cloprostenol and butaprost

The aim of this study was to determine whether the magnitude of the intraocular-pressure (IOP)-lowering response in monkeys to the nonselective prostaglandin (PG)F(2a)-isopropyl ester (ie) can be reproduced by combining other PG-subtype-selective compounds. IOP was lowered by approximately 25% after 4-5 days of topical administration with latanoprost (FP agonist, 1.5 microg, q.d.), bimatoprost (prostamide, whose metabolites have been shown to be FP agonists; 9 microg, q.d.), or travoprost (FP agonist, 1.2 microg, q.d) or the EP2 agonist, butaprost (25 microg, b.i.d.). The EP1 agonist, 17-phenyl trinor (PhT) PGE2 (b.i.d.), and EP3 agonist, sulprostone (b.i.d.), had no IOP-lowering effects. The addition of butaprost, sulprostone (10 microg), or 17PhTPGE2 (25 microg) to latanoprost did not lower IOP more than latanoprost alone. However, treatment with the combination of latanoprost, 17PhTPGE2, butaprost, and sulprostone produced a similar 50-55% reduction in IOP, as did PGF(2)alpha-ie (b.i.d.). In conclusion, latanoprost, travoprost, and bimatoprost produce similar IOP-lowering responses in normotensive monkeys and are most efficacious when administered q.d. pm, compared to b.i.d. The combination of the FP, EP1, EP2, and EP3 agonists used in this study was sufficient to lower IOP by the same magnitude as PGF(2)alpha-ie, suggesting that combining PG-subtype agonists may be a potent antiglaucoma strategy.

Topics: Administration, Topical; Alprostadil; Amides; Animals; Antihypertensive Agents; Bimatoprost; Cloprostenol; Dinoprost; Dinoprostone; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Latanoprost; Macaca fascicularis; Male; Ophthalmic Solutions; Prostaglandins F, Synthetic; Receptors, Prostaglandin; Receptors, Prostaglandin E; Tonometry, Ocular; Travoprost

1. Using gene chip technology, we first identified that PGF(2alpha) (FP agonist) and Butaprost (EP(2) agonist) induced about a five-fold upregulation of Nur77 mRNA expression in hFP-HEK 293/EBNA and hEP(2)-HEK293/EBNA cells. Northern Blot analysis revealed that PGF(2alpha)- and Butaprost-induced upregulation of Nur77 expression are dose- and time-dependent. 2. Both PGF(2alpha) and Butaprost upregulated Nur77 gene expression through the protein kinase C (PKC) pathway. These data are the first showing a link between EP(2) receptor stimulation and protein kinase C activation. Calcineurin was found to be involved downstream of the PKC pathway in PGF(2alpha)-induced Nur77 expression, but not in Butaprost-induced Nur77 expression. 3. We also used Nur77 as a marker gene to compare the effects of PGF(2alpha), Butaprost, and Bimatoprost (a prostamide) on Nur77 expression in human primary trabecular meshwork and ciliary smooth muscle (SM) cells, which are target cells for antiglaucoma drugs. The results showed that PGF(2alpha) and Butaprost, but not Bimatoprost, induced upregulation of Nur77 expression in human TM cells. PGF(2alpha), but not Bimatoprost, dramatically induced upregulation of Nur77 mRNA expression in human ciliary SM cells, whereas Butaprost slightly upregulated Nur77 mRNA expression in SM cells. 4. Nur77 promoter deletion analysis indicated that PGF(2alpha), but not Bimatoprost, activated Nur77 promoter-luciferase reporter in hFP-HEK 293/EBNA cells. Butaprost was less efficacious in inducing Nur77 promoter-luciferase reporter activity in hEP(2)-HEK293/EBNA cells relative to PGF(2alpha) in the comparable assay. The data for Nur77 promoter functional analysis were matched to the Northern blot analysis. 5. It appears that PGF(2alpha) and Butaprost activate Nur77 transcription mechanisms through the activation of FP and EP(2) receptor-coupled signaling pathways, whereas Bimatoprost stimulates neither FP nor EP(2) receptors.

Topics: Alprostadil; Amides; Bimatoprost; Cell Line; Ciliary Body; Cloprostenol; Dinoprost; DNA-Binding Proteins; Epstein-Barr Virus Nuclear Antigens; Humans; Immunoblotting; Kinetics; Lipids; Luciferases; Nuclear Receptor Subfamily 4, Group A, Member 1; Promoter Regions, Genetic; Protein Kinase C; Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear; Receptors, Prostaglandin E; Receptors, Prostaglandin E, EP2 Subtype; Receptors, Steroid; RNA; Trabecular Meshwork; Transcription Factors; Transcription, Genetic; Transfection; Up-Regulation

Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) and Cyr61 (cysteine-rich angiogenic protein 61) are members of the CCN gene family that encode multifunctional, extracellular matrix-associated signaling proteins. Because the mechanism of action of certain anti-glaucoma drugs involves extracellular matrix remodeling of ocular ciliary muscle, with a resultant increase in drainage of aqueous humor from the eye, we compared the effects of three pharmacologically distinct ocular hypotensive agents on Cyr61 and CTGF gene expression. Thus, prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF2alpha) (FP receptor agonist), Butaprost (EP2 receptor agonist), and Bimatoprost (a prostamide) were compared. Using Affymetrix gene chip technology, we first identified that PGF2alpha dramatically up-regulated Cyr61 and CTGF mRNA expression in HEK 293/EBNA cells (hFP-HEK 293/EBNA). Northern blot further confirmed the Cyr61 and CTGF up-regulation is in a dose- and time-dependent manner. PGF2alpha-induced up-regulation of Cyr61 appeared to exclusively involve the Rho pathway, and up-regulation of CTGF was via multiple intracellular pathways. Because prostamide receptors are, to date, defined only at the pharmacological level, Bimatoprost effects on Cyr61 and CTGF were studied in the isolated feline iris sphincter preparation, a tissue highly responsive to prostamides. Both PGF2alpha and Bimatoprost up-regulated Cyr61 mRNA expression in the cat iris tissue. Only PGF2alpha up-regulated CTGF mRNA expression in the cat iris. Therefore, PGF2alpha and Bimatoprost appear to interact with different receptors populations in the cat iris, according to their markedly different effects on CTGF. Activation of prostaglandin EP2 receptors (Gs-coupled) also up-regulated Cyr61 but not CTGF mRNA expression in the isolated cat iris. Similar data were observed in human primary ciliary smooth muscle cells. Thus, despite quite different signal transduction pathways, FP receptor stimulation up-regulates CTGF and Cyr61. The prostamide analog Bimatoprost and an EP2-selective agonist affects only Cyr61.

Topics: Alprostadil; Amides; Animals; Bimatoprost; Cats; Cell Line; Cells, Cultured; Ciliary Body; Cloprostenol; Connective Tissue Growth Factor; Cysteine-Rich Protein 61; Dinoprost; Gene Expression; Glaucoma; Humans; Immediate-Early Proteins; In Vitro Techniques; Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins; Iris; Kinetics; Lipids; Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis; Promoter Regions, Genetic; RNA, Messenger; Signal Transduction; Trabecular Meshwork; Up-Regulation

Cumulative concentration-effect curves for prostaglandin E(2), sulprostone and butaprost were constructed in matched strips of human non-pregnant myometrium from 14 different donors. All samples were obtained from the mid-lateral wall of the uterus. Prostaglandin E(2) produced four types of concentration-effect curves: monophasic inhibitory (n = 7), monophasic excitatory (n = 2), biphasic consisting of an excitatory phase followed by an inhibitory phase (n = 4), and biphasic consisting of an inhibitory phase followed by an excitatory phase (n = 1). Sulprostone produced excitation of spontaneous contractile activity in all tissues (mean pEC(50) = 9.1+/-0.2, range 8.1-10.1, n = 14). Butaprost produced relaxation of cloprostenol-stimulated contractile activity in all tissues (mean pEC(50) = 5.7 +/- 0.1, range 5.0-6.9, n = 14). The mean pEC(50) value for sulprostone was significantly higher in tissues where prostaglandin E(2) caused some excitation (pEC(50) = 9.4 +/- 0.2, n = 7) compared to those where prostaglandin E(2) caused only inhibition (pEC(50) = 8.8 +/- 0.2, n = 7). Mean pEC(50) values for butaprost were not significantly different between these groups. These data suggest that (a) variability in EP receptor-mediated responses exists within a single anatomical site; (b) both excitatory and inhibitory EP receptor-mediated pathways are always operative in human non-pregnant myometrium, regardless of the type of tissue response to prostaglandin E(2); and (c) regulation of EP receptor-mediated responses occurs predominantly in the excitatory (EP(3) or EP(1) receptor) pathway rather than the inhibitory (EP(2) receptor) pathway.

Topics: Adult; Alprostadil; Cloprostenol; Dinoprostone; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; In Vitro Techniques; Muscle Contraction; Myometrium