Time Factors

"Atypical anti-psychotics" are substances of choice in treating drug-induced psychosis (DP) in Parkinson's disease (PD). We report on four patients with DP who received treatment with ziprasidone after previously applied clozapine and quetiapine had failed. Three patients showed a significant improvement of DP, without deterioration of motor function. In one case, ziprasidone considerably increased decline in off-periods. Two patients developed pathological laughing as a possible side-effect of ziprasidone. Ziprasidone may serve as an additional "atypical anti-psychotic" for the treatment of DP in PD but can also induce deterioration of motor function.

Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Laughter; Levodopa; Male; Middle Aged; Neurologic Examination; Parkinson Disease; Parkinson Disease, Secondary; Piperazines; Psychoses, Substance-Induced; Quetiapine Fumarate; Thiazoles

To determine whether the coprescribing of two or more antipsychotics, a relatively frequent practice with little data to support its safety and efficacy, is associated with an increased prevalence of metabolic syndrome.. 364 newly admitted adults treated with second-generation antipsychotics underwent assessments evaluating antipsychotic polytherapy, and of the presence of metabolic syndrome and triglycerides/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio>3.5 (TG/HDL), a sensitive marker of insulin resistance. The correlates of antipsychotic polytherapy and associations with metabolic syndrome and TG/HDL were determined by univariate comparisons and multiple logistic regression analyses.. Antipsychotic polytherapy was present in 70 patients (19.2%) and was significantly more likely in patients with schizophrenia and those treated with clozapine, quetiapine or ziprasidone (p<0.0001). Compared with antipsychotic monotherapy, polytherapy was associated with elevated rates of metabolic syndrome (50.0% vs. 34.3%, p=0.015) and TG/HDL (50.7% vs. 35.0%, p=0.016). However, in logistic regression analyses, metabolic syndrome was significantly associated with higher body mass index (BMI), older age, a diagnosis of bipolar disorder or schizophrenia, and cotreatment with a first-generation antipsychotic (r(2): 0.25, p<0.0001). The TG/HDL marker of insulin resistance was associated with higher BMI, male sex, Caucasian race and absence of aripiprazole treatment (r(2): 0.14, p<0.0001). Antipsychotic polypharmacy dropped out of both multivariate models.. Compared with patients receiving antipsychotic monotherapy, patients on antipsychotic polytherapy have higher rates of metabolic syndrome and lipid markers of insulin resistance. However, antipsychotic polytherapy is not independently associated with the prevalence of these abnormalities, which are related to known demographic, clinical and anthropometric risk factors.

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Bipolar Disorder; Body Mass Index; Cholesterol, HDL; Clozapine; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Insulin Resistance; Male; Metabolic Syndrome; Middle Aged; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risk Factors; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Triglycerides

Topics: Adult; Allopurinol; Antipsychotic Agents; Chronic Disease; Clozapine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gout; Gout Suppressants; Hallucinations; Humans; Piperazines; Psychoses, Substance-Induced; Recurrence; Schizophrenia, Paranoid; Thiazoles

Impaired ability to detect and correct errors may contribute to poor cognitive and social function in schizophrenia.. To test the hypothesis that impairment in error monitoring contributes to impaired executive function in schizophrenia.. 56 schizophrenia patients and 77 healthy individuals were tested with the Penn Conditional Exclusion test (PCET), a computerised test of executive function which allowed collection of accuracy and latency performance parameters. Error monitoring was assessed by analyzing reaction times for correct (RTC) and incorrect (RTI) responses. Tests of face recognition, working memory (WM) and processing speed were also administered.. Executive error-monitoring effort (EXER), calculated by dividing the difference between RTI and RTC by the sum of RTC and RTI, was significantly smaller in patients than controls. A regression model with the executive function (PCET total errors) as dependent variable showed independent contributions of EXER, verbal WM and spatial WM to test performance and explained 35% of the variance. EXER showed significant association with error-monitoring effort for face recognition in patients but not controls.. Impaired error-monitoring contributes to poor executive function in schizophrenia. Independent contributions of error-monitoring effort and verbal WM to executive functions may reflect distinct contributions of prefrontal and medial frontal cortical dysfunctions. Error-monitoring mechanisms in different cognitive domains may share more neural resources in schizophrenia than in healthy individuals, reflecting inefficient processing.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Clozapine; Cognition Disorders; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Female; Humans; Male; Memory, Short-Term; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Reaction Time; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Self Efficacy; Severity of Illness Index; Thiazoles

Drug administration modifies the balance of neurotransmitter-controlled ion channel activity and consequently the firing pattern of local neuronal populations and intracerebral field potentials. Fast Fourier Transformation of these field potentials provides an electropharmacogram depicting drug-induced changes within defined frequency ranges. The present investigation was undertaken to investigate the difference between atypical and typical antipsychotic drugs.. Adult Fisher rats were implanted with 4 bipolar concentric steel electrodes using a stereotactic surgical procedure. Field potentials from four selected brain areas in freely moving rats were used to analyse the frequency content of the electropharmacogram after administration of 4 clinically used atypical antipsychotic drugs.. Atypical antipsychotics exerted effects similar to those reported for typical antipsychotics, on the electropharmacogram during the first hour after administration, whereas clear differences emerged during the second and third hour after dosing. During the latter period, only atypical antipsychotic drugs produced a statistically significant decrease in alpha1 and beta1 spectral power, especially within the striatum, somewhat less in the cortex.. Previous studies have attributed alpha1 frequency changes to the influence of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) and the present data are consistent with additional binding of atypical drugs to 5-HT receptors. This implies that a change in the balance between dopaminergic and 5-hydroxytryptaminergic neurotransmission (activation of both) is likely to underlie the relative lack of extrapyramidal side effects characteristic of atypical antipsychotics and also for their higher efficacy in the treatment of mood and cognition deficits in schizophrenics.

Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Corpus Striatum; Dibenzothiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Electroencephalography; Female; Hippocampus; Injections, Intraperitoneal; Male; Motor Activity; Movement; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Prefrontal Cortex; Quetiapine Fumarate; Rats; Rats, Inbred F344; Reticular Formation; Risperidone; Thiazoles; Time Factors

One prerequisite for therapeutic effects of psychiatric drugs is the ability to pass the blood brain barrier. Hence, it is important to know the concentration of antipsychotic drugs in brain tissue. In general, determinations of lipophilic compounds from lipophilic matricies such as the brain are a challenge. Here we have adapted a plasma assay for antipsychotics for the target organ the brain. Using modified sample preparation and chromatographic strategies, the analytes were extracted from rat brain homogenate and analyzed by LC-MS/MS. The method used a Waters Atlantis dC-18 (30 mm x 2.1 mm i.d., 3 microm) column with a mobile phase of acetonitrile/5 mM ammonium formate (pH 6.1 adjusted with formic acid) and gradient elution. All analytes were detected in positive ion mode using multiple-reaction monitoring. The method was validated and the linearity, lower limit of quantitation, precision, accuracy, recoveries, specificity and stability were determined. This method was then successfully used to quantify the rat brain tissue concentration of the analytes after chronic treatment with these antipsychotic drugs.

Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brain; Chromatography, Liquid; Clozapine; Haloperidol; Isoxazoles; Male; Olanzapine; Paliperidone Palmitate; Piperazines; Pyrimidines; Rats; Reproducibility of Results; Risperidone; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Thiazoles

This article reviews one of the basic tools of evidence-based medicine, the calculation and interpretation of Number Needed to Treat (NNT) and Number Needed to Harm (NNH). Especially appealing is the simplicity of extracting this information from journal articles that report binary outcomes, such as medication response or emergence of adverse events. On-line resources and calculators can help the clinician in determining confidence intervals for these metrics. After a discussion of absolute versus relative risk, P-values, and the mechanics of calculating NNT and NNH, the application of NNT and NNH to a large clinical trial, the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) for schizophrenia, is described.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Confidence Intervals; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Decision Making; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Likelihood Functions; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Research Design; Risk Assessment; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Databases, Factual; Dementia; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Utilization Review; Health Services for the Aged; Humans; Olanzapine; Pharmaceutical Services; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risk Assessment; Risperidone; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

To analyze the disproportionality of reporting of hyperprolactinemia, galactorrhea, and pituitary tumors with seven widely used antipsychotic drugs.. Retrospective pharmacovigilance study.. United States Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS) database.. We initially identified higher-than-expected postmarketing reports of pituitary tumors associated with risperidone, a potent dopamine D2-receptor antagonist antipsychotic, by analyzing reporting patterns of these tumors in the AERS database. To further examine this association, we analyzed disproportionate reporting patterns of pituitary tumor reports for seven antipsychotics with different affinities for blocking D2 receptors: aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, ziprasidone, and haloperidol.. To conduct both of these analyses, we used the Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS) data mining algorithm applied to the AERS database. The MGPS uses a Bayesian model to calculate adjusted observed:expected ratios of drug-adverse event associations (Empiric Bayes Geometric Mean [EBGM] values) in huge drug safety databases. The higher the adjusted reporting ratio, or EBGM value, the greater the strength of the association between a drug and an adverse event. Risperidone had the highest adjusted reporting ratios for hyperprolactinemia (EBGM 34.9, 90% confidence interval [CI] 32.8-37.1]), galactorrhea (EBGM 19.9, 90% CI 18.6-21.4), and pituitary tumor (EBGM 18.7, 90% CI 14.9-23.3) among the seven antipsychotics, and one of the highest scores for all drugs in the AERS database. Some tumors were associated with visual field defects, hemorrhage, convulsions, surgery, and severe (>10-fold) prolactin elevations. The EBGM values for risperidone for these adverse events were higher in women, but high EBGM values for these events were also seen in men and children. Moreover, the rank order of the EBGM values for pituitary tumors corresponded to the affinities of these seven drugs for D2 receptors.. Treatment with potent D2-receptor antagonists, such as risperidone, may be associated with pituitary tumors. These findings are consistent with animal (mice) studies and raise the need for clinical awareness and longitudinal studies.

Topics: Adolescent; Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Amenorrhea; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Child; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Galactorrhea; Gynecomastia; Haloperidol; Humans; Hyperprolactinemia; Male; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Pituitary Neoplasms; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Retrospective Studies; Risperidone; Sex Factors; Thiazoles; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Resistance; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Piperazines; Schizophrenia, Paranoid; Thiazoles

Antipsychotic drugs (APD) are widely prescribed for the treatment of schizophrenia. The APD are differentiated into typical and atypical based on the lower incidence of extra-pyramidal side-effects associated with the newer atypical APD. It was suggested that atypicality may arise from an interaction with the 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)(2) receptor and specifically on the 5-HT(2):dopamine D(2) affinity ratio. It is now realised that multiple subtypes of these receptors exist and that in addition, atypical APD interact with many monoamine receptors. The aim of the present study was to characterise the interaction of APD with a variety of monoamine receptors in terms of both affinity and efficacy. The data produced has highlighted that the atypical profile of APD such as olanzapine and clozapine may reflect antagonism of the 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(2C) receptors, whilst that of, ziprasidone and quetiapine may reflect partial agonist activity at the 5-HT(1A) receptor, and that of aripiprazole may reflect partial agonist activity at the 5-HT(1A) receptor as well as is its claimed partial agonist activity at the dopamine D(2) receptor.

Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Binding, Competitive; Biogenic Monoamines; CHO Cells; Clozapine; Cricetinae; Dibenzothiazepines; Dopamine; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT1A; Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2A; Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2C; Receptors, Dopamine; Receptors, Serotonin; Schizophrenia; Serotonin; Serotonin 5-HT1 Receptor Agonists; Serotonin 5-HT1 Receptor Antagonists; Serotonin 5-HT2 Receptor Antagonists; Serotonin Antagonists; Serotonin Receptor Agonists; Synaptic Transmission; Thiazoles

Atypical antipsychotics clozapine, olanzapine, and quetiapine have significant affinity for the muscarinic receptors in vitro, while aripiprazole, risperidone, and ziprasidone do not. Dissimilarity in binding profiles may contribute to the reported differences in the anticholinergic effects of these antipsychotics. However, it is difficult with the available data to predict the likelihood of anticholinergic effects occurring with various doses of an atypical antipsychotic.. We developed a model to assess the potential anticholinergic activity (AA) of atypical antipsychotics at therapeutic doses. A radioreceptor assay was used to measure in vitro AA at 6 clinically relevant concentrations of aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone. Using published pharmacokinetic data, in combination with the measured in vitro AA, dose-AA curves were generated.. Clozapine, and to a lesser extent olanzapine and quetiapine showed dose-dependent increases in AA. At therapeutic doses, the AA (in pmol/mL of atropine equivalents) was estimated to range from 27-250, 1-15, and 0-5.4 pmol/mL for clozapine, olanzapine, and quetiapine, respectively. Aripiprazole, risperidone, and ziprasidone did not demonstrate AA at any of the concentrations studied.. Therapeutic doses of clozapine, olanzapine, and, to a lesser extent, quetiapine are associated with clinically relevant AA.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Binding Sites; Clozapine; Cognition Disorders; Dibenzothiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Male; Neuropsychological Tests; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Receptors, Cholinergic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles

Previous research has suggested an association between use of atypical antipsychotics and onset of diabetes mellitus. We sought to compare the incidence of new onset diabetes among patients receiving atypical antipsychotics, traditional antipsychotics or antidepressants.. Retrospective cohort study of outpatients with claims for atypical antipsychotics (n = 10 265) compared to controls with claims for traditional antipsychotics (n = 4607), antidepressants (n = 60 856) or antibiotics (n = 59 878) in the administrative claims database of a large pharmaceutical benefit manager between June 2000 and May 2002. Main outcome measures were adjusted and unadjusted incidence rates of diabetes (new cases per 1000 per year) in a 12-month period, as measured using new prescriptions for antidiabetic drugs after a 6-month lead-in period.. Annual unadjusted incidence rates of diabetes (new cases per 1000 per year) were 7.5 for atypical antipsychotics, 11.3 for traditional antipsychotics, 7.8 for antidepressants and 5.1 for antibiotics. In multivariable analyses, age, male sex and Chronic Disease Score were associated with greater odds of diabetes onset. There were no statistically significant differences in outcome between the atypical antipsychotic, traditional antipsychotic and antidepressant groups. Multivariable comparisons among specific agents showed increased odds of diabetes for clozapine, olanzapine, ziprasidone and thioridazine (relative to risperidone), but these comparisons did not reach statistical significance.. In a large prescription claims database, outpatients taking atypical antipsychotics did not have higher rates of diabetes onset, compared to subjects taking traditional antipsychotics or antidepressants.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antidepressive Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Cohort Studies; Databases, Factual; Diabetes Mellitus; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Prescriptions; Female; Humans; Incidence; Insurance Claim Reporting; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Olanzapine; Outpatients; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Retrospective Studies; Risperidone; Sex Factors; Thiazoles; Thioridazine; Time Factors; United States

An isocratic high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method with column switching and ultraviolet (UV) detection is described for quantitative analysis of the new antipsychotic drug ziprasidone. After centrifugation of serum or plasma samples and addition of fluperlapine as internal standard, the samples were injected into the HPLC system. On-line sample clean-up was conducted on a column (10 x 4.0 mm ID) filled with silica C8 material (20-microm particle size) using 8% (vol/vol) acetonitrile in deionized water as eluent. Ziprasidone was eluted and separated on ODS Hypersil C18 material (5 microm; column size 250 x 4.6 mm ID) using acetonitrile-water-tetramethylethylendiamine (50:49.6:0.4, vol/vol/vol). The UV detector was set at 254 nm. Ziprasidone was separated within 20 minutes. The limit of quantification was 10 ng/mL. At therapeutic concentrations, the interassay reproducibility (coefficient of variation) of quality control samples was below 10%. The method was found to be robust and stable. More than 100 serum samples could be analyzed without changing the clean-up column and more than 300 samples using the same analytic column. Among multiple drugs tested for interference, only the tricyclic antidepressants trimipramine and clomipramine were found to exhibit retention times similar to that of ziprasidone. The method was applied to analyze ziprasidone concentrations in blood serum of 67 patients treated with 40 to 280 mg ziprasidone per day for at least 7 days (median 120 mg). The median steady-state serum concentration of ziprasidone was 76 ng/mL, and the 25th and 75th percentile were 43 to 131 ng/mL, respectively. Forty to 130 ng/mL may be considered the recommended target plasma concentration range. HPLC with column switching and UV detection as described here is suitable for therapeutic drug monitoring of ziprasidone.

Topics: Adult; Automation; Benzodiazepines; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Clozapine; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Reproducibility of Results; Schizophrenia; Sensitivity and Specificity; Spectrophotometry; Thiazoles; Time Factors

Excessive activation of non-NMDA receptors, AMPA and kainate, contributes to neuronal degeneration in acute and progressive pathologies, possibly including schizophrenia. Because 5-HT(1A) receptor agonists have neuroprotective properties (e.g., against NMDA-induced neurotoxicity), we compared the effects of the antipsychotics, clozapine, ziprasidone and aripiprazole, that are partial agonists at 5-HT(1A) receptor, with those of haloperidol, which is devoid of 5-HT(1A) agonist properties, on kainic acid (KA)-induced striatal lesion volumes, in C57Bl/6N mice. The involvement of 5-HT(1A) receptors was determined by antagonist studies with WAY100635, and data were compared with those obtained using the potent and high efficacy 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist, F13714. Intra-striatal KA lesioning and measurement of lesion volumes using cresyl violet staining were carried out at 48 h after surgery. F13714, antipsychotics or vehicle were administered ip twice, 30 min before and 3 1/2 h after KA injection. WAY100635 (0.63 mg/kg) or vehicle were given sc 30 min before each drug injection. Clozapine (2 x 10 mg/kg), ziprasidone (2 x 20 mg/kg) and aripiprazole (2 x 10 mg/kg) decreased lesion volume by 61%, 59% and 73%, respectively. WAY100635 antagonized the effect of ziprasidone and of aripiprazole but only slightly attenuated that of clozapine. In contrast, haloperidol (2 x 0.16 mg/kg) did not affect KA-induced lesion volume. F13714 dose-dependently decreased lesion volume. The 61% decrease of lesion volume obtained with F13714 (2 x 0.63 mg/kg) was antagonized by WAY100635. WAY100635 alone did not affect lesion volume. These results show that 5-HT(1A) receptor activation protects against KA-induced striatal lesions and indicate that some atypical antipsychotic agents with 5-HT(1A) agonist properties may protect against excitotoxic injury, in vivo.

Topics: Aminopyridines; Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Clozapine; Corpus Striatum; Disease Models, Animal; Excitatory Amino Acid Agonists; Haloperidol; Kainic Acid; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Piperazines; Piperidines; Pyridines; Quinolones; Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT1A; Schizophrenia; Serotonin 5-HT1 Receptor Agonists; Serotonin Antagonists; Thiazoles

Topics: Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dementia; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Approval; Drug Labeling; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risperidone; Thiazoles; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

We aimed to analyze the risks of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) induced by typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs using a common pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model based on the receptor occupancy. We collected the data for EPS induced by atypical antipsychotics, risperidone, olanzapine and quetiapine, and a typical antipsychotic, haloperidol from literature and analyzed the following five indices of EPS, the ratio of patients obliged to take anticholinergic medication, the occurrence rates of plural extrapyramidal symptoms (more than one of tremor, dystonia, hypokinesia, akathisia, extrapyramidal syndrome, etc.), parkinsonism, akathisia, and extrapyramidal syndrome. We tested two models, i.e., a model incorporating endogenous dopamine release owing to 5-HT2A receptor inhibition and a model not considering the endogenous dopamine release, and used them to examine the relationship between the D2 receptor occupancy of endogenous dopamine and the extent of drug-induced EPS. The model incorporating endogenous dopamine release better described the relationship between the mean D2 receptor occupancy of endogenous dopamine and the extent of EPS than the other model, as assessed by the final sum of squares of residuals (final SS) and Akaike's Information Criteria (AIC). Furthermore, the former model could appropriately predict the risks of EPS induced by two other atypical antipsychotics, clozapine and ziprasidone, which were not incorporated into the model development. The developed model incorporating endogenous dopamine release owing to 5-HT2A receptor inhibition may be useful for the prediction of antipsychotics-induced EPS.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Dibenzothiazepines; Haloperidol; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2A; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles

Considerable interest has arisen in identifying antipsychotic agents with improved efficacy against negative symptoms, such as social withdrawal. In rats, a social interaction deficit can be induced by the NMDA antagonist phencyclidine (PCP). Here, we examined the effects of antipsychotics, reported to exert dual 5-HT(1A)/D(2) actions, on PCP-induced social interaction deficits. Drugs were administered daily for 3 days in combination with either vehicle or PCP (2.5mg/kg, SC) and social interaction was measured on the last day of drug treatment. Pairs of unfamiliar rats receiving the same treatment were placed in a large open field for 10 min and the number of social behaviors were scored. The results indicate that: (1) PCP significantly reduced social interaction by over 50% compared with vehicle-treated controls; (2) haloperidol (0.0025-0.16 mg/kg, SC) and clozapine (0.04-10mg/kg, IP) did not reverse PCP-induced social interaction deficits; (3) the substituted benzamide remoxipride reversed PCP-induced deficits at 0.63 and 2.5mg/kg (4) the 5-HT(1A) agonist 8-OH-DPAT was inactive (at 0.01-0.63 mg/kg, SC); (5) among compounds reported to exert dual 5-HT(1A)/D(2) actions, SSR181507 (at 0.16 mg/kg, SC) and aripiprazole (at 0.04 and 0.16 mg/kg, IP), but not ziprasidone (0.04-2.5mg/kg, IP), SLV313 (0.0025-0.16 mg/kg, SC) or bifeprunox (0.01-0.63 mg/kg, IP), significantly reversed PCP-induced social interaction deficits; and (6) the 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist WAY100635 blocked the effects of SSR181507 and aripiprazole. These findings indicate that the balance of activity at 5-HT(1A) and D(2) receptors profoundly influences the activity of antipsychotics in this model of social withdrawal, and their potential benefit on at least some of the negative symptoms of schizophrenia.

Topics: 8-Hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin; Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Clozapine; Dioxanes; Dopamine Antagonists; Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists; Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists; Haloperidol; Interpersonal Relations; Male; Phencyclidine; Piperazines; Pyridines; Quinolones; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT1A; Remoxipride; Serotonin Antagonists; Serotonin Receptor Agonists; Thiazoles; Tropanes

In cases of treatment-resistant schizophrenia the combined application of antipsychotic drugs often becomes necessary. Clozapine has been combined successfully with other atypical antipsychotic drugs such as risperidone or amisulpride in the past. We report the difficult treatment of a 28-year-old schizophrenic woman. Psychotic symptoms were found resistant to monotherapy with clozapine or ziprasidone. In contrast, combined application led to a marked improvement in both positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia along with a decrease of side effects.The reported combination is a promising option in cases of treatment-resistant schizophrenia and should be further evaluated in prospective studies.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Piperazines; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

In cases of treatment-resistant schizophrenic psychoses combined application of atypical antipsychotic drugs is an often-used strategy.. We report the case of a 35-year old man with paranoid schizophrenia, whose symptoms turned out to be resistant to the application of olanzapine, risperidone and quetiapine. After switch to clozapine paranoid delusions remitted, but schizophrenic negative symptoms persisted and side effects limited the patient's compliance. Augmentation with ziprasidone allowed a reduction of the clozapine dose and ameliorated the affective deficits.. Positive and negative symptoms were well controlled. In spite of a transient hyperprolactinaemia and sexual dysfunction the patient was highly content.. The combined application of ziprasidone and clozapine follows a neurobiological rationale, seems able to reduce side effects, and should be further evaluated with respect to risk and benefit in prospective studies.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Follicle Stimulating Hormone; Humans; Hyperprolactinemia; Male; Piperazines; Prolactin; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia, Paranoid; Thiazoles

The noradrenergic system may play a role in antipsychotic modulation of schizophrenia symptoms. Therefore, the antagonistic potencies of the antipsychotics clozapine, chlorpromazine, risperidone, olanzapine, haloperidol, quetiapine, ziprasidone, iloperidone and aripiprazole were quantified using cell lines expressing the recombinant human alpha(2C)-adrenoceptor, alpha(2A)-adrenoceptor, or dopamine D(2L) receptor. The alpha(2)-adrenoceptor antagonists, yohimbine and idazoxan, were also tested. Alterations in cAMP were measured as changes in luminescence. In the alpha(2A)-adrenoceptor cell line, the agonist 5-bromo-6-(2-imidazolin-2-ylamino)quinoxaline (UK14,304) induced a concentration-dependent increase in luminescence. In cell lines expressing alpha(2C) and D(2L) receptors, agonists induced a concentration-dependent reduction in luminescence. Yohimbine and idazoxan were the most potent alpha(2A)-adrenoceptor antagonists, yohimbine and iloperidone were the most potent alpha(2C)-adrenoceptor antagonists, and haloperidol and olanzapine were the most potent dopamine D(2) receptor antagonists. Clozapine had the highest alpha(2C)/D(2) selectivity, and iloperidone the highest alpha(2C)/alpha(2A) ratio. It is hypothesised that alpha(2C)-adrenoceptor blockade contributes to improvement of cognitive function.

Topics: Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists; Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Antagonists; Adrenergic alpha-Agonists; Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists; Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Brimonidine Tartrate; Chlorpromazine; CHO Cells; Clozapine; Cricetinae; Cyclic AMP; Dibenzothiazepines; Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Gene Expression; Haloperidol; Humans; Isoxazoles; Norepinephrine; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Piperidines; Pirenzepine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Quinoxalines; Receptors, Adrenergic, alpha-2; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Risperidone; Thiazoles; Transfection; Yohimbine

The cognitive impairments evident in many schizophrenics are related to the severity of their negative symptoms and ability to function in society. Drugs that alleviate cognitive impairments, in addition to other psychotic symptoms, may have an important influence on treatment outcome and the course of the illness.. A delayed non-match to sample task conducted in an eight-arm radial maze was used to determine the influence of four atypical antipsychotics (olanzapine, ziprasidone, risperidone, and clozapine), as well as a typical neuroleptic (haloperidol) on consolidation processes in healthy rats.. Well-trained rats were required to recall after a 7-h delay where they had received food pellets during an information phase (first four arm choices) in order to obtain the remaining food pellets during a retention phase (second four arm choices).. The total number of errors that occurred during the retention session increased with increasing delay periods from 0 to 7 h. When administered orally immediately after the information phase, olanzapine (3 and 5 mg/kg) and risperidone (0.1 mg/kg) significantly reduced the number of errors made during the retention phase. Under the same conditions, clozapine, ziprasidone and haloperidol failed to affect the total number of retention phase errors.. Some atypical antipsychotics, such as olanzapine and risperidone, improve consolidation processes and may alleviate the cognitive impairments associated with schizophrenia.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Cognition; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Food Deprivation; Haloperidol; Male; Maze Learning; Memory; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Pirenzepine; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Risperidone; Thiazoles

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Olanzapine; Perphenazine; Piperazines; Pirenzepine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Clozapine; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Dystonia; Female; Humans; Piperazines; Schizophrenia; Serotonin Antagonists; Thiazoles

Most antipsychotic drugs act equivalently and potently on the symptoms of schizophrenia, with clozapine as the notable exception. Negative symptoms and cognitive deficits are strongly associated with poor prognosis; some reports suggest that these symptoms respond better to second- than to first-generation antipsychotics. Although second-generation antipsychotics exert their action through a blockade of dopamine and serotonin receptors (and some have a more complex action), each has a different set of pharmacologic characteristics, including side effects. Due to the differences among antipsychotics available today, optimizing treatment for individual patients requires choosing the most appropriate drug and, if necessary, switching to a different drug if the first proves unsatisfactory. The treating physician must carefully match the diverse needs of schizophrenic patients with the varied characteristics of the second-generation antipsychotics.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Haloperidol; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Pirenzepine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles

There is evidence that serotonergic mechanisms contribute to the functional profiles of antipsychotic drugs, several of which display affinity for human (h)5-HT(1A) receptors.. Here, we compared the interaction of several antipsychotic agents at h5-HT(1A) receptors employing mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), an intracellular marker.. The influence of antipsychotics on MAPK phosphorylation was quantified in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells stably transfected with h5-HT(1A) receptors by use of a highly selective antibody.. The novel antipsychotic agent, S16924, concentration-dependently (pEC(50), 8.10) stimulated the phosphorylation of MAPK. Its maximal effect (96%) was similar to that of the prototypical 5-HT(1A) agonist, (+)8-OH-DPAT (pEC(50), 8.54) (defined as 100%). The selective 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist WAY100,635, which was inactive alone, abolished stimulation of MAPK by S16924 with a pK(b) of 9.66. This stimulatory influence of S16924 on MAPK was potently mimicked by the benzoisoxazole, antipsychotic ziprasidone (pEC(50), 7.25; 93%). The atypical antipsychotic clozapine also activated MAPK, albeit with lower potency and efficacy (pEC(50), 5.43 and 43%). These actions of ziprasidone and clozapine were also blocked by WAY100,635. Evaluated at a single, high concentration, several other antipsychotics stimulated MAPK phosphorylation with variable efficacy: quetiapine (75%), ocaperidone (74%), tiospirone (57%), olanzapine (54%) and risperidone (21%). In all cases, their actions were abolished by WAY100,635. In contrast, haloperidol, thioridazine and sertindole did not stimulate MAPK.. Antipsychotics display contrasting efficacies in modulating MAPK phosphorylation at h5-HT(1A) receptors, ranging from high (e.g. S16924 and ziprasidone), via intermediate (e.g. clozapine) to low (e.g. haloperidol). Differential modulation of 5-HT(1A) receptor-coupled MAPK may contribute to their contrasting functional profiles.

Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; CHO Cells; Clozapine; Cricetinae; Enzyme Activation; Guanosine 5'-O-(3-Thiotriphosphate); Humans; Immunoblotting; Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases; Phosphorylation; Piperazines; Pyrrolidines; Receptors, Serotonin; Receptors, Serotonin, 5-HT1; Serotonin Antagonists; Serotonin Receptor Agonists; Thiazoles

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Dopamine Antagonists; Drug Labeling; Humans; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Pirenzepine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Safety; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; United States

The role of acetylcholine (ACh) in the action of antipsychotic drugs (APDs) was studied by microdialysis, without AChesterase inhibition, to facilitate the interpretation of any observed drug effects. The atypical APDs, clozapine (2.5-20 mg/kg), olanzapine (10 mg/kg), risperidone (1 mg/kg), and ziprasidone (3 mg/kg) significantly increased ACh release in rat medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), whereas the typical APDs, haloperidol (0.1-1 mg/kg), S(-)-sulpiride (10-25 mg/g), and thioridazine (5-20 mg/kg) did not. None of seven APDs increased ACh release in the nucleus accumbens or striatum at the doses effective in the mPFC. Thus, atypical and typical APDs may differ in the ability to increase cortical ACh release, a possible factor contributing to cognitive improvement in schizophrenia. After perfusion with neostigmine, an AChesterase inhibitor, clozapine, but not haloperidol, increased ACh release in all three aforementioned brain regions with an enhanced effect in the mPFC, indicating the importance of studying ACh release in the absence of AChesterase inhibition. Clozapine, and perhaps other atypical APDs, alone or in combination with an AChesterase inhibitor, may improve cognition in schizophrenia, and perhaps other cognitive disorders, e.g., early Alzheimer's disease, by enhancing cortical cholinergic transmission.

Topics: Acetylcholine; Acetylcholinesterase; Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cerebral Cortex; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Clozapine; Corpus Striatum; Haloperidol; Male; Nucleus Accumbens; Olanzapine; Oxotremorine; Piperazines; Pirenzepine; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Risperidone; Scopolamine; Sulpiride; Thiazoles; Thioridazine

Some atypical antipsychotic drugs appear to improve cognitive function in schizophrenia and since acetylcholine (ACh) is of importance in cognition, we used in vivo microdialysis to examine the effects of antipsychotics administered acutely (SC or IP) at pharmacologically comparable doses on ACh outflow in the hippocampus of the rat. The atypical antipsychotics olanzapine and clozapine produced robust increases in ACh up to 1500% and 500%, respectively. The neuroleptics haloperidol, thioridazine, and chlorpromazine, as well as the atypical antipsychotics risperidone and ziprasidone produced modest increases in ACh by about 50-100%. Since most atypical antipsychotics affect a variety of monoaminergic receptors, we examined whether selective ligands for some of these receptors affect hippocampal ACh. Antagonists for the 5-HT(2A) (MDL 100,907), the 5-HT(2C) (SB 242,084), the 5-HT(6) (Ro 04-6790), the D(2) (raclopride) receptors, and the alpha(1)-adrenoceptors (prazosin) modestly increased ACh by about 50%. The 5-HT(1A) agonist R-(+)-8-OH-DPAT and the alpha(2)-adrenoceptor antagonist yohimbine significantly increased ACh by about 100% and 50%, respectively. Thus, olanzapine and clozapine increased ACh to a greater extent than other tested antipsychotics, explaining perhaps their purported beneficial effect in cognitive function in schizophrenia. It appears that selective activity at each of the monoaminergic receptors studied is not the sole mechanism underlying the olanzapine and clozapine induced increases in hippocampal ACh.

Topics: Acetylcholine; Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists; Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chlorpromazine; Clozapine; Dialysis Solutions; Dopamine Antagonists; Extracellular Space; Haloperidol; Hippocampus; Injections, Intraperitoneal; Injections, Subcutaneous; Male; Microdialysis; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Pirenzepine; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Risperidone; Serotonin Antagonists; Thiazoles; Thioridazine

Rats were trained to recognize a discriminative stimulus (DS) elicited by the dopamine D(2)/D(3) receptor agonist, PD128,907 (0.16 mg/kg, i.p.), which suppressed frontocortical release of dopamine (DA) but not 5-HT. The selective 5-HT1A receptor agonists, 8-OH-DPAT and flesinoxan, dose-dependently generalized to PD128,907 with effective dose(50)s (ED50s) of 0.08 and 1.5mg/kg, s.c., respectively, and inhibited the release and synthesis of 5-HT but not of DA. The 'atypical' antipsychotic, clozapine, which displays weak partial agonist properties at 5-HT1A receptors, dose-dependently, though partially, generalized to PD128,907 (50%, 2.5mg/kg, s.c.). Further, S16924 and ziprasidone, which in a like manner, display partial agonist activity at 5-HT1A receptors, generalized with ED50s of 0.6 and 2.3mg/kg, s.c., respectively. In contrast, haloperidol, which is devoid of affinity at 5-HT1A sites, was inactive. At doses equivalent to those generalizing to PD128,907, clozapine, S16924 and ziprasidone reduced serotonergic (but not dopaminergic) transmission, whereas haloperidol was inactive. In rats trained to recognize a further D2/D3 agonist, 7-OH-DPAT (0.16 mg/kg, i.p.), generalization was obtained similarly with 8-OH-DPAT (ED50 = 0.07 mg/kg, s.c.), flesinoxan (3.4) and clozapine (0.6), but not with haloperidol. In conclusion, although PD128,907 and 7-OH-DPAT do not directly interact with 5-HT1A receptors or influence serotonergic transmission, their DS properties are mimicked by 5-HT1A receptor agonists at doses activating 5-HT1A but not D2/D3 (auto)receptors. These observations likely account for generalization of clozapine, S16924 and ziprasidone to PD128,907 and 7-OH-DPAT inasmuch as they behave as antagonists at D2/D3 receptors, yet agonists at 5-HT1A (auto)receptors.

Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzopyrans; Clozapine; Discrimination Learning; Dopamine; Dopamine Agonists; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Oxazines; Piperazines; Pyrrolidines; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Receptors, Dopamine D3; Receptors, Serotonin; Receptors, Serotonin, 5-HT1; Serotonin; Serotonin Receptor Agonists; Tetrahydronaphthalenes; Thiazoles

Ziprasidone is a novel antipsychotic agent with a unique combination of pharmacological activities at human receptors. Ziprasidone has high affinity for human 5-HT receptors and for human dopamine D(2) receptors. Ziprasidone is a 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist and an antagonist at 5-HT(2A), 5-HT(2C) and 5-HT(1B/1D) receptors. Additionally, ziprasidone inhibits neuronal uptake of 5-HT and norepinephrine comparable to the antidepressant imipramine. This unique pharmacological profile of ziprasidone may be related to its clinical effectiveness as a treatment for the positive, negative and affective symptoms of schizophrenia with a low propensity for extrapyramidal side effects, cognitive deficits and weight gain.

Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Binding Sites; Binding, Competitive; Cell Line; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Dopamine Antagonists; Haloperidol; Humans; Neurons; Norepinephrine; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Pirenzepine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Rats; Receptors, Adrenergic, alpha; Receptors, Dopamine; Receptors, Serotonin; Receptors, Serotonin, 5-HT1; Risperidone; Serotonin; Serotonin Antagonists; Thiazoles

5-HT(1A) receptors are implicated in the aetiology of schizophrenia. Herein, the influence of 15 antipsychotics on the binding of the selective 'neutral' antagonist, [3H]WAY100,635 ([3H]N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-(2-pyridinyl)-cyclo-hexanecarboxamide), was examined at human 5-HT(1A) receptors expressed in Chinese Hamster Ovary cells. In competition binding experiments, 5-HT displayed biphasic isotherms which were shifted to the right in the presence of the G-protein uncoupling agent, GTPgammaS (100 microM). In analogy, the isotherms of ziprasidone, quetiapine and S16924 (((R-2-[1-[2-(2,3-dihydro-benzo[1,4]dioxin-5-yloxy)-ethyl]-pyrrolidin-3yl]-1-(4-fluoro-phenyl)-ethanone), were displaced to the right by GTPgammaS, consistent with agonist actions. Binding of several other antipsychotics, such as ocaperidone, olanzapine and risperidone, was little influenced by GTPgammaS. Isotherms of the neuroleptics, haloperidol, chlorpromazine and thioridazine were shifted to the left in the presence of GTPgammaS, suggesting inverse agonist properties. For most ligands, the magnitude of affinity changes induced by GTPgammaS (alteration in pK(i) values) correlated well with their previously determined efficacies in [35S]GTPgammaS binding studies [Eur. J. Pharmacol. 355 (1998) 245]. In contrast, the affinity of the 'atypical' antipsychotic agent, clozapine, which is a known partial agonist at 5-HT(1A) receptors, was less influenced by GTPgammaS. When the ratio of high-/low-affinity values was plotted against efficacy, hyperbolic isotherms were obtained, consistent with a modified ternary complex model which assumes that receptors can adopt active conformations in the absence of agonist. In conclusion, modulation of [3H]-WAY100,635 binding by GTPgammaS differentiated agonist vs. inverse agonist properties of antipsychotics at 5-HT(1A) receptors. These may contribute to differing profiles of antipsychotic activity.

Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Binding, Competitive; Chlorpromazine; CHO Cells; Clozapine; Cricetinae; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; GTP-Binding Proteins; Guanosine 5'-O-(3-Thiotriphosphate); Haloperidol; Humans; Membranes; Piperazines; Piperidines; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Pyrrolidines; Receptors, Serotonin; Receptors, Serotonin, 5-HT1; Thiazoles; Thioridazine; Tritium

Ziprasidone (Zeldox) is a novel antipsychotic with a unique combination of antagonist activities at monoaminergic receptors and transporters and potent agonist activity at serotonin 5-HT(1A) receptors. 5-HT(1A) receptor agonism may be an important feature in ziprasidone's clinical actions because 5-HT(1A) agonists increase cortical dopamine release, which may underlie efficacy against negative symptoms and reduce dopamine D(2) antagonist-induced extrapyramidal side effects. This study investigated the in vivo 5-HT(1A) agonist activity of ziprasidone by measuring the contribution of 5-HT(1A) receptor activation to the ziprasidone-induced cortical dopamine release in rats.. Effects on dopamine release were measured by microdialysis in prefrontal cortex and striatum. The role of 5-HT(1A) receptor activation was estimated by assessing the sensitivity of the response to pretreatment with the 5-HT(1A) antagonist, WAY-100635. For comparison, the D(2)/5-HT(2A) antagonists clozapine and olanzapine, the D(2) antagonist haloperidol, the 5-HT(2A) antagonist MDL 100,907 and the 5-HT(1A) agonist 8-OHDPAT were included.. Low doses (<3.2 mg/kg) of ziprasidone, clozapine, and olanzapine increased dopamine release to approximately the same extent in prefrontal cortex as in striatum, but higher doses (> or =3.2 mg/kg) resulted in an increasingly preferential effect on cortical dopamine release. The 5-HT(1A) agonist 8-OHDPAT produced a robust increase in cortical dopamine (DA) release without affecting striatal DA release. In contrast, the D(2) antagonist haloperidol selectively increased striatal DA release, whereas the 5-HT(2A) antagonist MDL 100,907 had no effect on cortical or striatal DA release. Prior administration of WAY-100635 completely blocked the cortical DA increase produced by 8-OHDPAT and significantly attenuated the ziprasidone- and clozapine-induced cortical DA increase. WAY-100635 pretreatment had no effect on the olanzapine-induced DA increase.. The preferential increase in DA release in rat prefrontal cortex produced by ziprasidone is mediated by 5-HT(1A) receptor activation. This result extends and confirms other in vitro and in vivo data suggesting that ziprasidone, like clozapine, acts as a 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist in vivo, which may contribute to its activity as an antipsychotic with efficacy against negative symptoms and a low extrapyramidal side effect liability.

Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Clozapine; Corpus Striatum; Dopamine; Haloperidol; Male; Microdialysis; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Pirenzepine; Prefrontal Cortex; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptors, Serotonin; Sensitivity and Specificity; Synaptic Transmission; Thiazoles; Time Factors

Ziprasidone is a novel antipsychotic agent which binds with high affinity to 5-HT1A receptors (Ki = 3.4 nM), in addition to 5-HT1D, 5-HT2, and D2 sites. While it is an antagonist at these latter receptors, ziprasidone behaves as a 5-HT1A agonist in vitro in adenylate cyclase measurements. The goal of the present study was to examine the 5-HT1A properties of ziprasidone in vivo using as a marker of central 5-HT1A activity the inhibition of firing of serotonin-containing neurons in the dorsal raphe nucleus. In anesthetized rats, ziprasidone dose-dependently slowed raphe unit activity (ED50 = 300 micrograms/kg i.v.) as did the atypical antipsychotics clozapine (ED50 = 250 micrograms/kg i.v.) and olanzapine (ED50 = 1000 micrograms/kg i.v.). Pretreatment with the 5-HT1A antagonist WAY-100,635 (10 micrograms/kg i.v.) prevented the ziprasidone-induced inhibition; the same dose of WAY-100,635 had little effect on the inhibition produced by clozapine and olanzapine. Because all three agents also bind to alpha 1 receptors, antagonists of which inhibit serotonin neuronal firing, this aspect of their pharmacology was assessed with desipramine (DMI), a NE re-uptake blocker previously shown to reverse the effects of alpha 1 antagonists on raphe unit activity. DMI (5 mg/kg i.v.) failed to reverse the inhibitory effect of ziprasidone but produced nearly complete reversal of that of clozapine and olanzapine. These profiles suggest a mechanism of action for each agent, 5-HT1A agonism for ziprasidone and alpha 1 antagonism for clozapine and olanzapine. The 5-HT1A agonist activity reported here clearly distinguishes ziprasidone from currently available antipsychotic agents and suggests that this property may play a significant role in its pharmacologic actions.

Topics: Action Potentials; Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Animals; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Desipramine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Male; Neurons; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Pirenzepine; Pyridines; Raphe Nuclei; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptors, Serotonin; Receptors, Serotonin, 5-HT1; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Serotonin Antagonists; Serotonin Receptor Agonists; Thiazoles

In the present study we have compared the effects of the classical antipsychotic drug haloperidol and four different atypical antipsychotics (clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, ziprasidone) on extracellular levels of dopamine and noradrenaline in the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) of conscious rats. Haloperidol (10, 100 and 800 nmol/kg), clozapine (0.3, 1, 10 and 30 micromol/kg), risperidone (100, 500 and 5000 nmol/kg), olanzapine (10, 100 and 500 nmol/kg) and ziprasidone (10, 100 and 1000 nmol/kg) were administered subcutaneously to rats. All compounds induced increases in dialysate levels of dopamine and noradrenaline in the medial prefrontal cortex. The increases induced by the four antipsychotic agents in extracellular levels of dopamine and noradrenaline displayed a striking co-variation both in dose and time. A similar co-variation was seen in the decrease of dopamine and noradrenaline, after administration of a low dose (30 nmol/kg, s.c.) of the dopamine D2/3 receptor agonist (+)-7-hydroxy-2-(N,N-di-n-propylamino) tetralin ((+)-7-OH-DPAT). It is concluded that there is a close coupling between the release of dopamine and noradrenaline in the medial prefrontal cortex. The mechanism of action of this interaction, that might be of importance for a better understanding of the mechanism of action of antipsychotic drugs, is discussed.

Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Brain; Clozapine; Dopamine; Dopamine Agonists; Extracellular Space; Haloperidol; Male; Norepinephrine; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Pirenzepine; Prefrontal Cortex; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Reference Values; Risperidone; Tetrahydronaphthalenes; Thiazoles