clozapine and sertindole

The dose-response relationships of antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia are not well defined, but such information would be important for decision making by clinicians. The authors sought to fill this gap by conducting dose-response meta-analyses.. A search of multiple electronic databases (through November 2018) was conducted for all placebo-controlled dose-finding studies for 20 second-generation antipsychotic drugs and haloperidol (oral and long-acting injectable, LAI) in people with acute schizophrenia symptoms. Dose-response curves were constructed with random-effects dose-response meta-analyses and a spline model. The outcome measure was total score reduction from baseline on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale or the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. The authors identified 95% effective doses, explored whether higher or lower doses than the currently licensed ones might be more appropriate, and derived dose equivalencies from the 95% effective doses.. Sixty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The 95% effective doses and the doses equivalent to 1 mg of oral risperidone, respectively, were as follows: amisulpride for patients with positive symptoms, 537 mg/day and 85.8 mg; aripiprazole, 11.5 mg/day and 1.8 mg; aripiprazole LAI (lauroxil), 463 mg every 4 weeks and 264 mg; asenapine, 15.0 mg/day and 2.4 mg; brexpiprazole, 3.36 mg/day and 0.54 mg; haloperidol, 6.3 mg/day and 1.01 mg; iloperidone, 20.13 mg/day and 3.2 mg; lurasidone, 147 mg/day and 23.5 mg; olanzapine, 15.2 mg/day and 2.4 mg; olanzapine LAI, 277 mg every 2 weeks and 3.2 mg; paliperidone, 13.4 mg/day and 2.1 mg; paliperidone LAI, 120 mg every 4 weeks and 1.53 mg; quetiapine, 482 mg/day and 77 mg; risperidone, 6.3 mg/day and 1 mg; risperidone LAI, 36.6 mg every 2 weeks and 0.42 mg; sertindole, 22.5 mg/day and 3.6 mg; and ziprasidone, 186 mg/day and 30 mg. For amisulpride and olanzapine, specific data for patients with predominant negative symptoms were available. The authors have made available on their web site a spreadsheet with this method and other updated methods that can be used to estimate dose equivalencies in practice.. In chronic schizophrenia patients with acute exacerbations, doses higher than the identified 95% effective doses may on average not provide more efficacy. For some drugs, higher than currently licensed doses might be tested in further trials, because their dose-response curves did not plateau.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Clozapine; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Haloperidol; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Isoxazoles; Lurasidone Hydrochloride; Olanzapine; Paliperidone Palmitate; Piperazines; Piperidines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Thiazoles; Thiophenes

There are many psychotropic drugs available for treatment of schizophrenia. The clinician's choice of the most effective first-line antipsychotic treatment for patients with schizophrenia should balance considerations of differential efficacy of antipsychotics against the relative risk of different side effects.. We reviewed recent studies using meta-analytic techniques and additional studies of new antipsychotics which quantitatively evaluate the efficacy of side effects of first- and second-generation antipsychotics and studies of the efficacy on add-on secondary medications. We present an integrated summary of these results to guide a clinician's decision-making.. Recent meta-analyses have suggested that antipsychotics are not equivalent in efficacy. Clozapine (effect size [SMD] 0.88 vs. placebo), amisulpride (effect size 0.6 vs placebo), olanzapine (effect size 0.59 vs. placebo), and risperidone (effect size 0.56 vs placebo) show small but statistically significant differences compared to a number of other antipsychotics on measures of overall efficacy (effect sizes 0.33-0.50). However, increasing placebo response remains a concern in interpreting these data. Amisulpride (effect size 0.47 vs placebo) and cariprazine (effect size in one trial compared to risperidone 0.29) have the strongest evidence indicating greater efficacy for treating primary negative symptoms relative to other antipsychotics. In terms of side effects, clozapine and olanzapine have among the highest weight gain potential and sertindole and amisulpride have more effects on QTc prolongation than other commonly used antipsychotics. Prolactin elevation is highest with paliperidone, risperidone, and amisulpride. Adjunctive treatment with an antidepressant drug may improve response in patients with schizophrenia who also have severe depressive or negative symptoms. For multi-episode patients with an inadequate response to an adequate dose and duration of the initial antipsychotic choice, switching to another antipsychotic, with a different receptor profile, may improve response, although evidence is very limited. In first-episode patients, a recent study on switching to another antipsychotic, with a different receptor profile after 4 weeks demonstrated no beneficial effects. There is little evidence to support using doses above the therapeutic range other than in exceptional circumstances.. Our review of recent studies using meta-analytic techniques has provided evidence that all antipsychotics are not equal in the severity of different side effects and in some measures of clinical efficacy. Comparative analysis and rankings from network meta-analyses can provide guidance to clinicians in choosing the most appropriate antipsychotic for first-line treatment, if used in conjunction with available information of the patient's history of previous clinical response or higher risks for specific side effects.

Topics: Amisulpride; Antidepressive Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Depression; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

In many countries of the industrialised world second-generation ("atypical") antipsychotics (SGAs) have become the first line drug treatment for people with schizophrenia. The question as to whether and if so how much the effects of the various SGAs differ is a matter of debate. In this review we examined how the efficacy and tolerability of risperidone differs from that of other SGAs.. To evaluate the effects of risperidone compared with other atypical antipsychotics for people with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like psychosis.. 1. Electronic searching We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (April 2007) which is based on regular searches of BIOSIS, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO.2. Reference searching We inspected the references of all identified studies for more trials.3. Personal contact We contacted the first author of each included study for missing information.4. Drug companies We contacted the manufacturers of all atypical antipsychotics included for additional data.. We included all randomised, blinded trials comparing oral risperidone with oral forms of amisulpride, aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, sertindole, ziprasidone or zotepine in people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like psychosis.. We extracted data independently. For dichotomous data we calculated risk ratio (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) on an intention-to-treat basis based on a random-effects model. We calculated numbers needed to treat/harm (NNT/NNH) where appropriate. For continuous data, we calculated mean differences (MD), again based on a random-effects model.. The review currently includes 45 blinded RCTs with 7760 participants. The number of RCTs available for each comparison varied: four studies compared risperidone with amisulpride, two with aripiprazole, 11 with clozapine, 23 with olanzapine, eleven with quetiapine, two with sertindole, three with ziprasidone and none with zotepine. Attrition from these studies was high (46.9%), leaving the interpretation of results problematic. Furthermore, 60% were industry sponsored, which can be a source of bias.There were few significant differences in overall acceptability of treatment as measured by leaving the studies early. Risperidone was slightly less acceptable than olanzapine, and slightly more acceptable than ziprasidone in this regard.Risperidone improved the general mental state (PANSS total score) slightly less than olanzapine (15 RCTs, n = 2390, MD 1.94 CI 0.58 to 3.31), but slightly more than quetiapine (9 RCTs, n = 1953, MD -3.09 CI -5.16 to -1.01) and ziprasidone (3 RCTs, n = 1016, MD -3.91 CI -7.55 to -0.27). The comparisons with the other SGA drugs were equivocal. Risperidone was also less efficacious than olanzapine and clozapine in terms of leaving the studies early due to inefficacy, but more efficacious than ziprasidone in the same outcome.Risperidone produced somewhat more extrapyramidal side effects than a number of other SGAs (use of antiparkinson medication versus clozapine 6 RCTs, n = 304, RR 2.57 CI 1.47 to 4.48, NNH 6 CI 33 to 3; versus olanzapine 13 RCTs, n = 2599, RR 1.28 CI 1.06 to 1.55, NNH 17 CI 9 to 100; versus quetiapine 6 RCTs, n = 1715, RR 1.98 CI 1.16 to 3.39, NNH 20 CI 10 to 100; versus ziprasidone 2 RCTs, n = 822, RR 1.42 CI 1.03 to 1.96, NNH not estimable; parkinsonism versus sertindole 1 RCT, n = 321, RR 4.11 CI 1.44 to 11.73, NNH 14 CI 100 to 8). Risperidone also increased prolactin levels clearly more than all comparators, except for amisulpride and sertindole for which no data were available.Other adverse events were less consistently reported, but risperidone may well produce more weight gain and/or associated metabolic problems than amisulpride (weight gain: 3 RCTs, n = 585, MD 0.99 CI 0.37 to 1.61), aripiprazole (cholesterol increase: 1 RCT, n = 83, MD 22.30 CI 4.91 to 39.69) and ziprasidone (cholesterol increase 2 RCTs, n = 767, MD 8.58 CI 1.11 to 16.04) but less than clozapine (weight gain 3 RCTs n = 373, MD -3.30 CI -5.65 to -0.95), olanzapine (weight gain 13 RCTs, n = 2116, MD -2.61 CI -3.74 to -1.48), quetiapine (ch. Risperidone seems to produce somewhat more extrapyramidal side effects and clearly more prolactin increase than most other SGAs. It may also differ from other compounds in efficacy and in the occurrence of other adverse effects such as weight gain, metabolic problems, cardiac effects, sedation and seizures. Nevertheless, the large proportion of participants leaving studies early and incomplete reporting of outcomes makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions. Further large trials, especially comparing risperidone with those other new drugs for which only a few RCTs are available, are needed.

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sulpiride; Thiazoles

The possible side effects of antipsychotics are extensive, varied, frequently, intolerable, too often serious and sometimes fatal. The knowledge about pharmacoepidemiological and toxicological aspects of atypical neuroleptics usage is very important in clinical practice. In this paper we described practical information about side effects, toxicological profile and unwanted drug interactions of atypical neuroleptics.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Drug Interactions; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Olanzapine

The metabolic side effects of second-generation antipsychotics (SGA) are serious and have not been compared head to head in a meta-analysis. We conducted a meta-analysis of studies comparing the metabolic side effects of the following SGAs head-to-head: amisulpride, aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, sertindole, ziprasidone, zotepine.. We searched the register of the Cochrane schizophrenia group (last search May 2007), supplemented by MEDLINE and EMBASE (last search January 2009) for randomized, blinded studies comparing the above mentioned SGA in the treatment of schizophrenia or related disorders. At least three reviewers extracted the data independently. The primary outcome was weight change. We also assessed changes of cholesterol and glucose. The results were combined in a meta-analysis.. We included 48 studies with 105 relevant arms. Olanzapine produced more weight gain than all other second-generation antipsychotics except for clozapine where no difference was found. Clozapine produced more weight gain than risperidone, risperidone more than amisulpride, and sertindole more than risperidone. Olanzapine produced more cholesterol increase than aripiprazole, risperidone and ziprasidone. (No differences with amisulpride, clozapine and quetiapine were found). Quetiapine produced more cholesterol increase than risperidone and ziprasidone. Olanzapine produced more increase in glucose than amisulpride, aripiprazole, quetiapine, risperidone and ziprasidone; no difference was found with clozapine.. Some SGAs lead to substantially more metabolic side effects than other SGAs. When choosing an SGA for an individual patient these side effects with their potential cause of secondary diseases must be weighed against efficacy and characteristics of the individual patient.

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Cholesterol; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sulpiride; Thiazoles; Weight Gain

Weight overload and obesity became these last years a major health problem. However gain weight is a frequent side effect of a large number of psychotropics. This article proposes to discuss this potential while reviewing various molecules. This reveals that the atypical antipsychotics are most likely to induce weight gain, in particular clozapine and olanzapine. The tricyclic antidepressants and mirtazapine come next, with the majority of the mood stabilizers. The old antipsychotics seem to involve less gain of weight. The SSRI make lose weight in the first weeks of treatment, but induce a moderate weight gain on the long term.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amisulpride; Antidepressive Agents; Antimanic Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Body Mass Index; Child; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fructose; Haloperidol; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Male; Obesity; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Placebos; Psychotropic Drugs; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Socioeconomic Factors; Sulpiride; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Topiramate; Valproic Acid; Weight Gain

Both first-generation and second-generation antipsychotic medications can lower the seizure threshold, increasing the chances of seizure induction. This article reviews the published literature concerning the seizure-lowering effects of first- and second-generation antipsychotic medication. Unfortunately, rigorously controlled studies are relatively infrequent, and case reports form a large part of the available literature, limiting the confidence with which firm conclusions can be drawn. Of the first-generation antipsychotic medications, chlorpromazine appears to be associated with the greatest risk of seizure provocation, although other first-generation antipsychotics also lower seizure threshold. Conversely, molindone, haloperidol, fluphenazine, pimozide and trifluoperazine are associated with a lower risk of seizure induction. Clozapine is the second-generation antipsychotic most frequently associated with seizures, with risperidone appearing to confer a relatively low risk. Other factors such as history of seizure activity, concurrent use of other drugs that lower seizure threshold, rapid dose titration, slow drug metabolism, metabolic factors and drug-drug interactions appear to increase the chances of an antipsychotic medication inducing seizure activity.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Pirenzepine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risperidone; Seizures; Thiazoles

"Atypical" antipsychotics represent a new generation of antipsychotics with a significantly lower incidence of extrapyramidal side effects (EPS), as well as little or no effect on prolactin elevation. These advantages constitute a major improvement in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia. The exact mechanisms that make these drugs atypical is not clear. However, a preferential action on serotonin 5-HT2 or D4 receptors, or a more rapid dissociation from the dopamine D2 receptor, may account for atypicality. Although the atypical antipsychotics have overcome EPS, other side effects such as weight gain and impaired glucose tolerance/lipid abnormalities have come to the fore. Thus, the challenges are far from over. The current atypicals are much more effective against the psychosis of schizophrenia than against the other, more enduring aspects of this disorder, e.g. negative symptoms and cognitive dysfunction. At present, the atypicals use a "pharmacological shotgun" strategy to treat aspects of the disease in all patients. A more sophisticated and perhaps effective approach to schizophrenia may lie in independently targeting the pathophysiological mechanisms of each clinical dimension (i.e. positive, negative, cognitive, and affective) with more selective drugs that can be combined and individually titrated to the needs of each patient.

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Dibenzothiepins; Dopamine Antagonists; Drug Monitoring; Haloperidol; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Pirenzepine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Receptors, Dopamine D4; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Serotonin Antagonists; Sulpiride; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

A comprehensive evaluation of atypical antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia involves documentation of clinical effectiveness, quality of life and medical cost outcomes. The results of pharmacoeconomic studies assist psychiatrists, and other healthcare decision-makers, in identifying pharmacotherapies that provide the greatest benefit to patients at the most acceptable cost. The cost-effectiveness of the newer atypical antipsychotics has been examined using clinical decision-modeling studies and randomized clinical trials. The research evidence suggests that clozapine is a cost-effective treatment for neuroleptic refractory schizophrenia. Olanzapine and risperidone may be cost-neutral or, at best, slightly cost-saving compared with conventional antipsychotics, although they do improve clinical symptoms and quality of life outcomes. There is insufficient published data on pharmacoeconomic outcomes for sertindole, quetiapine and ziprasidone to make any conclusions about their cost-effectiveness in treating schizophrenia.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dibenzothiazepines; Health Care Costs; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone

The results of controlled studies of the efficacy of the new atypical neuroleptics in treating negative symptoms show that these antipsychotics have a more pronounced effect on negative symptoms in acute schizophrenic patients than the classical neuroleptics. Supplementary complex statistical analyses substantiate that the increased efficacy of the atypical neuroleptics in treating negative symptoms can only partially be explained by indirect effects of better extrapyramidal tolerability, better effects on productive psychotic symptoms, etc. Instead, it is due largely to the stronger direct effect of these atypical neuroleptics. Clinical studies to evaluate their efficacy in chronic schizophrenic patients with stable, predominantly negative symptoms are still mostly lacking. First results support the presumption that atypical neuroleptics have a direct effect. Parallel to the evaluation of the new atypical neuroleptics, important progress has been made in the methodology of clinical studies in this area.

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Dibenzothiepins; Double-Blind Method; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Neurotransmitter Agents; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Pirenzepine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Sulpiride; Thiazoles

To review systematically data relating to weight changes with atypical antipsychotics.. We conducted a Medline search on October 29 1999 and covered the period 1980-99. All recovered papers were examined for further relevant reports. In addition, we wrote to pharmaceutical manufacturers and 10 practising clinicians to ask them to provide other relevant reports known to them.. Eighty reports mentioning change in body weight were retrieved. Data relating to weight changes were of variable quality. Weight changes were indicated by a variety of measures. The majority of reports related to short-term changes.. All atypical drugs, with the exception of ziprasidone, have been associated with weight increases. Clozapine seems to have the highest risk of weight gain, followed by olanzapine and quetiapine. There is probably a lower risk with risperidone, sertindole and zotepine and a still lower risk with amisulpride. Ziprasidone appears not to be associated with weight gain. In the absence of more compelling data, these rankings must be considered approximate and preliminary. Longer, more robust trials are needed.

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Dibenzothiepins; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Pirenzepine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Sulpiride; Thiazoles; Weight Gain

To develop an evidence base for recommendations on the use of atypical antipsychotics for patients with schizophrenia.. Systematic overview and meta-regression analyses of randomised controlled trials, as a basis for formal development of guidelines.. 12 649 patients in 52 randomised trials comparing atypical antipsychotics (amisulpride, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and sertindole) with conventional antipsychotics (usually haloperidol or chlorpromazine) or alternative atypical antipsychotics.. Overall symptom scores. Rate of drop out (as a proxy for tolerability) and of side effects, notably extrapyramidal side effects.. For both symptom reduction and drop out, there was substantial heterogeneity between the results of trials, including those evaluating the same atypical antipsychotic and comparator drugs. Meta-regression suggested that dose of conventional antipsychotic explained the heterogeneity. When the dose was

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Costs; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Regression Analysis; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Sulpiride

The introduction of conventional antipsychotics revolutionized the management of psychotic disorders in the 1950s. The use of these agents has been marked by several shortcomings, including their association with severe motor disturbances and their limited efficacy in treating the negative and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia. Patients noncompliance has largely been the result of subjectively distressing extrapyramidal motor side-effects (EPMS). It was therefore necessary to develop antipsychotic drugs with selective pharmacological profiles, e.g. limbic selectivity. A defining characteristic of atypical neuroleptics is a higher ratio of serotonin receptor blockade to D2 receptor blockade. Their primary advantage is their superior side-effect profile. The implications of EPMS reduction touch several domains of pathology in schizophrenia such as short- and long-term movement disorders, noncompliance, relapse rate, negative symptoms and cognitive dysfunction. Novel antipsychotics may represent the second pharmacological revolution in the treatment of psychotic disorders. There is, however, still a need for a critical evaluation of the risk-benefit-ratio of differing atypical agents.

Topics: Aged; Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Dibenzothiazepines; Dibenzothiepins; Haloperidol; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Pirenzepine; Placebos; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Serotonin Antagonists; Sulpiride; Thiazoles

The introduction of the atypical antipsychotics clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine and sertindole for the treatment of schizophrenia has coincided with an increased awareness of the potential of drug-drug interactions, particularly involving the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes. The current literature describing the pharmacokinetics of the metabolism of these agents, including their potential to influence the metabolism of other medications, is reviewed. Clozapine appears to be metabolized primarily by CYP1A2 and CYP3A4, with additional contributions by CYP2C19 and CYP2D6. In addition, clozapine may inhibit the activity of CYP2C9 and CYP2C19, and induce CYP1A, CYP2B and CYP3A. Risperidone is metabolized by CYP2D6, and possibly CYP3A4. In vitro data indicate that olanzapine is metabolized by CYP1A2 and CYP2D6. Quetiapine is metabolised by CYP3A4 and sertindole by CYP2D6. There is, however, a general paucity of in vivo data regarding the metabolism of the atypical antipsychotics, indicating a need for further research in this area.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Interactions; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia

Since the discovery of the neuroleptics in 1952, french psychiatrists have proposed a classification of neuroleptics taking into account the pharmalogical and therapeutic differences between these drugs. They distinguished three different clinical effects of neuroleptics: sedative effects, effects on the positive symptoms of schizophrenia and effects on the negative symptoms. However these agents have many side effects including the extrapyramidal syndrome (EPS), akathisia, dystonia and parkinsonism. These side effects occur in up to 75% of patients receiving typical neuroleptics and are the main cause of non-compliance. Since the eighties, clozapine was introduced for use in refractory patients because it has a better efficacy (than haloperidol) specifically on negative symptoms, a better tolerance and fewer effects. After clozapine, several new antipsychotic agents are now available, such as risperidone, olanzapine, sertindole, quietapine, ziprasidone ... Their therapeutical effects are probably linked with a dual antagonist effect on 5HT2 and D2 receptors. The present article reviews the evolution of the use of these new agents, their real efficacy, their adverse effects and their expanding indications. Future research will more clearly establish appropriate treatment guidelines for their use. These new antipsychotics should add a positive modification in schizophrenia care and in some mood disorders. The approach consisting on individualizing dimensions and clusters analysis might be useful to test the efficiency of each antipsychotic on a syndromic dimension.

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Pirenzepine; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Sulpiride; Thiazoles

As antipsychotic treatment evolves toward a broader range of efficacy and more benign side effect profiles, our criteria for treatment-refractory schizophrenia may become more subtle. Unidimensional concepts of treatment resistance may be replaced by multiaxial descriptions of the target symptoms, side effects, and compliance issues that limit the ultimate goals of enhanced psychosocial function and quality of life. Augmentation strategies, increasing insight into dose response relationships, and atypical agents may benefit patients who failed to respond to or tolerate previous therapies. The advantages of newer agents in treatment-resistant schizophrenia may arise in part from their preferential targeting of newer agents in treatment-resistant schizophrenia may arise in part from their preferential targeting of mesolimbic compared with motor and tuberoinfundibular dopaminergic pathways.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clozapine; Diagnosis, Differential; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Olanzapine; Patient Compliance; Pirenzepine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Terminology as Topic; Treatment Failure

The atypical antipsychotics are a new class of agents with great promise for use in the elderly because of their reduced propensity to cause acute extrapyramidal adverse effects. Treatment of older patients with these agents, however, needs to take into consideration age-related changes in pharmacokinetics and the risks of drug-drug interactions. Additionally, current evidence of their efficacy in late-life psychoses is derived largely from case series and from the extrapolation of results obtained in studies of younger patients with schizophrenia. Controlled clinical studies of atypical antipsychotics in elderly patients are urgently needed.

Topics: Aged; Aging; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Treatment Outcome

Traditional neuroleptics are often utilized clinically for the management of bipolar disorder. Although effective as antimanic agents, their mood stabilizing properties are less clear. Additionally, their acute clinical side effect profile and long term risk of tardive dyskinesia, particularly in mood disorder patients, portend significant liability. This review focuses on the use of atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of bipolar disorder focusing on clozapine as the prototypical agent. Although, preclinical research and clinical experience suggest that the atypical antipsychotics are distinctly different from typical antipsychotics, they themselves are heterogeneous in profiles of neuropharmacology, clinical efficacy, and tolerability. The early clinical experience of clozapine as a potential mood stabilizer suggests greater antimanic than antidepressant properties. Conversely, very preliminary clinical experience with risperidone suggests greater antidepressant than antimanic properties and some liability for triggering or exacerbating mania. Olanzapine and sertindole are under investigation in psychotic mood disorders. The foregoing agents and future drugs with atypical neuroleptic properties should come to play an increasingly important role, compared to the older classical neuroleptics, in the acute and long term management of bipolar disorder.

Topics: Antidepressive Agents; Antimanic Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Clozapine; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Risperidone; Trimipramine

To present aspects of preclinical and clinical pharmacology of new antipsychotic drugs and to emphasize those preclinical drug characteristics which might predict desirable clinical actions.. Review of the relevant literature and publicly presented data.. Traditional neuroleptics have considerable effectiveness in treating positive symptoms of psychosis but can cause serious motor side effects. Clozapine produces no motor side effects and delivers a unique antipsychotic action. Risperidone also produces low motor side effects, but only at relatively low doses. Olanzapine and sertindole are newly introduced. Both have potent antipsychotic actions, with greatly reduced motor side effects. Both drugs also have possible advantages in negative symptoms.. These data support the conclusion that several new antipsychotics are becoming available for general use which are safe and effective in the treatment of psychosis and have several advantages over traditional neuroleptics.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

The unprecedented level of activity in the development of new antipsychotic medications can be traced to the 1989 approval of clozapine by the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of refractory schizophrenia. This has encouraged the development of other new agents that share some of clozapine's receptor binding characteristics. A wide range of clinical trial designs are being used during the development of new antipsychotic medications. This article describes both basic designs and more innovative ones: flexible-dose designs that include placebo and conventional neuroleptic agents as controls; fixed-dose designs with multiple doses of experimental medication; and fixed-dose designs with multiple doses of the experimental and comparator medication. The strengths and weaknesses of each are identified. The need for long-term maintenance studies of newer agents is emphasized because psychotic disorders in general, and schizophrenia in particular, are chronic relapsing illnesses. The current status of four newer antipsychotic medications is considered: clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, and sertindole. The importance of direct comparison among the newer antipsychotic medications in both short- and long-term trials is highlighted.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clozapine; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Approval; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Placebos; Psychotic Disorders; Recurrence; Research Design; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Although neuroleptic drugs have become the mainstay of treating acute and chronic psychosis, they are substantially limited by troublesome side effects. The traditional neuroleptic drugs have a wide array of central nervous system and peripheral system side effects that often lead to problems in management or patient noncompliance. Of particular difficulty are the extrapyramidal symptoms and tardive dyskinesia. However, other side effects of seizures, sedation, neuroleptic malignant syndrome and cardiovascular, hematologic, endocrinological, and weight gain problems remain as clinical management challenges posed by existing antipsychotic drug therapy. Considerable progress has been made in improving the motor side effect profile with the advent of clozapine and risperidone. However, each of these drugs has its own dose-limiting side effect profile. Two new drugs, olanzapine and sertindole, are now added to the pharmacopeia for treating psychosis. They further improve the benefit/ risk ratio because they have even fewer EPS and other side effects. Overall, these new antipsychotic agents greatly improve the treatment of psychosis by reducing drug-induced morbidity and improving the quality of life for patients.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Seizures; Sleep; Weight Gain

To assess the cognitive effects of sertindole augmentation in clozapine-treated patients diagnosed with schizophrenia. Cognition is secondary outcome of the trial.. A 12-week, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, augmentation study of patients treated with clozapine. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive 16 mg of sertindole or placebo as adjunctive treatment to clozapine.. Participants displayed substantial cognitive deficits, ranging from 1.6 standard deviation below norms at baseline to more than three standard deviations on tests of response readiness and focused attention. There were no significant differences between sertindole augmentation and placebo groups at study end. Correlation analysis of Positive and Negative Syndrome (PANSS) subscales, Global Assessment of Functioning subscale (GAF-F) and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) with 20 neurocognitive indices was conducted, but no significant correlations were found. Second, we tested change from baseline to endpoint for the PANSS, GAF-F, and CGI, vs. the concomitant changes in cognitive test performance, and found no significant correlations.. The clozapine-treated patients displayed marked cognitive deficits at baseline. Adding sertindole did not improve or worsen cognitive functioning, which is in line with previous negative studies of the effect on cognition of augmenting clozapine treatment with another antipsychotic drug.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Cognition Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Male; Neuropsychological Tests; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia

Clozapine augmentation with antipsychotic drugs is widely used despite sparse evidence supporting this strategy. Sertindole is a nonsedating atypical antipsychotic drug with low affinity for cholinergic receptors, which makes it potentially suitable for augmentation of clozapine. The study design was a 12-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study including patients with International Statistical Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision schizophrenia (F20.0-F20.3) and treated with clozapine for at least 6 months who had not achieved sufficient response. Patients were randomized 1:1 to either sertindole 16 mg or placebo, and assessment was done at baseline and after 6 and 12 weeks. Assessment included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Clinical Global Impression, Udvalg for Kliniske Undersøgelser, World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief, Drug Attitude Inventory, fasting glucose, lipids, and electrocardiogram. Clozapine augmentation with sertindole was not superior to placebo regarding total score or subscale score of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Clinical Global Impression, World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief, or Drug Attitude Inventory. No increased adverse effects compared with placebo were found. Four patients randomized to sertindole experienced a significant worsening of psychosis, and 2 of them required psychiatric admission. Metabolic parameters were unchanged during the study, but augmentation of clozapine with sertindole was associated with a 12-millisecond (SD, 20-millisecond) QTc prolongation compared with 0 millisecond (SD, 20 milliseconds) in the placebo group (P < 0.03). Augmentation with sertindole showed no benefits compared with placebo. Psychiatrists should be aware that augmentation might not add any benefits for the patients and in some cases worsen psychosis.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quality of Life; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

As part of a prospective clinical study investigating the effects of atypical neuroleptics on autonomic neurocardiac function (ANF), serial standardized recordings of conventional electrocardiograms and computer-calculated measurements of 5-minute resting heart rate variability (HRV) were obtained from 51 medication-free inpatients with schizophrenia (DSM-III-R-diagnosed) before and after an average of 14.1 days of treatment with amisulpride 400 mg/day (N = 12), olanzapine 20 mg/day (N = 13), sertindole 12 mg/day (N = 13), or clozapine 100 mg/day (N = 13). Reference values for the HRV data were obtained from a large group of well-matched healthy controls (N = 70). The most important findings were the following: (1) clozapine, olanzapine, and sertindole all prolonged mean frequency-corrected QTc times, which, in the case of sertindole, proved to be significant (Wilcoxon test p <0.05); (2) sertindole and clozapine significantly increased the mean resting heart rate; and (3) only clozapine significantly reduced the parasympathetic resting tone. The results of the HRV studies are discussed considering the in vitro receptor profiles of the atypical neuroleptics under study. Potential implications for the cardiac safety and tolerance of these drugs are also discussed.

Topics: Adult; Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Autonomic Nervous System; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Electrocardiography; Female; Heart; Heart Rate; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Prospective Studies; Sulpiride

We performed a retrospective analysis of 122 clinical records of 92 male patients with DSM-III-R schizophrenia to examine the relative weight gain liabilities of clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, and sertindole compared with haloperidol. We hypothesized that the unique pharmacodynamic profiles of these agents would contribute to different amounts and patterns of weight gain.. Data were analyzed to determine differences in weight gain during treatment among patients receiving 5 different drug treatments (clozapine [N = 20], olanzapine [N = 13], risperidone [N = 38], haloperidol [N = 43], and sertindole [N = 8]). Measures of maximal weight gain, final weight, and duration to maximal weight gain were calculated.. Repeated measures analyses of variance controlling for age, treatment duration, and initial weight revealed statistically significant differences between groups on all 3 measures. Clozapine and olanzapine had the greatest maximal weight gain liability (F = 4.13, df = 4,23; p = .01). Weight gain with clozapine, but not olanzapine or risperidone, appears to persist (as reflected by final weight) despite behavioral interventions (e.g., nutritional consultation, suggested exercise regimen; F = 5.69, df = 4,23; p = .003). Clozapine- and olanzapine-treated subjects appeared to gain weight over a prolonged period of time, whereas risperidone-and sertindole-treated subjects had a more limited period of weight gain (F = 2.95, df = 4,25; p = .04).. Clozapine and olanzapine caused the most weight gain, risperidone was intermediate, and sertindole had less associated weight gain than haloperidol. The relative receptor affinities of the novel antipsychotics for histamine H1 appear to be the most robust correlate of these clinical findings.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Double-Blind Method; Haloperidol; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Male; Obesity; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Placebos; Retrospective Studies; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Weight Gain

Packed with hemoglobin, an essential protein for oxygen transport, human erythrocytes are a suitable model system for testing the pleiotropic effects of lipophilic drugs. Our study investigated the interaction between antipsychotic drugs clozapine, ziprasidone, sertindole, and human hemoglobin under simulated physiological conditions. Analysis of protein fluorescence quenching at different temperatures and data obtained from the van't Hoff diagram and molecular docking indicate that the interactions are static and that the tetrameric human hemoglobin has one binding site for all drugs in the central cavity near αβ interfaces and is dominantly mediated through hydrophobic forces. The association constants were lower-moderate strength (~10

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Humans; Molecular Docking Simulation; Olanzapine

Chronic use of atypical antipsychotics may produce hepatic damage. Atypical antipsychotics, including clozapine, sertindole, and ziprasidone, are extensively metabolized by the liver and this process generates toxic-free radical metabolic intermediates which may contribute to liver damage. The aim of this study was to investigate whether clozapine, sertindole, or ziprasidone affected hepatic antioxidant defense enzymes which consequently led to disturbed redox homeostasis. The expression and activity of antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), glutathione reductase (GR), catalase (CAT), and glutathione-S-transferases (GST) were measured in rat livers at doses corresponding to human antipsychotic therapy. Clozapine increased activity of SOD types 1 and 2, GR and GST, but reduced CAT activity. Sertindole elevated activities of both SODs. In ziprasidone-treated rats only decreased CAT activity was found. All three antipsychotics produced mild-to-moderate hepatic histopathological changes categorized as regenerative alterations. No apparent signs of immune cell infiltration, microvesicular or macrovesicular fatty change, or hepatocytes in mitosis were observed. In conclusion, a 4-week long daily treatment with clozapine, sertindole, or ziprasidone altered hepatic antioxidant enzyme activities and induced histopathological changes in liver. The most severe alterations were noted in clozapine-treated rats. Data indicate that redox disturbances may contribute to liver dysfunction after long-term atypical antipsychotic drug treatment.

Topics: Animals; Antioxidants; Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Imidazoles; Indoles; Liver; Liver Diseases; Male; Piperazines; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Thiazoles

Atypical antipsychotics produce severe side effects including myocarditis that may be attributed to oxidative stress. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of clozapine, ziprasidone, and sertindole on rat heart morphology and determine whether redox imbalane plays a role in development of histopathological changes. Adult 3-month-old male Wistar rats were treated with recommended daily dose for selected drugs. After 4 week treatment histopathological analysis of the heart was performed and expression and activity of antioxidant enzymes determined. All examined drugs induced histopathological changes that were characterized as toxic myocarditis. Degenerative changes in cardiomyocytes were accompanied by lymphocytic infiltration as well as pericardial histopathological alterations in all treated groups. The least prominent changes were observed in sertindole-treated animals, and most severe with clozapine. Clozapine increased superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) activity while ziprasidone reduced glutathione reductase (GR) activity. Sertindole exerted no marked effect on antioxidant enzyme function in the heart even though myocardial degeneration was noted. In conclusion, treatment with clozapine or ziprasidone induced pathophysiological alterations in rat heart, which appeared to be associated disturbances in antioxidant capacity. Abbreviation: AAP, Atypical antipsychotics; ROS, reactive oxygen species; SOD1, Copper-zinc superoxide dismutase; SOD2, Manganese superoxide dismutase; CAT, Catalase; GPx, Glutathione peroxidase; GR, Glutathione reductase; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin stain; TNF- α, tumor necrosis factor alpha.

Topics: Animals; Antioxidants; Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Heart; Imidazoles; Indoles; Male; Myocardium; Oxidation-Reduction; Piperazines; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Thiazoles

The use of atypical antipsychotic drugs (APD) was reported to be associated with adverse effects on the kidneys. Thus, the aim of this study was to examine whether APD exerted their adverse effects by interfering with the renal antioxidant defense system. Male 3-mo-old Wistar rats were treated for 28 d with ziprasidone (ZIP), clozapine (CLO), or sertindole (SER) using a daily dose recommended for antipsychotic drug therapy. The expression and activities of antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase (SOD) type 1 and type 2, catalase (CAT), glutathione reductase (GR), and glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) activity were measured in the kidneys. Changes in the kidneys were also evaluated histologically. Ziprasidone, CLO, and SER reduced renal SOD type 1 and type 2 activities. Decreased CAT activity was observed only in SER-treated rats. An inhibition in GR activity and increased activity of GST was found only after treatment with CLO. Histological analysis showed dilatation of proximal tubules in kidneys with all three drugs. In conclusion, data indicate that redox disturbances may contribute to renal morphologic alterations in proximal tubules in rats treated with all APD.

Topics: Animals; Antioxidants; Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Imidazoles; Indoles; Kidney; Male; Oxidative Stress; Piperazines; Random Allocation; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Thiazoles

This study was set out to examine the impact of atypical antipsychotic drugs: aripiprazole, clozapine, ziprasidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, sertindole and amisulpride on the activity of antioxidant defence enzymes in human erythrocytes in vitro.. Cu,Zn-superoxide dismutase (SOD1), catalase (CAT), selenium-dependent glutathione peroxidase and glutathione reductase activities were determined after drugs incubation with blood of 15 apparently healthy non-smoking male volunteers (ages 23-39) for 1 h at 37 °C.. A statistically significant increase in SOD1 activity was found in samples incubated with aripiprazole (p < 0.01) and quetiapine (p < 0.05) compared with incubated control. SOD1 activity profile following native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis indicates that aripiprazole and quetiapine protect enzyme activity from inhibition with hydrogen peroxide. Our results showed that sertindole decreases activity of CAT comparing with control non-treated erythrocytes. Moreover, in sertindole treated erythrocytes, negative correlation between SOD1 and glutathione peroxidase activities was found. Increased amount of hydrogen peroxide in such situation may leave erythrocytes and transform their role in circulation from anti-oxidative to pro-oxidative.. Our results indicate that mechanism through sertindole could express its in vivo toxic effects and point toward possible (neuro)protective effects of aripiprazole and quetiapine.

Topics: Adult; Amisulpride; Antioxidants; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Catalase; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Enzyme Activation; Erythrocytes; Glutathione Peroxidase; Glutathione Reductase; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Male; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Sulpiride; Superoxide Dismutase; Superoxide Dismutase-1; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Drug attitude inventory (DAI-30) is considered to be the best predictor of poor adherence in first-episode schizophrenia. We compared the short version (DAI-10) with DAI-30 in long-term schizophrenia, documented if DAI was associated with poor insight, PANSS and GAF and constructed DAI-10 percentiles. DAI-30 and DAI-10 were homogenous (r = 0.82 and 0.72, respectively) with good test-retest reliability (0.79). The correlation between the DAI versions was high (0.94). Percentile scores of DAI-10 were computed. DAI is an easy-to-use self-report instrument seemingly assessing a unique clinical dimension relevant to non-adherence. DAI-10 might be preferred for its simplicity and good psychometric properties.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Attitude to Health; Clozapine; Cognitive Science; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Pharmacology, Clinical; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychometrics; Reproducibility of Results; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Self Report; Work Simplification

Blockade of N-methyl-d-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptors in the rat medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) impairs performance in the five-choice serial reaction time task (5-CSRTT) and increases glutamate (GLU) release. Recent research suggests that excessive GLU release may be critical for attention deficits.. We tested this hypothesis by investigating the effects of the atypical antipsychotics sertindole and clozapine on 3-(R)-2-carboxypiperazin-4-propyl-1-phosphonic acid (CPP)-induced performance deficits in the 5-CSRTT and on the CPP-induced GLU release in the mPFC.. The 5-CSRTT, a test of divided and sustained visual attention providing indices of attentional functioning (accuracy of visual discrimination), response control (anticipatory and perseverative responses) and intracortical microdialysis in conscious rats were used to investigate the effects of sertindole and clozapine.. Low doses of sertindole (0.02-0.32 mg/kg) prevented CPP-induced accuracy deficits, anticipatory over-responding and the rise in GLU release. In contrast, doses ranging from 0.6 to 2.5 mg/kg had no effect or even enhanced the effect of CPP on anticipatory responding. Similarly, 2.5 mg/kg sertindole was unable to reverse CPP-induced rise in GLU release. Clozapine (2.5 mg/kg) prevented accuracy deficits and the increase in anticipatory responding and abolished the rise in GLU release induced by CPP.. These findings show that the ameliorating effects of sertindole and clozapine on NMDA receptor dependent attention deficit is associated with suppression in GLU release in the mPFC. This supports the proposal that suppression in GLU release might be a target for the development of novel drugs aimed at counteracting some aspects of cognitive deficits of schizophrenia.

Topics: Analysis of Variance; Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Attention; Behavior, Animal; Choice Behavior; Clozapine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists; Glutamic Acid; Imidazoles; Indoles; Male; Microdialysis; Neuropsychological Tests; Photic Stimulation; Piperazines; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Reaction Time

Cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia is associated with functional disease symptoms. The beneficial effects of second generation antipsychotic drugs on cognitive function in schizophrenic patients are controversial. In this study, we investigated the effects of the second generation antipsychotics olanzapine, sertindole and clozapine on cognitive function in the Morris water maze task in naive or MK-801-treated animals. Male balb-c mice were treated subchronically with olanzapine (1.25, 2.5 and 5mg/kg, i.p.), sertindole (0.63, 1.3, 2.5mg/kg, s.c.) or clozapine (0.5 and 1mg/kg, i.p.), and cognitive deficits were induced by MK-801 (0.2mg/kg, i.p.) administration. Water maze performance was expressed as escape latency to find the hidden platform, the time spent in target quadrant, the mean distance to platform and the swim speed. In naive mice olanzapine impaired water maze performance, whereas sertindole and clozapine had no effect while the MK-801-induced cognitive impairment was reversed by the second generation antipsychotics - olanzapine, sertindole and clozapine at the doses used. These results revealed that while olanzapine had some disturbing effects on cognitive functions in naive animals; olanzapine, sertindole and clozapine might improve cognitive deficits in schizophrenic patients.

Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dizocilpine Maleate; Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists; Imidazoles; Indoles; Learning; Male; Maze Learning; Memory; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Olanzapine

We investigated the effects of the second generation antipsychotics olanzapine, sertindole and clozapine on visual recognition memory using the novel object recognition (NOR) test in naive and MK-801-treated animals. The effects of drug treatment on locomotion and anxiety were also determined using the open field test. Male Balb-c mice were treated with olanzapine (0.2, 0.4 and 0.6 mg/kg; i.p.), sertindole (0.63, 1.3 and 2.5mg/kg; s.c.) or clozapine (0.5 and 1mg/kg; i.p.), and cognitive deficits were induced by MK-801 (0.2mg/kg; i.p.) administration. Olanzapine treatment decreased the ratio index in the NOR test, whereas sertindole and clozapine had no effect in naive mice. MK-801-induced cognitive impairment was reversed by treatment with olanzapine, sertindole or clozapine. While olanzapine, sertindole and clozapine had no effect on the anxiety of naive mice as determined by the open field test, MK-801 significantly increased the total distance traveled, time spent in the center zone and the velocity of the animals. MK-801-induced effects on locomotion and anxiety in the open field test were reversed by olanzapine, sertindole or clozapine treatment. The results of the present study demonstrated that olanzapine, sertindole and clozapine improved cognition in MK-801 treated mice, and indicate that these drugs have a potential to improve cognition in schizophrenia.

Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dizocilpine Maleate; Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists; Imidazoles; Indoles; Learning; Male; Memory Disorders; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Motor Activity; Olanzapine; Recognition, Psychology; Visual Perception

Insomnia associated with chronic schizophrenia and after clozapine discontinuation represents a common, but mostly not predominant, complaint and often does not respond sufficiently to classical hypnotics. We report the case of a 46-year-old patient with schizophrenia who developed a rebound insomnia confirmed by polysomnography after discontinuation of long-term treatment with clozapine and changing to sertindole therapy. Zolpidem, zolpiclone and chloral hydrate only led to short-term improvement of subjective sleep quality. An add-on therapy with 300 mg quetiapine resulted in improved subjective quality of sleep regarding sleep latency and the number of nocturnal awakenings. The combination of the two neuroleptics did not lead to increased QTc intervals (normal QTc < 450 ms) or metabolic side effects. In conclusion, the combination of sertindole and quetiapine might be a safe and effective combination in therapy-refractory insomnia after clozapine discontinuation in schizophrenia.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Imidazoles; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Polysomnography; Quetiapine Fumarate; Schizophrenia; Sleep; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders

This naturalistic study aims to compare discontinuation rates for low-dose first-generation versus second-generation antipsychotics in first-episode psychotic patients.. The prescription of antipsychotic medication in 301 consecutively admitted patients with first-episode psychosis from four catchment areas is described. For the first year of inclusion a first-generation antipsychotic in low dose was recommended as the first medication. From the second year a second-generation antipsychotic was recommended as first choice. Switching was allowed when any drug was judged to be ineffective or to have serious side-effects. Switching during the first 2 years after inclusion is described.. Switching from a low-dose first-generation antipsychotic was more frequent than from a second-generation antipsychotic (90.7 vs. 58.4%). Lack of therapeutic effect and side-effects were the more frequently recorded reasons for changing in the first-generation group. Akathisia, parkinsonism, dyskinesias, dystonia and dysphoria were more often reported in patients on first-generation drugs. Weight gain and sedation were more often reported in patients on second-generation drugs.. The findings suggest a better adherence to and tolerability for second-generation antipsychotics than for low-dose first-generation antipsychotics in first-episode psychosis.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chi-Square Distribution; Clopenthixol; Clozapine; Female; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Perphenazine; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Statistics, Nonparametric; Time Factors; Young Adult

In the rat, selective suppression of conditioned avoidance response has been widely reported as a test with high predictive validity for antipsychotic efficacy. Recent studies have shown that the relationship between dopamine D2 receptor occupancy and the suppression of conditioned avoidance response behaviour correlates well with the relationship between human dopamine D2 receptor occupancy and clinical effect. The aim of the present study was to evaluate how pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) predictions of therapeutic effective steady-state plasma levels by means of conditioned avoidance response behaviour in rodents, correlate with clinically relevant plasma exposure for the classical antipsychotic drug haloperidol and four second generation antipsychotics: sertindole, clozapine, risperidone and olanzapine, including selected metabolites. In order to confirm the validity of the present conditioned avoidance response procedure, in vivo striatal dopamine D2 receptor occupancy was determined in parallel using 3H-raclopride as the radioligand. The PK/PD relationship was established by modelling the time-response and time-plasma concentration data. We found the order of dopamine D2 receptor occupancy required to suppress conditioned avoidance response behaviour according to EC50 measurements to be sertindole (+dehydrosertindole)=dehydrosertindole=paliperidone (the metabolite of risperidone)=haloperidol=olanzapine>risperidone>>clozapine. Overall, a good agreement was observed between the rat dopamine D2 receptor occupancy levels providing 50% response in the conditioned avoidance response test and the dopamine D2 receptor occupancy levels reported from responding schizophrenic patients treated with antipsychotics. Predictions of therapeutically effective steady-state levels for sertindole (+dehydrosertindole) and olanzapine were 3-4-fold too high whereas for haloperidol, clozapine and risperidone the predicted steady-state EC50 in conditioned avoidance responding rats correlated well with the therapeutically effective plasma levels observed in patients. Accordingly, the proposed PK/PD model may act as a guide for determining effective plasma concentrations of potential antipsychotics in the clinical setting and thereby accelerating the overall drug development process.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia; Behavior, Animal; Benzodiazepines; Binding, Competitive; Clozapine; Conditioning, Psychological; Dopamine Antagonists; Haloperidol; Imidazoles; Indoles; Injections, Subcutaneous; Male; Models, Biological; Olanzapine; Protein Binding; Raclopride; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Reproducibility of Results; Risperidone

In humans, the N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist phencyclidine (PCP) induces behavioral changes that mimic schizophrenia symptoms, including positive and negative symptoms as well as cognitive deficits. In clinic, the cognitive deficits are closely associated with functional outcome. Thus, improvement of cognition may have high impact on patients' daily life.. In the present study, three second-generation antipsychotics (sertindole, risperidone, and clozapine) as well as the classical antipsychotic haloperidol were tested for the ability to reverse PCP-induced cognitive deficits in the Morris' water maze.. The second-generation antipsychotics reversed the PCP-induced cognitive impairment: sertindole (0.63-2.5 mg/kg, s.c.), risperidone (0.04 mg/kg, s.c.; whereas 0.08 and 0.16 mg/kg were without significant effect), and clozapine (0.63 mg/kg, s.c.; while 1.3 mg/kg was without significant effect). The significant effect of sertindole was observed from day 2 onwards, while clozapine and risperidone only had significant effect at day 3. The classical antipsychotic haloperidol (0.010-0.020 mg/kg, s.c.) was ineffective. No compounds influenced swimming speed at the doses used, indicating that motor function was preserved.. These results confirm that repeated PCP administration induces marked cognitive deficits. Further, second-generation antipsychotics like sertindole, clozapine, and risperidone within a certain, often narrow, dose range are able to reverse the impairment and thus might improve cognitive deficits in schizophrenic patients, whereas classical compounds like haloperidol lack this effect. The receptor mechanisms involved in the reversal of PCP's disruptive effect are discussed and likely include a delicate balance between effects on dopamine D(2), 5-HT(2A/6), alpha-adrenergic, muscarinic, and histaminergic H(1) receptors.

Topics: Analysis of Variance; Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Behavior, Animal; Clozapine; Cognition Disorders; Disease Models, Animal; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Haloperidol; Imidazoles; Indoles; Male; Maze Learning; Phencyclidine; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate; Risperidone; Schizophrenic Psychology

Cognitive deficits in schizophrenia are associated with poor functional outcome, and may be further aggravated by treatment with antipsychotics. In the present study the acute and chronic (3 weeks of treatment) effects of clozapine, olanzapine, and sertindole on performance in the Morris water maze in rats was compared, using pharmacologically and/or clinically relevant dose regimens. An experimental design consisting of three trials/day over 3 days was used. Performance was expressed as the distance and latency to find a submerged platform, as well as the percentage of "non-finders", i.e. percentage of trials where the rat was unable to find the platform within the total trial time of 60 s. Clozapine (40 mg/kg, p.o.) and olanzapine (2.5 mg/kg, s.c.) impaired water maze performance when given acutely. However, tolerance developed to the deficit induced by clozapine, whereas the olanzapine-mediated impairment was enhanced after chronic treatment. Sertindole (2.5 mg/kg, p.o.) had no disruptive effect on performance after either acute or chronic treatment. Exposure measurements confirmed that all three compounds were present in the serum at least at clinically effective concentrations. Thus, the three antipsychotics tested differentially affected rodent cognition, whereby sertindole appeared to have a lower potential than either clozapine or olanzapine to induce cognitive impairment. The hypothesis that the low potency of sertindole in inducing dopamine D2 receptor blockade, combined with lack of antimuscarinic and histamine H1 antagonist activity in vivo is discussed. Clearly further studies are needed to assess the potential cognition-enhancing effects of sertindole vs. other antipsychotics in a relevant animal model of schizophrenia.

Topics: Analysis of Variance; Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Behavior, Animal; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Imidazoles; Indoles; Male; Maze Learning; Olanzapine; Psychomotor Performance; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Time Factors

The effects of acute administration of sertindole on DA output were examined in the shell part of the nucleus accumbens (NACS) and the striatum (STR), areas which are associated with limbic functions and motor control, respectively, by using in vivo differential normal pulse voltammetry in rats. The effect of sertindole was compared to those obtained with the reference antipsychotic drugs clozapine and haloperidol, new generation antipsychotics represented by risperidone, olanzapine, ziprasidone, quetiapine, and aripiprazole, as well as, with those of preferential D2/3, D4, 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A, 5-HT2C, alpha1, and alpha2 receptor ligands. In similarity with the new generation antipsychotics, sertindole preferentially increase DA output in the NACS as compared to the STR whereas the opposite was true for haloperidol. The regional specific effect of the partial D2 receptor agonist aripiprazole was mainly driven by a decrease in striatal rather that by an increase in accumbal DA output. The selective 5-HT2A and D4 receptor antagonists MDL100,151 and Lu 38-012, respectively, both preferentially increased DA output in the NACS. Thus, the present results are in line with the hypothesis that 5-HT2A receptor antagonism is of importance for the observed limbic selectivity of new generation antipsychotics and, in turn, to their favorable clinical profile especially as regards extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) liability. For some compounds, blockade of D4 receptors may also play a role in this regard.

Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Corpus Striatum; Dopamine; Dopamine Agents; Efferent Pathways; Haloperidol; Imidazoles; Indoles; Limbic System; Male; Presynaptic Terminals; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2A; Receptors, Dopamine; Receptors, Serotonin; Serotonin; Serotonin 5-HT2 Receptor Antagonists; Serotonin Agents; Synaptic Transmission

A new class of 5-heteroaryl-substituted 1-(4-fluorophenyl)-3-(4-piperidinyl)-1H-indoles as highly selective and potentially CNS-active alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonists is described. The compounds are derived from the antipsychotic sertindole. The structure-affinity relationships of the 5-heteroaryl substituents, and the substituents on the piperidine nitrogen atom were optimized with respect to affinity for alpha 1 adrenoceptors and selectivity in respect to dopamine (D(1-4)) and serotonin (5-HT(1A-1B) and 5-HT(2A,2C)) receptors. The most selective compound obtained, 3-[4-[1-(4-fluorophenyl)-5-(1-methyl-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)-1H-indol-3-yl]-1-piperidinyl]propionitrile (15c), has affinities of 0.99, 3.2, and 9.0 nM for the alpha(1a), alpha(1b), and alpha(1d) adrenoceptor subtypes, respectively, and a selectivity for adrenergic alpha(1a) receptors in respect to dopamine D2, D3, and D4 and serotonin 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(2C) higher than 900, comparable to the selectivity of prazosin. In addition, the compound is more than 150-fold selective in respect to serotonin 5-HT(1A) and 5-HT(1B) receptors. A new basic pharmacophore for alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonists based on a previously reported pharmacophore model for dopamine D2 antagonist is suggested.

Topics: Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists; Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Azoles; Brain; Cell Line; Cricetinae; Humans; Imidazoles; In Vitro Techniques; Indoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Radioligand Assay; Rats; Receptors, Adrenergic, alpha-1; Receptors, Dopamine; Receptors, Serotonin; Structure-Activity Relationship; Triazoles

The current generation of atypical antipsychotic drugs represents an improvement over traditional ("typical") antipsychotics in many respects. However, a theoretical framework and adequate preclinical models have not yet been developed to predict or explain differences among the atypical antipsychotics, a necessary component of future development.. The purpose of the present set of experiments was to identify differences between the acute and subchronic effects of several atypical antipsychotic drugs and the typical antipsychotic haloperidol on operant responding in rats.. The effects of haloperidol and the atypical antipsychotics clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, sertindole, quetiapine, remoxipride, and thioridazine were determined in rats trained to respond for food reward under a multiple fixed ratio 30/fixed interval 60 s schedule. A profile of the acute effects of each drug on response rates, response durations, and within-session effects were determined. Next, the dose of each drug that produced 75% suppression of response rates was administered for 16 consecutive days to determine whether or not tolerance would develop to the rate-suppressing effects of that dose.. All drugs produced dose-related decreases in response rates. Only haloperidol and risperidone produced significant increases in response duration, while only haloperidol and remoxipride displayed within-session response decrements. Tolerance was evident for clozapine and to a lesser extent thioridazine.. These results illustrate that the current generation of atypical antipsychotics are a heterogeneous group and that operant procedures may be useful for identifying differences preclinically. Specifically, clozapine appears to possess properties that distinguish it from other atypical antipsychotics, particularly after repeated dosing.

Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Conditioning, Operant; Dibenzothiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Haloperidol; Imidazoles; Indoles; Male; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Remoxipride; Risperidone; Thioridazine; Time Factors

A 30-year-old male patient with paranoid schizophrenia was on clozapine therapy for more than five years. Discontinuation of clozapine and an attempt to change his medication to sertindole has led to serious psychotic and somatic symptoms. After readministration of clozapine the psychotic symptoms rapidly disappeared. The patient was monitored by BPRS and PANSS positive and negative scale. Also clinical and labor parameters of the patient were monitored. The change of his medication from clozapine to sertindole was unsuccessful. This case report suggests that although atypical antipsychotics may be generally different from the classical neuroleptic drugs, there are also significant differences among the atypical antipsychotic drugs in their effects on the receptors of the central nervous system. Therefore the change of clozapine to another atypical antipsychotic medication in the clinical practice should be cross-tapered and the symptoms of withdrawal closely monitored.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Male; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia, Paranoid; Schizophrenic Psychology; Substance Withdrawal Syndrome

Previous drug discrimination studies with clozapine have not reliably distinguished between atypical and typical antipsychotics.. The present study was conducted to determine whether low-dose clozapine drug discrimination could distinguish atypical from typical antipsychotics.. Rats were trained to discriminate 1.25 mg/kg clozapine from vehicle in a two-lever drug discrimination procedure.. Generalization testing revealed full substitution with the atypical antipsychotics olanzapine (90.3% maximum generalization), sertindole (99.8%), and risperidone (87.1%) and partial substitution for quetiapine (seroquel, 66.4%) and the typical antipsychotics haloperidol (56.8%) and thioridazine (74.3%). Remoxipride (23.1%) and the typical antipsychotics chlorpromazine (27.9%) and fluphenazine (29.5%) did not reliably substitute for clozapine.. In contrast to previous clozapine drug discrimination studies with higher training doses, the atypical antipsychotics olanzapine, sertindole, and risperidone reliably substituted for clozapine while typical antipsychotics did not. These results suggest that low-dose clozapine drug discrimination may be a more sensitive assay for distinguishing atypical from typical antipsychotic drugs.

Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Discrimination Learning; Imidazoles; Indoles; Male; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Risperidone

The effect of the selective dopamine D2 receptor agonist quinpirole, the selective 5-HT1A receptor agonist 8-OH-DPAT and the selective 5-HT2A receptor antagonist ketanserin on catalepsy induced by atypical antipsychotics clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine and sertindole at higher doses was studied in rats. Haloperidol (0.5, 1 and 2 mg/kg), clozapine (50 and 75 mg/kg) and olanzapine (15 and 30 mg/kg) produced catalepsy dose-dependently while sertindole at doses up to 40 mg/kg failed to produce catalepsy in rats. However, sertindole (15, 30 and 45 mg/kg) produced a cataleptic effect in mice in a dose-dependent manner. At a high dose (5 mg/kg), risperidone produced catalepsy in rats. Quinpirole (0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg) reversed the cataleptic effect of haloperidol (2 mg/kg), risperidone (5 mg/kg), olanzapine (30 mg/kg) and sertindole (45 mg/kg). Quinpirole (0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg) reversed clozapine (75 mg/kg)-induced catalepsy. 8-OH-DPAT (0.15 and 0.3 mg/kg) dose-dependently reversed catalepsy induced by haloperidol (2 mg/kg) and risperidone (5 mg/kg) without affecting the cataleptic effect of olanzapine. However, the higher dose (0.45 mg/kg) of 8-OH-DPAT reversed it significantly. 8-OH-DPAT (0.3 mg/kg) reversed clozapine (75 mg/kg)-induced catalepsy. 8-OH-DPAT (0.15, 0.3 and 0.45 mg/kg) failed to reverse sertindole-induced catalepsy. Ketanserin (0.75 and 1.5 mg/kg) completely reversed catalepsy induced by haloperidol (2 mg/kg) and risperidone (5 mg/kg). Ketanserin (0.75 and 1.5 mg/kg) dose-dependently reversed olanzapine (30 mg/kg) and sertindole (45 mg/kg)-induced catalepsy without any effect on clozapine (75 mg/kg)-induced catalepsy. A higher dose (3 mg/kg) of ketanserin reversed clozapine-induced catalepsy. The present study suggests that atypical antipsychotics show fewer extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) due to greater modulation of the serotonergic system. Therefore, an antipsychotic with dopamine D2/5-HT2A antagonistic action and 5-HT1A agonistic action may prove to be superior to the existing antipsychotics.

Topics: 8-Hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin; Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Catalepsy; Clozapine; Dopamine Agonists; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Imidazoles; Indoles; Ketanserin; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Quinpirole; Random Allocation; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Risperidone; Serotonin Agents; Serotonin Antagonists; Serotonin Receptor Agonists; Species Specificity

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Drug Overdose; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Male; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

The striatal D2 dopamine binding was studied in schizophrenic patients treated with the novel atypical antipsychotic drug sertindole (n=10). Comparisons were obtained with haloperidol (n=8), clozapine (n=6), risperidone (n=11) and untreated healthy controls (n=8) of a dataset which has partly been reported previously. 123I-Iodobenzamide (IBZM) single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) was used for estimation of striatal dopamine D2 receptor binding. Sertindole-treated patients exhibited significantly (P < 0.001) lower levels of striatal D2 binding (BG/FC ratio:1.28) compared with those treated with haloperidol (BG/FC ratio:1.09) and risperidone (8 mg:1.18) but significantly (P < 0.005) higher levels compared with clozapine (BG/FC ratio: 1.49). However, if patients were pretreated with a depot neuroleptic, significantly (P < 0.05) higher striatal D2 binding (BG/FC ratio:1.12) has been obtained. Since sertindole has been shown to exert distinct clinical efficacy for treatment of positive and negative symptoms, our data are indicative that antipsychotic efficacy is not associated with a high degree of striatal D2 receptor occupancy in schizophrenic patients.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzamides; Clozapine; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Iodine Radioisotopes; Male; Middle Aged; Neostriatum; Pyrrolidines; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon

Some antipsychotic drugs have been found to prolong the QT interval on electrocardiographic (ECG) recordings, a phenomenon which, when severe, may facilitate the occurrence of complex ventricular arrhythmias such as torsade de pointes. However, the effects of these drugs on the cardiac repolarization process have not been evaluated extensively. This study was designed to examine the potency of five antipsychotic drugs in lengthening the QT interval of the perfused feline heart: haloperidol, risperidone, sertindole, clozapine, and olanzapine. The hearts were infused with increasing concentrations of drugs (0.1-20 micromol/L) for 40-minute intervals at each concentration. ECG recordings were made, with signals amplified and data recorded on a strip chart recorder. Four representative beats from each set of three signal recordings were chosen for QT interval measurement. Our data indicated that all tested drugs prolonged the QT interval in a concentration-dependent manner (p < 0.01). Haloperidol and risperidone were significantly more potent than sertindole, clozapine, and olanzapine (p < 0.001). At a concentration of 0.5 micromol/L over a 40-minute infusion interval, haloperidol lengthened the interval by 26.2+/-0.7%, risperidone by 19.4+/-2.2%, and sertindole by 8.9+/-3.5% (p < 0.05 compared with baseline); clozapine and olanzapine were less potent. Although species differences may limit extrapolation of our findings to humans, the cardiac potassium channels of felines clearly resemble those of humans. This model may serve as the basis for further studies of drug-induced prolongation of the QT interval and precipitation of ventricular arrhythmias.

Topics: Analysis of Variance; Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Cats; Clozapine; Electrocardiography; Haloperidol; Heart; Humans; Imidazoles; In Vitro Techniques; Indoles; Risperidone

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Male; Psychotic Disorders; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Treatment Failure

In a previous study using Sprague-Dawley rats, we showed that in a prepulse inhibition (PPI) procedure with levels of PPI ranging from approximately 10 to 40% (for prepulse intensities 2, 9 and 15 dB above background noise), the antipsychotics clozapine and haloperidol, but also the alpha 1 adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin, robustly and dose-dependently potentiated PPI. In contrast, the antipsychotics risperidone, amisulpride, raclopride and remoxipride did not potentiate PPI. The false positive (prazosin) and the four false negatives led us to conclude that this PPI-enhancing procedure had poor predictive validity as a screening tool for potential antipsychotics. In the present study, we used Wistar rats, which under the same protocol as that used for Sprague-Dawley rats show a very low level of PPI. We examined the ability of six antipsychotics, given intraperitoneally (i.p.), to reverse this PPI deficit. It was found that clozapine (5-20 mg/kg), olanzapine (5-20 mg/kg) and sertindole (1-10 mg/kg) reversed this deficiency of PPI (i.e. potentiated the low level of PPI). In contrast, risperidone (0.1-1 mg/kg), remoxipride (1-10 mg/kg) and haloperidol (0.1-1 mg/kg) were inactive. The negative results with three clinically active antipsychotics (risperidone, remoxipride and haloperidol) indicate that reversal of this PPI deficit in Wistar rats has poor predictive validity to screen for potential antipsychotic activity. In an attempt to investigate the mechanism that might underlie the reversing effect of clozapine, olanzapine and sertindole, we tested the ability of the alpha 1 adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin (3-20 mg/kg), the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist SCH 23390 (0.01-0.1 mg/kg) and the 5-HT2 antagonist ritanserin (0.3-3 mg/kg) to reverse the PPI deficit. Negative results with these three drugs did not allow us to characterize the receptor(s) that might be implicated in the reversal of this type of PPI deficit.

Topics: Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists; Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Behavior, Animal; Benzazepines; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Haloperidol; Imidazoles; Indoles; Injections, Intraperitoneal; Male; Neural Inhibition; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Prazosin; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Reflex, Startle; Remoxipride; Risperidone; Ritanserin; Serotonin Antagonists

Extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) are major limitations to neuroleptic treatment of psychoses. To evaluate further the behavioral characteristics of the novel antipsychotic agents, a wide range of single intramuscular doses of sertindole (0.1-2.5 mg/kg IM), risperidone (0.01-0.25 mg/kg IM), clozapine (1.0-25.0 mg/kg IM), and haloperidol (0.01-0.25 mg/kg IM) were blindly evaluated at weekly intervals in Cebus monkeys previously sensitized to neuroleptics. All drugs except clozapine produced dystonia and parkinsonian symptoms, but haloperidol and risperidone were 50-100 times more potent than sertindole in producing EPS. Sertindole, risperidone and haloperidol had no significant sedative effects, whereas clozapine produced dose related sedation. Risperidone, clozapine and haloperidol but not sertindole decreased locomotor activity. Sertindole, risperidone and clozapine had a calming effect at doses below the EPS threshold, unlike haloperidol. Sertindole has many behavioral effects in nonhuman primates that are similar to those seen with the new antipsychotics, risperidone and clozapine, which suggests a favorable antipsychotic benefit/risk ratio in the clinic, especially regarding EPS.

Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Behavior, Animal; Cebus; Clozapine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Haloperidol; Imidazoles; Indoles; Risperidone

The inhibitory effects of a variety of established and putative antipsychotic compounds on the hypermotility induced by D-amphetamine at two dose levels (0.5 and 2.0 mg/kg) have been studied. Classical antipsychotics (haloperidol, fluphenazine and cis(Z)-flupentixol) and the selective dopamine D2 receptor antagonist remoxipride inhibit hypermotility in the two conditions with similar potencies, whereas sertindole, clozapine, risperidone, ziprasidone and olanzapine preferentially inhibit the effect of the low dose of D-amphetamine (selectivity ratios between 6.5 and 18). Seroquel, amperozide and the selective 5-HT2A receptor antagonist MDL 100.151 ((+/-)-alpha-(2,3-dimethoxyphenyl)-1-[2-(4-fluorophenylethyl)]-4-p iperidine - methanol) have no effect on D-amphetamine 2.0 mg/kg, but inhibit the response to D-amphetamine 0.5 mg/kg. The alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin inhibits the motility response to D-amphetamine 0.5 mg/kg with slightly higher potency than that to D-amphetamine 2.0 mg/kg, whereas the 5-HT2A/2C receptor antagonist ritanserin selectively inhibits the effect of D-amphetamine 0.5 mg/kg. The histamine H1 receptor antagonist mepyramine is ineffective in both models. All compounds, except remoxipride, MDL 100.151 and ritanserin (which are ineffective) inhibit spontaneous locomotor activity at dose levels close to those inhibiting the response to D-amphetamine 2.0 mg/kg. Prazosin has partial inhibitory effect. In conclusion, dopamine antagonism has similar inhibitory effect on hyperactivity induced by low and high D-amphetamine dosages, alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonism also contributes to both effects, whereas 5-HT2 receptor antagonism selectively interacts with the low D-amphetamine dose. This indicates that the responses to D-amphetamine 0.5 and 2.0 mg/kg are differently modulated by these neurotransmitters.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Dextroamphetamine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fluphenazine; Haloperidol; Imidazoles; Indoles; Locomotion; Male; Motor Activity; Prazosin; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Ritanserin

The present study describes the effect of sertindole, clozapine and haloperidol on the number of spontaneously active dopamine neurons in ventral tegmental area and substantia nigra pars compacta after daily oral treatment for 1, 2 or 3 weeks. In general, daily administration of high dosages (sertindole: 2.8 mumol/kg/day, clozapine: 60 mumol/kg/day, haloperidol: 0.43 mumol/kg/day) induced no statistically significant decrease in the number of active dopamine neurons within the first 2 weeks of treatment. All three compounds induced a marked effect in ventral tegmental area after administration for 3 weeks, but only sertindole and haloperidol influenced the activity in substantia nigra pars compacta. This result is in accordance with clinical data where the antipsychotic effect is observed after 2-3 weeks of treatment.

Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Haloperidol; Imidazoles; Indoles; Male; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Substantia Nigra; Ventral Tegmental Area

A series of 1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1H-indoles substituted at the 3-position with 1-piperazinyl, 1,2,3,6-tetrahydro-4-pyridinyl, and 4-piperidinyl was synthesized. Within all three subseries potent dopamine D-2 and serotonin 5-HT2 receptor affinity was found in ligand binding studies. Quipazine-induced head twitches in rats were inhibited by most derivatives as a measure of central 5-HT2 receptor antagonism. Piperazinyl and tetrahydropyridyl indoles were cataleptogenic, while piperidyl substituted indoles surprisingly were found to be noncataleptogenic or only weakly cataleptogenic. Noncataleptogenic piperidyl derivatives also failed to block dopaminergic-mediated stereotypies, that is methyl phenidate-induced gnawing behavior in mice. These profiles resemble that of the atypical neuroleptic clozapine. 1-Ethyl-2-imidazolidinone was found to be the optimal substituent of the basic nitrogen atom in order to avoid catalepsy. The atypical neuroleptic 1-[2-[4-[5-chloro-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1H-indol-3-yl]-1-piperidinyl] ethyl]-2-imidazolidinone (sertindole, compound 14c) was selected for further development as a result of these structure/activity studies.

Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Dopamine Antagonists; Imidazoles; Indoles; Male; Mice; Piperazines; Quipazine; Rats; Rats, Inbred Strains; Receptors, Serotonin; Serotonin Antagonists; Structure-Activity Relationship

Sertindole (Lundbeck code No. Lu 23-174) (1-[2-[4-[5-chloro-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1H-indol-3-yl]-1-piperidinyl] ethyl]-2-imidazolidinone) is a new potential neuroleptic compound. After 3 weeks of treatment sertindole shows an extreme selectivity to inhibit the number of spontaneously active dopaminergic (DA) neurones in ventral tegmental area (VTA) while leaving the number of active DA neurones in substantia nigra pars compacta (SNC) unaffected. Acute injection of apomorphine or baclofen reverse the inhibition of activity seen after repeated treatment with sertindole. This suggests that sertindole induces a depolarization inactivation of the DA neurones. The depolarization inactivation is reversible since normal activity of DA neurones is found in both SNC and VTA after two weeks withdrawal from repeated treatment with a low dose with sertindole. One or two weeks administration of a high dose of sertindole induced only minor effects on the DA neurones in VTA; i.e., in order to obtain the depolarization inactivation sertindole requires 3 weeks of treatment as has also been reported for other neuroleptics. Three weeks of treatment with clozapine induces a selective inhibition of the active DA neurones in VTA but at much higher doses than seen with sertindole, while haloperidol induces a non-selective decrease of spontaneously active DA neurones in both areas. In acute electrophysiological experiments intravenous (i.v.) administration of sertindole--in contrast to both clozapine and haloperidol--neither reverse d-amphetamine- nor apomorphine-induced inhibition of the firing frequencies of DA neurones in SNC or in VTA. In addition, sertindole does not--even in high doses--increase the firing frequency of DA neurones in SNC or VTA.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Apomorphine; Clozapine; Dextroamphetamine; Dopamine; Drug Administration Schedule; Electrophysiology; Haloperidol; Imidazoles; Indoles; Male; Mesencephalon; Neurons; Rats; Rats, Inbred Strains; Substantia Nigra; Tegmentum Mesencephali